Recent experience of CIA in renewables consenting in Scotland Ian Davies Marine Scotland Science.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gero Vella Offshore renewable energy: a business perspective On behalf of: Renewable Energy Systems Limited (RES) & Centrica Renewable Energy Limited.
Advertisements

National Environmental Policy Act of Establishes protection of the environment as a national priority Mandates that environmental impacts be considered.
“International context and response to draft D5b – a conservation agencies view” PROTECT Workshop, Aix en Provence. 14 May 2008.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Goals and Challenges
East coast marine mammal acoustic study: using multiple modalities to assess habitat usage by harbour porpoises and bottlenose dolphins K.J. Palmer (1)*,
Introduction to the Birds and Habitats Directives David Harrison – Senior Specialist, Site Protection.
National Environmental Research Institute - DENMARK Department of Wildlife Ecology and Biodiversity RECOMMENDATION FOR GOOD ENVIRONMENTAL PRACTICE INTO.
Overview of survey, data collection and data analysis challenges Jared Wilson Marine Ornithologist.
Birds & Wind Farms - high fliers? Rowena Langston Assessing the impacts offshore.
EC Habitats Directive (With focus on the marine environment) MARCOS Kick off meeting Åsa Andersson, February 2007.
North Hoyle Offshore Wind Farm 17th April 2002 BONUS Energy A/S.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SEA Jamie Byfield SEA Technical Officer HRA & EIA Cara Davidson Policy Manager.
1 CEER How to balance the public’s concerns and critical infrastructure construction Matti Vainio, Deputy HoU DG ENV – C.5, European Commission.
Beth Scott University of Aberdeen Impact Assessment: Research methods for assessing impacts on birds.
Science requirements to support licensing of marine renewable Ian Davies Marine Scotland.
Environmental Assessment of Marine Renewable Energy Presentation to Pre-BIC meeting 24 th June 2010 Andrew Casebow Chris Green.
Bob Batty Scottish Association for Marine Science Impact Assessment: predictive modelling of collision risk.
Spatial planning in the marine environment Gillian Glegg and Jonathan Richards.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive Consultation on Good Environmental Status Descriptor 7 – Hydrographical Conditions Dr Alejandro Gallego Marine Scotland.
CEEWEB Academy III Strengthening civil participation in the implementation of EU nature conservation directives through the experiences gained by the 10.
TYPE II ERROR ON THE GRAND BANKS INADEQUATE MONITORING OF MARINE BIRDS AND MAMMALS AT HIBERNIA AND TERRA NOVA TYPE II ERROR ON THE GRAND BANKS INADEQUATE.
Protection Against Occupational Exposure
Centrica – An Energy Utility Perspective Gearόid Lane Director, British Gas New Energy 29 th April 2009.
End users of MIDA – a government perspective Trevor Harrison Environment and Heritage Service Department of the Environment Northern Ireland.
MSFD - POMS Consultation Descriptor 1 – Biodiversity Descriptor 4 – Food Webs Descriptor 6 – Sea-floor integrity Simon Greenstreet, Marine Scotland Science.
Possible future changes to the marine planning and management framework and implications for aquaculture John Hambrey SARF046 – Socioeconomic assessment.
SNH PERSPECTIVE ON PLANNING AND THE ENVIRONMENT Derek Manson Planning Adviser.
Marine Licensing Signposts Roger May Marine Scotland, Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen.
Input Information for Salmon Collision Risk Modelling Ross Gardiner Marine Scotland Science.
Current condition and Challenges for the Future Report s (Scotland and Solway Tweed)
European Marine Sites Update Ruth Crundwell. Natural England Advisers to the government on the environment, providing practical scientific advice on how.
Managing the Natura 2000 network: state of play, challenges and opportunities.
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE World Heritage renomination Presentation to the first leadership committee of the Ha Long Bay-Cat Ba Alliance.
LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS IN NATURE CONSERVATION AND HABITATS LAW IN 2011 Margaret Austin 29 March 2012.
ESPON TERRITORIAL TRENDS OF THE MANAGEMENT OF THE NATURAL HERITAGE 1Context and objectives 2Facts and Figures 3Physical developments and policy.
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
Policy drivers for seabed mapping Evanthia Karpouzli Marine Ecological Adviser Scottish Executive.
Marine Renewables Marine Renewables and integrated planning Mike Neilson Director, Marine Scotland Scottish Government.
International Network Network of Basin OrganizationsInternationalOffice for Water PARIS Paper of Mr. Jean-François DONZIER Paper of Mr. Jean-François DONZIER.
Prof. Dr. G. Van Hoorick Faculty of Law – Department of Administrative and Environmental Law pag. 1 COMPENSATORY MEASURES IN EUROPEAN NATURE CONSERVATION.
EU management – current situation and future actions Kenneth Patterson European Commission Directorate-General of Fisheries and Maritime Affairs.
Acceptable Change: A case study from the Moray Firth Dr Jared Wilson Marine Ornithologist.
Development of a process for setting Conservation Objectives Dr Rebecca Jeffrey Science and Biodiversity Section National Parks and Wildlife Service Ireland.
Seabird displacement evidence at an offshore wind farm in the Belgian part of the North Sea Nicolas Vanermen, Wouter Courtens, Marc Van de walle, Hilbran.
Planning Scotland’s Seas consultation Seas Consultation 2013.
The Habitats Directive in BANES A (brief) guide to the most commonly encountered legal issues.
Special Protection Areas National Workshop 8 & 9 March 2016.
Dutch program offshore wind energy Cumulative effects and Mitigation measures ORELG 4 february 2016.
Marine Planning since 2011 Linda Rosborough – Director of Marine Scotland.
COMMISSION NOTE ON THE DESIGNATION OF SPECIAL AREAS OF CONSERVATION (SACs) Habitats Committee Brussels, 13 May 2011.
Developing conservation objectives © L. Campbell.
Median Estimates of Direct Anthropogenic Bird Mortality (Loss et al. 2014)
What is the MPA network?. Marine Nature Conservation Strategy Vision: Clean, healthy, safe, productive and biologically diverse marine and coastal environment.
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No Overview of.
Marine Bird surveys Collecting data to identify important areas for birds in the marine environment Marine SPA Team, JNCC.
Principles and rationale for SAC/SPA designation and management
Scottish Natural Heritage
Annex III Annex I Qualitative descriptors Characteristics
DG Environment, Nature Protection Unit (D3)
Working Group on estuaries and coastal zones
Conservation objectives: The favourable conservation status
Updating the Article 6 guide Outline of envisaged changes
Overview of Article 6 procedures under the Habitats Directive
Meeting of the WFD Strategic Co-ordination Group 11 March 2009
PROVISIONS UNDER THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE RELEVANT TO NEEI
Analysis of the notification of compensatory measures
Wind energy & EU legislation for Nature conservation
Turbine collision risk for birds
Expert meeting on Wind Energy Potential in Europe
Marine Planning and Licensing Policy
Presentation transcript:

Recent experience of CIA in renewables consenting in Scotland Ian Davies Marine Scotland Science

Planning authority Licensing authority Science support Marine Scotland’s roles in renewable energy

Consents and licences in Scotland Marine Scotland Act and Marine and Coastal Access Act Licence Section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989 (s.36) Section 44 European Protected Species (EPS) Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act Energy Act (2004) Decommissioning issued by DECC

EC EIA Directive. Assess effects on: Human beings Fauna and flora Landscape/seascape Material assets Cultural heritage EC Habitats Directive: Effects on protected sites and species SPAs SACs Requirement for CIA

Moray Firth wind farms Consented 2014

To avoid deterioration of the habitats of the qualifying species or significant disturbance to the qualifying species, thus ensuring that the integrity of the site is maintained and the site makes an appropriate contribution to achieving favourable conservation status for each of the qualifying features; and To ensure for the qualifying species that the following are established then maintained in the long term: (i) Population of the species as a viable component of the site* (ii) Distribution of the species within site (iii) Distribution and extent of habitats supporting the species (iv) Structure, function and supporting processes of habitats supporting the species (v) No significant disturbance of the species Bottlenose dolphin Harbour (common) seal

Assessment framework Moray Firth developers worked with University of Aberdeen to develop framework for assessing effects of pile driving to harbour seal populations Got regulatory and SNCB buy in early in the process Generic enough to allow use for other species in other areas Draws on available data and supplements with expert opinion where data not available

Areas and issues included in cumulative assessments Carried out at different “regional” scales for different species Defined by population range Harbour seals assessed at 2 levels: Moray Firth (and Firths of Forth and Tay) Bottlenose dolphins assessed at whole east coast level Main issue considered to be noise from pile driving Assessments looked at potential effects on survival and reproductive rates based on level of exposure to noise Exposure to PTS had influence on survival and disturbance had effect on reproductive ability Population modelling used to assess the effect of these changes to survival and reproduction in the long term Example output from population model for harbour seals

Monitoring Funding of population and demographic data collection for harbour seals and bottlenose dolphins (Aberdeen and St Andrews universities) Passive acoustic monitoring of dolphins and porpoises on east coast (MSS) to allow assessment of changes to distribution – Using CPODs to detect porpoise and dolphin presence and SM2Ms to record dolphin whistles for species ID

Moray Firth wind farms Consented 2014

Species of negligible concern Black-legged kittiwake, Northern fulmar, Great skua and Arctic skua SNCBs advised no adverse effect on site integrity using a qualitative assessment due to the minimal predicted effects.

Great black-backed gull, Herring gull, Puffin, Razorbill and Guillemot) Full quantitative assessment required Species of greater concern

What was the problem? Displacement proportion of birds displaced birds on water, using water, in flight or all potentially vulnerable proportion of birds adult proportion of adults breeding proportion of adults from Colony X, Y and Z mean, peak or mean peak abundance estimate proportiobn of birds that fail to breed successfully each displaced bird from a discrete pair Collision Avoidance rate breeding season nocturnal activity flap/ gliding flight attraction to survey vessles rotor speed - mean, seasonal mean Apportioning SNH approach At-sea flight direction information GPS tracking data Starting populations SPA vs non-SPA colonies ThresholdsPopulation Viability Analysis (PVA) Potential Biological Removal (PBR) Starting population Maintain +ve trajectory What is acceptable f-value for use in PBR PBR in relation to productivity effects

Why was it a problem? Difficult to identify differences in approaches taken. Lack of transparency if different approaches used without clear rationale Unclear whether different values can be combined for CIA May artificially bias conclusions for/ against one project May result in CIA conclusions being opaque or open to challenge

How was it resolved? Discussions between developers, SNCBs and MSS Aim to reconcile any differences where possible Clarification of reasons for any remaining differences Re-running collision or displacement effect assessments using Common Currency as required

Assessment of consequences for populations SNCBs favoured use of Potential Biological Removal (PBR). MSS developed Acceptable Biological Change (ABC) method. – Probabalistic population modelling – Accommodate mortality and productivity – Not result in significant additional risk to the populations of concern

Consequences Windfarms licensed on a reduced scale Lessons learned to feed into advice and guidance. More strategic approach e.g. PVAs for key colonies/ populations, estimating effects at a regional scale Post-consent monitoring????

CIA is a significant hurdle and should be discussed early in the application process. Predictable challenges: – Definition of scope – Timing of projects – Quantification – Underwater collision – Displacement and consequences – Population models and assessment methods – Horizon : Basking sharks, other protected fish, new MPAs/SPAs Lessons for wave and tidal