Assessment Policy Overview Dwayne Holford Coordinator, Academic Affairs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes In the Context of SACS Re-accreditation Standards Presentation to the Dean’s Council September 2, 2004.
Advertisements

Instructor Teaching Impact. University Writing Program 150 sections of required writing courses per semester, taught by Instructors and GTAs 33 Instructors–
THIS WORKSHOP WILL ADDRESS WHY THE FOLLOWING ARE IMPORTANT: 1. A comprehensive rationale for funding; 2. Measurable objectives and performance indicators/performance.
Academic Scholars/Other Scholarships PHF Conference Center July 22, 2014 Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education.
 Objective  Policy review timeline  Overview of current admissions policy and recommendations  Overview of current remedial policy and recommendations.
January 22, /25/ STAAR: A New Assessment Model STAAR is a clearly articulated assessment program. Assessments are vertically aligned within.
Tribal Colleges & Universities Chief Academic Officers 3 rd Annual Meeting 1 Wisdom Sharing: Assessment and Academic Program Review Dr. Koreen Ressler,
Illinois High School to College Success Report High School Feedback Reporting In Cooperation with ACT, Inc. Illinois Community College Board Illinois Board.
2 EOC Graduation Policy High Stakes Policy District Test Coordinator Spring 2010 Pretest Workshop.
The Blinn Transfer Enrollment to A&M (TEAM) Program Kriss H. Boyd, Ph.D. Executive Director General Academic Programs Texas A&M University Michael J. Yeater,
Foundation and Conceptual Framework for a Teaching Certificate Program for Professional and Graduate Students, Residents, Fellows, and Practitioners Dana.
Warren Hills Regional School District State Assessment Results October 2013 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Kimberly Unangst Director of Special.
Admission Requirements and Dual Enrollment/Dual Credit Casey Turnage, Ph.D. Director of P-20 Initiatives Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning.
Ivy Tech and the HLC Assessment Academy Learning College Conference February 26-27, 2009.
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 Part II OSU Outcomes Assessment for ABET EC200.
University System of Georgia PROBE Counselor Workshops Fall 2011.
WASC Accreditation Process DUE Managers Meeting December 2, 2009 Sharon Salinger and Judy Shoemaker.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Florida Department of Education Office of Student Financial Assistance 1.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Division of Florida Colleges Update
Module 1: PERA Illinois Administrative Code Part 50
Indiana’s Graduation Requirements (Class of 2016 & Beyond)
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
CAA’s IBHE Program Review Presentation April 22, 2011.
College-Ready Determination Policy and Performance Level Descriptors July
Schreiber High School Middle States Implementation Progress Update.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
Intern 2 Learn Program Overview. Intern 2 Learn What is Intern 2 Learn ? Intern 2 Learn is an undergraduate, student employment program designed to: Provide.
Redesigned Developmental Education Presentation to SDV Faculty February 11 & 12.
2009 Closing the Expectation Gap Fourth Annual 50-State Progress Report on the Alignment of High School Policies with the Demands of College and Careers.
Accelerating Achievement Designing a State-Level Response to the Developmental Education Challenge Presentation for Southern Regional Education Board June.
Planning for College Public Institutions Kimberly A. Gentile Kimberly A. Gentile Senior Associate Director of Admissions Senior Associate Director of Admissions.
Placement Testing Dr. Edward Morante Faculty to Faculty Webinar April 19, 2012 Sponsored by Lone Star College.
Evidence of Student Learning Fall Faculty Seminar Office of Institutional Research and Assessment August 15, 2012.
UCF University-wide System for Assessing Student Learning Outcomes Dr. Julia Pet-Armacost Assistant VP, Information, Planning, and Assessment University.
AQIP Action Projects  Action Project Directory created in 2002  An overt commitment to continuous improvement  At least three active action projects.
Full-Time Faculty In-Service: Program and Student Learning Outcomes Fall 2005.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Student Outcomes Assesment for CTE Programs. Student Outcomes Assessment and Program Review  In 2004, the Program Review process was redesigned based.
Oregon State University, 1 11/25/2015 Details and implications for Oregon State University.
Institutional Effectiveness A set of ongoing and systematic actions, processes, steps and practices that include: Planning Assessment of programs and.
HIALEAH HIGH SCHOOL College Assistance Program. Testing For College  PSAT  SAT  ACT  CPT.
NCAA Eligibility Center: Overview and Updates
Intro to Outcomes. What is “Outcomes”? A. a statewide initiative aimed at improving learning and accountability in education B. a standing SFCC committee.
Assessment Report October 26, Types of Assessments Given Formative Summative Aptitude/Achievement Curriculum Based Assessments.
Florida Board of Governors Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Subcommittee March 17, 2004 University of Central Florida R.E. LeMon, Vice Chancellor,
Performance Accountability System. PAS Overview Performance Accountability System (PAS) was developed by the Technical College System of Georgia (TCSG)
DSHS IMPROVING COLLEGE READINESS. COLLEGE READINESS ACROSS THE NATION Source: ACT, 2010, The Condition of College and Career Readiness : National.
Stetson University welcomes: NCATE Board of Examiners.
Recent data presented at the Governor’s Conference on Postsecondary Education Trusteeship indicated:  45% of KY’s high school graduates required developmental.
The Who, What, and Why on testing and how to help your child be successful Created by Serena Hill, MA School Counselor.
Institutional Effectiveness at CPCC DENISE H WELLS.
DEFINING AND REFINING LEARNING OUTCOMES UK Office of Assessment.
Accountability & Program Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.
Transfer Course Credit – Institutions of Higher Education Credit for Prior Learning Industry Recognized Credentials/Test Credit AGC – April 2016.
Educational Effectiveness Assessing WIC Student Learning Outcomes October 2006 Halyna Kornuta.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
College Name Student Names.
Assessment Basics PNAIRP Conference Thursday October 6, 2011
What’s Happening and What Do We Do Now?
Director of Policy Analysis and Research
Using Multiple Measures to Inform Student Placement:
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
California's Accountability System
Closing the Expectations Gap
Advanced Placement Program®
Advanced Placement Program®
Presentation transcript:

Assessment Policy Overview Dwayne Holford Coordinator, Academic Affairs

History of Assessment in Oklahoma assessment demands placed on higher education the North Central Association of Colleges and Universities adopted a “Statement on Assessment and Student Academic Achievement.” Legislature adopted 1219 which provided for the establishment of a system wide assessment fee.

History of Assessment in Oklahoma Regents adopted policy institutional plans submitted program fully operational in spring revision required ACT cut scores revision included graduate student assessment The assessment policy has not changed since 1996 but there have been changes in policy language

Current Policy Policy Contents Statement of Accountability Definition and Purpose Institutional Requirements Entry-level Assessment and Placement Mid-Level Assessment Program Outcomes Assessment Assessment of Student Satisfaction Graduate Student Assessment

Entry Level Assessment Each institution will use established ACT scores at or above the State Regents’ established minimum in the four subject areas of science reasoning, mathematics, reading, and English. To assist institutional faculty and counselors in making decisions that will give students the best possible chance of success in attaining their academic goals

Entry Level Requirements ACT or SAT OU* (resident) OU (nonresident) OSU USAO Regional universities20940 Community collegesNo minimum required

Entry-Level Reporting The number of students participating in entry level assessment and assessment results The number of students requiring basic skills development by area A summary and explanation of the assessment results The methodologies by which students were required to participate in the improvement of basic skills

Mid-Level Assessment Competencies gained through general education Results used to improve the institution program Designed to assess students academic progress in reading, writing, mathematics, and critical thinking After student completes 45–70 credit hours Examples of mid-level assessment include: 1. Academic standing 2. GPA 3. Standardized or locally developed instruments

Program Outcomes Assessment Also known as field of study assessment Measures how well students are meeting goals and objectives Instrument is the responsibility of the institution Guidelines for selecting methodologies 1. Should reflect the curriculum of the major 2. Should assess higher level thinking skills 3. Should be reliable and valid

Student Satisfaction Perceptions of students and alumni important in the evaluation of programs and services Provide an indication of students’ subjective view Accomplished through surveys and interviews Activities included are satisfaction with student services, quality of food, access to financial aid, and parking

Mid-Level, Program, and Student Satisfaction Assessment Reporting The number of students assessed and the assessment results A summary and explanation of the assessment results Detailed plans for any instructional changes due to the assessment results

Graduate Student Assessment Institutions are required to perform assessment of graduate students if assessment fees are charged Emphasis placed on assessing student learning and evaluating student satisfaction Departmental pre-tests, capstone experiences, cohort tracking, portfolios, interviews and surveys are commonly used methods

OSRHE Policy Manual

Any Questions