Dred Scott v Sanford. Who was Dred Scott? A slave born around the 1800’s Married fellow slave: Harriet Robinson 2 children: Eliza and Lizzie Died: Sept.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kansas-Nebraska Act Dred Scott Case Pages Workbook 88.
Advertisements

Dred Scott And The case for freedom By: Nate Widitor And The case for freedom By: Nate Widitor.
Dred Scott v. Sanford 1857 Missouri Compromise Decision; Citizenship for Blacks.
Dred Scott A suit for freedom.
The Dred Scott Decision
By Trevor Burns atures/bio/B11.html.
II. Basis of Citizenship
Road to Civil War Challenges to Slavery p
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857). Background: The Missouri Compromise 1803: U.S. purchases Louisiana Territory from France 1820: Compromise allows slavery.
Extending Rights to All present What documents and institutions protect the rights of Americans?
 Dred Scott v. J. A. Sanford (1857).   Who was Dred Scott?  Events Affecting Dred Scott’s fate  Timeline of Events  The Two Sides of the Issue 
Objectives:. Bellringer: What was the Missouri Compromise?
A Nation Divided Political Divisions Chapter 15, Section 3 Pages
The Court ruled that Scott's "sojourn" of two years to Illinois and the Northwest Territory did not make him free once he returned to Missouri.
II. Basis of Citizenship. A. National Citizenship Founders let states decide who was a citizen Naturalization – Legal process by which a person is granted.
Griffin Honeycutt Block 2 October 29,  Official Name- Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford  The defendant’s name was actually Sanford, but was misspelled.
By Alexander M. Barker. Born as a slave in the late 1700s Owned by the Blow family Parents are unknown Lived in Southampton County, VA Moved to Alabama;
V. Sanford Dred Scott A presentation presented by Paola Garcia.
Chapter 15, Section 3 Challenges to Slavery.
YOU MUST WRITE EVERYTHING DOWN, UNLESS I TELL YOU OTHERWISE.
By: Mireina Barrios. Dred Scott and Roger B. Taney Dred Scott, a slave who had his freedom at Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving.
Emerson DeLoach Elicia Bilyeu Isidro Hernandez Noah Hickman Supreme Court Cases.
 By: Kylisha Smith and Hasan Evans.  Dred is an slave who lived in the free state of Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving back.
Dred Scott. Background Scott was the slave of an Army surgeon who took him from Missouri to posts in Illinois and modern day Minnesota. Scott was the.
Fill in your “Describing Historical Event” handout using the following PowerPoint presentation. If you need extra space use the back of your handout. Aim:
APUSH – Spiconardi.   In the 1830s, Dred Scott, a slave, accompanied his owner from Missouri to Illinois and later the territory of Wisconsin  Scott.
What lead to the Civil War. Missouri Compromise 1819 Missouri asks to join the United States as a slave state – South wanted it to be a slave state –
LEHHS FOCUS: Lawyer Reconstruction to the Rise of Railroads.
Events and Compromises
Lesson 18: The Union in Peril part 7
Dred Scott Decision (1857).
Deaton US History.   What Rights do you have as a citizen? Citizen Rights.
APUSH Review: Dred Scott v. Sanford Everything You Need to Know About Dred Scott v. Sanford To Succeed In APUSH
Dred Scott v. Sandford By Chloe Sturges. Overview Dred Scott, a slave in the 1800s, was taken out of Missouri, a slave state, by his owner John Emerson.
Dred Scott Decision (1857).
Ch. 15, Section 3: Challenges to Slavery pg. 445  Main Idea: Social, economic, and political differences divided the North and South.  Key Terms:  Arsenal.
Compromises and Events that Led to the Civil War.
FIRST THINGS FIRST Why is slavery wrong?.
By Greg Munetz. He was born a slave in 1795 in Southampton County, Virginia He was industrious and intelligent, he served as a farmhand, a stevedore,
Peyton Waters and John McArthur 2A DRED SCOTT V. SANDFORD(1857)
11.6 Roger B. Taney, Dred Scott v. Sanford Vanessa Valenzuela & Brianna Beas Period. 5.
Tyler Kennedy Nick Logan.  Born a slave to the Blow family  Sold to Army Surgeon named Dr. John Anderson  Owner died then got a new owner  Lived in.
Dred Scott V. Sanford 1858 Julien Mercier and Kendal Kulp.
By: Mireina Barrios. Dred Scott and Roger B. Taney Dred Scott, a slave who had his freedom at Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving.
Back to the 1850’s… Law in the 1850’s. Rights of African Americans Still the Fugitive Slave Act Whether free or slave you could NOT be citizen Still segregation.
Dred Scott v. Sandford A Supreme Court Decision in 1857.
Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) 1854 Law that allowed for popular sovereignty in the Kansas and Nebraska Territories Devised by the “Little Giant” Stephen Douglas.
Dred Scott.  I can explain how the Dred Scott Court decision impacted African Americans during the time before the Civil War.
Ch:14 The Nation Divided :3 The Crisis Deepens.
WhoA Missouri slave What When Where Why Concept Development: Dredd Scott was a slave who argued for his freedom to the Supreme Court. Dredd Scott vs. Sanford.
21.6 & 21.7: The Dred Scott Case & Decision Page
On your own and on the worksheet provided: 1) Write a definition for the word property. 2) List some examples of property.
Uncle Tom’s Cabin and Dred Scott
Pre-Civil War Events Ms.Bean.
Dred Scott.
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
Dred Scott By :mina 5B.
Dred Scott Presentation created by Robert Martinez
Opener – Copy into Notebook pp. 84
Background: Who was Dred Scott?
Challenges to Slavery 15-3
Famous Abolitionists.
FOA 2/29/16 1. What did the Kansas-Nebraska Act actually do?
The Dred Scott Decision
Events that Helped Spark the Civil War By: Mrs. Andreatta
And The case for freedom
NOTES: Causes of the Civil War
Dred Scott Decision (1857).
The Freed Man Shall Not Be Free
Presentation transcript:

Dred Scott v Sanford

Who was Dred Scott? A slave born around the 1800’s Married fellow slave: Harriet Robinson 2 children: Eliza and Lizzie Died: Sept. 17, 1858 Dred Scott

Who was Sanford? Brother of Irene Sanford Emerson (Dr. Emerson’s widowed wife) Proslavery. Claimed rights to Scott Family Dealt with all of Irene’s affairs

Migration He and his master (Peter Blow) migrated westward from Southhampton County, VA to AL In 1830, they migrated to St. Louis Peter Blow died two years later Southhampton County

New Master Dred Scott was bought by army surgeon: Dr. Emerson Then brought to the free state of IL. Then two years later brought to WI Territory Emerson’s duty moved him south, Scott Family followed a year later, unaccompanied Dr. Emerson then died in 1843

Harriet Robinson Dred Scott met and married Harriet on WI Territory She became pregnant in 1838 Harriet gave birth to their daughter Eliza Scott in free waters on the steamer Gipsey She then gave birth to another daughter: Lizzie

Life with Irene Sanford Emerson Ownership of the Scott family transferred to Irene (widow of Dr. Emerson) Refused to allow Dred Scott and his wife pay for their emancipation for $300 Forced them to work for other people while collecting their wages

Filing for Freedom Not uncommon for slaves to file for freedom while living in a free state. Dred Scott lived in free territory for the past decade Thought he would be successful April 6,1846: Dred Scott and his wife both filed separately for freedom from Irene with the help of the Blow family and a African American Minister, John R. Anderson because neither of them could read or write

Trial Cases came to trial June 30, 1847 Both were dismissed on technicality (could not prove they belonged to widow) Lawyer pushed for a new trial.

Road to Supreme Court 1848: MI Supreme Court decide case need to be retried 1850: Case retried, St. Louis court declare family free Mrs. Emerson refused to accept the court’s decision Both cases were combined 1852: MI Supreme Court declare St. Louis court’s decision invalid Scott and lawyers brought case to federal courts 1854: United States Circuit Court in MI, same decision as MI Supreme Court

Chief Justice Scott and his lawyers then brought the case to Supreme Court Chief Supreme Court Justice: Roger B. Taney- A former slave owner from Maryland Roger B. Taney

Nine Justices There were nine justices appointed to the case Strong Bias: Seven had been appointed by pro-slavery presidents from the South Of these, five were from slave-holding families

Decision of Supreme Court The Scott’s daughters were added to the case March 1857: Scott lost the decision as seven out of nine Justices on the Supreme Court declared no slave or descendant of a slave could be a U.S. citizen, or ever had been a U.S. citizen As a slave and therefore a non-citizen Scott had no rights and could not sue in a Federal Court

Effect of Case Decision affected both the enslaved and the free African- Americans Step backwards regarding rights of African-Americans Also declared MI Compromise of 1820 unconstitutional The MI Compromise of 1820 violated the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution (prohibits Congress from depriving persons of their property without due process of law) Therefore ruling that the federal government did not have the power to prohibit slavery in its territories

Dred Scott after the case Peter Blow's sons, childhood friends of Scott, had helped pay Scott's legal fees through the years After the Supreme Court's decision, the former master's sons purchased Scott and his wife May 26, 1857, Dred and Harriet Scott appeared in the Circuit Court of St. Louis and the Blow son’s emancipated them Harriet worked as a free laundress and Dred delivered her laundry and he was a porter at a hotel Dred Scott died nine months later of tuberculosis

OVERALL Widened the political and social gap between North and South and took the nation closer to the brink of Civil War.

Information Sources ml leaders/dscott/dscott.shtml

Image Sources /072103scottdred.jpg FTmzcDM: 9/harrietscott2hh.jpg lxKM: 09/03/roger_b_taney_portrait_cropped.jpg remeCourt.jpg