Hertfordshire Congestion Topic Group 11 June 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Limerick City Green Routes Corridor Selection Study Presentation to Limerick City Council 14 th February 2008.
Advertisements

Consultation on key routes which run parallel to Oxford Road corridor September 2012 Bus priority package.
Transport for Canberra 07 November2013. Transport for NSW: Regional Transport Plan ACT, whilst not part of the region, is an important destination Transport.
SCATTER workshop, Milan, 24 October 2003 Testing selected solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
Hertfordshire County Council Scrutiny 20 May 2010 Gerard Burgess Partnerships Manager London Midland (D) (ii)
Restricted © Siemens AG 2013 All rights reserved.Answers for infrastructure and cities. WORLD CLASS? London’s Transport: Progress and Future Challenges.
London Streets...The Way Ahead Garrett Emmerson Chief Operating Officer: London Streets.
NORTH SHEFFIELD STATUTORY QUALITY PARTNERSHIP SCHEME Presentation by:David Brown To:EMTA Date:April 2007.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Work Group Meeting presented by Christopher Wornum Cambridge.
Feb Travel Time and Sustainable Travel Behaviour David Metz Centre for Transport Studies University College London.
Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting September 30, 2013.
INNER CITY INVESTMENT SUMMIT TRANSPORT, INTEGRATED PUBLIC TRANSPORT NETWORK AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT Presenter: L N Mangcu SED: Transport and Roads Department.
Site Location Site Bus Stop Footbridge 400, 800, 1,200 and 1,600 Metre Walk Distance Primary Shopping Areas
Enhanced analytical decision support tools The Scheme level Final workshop of the DISTILLATE programme Great Minster House, London Tuesday 22 nd January.
1 Integration as a competitiveness instrument for Public Transport in rural areas Helder Cristóvão, José M Viegas Integration as a Competitiveness Instrument.
Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS) Transit ITS CEE582.
A Very Big Experiment Congestion Charging in London Peter Jones Transport Studies Group University of Westminster.
Mobility plan for Geneva Airport employees. Constraints and needs for the mobility of Geneva airport staff Airport staff: all employees working in the.
A Brief Comparison on Traffic System Between London and Shanghai Allen Liu, Shanghai Feb. 16 th 2012.
Reinventing Transit A European Perspective David Bayliss.
Transport for London and the Mayor’s Transport Strategy Steve Newsome Transport for London EMTA General Meeting, Madrid 31 March 2011.
Paul Roberts – TIF Technical Manager Presentation to the TPS – 3 June 2009.
CENTRAL ACCESS SCHEME FOR THE CITY OF KILKENNY Traffic Considerations The feed back resulting from public consultation did cause us to revisit the traffic.
Stagecoach South West Michael Watson Managing Director TravelWatch SouthWest 7 th March 2015 Facilitating Economic Growth in the South West.
Colin Brader Integrated Transport Planning Ltd Cambridge Futures 23rd November 2001.
Modelling of Trips using Strategic Park-and-Ride Site at Longbridge Railway Station Seattle, USA, Oct th International EMME/2 Users Conference.
GeniUS! Challenge #4 - Utilising footfall & transport 15/3/12 Andy D’Agorne.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 20: Transit System Design.
Regional Centre Transport Vision 2013 Presentation to Salford City Council Members - 19 August 2008.
 Scotland’s National Transport Strategy A Consultation.
Innovative ITS services thanks to Future Internet technologies ITS World Congress Orlando, SS42, 18 October 2011.
23e Congrès mondial de la Route - Paris 2007 Public Transport in Gauteng Province: Order out of Chaos Prof Nevhutanda Alfred Department of Transport(South.
Central London Congestion Charging David Hutchinson GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY International Union of Air Pollution Prevention and Environmental Protection.
Olympic Transportation Planning For London 2012 A Peak Flow And Modal Share Analysis For Rail Usage At The Stratford Regional Station.
Arriva in Southend Kevin Hawkins Commercial Director.
GNTP Business Forum – The Big Idea – Gary Smerdon-White 18 th September 2012.
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS
TRANSPORT The Cambridge Futures response to the Draft Structure Plan Dr Tony Hargreaves, Cambridge Futures.
PLUTO FOR WINDOWS P lanning L and U se and T ransport O ptions Dr. Csaba OROSZ associate Prof. Department. of Highway and Railway Engineering, BUTE.
0 Christopher A. Pangilinan, P.E. Special Assistant to the Deputy Administrator Research and Innovative Technology Administration, ITS Joint Program Office.
Prague Integrated Transport (PID).  Prague - area 496 km 2 population 1.2 mil. distance of the city boundary from the centre is 10 km to the north, 18.
Cal y Mayor y Asociados, S.C. Atizapan – El Rosario Light Rail Transit Demand Study October th International EMME/2 UGM.
Considering land use as a transport policy tool: A London perspective Isabel Dedring, Transport for London IMPACTS Vienna, March 2006.
1 Development of a Regional BRT System Proposal Presented to the TPB Access for All Committee April 23, 2009 Michael Eichler and Monica Bansal Transportation.
February 2014 Bus Rapid Transit for Chennai. Chennai city bus service GOOD PATRONAGE  50 lakh daily passenger trips  3650 buses  Maximum flow of.
Evaluating the Impacts of Real Time Passenger Information and Bus Signal Priority in Trondheim Morten Welde, Norwegian Public Roads Administration Trond.
Siemens Traffic Controls Ltd ITSE99/Standards 1 Traffic Management and Control Workshop on Research and Technological Development for Information Society.
Roads & Traffic Department College Green Public Transport Priority measure.
Putting Luas Cross City in context - Public Transport and Sustainable Measures in Dublin Dublin City Council 21 st March 2013 Gerry Murphy.
David Connolly MVA Transport, Travel and SHS Data SHS Topic Report: Modal Shift.
SEMINAR 21/01/2015 Railway infrastructure – key to achieve sustainable transport Track Access Charges for the Bulgarian Railways – Technical Assistance.
PARKING STRATEGY POLICY DEVELOPMENT Transportation & Asset Management Environment & Regeneration Scrutiny Committee 28 February 2007.
Chapter 5 Guidelines for Public Transport Planning in South Africa.
An Algorithm for Event Detection based on a combination of Loop and Journey Time Data Pengjun Zheng, Mike McDonald and David Jeffery Transportation Research.
Capacity and Service to Road Users Task 05: To optimise the capacity of the road network Mike Wilson, Bristol 27 January 2006.
GM Future Transport Objectives – via TIF Reduce congestion on key commuter routes at peak times Transform bus, heavy rail and light rail services –More.
June 14th, 2006 Henk Taale Regional Traffic Management Method and Tool.
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS (ITS) COMPETENCE SEMINAR ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference The Results of Selected BRT Projects 2:00 – 3:20 p.m. Walt Kulyk Director, FTA Office of Mobility Innovation.
Public Transportation Planning: Rapid transit solutions for adequate mass movement Mobility.
Update to Dublin Chamber of Commerce Network Direct Paddy Doherty Thursday 18 th November 2010.
Submission Document went to cabinet … Planning for the Future Core Strategy and Urban Core Plan (the Plan) is a key planning document and sets out the.
Safe roads, Reliable journeys, Informed travellers Highways Agency’s Journey Time Reliability Target With Thanks to Paresh Tailor Business Planning & Performance.
Lecture 2: Improving Transit Service Through Planning, Design, and Operations This lecture was originally prepared by Dr. Kari Watkins, Georgia Institute.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
“The ONE BILLION Challenge” Claire Haigh Campaign Director.
Preconditions for the introduction of free public transport in Tallinn Dago Antov Tallinn University of Technology Professor on transport planning 1 Tasuta.
NHT Survey 2013 Explanation of Indicators. Survey Questions BIs (Benchmark Indicator) KBIs ( Key Benchmark Indicator) Theme e.g. Accessibility e.g. KBI.
Cambourne to Cambridge Better Bus Journeys
Edinburgh Fastlink.
Presentation transcript:

Hertfordshire Congestion Topic Group 11 June 2010

How congestion affects bus services Increases journey times Reduces frequencies and level of service Increases number of buses needed to provide same frequency Increases costs and eventually fares Persuades fewer people to use the bus Makes services unreliable Reduces trust in buses Makes services difficult to plan and manage Increases costs and eventually fares Persuades fewer people to use the bus

Why does this matter? Arriva the Shires alone carries 16.7 million passengers per year in Hertfordshire Achieving modal shift from cars to buses can help to reduce congestion The Traffic Commissioner now has powers to call local authorities to public enquires over bus punctuality as well as operators Arriva’s Customer Satisfaction Surveys consistently place punctuality and reliability at the top of their most important issues

Traffic Commissioners’ punctuality targets On frequent services – on at least 95% of occasions 6 or more buses will depart within any period of 60 minutes and the interval between consecutive buses will not exceed 15 minutes On timetabled services – 95% of buses will depart within the window of tolerance of ‘up to 1 minute early or up to 5 minutes late’ On timetables services – 95% of all services are expected to arrive at the final destination point no more than 5 minutes late Annual bus national punctuality statistics for 2007 showed 75% of buses departed on time

How can buses help to reduce congestion? The Office for National Statistics omnibus surveys shows: 48% of car users say they would use the car less if buses were quick and frequent 51% say they would use their cars less if buses were within easy walking distance of each end of their journey 56% say they would use buses more if car parking were expensive 64% say they would use buses more if it were difficult to find somewhere to park the car

How can buses help to reduce congestion? Before and after surveys in Dublin showed that from upgraded bus routes for every 1 minute saving in bus journey time 1.22% transferred from car to bus Source – Commission for Integrated Transport

How can buses help to reduce congestion? TAS has shown from generalised modelling on a sample corridor: A combination of journey time and reliability improvements could increase bus market share from 16.3% to 19.5%, and reduce car market share from 69.4% to 66.8% If accompanied by a £2 increase in car parking charges the bus market share would increase to 25.2% and car market share reduce to 57%

How can buses help to reduce congestion? First Group introduced identical network simplification and fleet improvements in York, Aberdeen and Bradford In York parking policy restricted spaces and introduced a 3 hour parking limit on parking in the City Centre Patronage growth in Bradford – 6% Patronage growth in Aberdeen – 14% (free concessionary fares scheme introduced in the interim) Patronage growth in York – 25%

Changes in peak running times over the last 10 years +95% Woodside – Watford Town Centre +95% +94% Garston – Berry Lane +94% +43% Garston – Watford Town Centre +43% +33% Northwood – Watford Town Centre +33% +32% Holywell – Watford Town Centre +32% +31% Borehamwood Station – Watford Town Centre +31% Experience in Hertfordshire

For example… Service 321 – Luton  Watford – 0717 to 0837  80 minutes – 0720 to 0925  125 minutes 45 An increase of 45 minutes!

For example… Service journey requires 36 minutes extra running time than 0517 journey Equivalent Saturday journey takes 51 minutes less running time (31% less)

Unpredictable peak flows Thursday 27/11/08 ( ) – Typical day St Albans Rd (Railway Bridge)  Market St 8 30 buses – Average of 8 minutes journey time 416 Quickest 4 minutes, Slowest 16 minutes Market St  St Albans Rd (Railway Bridge) 9 29 buses – Average of 9 minutes journey time 617 Quickest 6 minutes, Slowest 17 minutes

Broken down car at traffic lights of junction, Beechen Grove & Loates Lane Watford Junction  Bushey Station Watford JunctionBushey StationJourney Time mins mins mins mins mins mins mins mins A small problem causes huge delays

Improvement targets Bus journey times Journey times must be competitive to other modes This should include onward journey times (e.g. the walk from the bus to key shopping areas vs the walk from a central car park

Improvement targets Bus journey predictability Variability must be reduced as much as possible Reduced variability in journey times makes trips more predictable to passengers A reduction in variability leads to a reduced requirement for recovery time

How can bus punctuality and attractiveness be improved? Operators to develop realistic schedules Provision of bus priority wherever possible Maximising self enforcing measures Protection of bus stops Enforcement of traffic regulation orders Management and planning of roadworks Accessibility to traffic generators

Parking Inconsiderate and illegal parking Creates delays if bus can't pass unless oncoming traffic allows it to Occasionally bus can't pass at all unless offending vehicle is moved Vehicles parked in bus stops prevent the bus pulling in close to the kerb negating the benefit of low floor vehicles

Enforcement Illegal roadside parking Illegal roadside deliveries Blocking of bus stops Illegal parking adjacent to bus stops Illegal parking/delivery in bus lanes Illegal use of bus lanes Parking adjacent to speed cushions

Roadworks Can have devastating effects on bus punctuality and reliability Buses cannot deviate to avoid road closures, one way working or traffic signals The Traffic Commissioners expect us to take compensating actions The most vulnerable are affected

Roadworks – what can be done? Active management of roadworks Advanced warning of roadworks to bus operators Coordination of roadworks by multiple contractors Consideration of actions to minimise or mitigate delays, e.g. out of peak times Consultation with bus operators on traffic management arrangements

Conclusions Bus services can be made more attractive through improved journey times and reduced unpredictability This would help operators to improve frequencies and reduce fares This would enable us to help you to achieve modal shift This will be much more effective with some demand restraint These actions will help to achieve congestion and environmental targets