Karl Zipf DelDOT February 2014

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Selecting the Correct PG Asphalt for Your Airport Project
Advertisements

Regional Implementation of the MSCR Test
New Zealand Performance Based Chip Seal Bitumen Specification Opus Research Austroads Workshop 4 December 2014.
Background: Hot mix asphalt (HMA) is a mixture of aggregate and asphalt binder. The asphalt is a petroleum based substance and, since the oil embargo of.
Advanced Asphalt Technologies, LLC “Engineering Services for the Asphalt Industry” WHRP Project Effect of Recovered Binders from Recycled Shingles.
SuperPave Asphalt Specifications
Superpave Implementation Across Canada ( ) Results from the 2001 Canadian Superpave Implementation Tracking Study (C-SITS) Steve Goodman C-SHRP.
In the United States, there are an estimated 250 million registered vehicles traveling on four million miles of public roads. With such a large volume.
North East Asphalt User/Producer Group Steering Committee Meeting Monday March 26, 2012 Presented by: Jo Sias Daniel, University of New Hampshire © Thorndyke.
1 Nam Tran Lead Research Engineer. 2 Overview Methods of incorporating GTR Applications of rubber-modified binders Performance of test sections at NCAT.
Binder Characterizations for High Tire Pressure Project 04/26/2012 Injun Song Injun Song, Ph.D., P. E. SRA International, Inc. Federal Aviation Administration.
Recycled Asphalt Program & Environmental Stewardship Program (Post Consumer Content) Robert C. Rea Nebraska Department of Roads WASHTO – Omaha, Nebraska.
Office of Infrastructure R&D U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration High Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Use in Asphalt Mixtures Canadian.
Update on VDOT’s Asphalt Research Activities 2014 VDOT Asphalt Seminars February & March,
Innovations in HMA Performance Testing John D’Angelo D’Angelo Consulting, LLC Canadian User Producer Group for Asphalt.
Development and Application of the Asphalt Mix Performance Tester Ramon Bonaquist, Ph.D., P.E Advanced Asphalt Technologies, LLC.
HISTORY OF ASPHALT GRADING SYSTEMS
John A. D’Angelo US Federal Highway Administration CUPGA 2008 Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.
Development of Biopolymers from Soybean Oil Andrew Cascione & Nacú Hernández Dr. Christopher Williams and Dr. Eric Cochran 1 October 10, 2012.
WMA TWG December NCAT WMA Research 2007 Andrea Kvasnak.
Dr. Haleh Azari AASHTO Advanced Pavement Research Laboratory (AAPRL)
New Technologies Land on Airport Pavements Rocky Mountain Asphalt Conference February 18-20, 2009.
Types, Properties and Grades of Asphalt-Part B
Warm Mix Asphalt Yellowstone National Park Brad Neitzke Western Federal Lands Highway Division.
Activities as Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center Jack Youtcheff Materials & Construction Team Federal Highway Administration
Warm Mix for a Cold Climate Colorado DOT’s 2007 WMA Project.
“GENERAL ISSUES IN ASPHALT TECHNOLOGY” 2006 Meeting of TRB Committee AFK10 RENAISSANCE AIRPORT HOTEL PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA APRIL , 2006.
HUSKY ASPHALT 1-2-3’s of PGAC Calgary Presentation August 14, 2006.
RAP and RAS At DelDOT Karl Zipf, Chief Chemist DelDOT 2014.
Characterization of Alaskan Hot-Mix Asphalt containing RAP
Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.
LTPP Program Presented to the ACPA Professors Workshop Skokie, IL June 19, 2008 Long-Term Pavement Performance Program.
2 3 WMA Technical Working Group (WMA TWG) Formed in 2005 Purpose: Promote Technology Transfer Facilitate Product Approval Methods Encourage Research.
Research Findings from the NCAT Test Track APAI Winter Conference Indianapolis, December 14, 2010.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program. Superpave Mixture and Aggregate Expert Task Group Las Vegas, Nevada 16 – 18 September 2003.
Mihai Marasteanu & Adam Zofka Summary of Shingles Work at the University of Minnesota.
RUT MIX CHALLENGE GAUTRANS RPF NOVEMBER RUT MIX CHALLENGE The need arose from increased occurrence of premature failures As a result Client bodies.
 The methods used for the characterization and testing of asphalt materials have advanced considerably in the past 20 years. The State of Qatar has.
Asphalt Rubber Research
National Performance of High Recycled Mixtures. 2 Outline Trends in RAP and RAS usage and practices Motivations for higher recycled contents Barriers.
February 5, Fatigue of Asphalt Mixtures, Endurance Limit, Polymer Modifications, Healing 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E-07 1.E-05 1.E-03 1.E-01.
Using Reflective Crack Interlayer-
6th China Asphalt Summit
An Overview of the Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester.
Asphalt Technology Course
Critical Factors Affecting Asphalt Concrete Durability
Evaluation of Cracking Resistance and Durability of 100% Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mixtures Hesham Ali, PhD, PE. Mojtaba M. Afzali.
2015 Pavement Test Track Conference
Research Implementation WHRP Flexible Group
TxDOT Implementation Project Darren Hazlett, Jerry Peterson
Asphalt Pavements and Materials
UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI MASTERS OF SCIENCE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING
Rebecca McDaniel KDOT/KAPA Fall Forum November 5, 2014
2018 Pavement Workshop May 23-24, 2018
2018 Pavement Workshop May 23-24, 2018
Performance Graded Specifications for Emulsified Asphalt
2018 Pavement Workshop May 23-24, 2018
Performance Assessment of 100% Recycled Hot Mix Asphalt
Emulsion Task Force Meeting
ETF Emulsion/Residue Testing Program
Jerry Peterson, Construction Division
Long-Term Pavement Performance Program
Dr. Randy West, P.E. Director / Research Professor
Performance Graded Specifications for Emulsified Asphalt
AASHTOWare Pavement-ME Design Software: Materials Library
ADOT SPR-742 PROJECT Akshay Gundla, Ph.D. Applied Research Associates
2019 Pavement Workshop May 21-23, 2019
Superpave5 Superpave Design at Five Percent Air Voids
ETF Emulsion/Residue Testing Program
Rethinking PP Timing Strategies
Presentation transcript:

Karl Zipf DelDOT February 2014 Grading Asphalt Binders with the Multiple Stress Creep Recovery Test AASHTO TP-70 and MP-19 “The Future is Coming” Karl Zipf DelDOT February 2014

WARNING

Brief History of the Test DTFH61-08-H-0003 – Cooperative Agreement between the FHWA and the Asphalt Institute John A. D’Angelo (FHWA) Asphalt Binder ETG Member Companies of the Asphalt Institute – Technical Advisory Committee

The present test methods for asphalt binder grading do not adequately characterize rutting or polymer-modified asphalts (PMA). The current PG System (AASHTO M-320) is blind to modification and requires PG plus tests such as Elastic Recovery to characterize PMA binders.

The PG system was supposed to reduce rutting but over the past decade and a half it has not

The New Asphalt Binder Test Uses the DSR which labs already have. Runs the sample 10 times. Load and relax.

MSCR Test Data The test gives two values which are the basis of the standards, TP-70 and MP-19. Jnr – Nonrecoverable creep compliance for 10 cycles at a creep stress of 3.2 kPa % Average Recovery at a creep stress of 3.2 kPa

The New Asphalt Binder Test

What’s in a Name SHRP (Sharp) – Strategic Highway Research Program ISTEA (Ice Tea) – Intermodal Surface Transportation Equality Act TWG (Twig) – Technical Working Group MSCR (???) – Multiple Stress Creep Recovery

“MASCAR” Sounds like NASCAR

“Massacre” Like in the Boston Massacre

“Mascara” Both asphalt and mascara are black

“Muskrat” Multiple Stress Creep Recovery Test

Jnr Limits are Based on Rut Data The Jnr (Nonrecoverable Compliance) correlated to rut depth in the ALF track, field studies and lab tests. The Jnr will used to determine the binder grade. Jnr works for both modified and non-modified binders.

MSCR % Recovery & Modification Many processes will stiffen and binder but not all make them elastic. The % Recovery is used to characterize the elasticity from polymer modification. A polymer curve was developed based on data from available PMA binders.

Polymer Modification Curve Currently in TP-70, will move to MP-19

So Far So Good Jnr % Recovery So how do you grade a binder? Two key values for the MSCR test These will determine the binder grade and whether it can be called a PMA binder. Jnr % Recovery So how do you grade a binder?

Like PG System, Grade Based on LTPP Climate Temperature

Looks Familiar USDA Plant Hardiness Zone Map

Northeast States LTPP High, Low and USDA

M-320 & MSCR Nomenclature Right now it now it looks like the PG System The BIG change is that everything is based on the LOCAL high temperature environment. Our environment is 64C and our standard grade, like the PG system is PG 64-22. Other grades, PG 70, and PG 76 will be tested at 64C as PG 64(something), based on the Jnr. Binder name becomes state/region dependent.

MSCR and Low Temperature The low temperature tests and nomenclature will not change with MSCR. It still uses the BBR results. The mid temperature criteria, the 8 mm DSR test, will have 6000 kPa as a cutoff for the stiffer grades, since for DelDOT the test temp will be 25C.

MP-19 Grades at 64C Jnr = 2.0 – 4.0 = PG 64S-22 “Standard” = PG 64-22 Jnr = 1.0 – 2.0 = PG 64H-22 “Heavy” = PG 70-22 Jnr = 0.5 – 1.0 = PG 64V-22 “Very Heavy” = PG 76-22 Jnr = 0.25 – 0.5 = PG 64E-22 “Extreme” = PG 76-22 Note MP-19 uses “High” & “Heavy” interchangeably Standard “S” = traffic < 10 million ESALs, > 70 km/h Heavy “H” = traffic 10-30 million ESALs, 20-70 km/h Very Heavy “V” = traffic > 30 million ESALs, < 20km/h Extreme “E” > 30 million ESALs, < 20km/h, toll plazas

Polymer Curve & DelDOT Data

Where the New Grades Fall at 64C

When Will DelDOT See MP-19? The FHWA is pushing the MSCR test ASAP. The Asphalt Institute is pushing the MSCR test. The NEAUPG (Northeast Asphalt User-Producer Group) is reviewing a limited regional implementation for maybe 2014. NEAUPG will be polymer curve in 2014, and non-PMA in a future year. SEAUPG will consider it in 2015, central USA later, and west coast probably not at all. National implementation date is unknown.

DelDOT M-320 vs MP-19 Grades PG 58-28 = PG 58S-28, Jnr 2.0 – 4.5 58C PG 70-22 = PG 64H-22, Jnr 1.0 – 2.0 64C No Grade = PG 64V-22, Jnr 0.5 – 1.0 64C For 2014 ? PG 76-22 = PG 64E-22, Jnr < 0.5 64C and meet polymer elasticity curve.

DelDOT and PG 76-22 as MSCR 64V 64E

NEAUPG & PMA From Maine to Maryland there will probably be two standard grades, PG 58S & PG 64S. NYDOT will switch over all grades around Sept 2014 to MP-19.

MSCR and RAP Like the PG System, M-320 the MSCR spec, MP-19 is based on 100% virgin binders. RAP is stiff, Jnr 0.1 - 0.2, but not elastic so will fail the polymer curve. RAP affects the low temperature properties, and these rules have not changed, and it is the low temperature where one sees failure.

August 2014 The MSCR Test AASHTO TP-70 will be a full standard AASHTO T-350 The MSCR Binder Grading AASHTO MP-19 will be a full standard, AASHTO M-322.

The End (Not really. There will probably be more next year.) Questions?

Implementing a New Standard