APTi Conference 2011 The Role of the Pensions Ombudsman Paul Kenny.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Women and Pensions The Impact of Ms. Murphys Law Paul Kenny Pensions Ombudsman IWLA Conference, July 2009.
Advertisements

Industrial Relations Act 1990 Next Slide. What is the difference in an employer and an employee? Employer is a person who pays one or more people to work.
Last Topic - Natural Justice
Staff Development Emergency Operations 1. Identify 5 purposes of the offender/student grievance process Identify 5 grievable issues Identify 12 non-grievable.
2. 12 Resolving disagreements Resolving disagreements Disagreements between employers and employees  May occur rarely, if ever  May be minor,
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures.
APLI 15 December 2011 Murphy’s Law Reaffirmed (He hasn’t gone away, you know….)
East Anglia Branch Annual Seminar Downing College, Cambridge 14 June 2013 The Man* in the Middle *The masculine gender shall include the feminine.
IAPF / IIPM Pensions Ombudsman An Update Paul Kenny CORK, 9 February 2011.
The Pensions Board’s regulatory powers A practical perspective Sylvia McNeece 25 September 2013.
Wednesday 17 September 2014 How to… defend a claim in the Employment and Discrimination Tribunal. Elena Moran, Partner.
Business Breakfast Compliance – Pensions The Pensions Acts Paul Kenny 5 April 2005 Pensions Ombudsman Mary Hutch Head of Information & Training.
Hong Kong Privacy Code on Human Resource Management
What They Are and How to Research Them.  Regulate business before court ◦ Control operation of court ◦ Control conduct of litigants ◦ Span from font.
CHAPTER 1 The sources and institutions of employment law.
Minimum Wages Act History of Minimum Wages ILO Convention no26 in1928 Recommended Machinery for Fixation of minimum wages The Standing Labour Committee.
1 OVERVIEW PRESENTATION FREEDOM OF INFORMATION (SCOTLAND) ACT 2002.
LIA The Role of the Pensions Ombudsman Paul Kenny 25 November 2010.
1 Mr. Tony McCourt Ombudsman for the Defence Forces Presentation to Joint Committee on Public Service Oversight and Petitions 5 th November, 2014.
Mary Hutch Head of Information & Training The Pensions Board 24 January 2007 The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland Role of The Pensions Board.
Association of Pension Trustees of Ireland Biennial Conference 12 April 2013 An update from the Regulator Tom Dunphy Head of Enforcement The Pensions Board.
Complaints by Older Adults against Financial Institutions Examples and Possible solutions By Conor Cashman Senior Investigator.
Chapter 18 Administrative Law Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent.
Business Breakfast Compliance – Pensions The Pensions Acts Paul Kenny 3 June 2004 Pensions Ombudsman Mary Hutch Head of Information & Training.
Appeals Appeal lies against; - order of punishment - order of suspension/put off duty - order denying the benefits under service conditions.
© May not be reproduced without permission of Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd 1 Financial Ombudsman Service Alison Hoyland Policy Unit Manager, Corporate.
Murphy Lives On – or, Anything that can go wrong already has….. In the Public Service too! With some observations on complaint handling Paul Kenny The.
Chapter 4 Business Law. Number 1 ◦ Is Ed bound by a third party decision? Number 2 ◦ Should Walter pay the money? ◦ Should Olivia sue, even though she.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
The Pensions Board Credit Union Manager’s Association AGM Andrew Nugent Assistant Head of Information Services The Pensions Board.
Implementing a Medicare Compliance Program. Implementation of Medicare Compliance Program Rules & procedures to reduce chance of wrongdoing High level.
Procedural Safeguards. Purpose Guarantee parents both an opportunity for meaningful input into all decisions affecting their child’s education and the.
© 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Lecture 4. OUTCOMES What must the equity plan include?. What must affirmative action measures include? Which factors are taken into account in determining.
New rights for people complaining about adult social care providers – an introduction.
Certificate for Introduction to Securities & Investment (Cert.ISI) Unit 1 Lesson 59:  Breaches, complaints and compensation  The difference between a.
TEAGASC 2 September 2004 Aongus Horgan Assistant Head of Information & Training.
1 P.AG. KENYA PASTORS & STAFF PROVIDENT FUND. DUTIES OF A SCHEME ADMINISTRATOR.
New Pensions Act Developments: What you need to know Yvonne White & Jerry Moriarty The Pensions Board 18 April, 2007.
Paulyn Marrinan Quinn S.C. Ombudsman for the Defence Forces - Ireland Tuesday 8 May 2012, Istanbul, Turkey Session III : Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
Mandate Pension Trustees Course 25 March 2009 Andrew Nugent Assistant Head of Information Services.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
SUPPORTS YOU CAN CALL ON & BODIES THAT ARE DEALING WITH EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION.
Minimum Wages Act 1948.
Key Individual Chapter 2. Purpose of FAIS Consumer protection Professionalize intermediary and advisory services in Financial Services industry Regulate.
R EGISTERED A DMINISTRATORS T HE P ENSIONS B OARD 11 TH AND 12 TH J UNE
The Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement Kevin Prendergast Corporate Compliance Manager, ODCE.
1 Paulyn Marrinan Quinn S.C. Ombudsman for the Defence Forces Presentation to Joint Committee on Investigations, Oversight and Petitions 29 th February,
What Is Employment? Compare employee with agent and independent contractor Differences: Control test - Degree of control exercised over an employee is.
Public Sector Pensions The Regulatory Perspective Grace Guy The Pensions Authority 20 November 2014.
The Law Society and You. The Role of the L.S.U.C. Regulates, governs and licenses Ontario’s lawyers and licensed paralegals pursuant to the Law Society.
New Pension Developments - focus on Trusteeship Review 6 July 2007 Ciarán Holahan.
The Pensions Board Andrew Nugent Assistant Head of Information Services The Pensions Board.
Procedure and application.  Before the enactment of the consumer Protection Act,1986 a person aggrieved by the defective goods or deficiency in service.
FIRST CONTRACTUAL SAVINGS CONFERENCE : SUPERVISORY AND REGULATORY ISSUES IN PRIVATE PENSIONS AND LIFE INSURANCE SUPERVISORY AND REGULATORY PRACTICES IN.
The current position of pensions in the workplace IPASS Annual Conference 12 May 2016 Tom Dunphy Head of Compliance and Enforcement.
Pensions Ombudsman Service
Industrial Relations Act 1990
Mason County School District
Extending Your Reach The Public Services Ombudsman Legislation
Consumer Protection Act, 1986
(Portfolio Committee on Justice and Correctional Services)
Principles of Administrative Law <Instructor Name>
TWIN PEAKS ARRIVES – THE FINANCIAL SECTOR REGULATION ACT, 2017 BECOMES LAW Fiona Rollason.
SIMAD UNIVERSITY Keyd abdirahman salaad.
Missouri Association of Rural Education
Resolving Issues ADR, Due Process and CDE Complaints
OHSC 2018 CONSULTATIVE WORKSHOPS CERTIFICATION AND ENFORCEMENT
Robert Plumb Scheme Liaison Manager 15 January 2015
OHSC 2018 CONSULTATIVE WORKSHOP - GAUTENG PROVINCE ENFORCEMENT
Presentation transcript:

APTi Conference 2011 The Role of the Pensions Ombudsman Paul Kenny

Why is there a Pensions Ombudsman? The Pensions Act, 1990, was the first attempt to regulate the conduct of Occupational Pension Schemes Pensions Board set up as the Regulator Criminal offences created Extensive powers of investigation into “state and conduct” (S.18) Can Prosecute offences under the Act

Why is there a Pensions Ombudsman? -2 To fill a gap in the Pensions Act: Board can investigate, prosecute, but not order redress: In 2002, Office of the Pensions Ombudsman established (Pensions Amendment Act, 2002) –To investigate complaints of maladministration in relation to pension schemes and PRSAs –To award redress in case of financial loss –To decide matters of fact or law Maladministration and non-compliance are not always the same thing

The Legal Position Determinations are binding on all parties Can be enforced by Order of the Circuit Court - on the application of the Complainant or of the Pensions Ombudsman* May be appealed to the High Court within 21 days PO can prosecute for failure to provide information &c. Enforcement Orders also possible in these cases *Minister SFA pre-March 2010

Who Can Complain? an actual or potential beneficiary –a member or a former member –a surviving dependant –a person claiming to be a member or a surviving dependant –a contributor to a PRSA –a personal representative of a member or contributor –a widow or widower of a member or contributor –If a person cannot act for themselves, a representative may make the complaint –No charge to complainants

Against Whom? Former / trustee Former / employer Former / PRSA provider Other category “to be prescribed” –That means Regulations – Statutory Instrument Regulations: “Administrator” includes persons Providing administration service To whom S.59 duties delegated Interpreting or applying scheme rules To whom PRSA provider has delegated

Time Limits If event complained of occurred before “Appointment Day” (28 April, 2003),time limit is six years back from date of signature of 2002 Act* – i.e., 13 April If post- Appointment Day, either –Six years from the date of the event, or –Three years from the date complainant knew or ought to have known…. *Pensions (Amendment) Act 2002

This is being tested… Complaint regarding failure to pay benefits Benefit vested (Leaving through no fault) many years ago Benefits surrendered by ER/Trustee in March 1996 PO has taken the view that “action” in this case is failure to pay the benefits when they fell due under the rules – ongoing trustee duty, not discharged Trustee has appealed - Judgment awaited

Before a Complaint is Taken Internal Disputes Resolution Complaint in writing To trustees (Occupational Pension Scheme and Trust RAC) To Minister (Public Authority) To Provider (PRSA)

Unless…… Dispute or complaint already subject to investigation by the Board –Which certifies –“completed or terminated…………” Scheme in Winding Up Frozen Scheme with no Employer trading From 2006, if PO thinks it appropriate to waive – this option is available only in the private sector

Exhaustion of IDR After three-month deadline has passed, PO may consider the IDR process to be “exhausted within its terms”, and proceed to investigation Also applies to the Public Authority schemes

Complaint Considered by “Appropriate Person” Notice of Determination in writing Conditions to be met –WHAT HAS BEEN DECIDED…. –WHAT IS RELIED UPON IN DECIDING…. –THAT COMPLAINANT IS NOT BOUND….. –BUT CAN TAKE THE PROBLEM ONWARDS

Structure of IDR Considerations in Ireland: Simple User-friendly Saving time Trustees can decide structure of IDR procedure appropriate to scheme - size, circumstances IDR result not binding on the complainant

Practice Varies Some schemes have good and established IDR processes –e.g., –Expert adjudicator recommends solution –Committee considers and recommends If not, advice is available IR machinery may not be suitable for Pensions Trustees and HR people need to understand IDR requirement may not suit established “Grievance Procedures” Employment grievance procedures not open to ex- employees, pensioners, dependants

Public sector Would prefer not to be mixed up with this Traditionally appeals take time – 3 month limit! Local expertise may be absent –Or people don’t want to know Appeals procedures not defined; e.g., –S. 11(5) “…may appeal to the Minister…..” –Information sometimes not readily available (though required by Disclosure Regulations)

Failure to Operate IDR Breach of the Pensions Act Criminal Offence But sanction on employer / trustee does not give redress to the complainant PO now has discretion after the expiry of three- month deadline “to deem the process to be exhausted within its terms”

When a complaint is received… Preliminary Examination –Is IDR required or to be waived? –Is the complaint within terms of reference? –If not: divert to DSFA, FSO, Pensions Board, Financial Regulator, Equality Tribunal MOUs –If within jurisdiction, can the problem be solved quickly – intervention, mediation, even explanation?

Powers To Summon witnesses To require production of documents Powers and privileges of the High Court –Witness immunities and privileges –Statement/admission not admissible in criminal proceedings To state a case to the High Court To make report on investigation –Absolute privilege in Defamation To decide on Jurisdiction To exchange information with Board and Revenue Commissioners

Investigations Respondents notified Papers copied to all known to be involved –Invited to name anyone with an interest Investigators follow up Oral Hearings possible – complainants often request them but they are seldom granted in practice - usually what they actually want is a meeting

Oral hearings Evidence under oath May be held in public Not often used – Usual conditions: –Dispute of fact not solved from the papers –Person’s good name at stake –Conflict of evidence – veracity of witnesses These conditions are published on the Website

Determination Pensions Ombudsman may give Preliminary View –Time allowed for parties to respond to this PO makes Determination Final and binding – can be enforced by Circuit Court Order Appeal to the High Court within 21 days

Other Matters Jurisdiction may overlap with that of Pensions Board, Financial Services Ombudsman, Financial Regulator, Equality Tribunal Memoranda of Understanding with FSO, Board, Regulator, Revenue Commissioners, ODCE MoU with UK Pensions Ombudsman – joint jurisdiction

Other Matters, cont’d Staff are Civil Servants in the Service of the State Overall cost €1Million p.a.

Main Types of Complaint OTOR: –Referral to Ombudsman, Regulator, or out of time Failure to remit contributions ( %) Calculation of Benefits:( %) Fund values (34 – -59%) Problems with Winding-up ( %) Purchase of added years (public sector) (44 - n/c) Disclosure of information ( %) Failure to grant early retirement – solvency issues and ill health (37 – n/c) Overall 2010 down 25%; 2009 up 71%; 2008 up 49%

Compliance with Pensions Act Most trustees and employers comply with most of the Act Most Common failure is in disclosure of information Worst failure is in remittance of contributions –S. 58A requires employers to remit all contributions (DC) or employee contributions (DB) within 21 days of month end –Confirm remittance, e.g., on payslip –Extra disclosure in new Regulations Theft of contributions

Disclosure of Information Many complaints lie in failure of communication Merely to adhere to the Disclosure Requirements does not represent high quality communication Quantity -v- Quality Regulation and supervision – small print –Legally correct but incomprehensible –What’s wrong with using English?

Not all complaints are serious –Not pensioned on all of his service – shortfall in benefits Misinformation on transferred service – overstated by 100 days - “loss” was €3.38 per fortnight PO cannot compensate for loss of expectation –Civil servant missing pension credit for ONE day of his service It was a strike day –One man complained that trustees hadn’t told him inflation would erode the value of his pension –Complainant insisted on being paid by cheque, then complained compensation for EFT not included in pensionable pay

Reporting Reports are absolutely privileged Annual Reports and Digest of cases –Protection of identities –Name and shame? –If Complainant goes public…. Prosecutions for non-production of information –Criminal sanctions Applications for enforcement of discovery

Legal Proceedings Apart from appeals and JR, prosecutions in the District Court for failure to comply with requirement for information –9 convictions in 2010 –Fines € ; costs € –One under appeal to Circuit Court Power of Enforcement –Primary enforcer should be the Complainant –Application to circuit Court –Minister’s Power to apply now given to PO

Office of the Pensions Ombudsman 36 Upper Mount St, Dublin