ORD PM Methods Research Proposed Plans 2003-2005 Paul Solomon ORD/NERL OC/EC Meeting Durango, CO March 4-5, 2003 This presentation has been subject to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What are the important parameters that need to be defined for a carbonaceous aerosol analysis ? Hélène CACHIER Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de.
Advertisements

Chemical Composition of Organic Carbon Fractions Barbara Zielinska.
Example Conceptual Models for Organic Sampling Artifacts on Quartz Fiber Filter Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the IMPROVE/CSN Carbon Monitoring Workshop.
Carbon artifact adjustments for the IMPROVE and CSN speciated particulate networks Mark Green, Judith Chow, John Watson Desert Research Institute Ann Dillner.
1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop PM 2.5 Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) Carbon Conversion Joann Rice.
STN/IMPROVE Comparison Study Preliminary Results Paul Solomon, ORD Tracy Klamser-Williams, ORIA Peter Egeghy, ORD Dennis Crumpler, OAQPS Joann Rice, OAQPS.
Overview of CSN Data Relevant to OC/EC Artifact Adjustments presented by James Flanagan RTI International Davis, CA January 22-23, 2008.
Sources of PM 2.5 Carbon in the SE U.S. RPO National Work Group Meeting December 3-4, 2002.
Emissions of Size-Segregated Aerosols from On-Road Vehicles in the Caldecott Tunnel Jonathan O. Allen SCOS97 -- NARSTO Data Analysis Conference15 February.
Carbon Measurements and Adjustments Measurement of organics by IMPROVE & STN networks, Use of blank data to correct carbon concentration measurements,
A Project to Characterize The Effects of Transient Air Pollutants on the Health of African-Americans in Atlanta, Georgia John H. Hall Morehouse College.
U. Dusek 1, R. Holzinger 1, T. Röckmann 1 Institute for Marine and Atmospheric research Utrecht (IMAU), Utrecht University, The Netherlands Combined measurements.
Section highlights Organic Aerosol and Field Studies.
Nolwenn PERRON Göteborg, OC and EC separation for 14 C analyses N. Perron 1, L. Besnier 1, S. Szidat 2, A. S. H. Prévôt.
Source apportionment of Swiss carbonaceous aerosols using radiocarbon analyses of different fractions References: S. Szidat et al., 2007: Dominant impact.
Predicting TOR OC and EC from FT-IR Spectra of IMPROVE samples Ann M. Dillner Assoc. Research Scientist University of California, Davis Satoshi Takahama.
INDIRECT AEROSOL EFFECTS
Fossil and modern sources of aerosol carbon in the Netherlands – A year-long radiocarbon study Fossil and modern sources of aerosol carbon in the Netherlands.
Organic Carbon and Elemental Carbon in Atlanta Area Chao Wu.
Evaluation of Secondary Organic Aerosols in Atlanta
Prakash V. Bhave, Ph.D. Physical Scientist EMEP Workshop – PM Measurement & Modeling April 22, 2004 Measurement Needs for Evaluating Model Calculations.
Source apportionment of the carbonaceous aerosol – Quantitative estimates based on 14 C- and organic tracer analysis 1.Norwegian Institute for Air Research.
IMPROVE Corrects OC and EC for a Positive Artifact The positive artifact correction causes the organic and elemental carbon to approach zero as fine mass.
Scientific Issues: Organic Aerosols
Diurnal cycle of fossil and non-fossil total carbon using 14 C analyses during CalNex P. Zotter 1, A.S.H. Prévôt 1, Y. Zhang 2, S. Szidat 2, X. Zhang 3,
NATURAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY INFLUENCES ON PARTICULATE MATTER IN THE UNITED STATES: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EPA REGIONAL HAZE RULE Rokjin J. Park ACCESS VII,
Comparison of the STN and IMPROVE Networks for Mass and Selected Chemical Components (Preliminary Results) Paul Solomon, ORD Tracy Klamser-Williams, ORIA.
Daily PM 2.5 : Feb, 2000 – Feb., 2001 Mass: by Partisol FRM Ions: SO4, NO3, NH4, K, Na, Cl, PO4 by IC Elements: by ICP-AES and ICP-MS Carbon by TOT.
1 β Attenuation Method PM10/2.5 Automated Dichotomous Monitor SPM-613D β Attenuation Method PM10/2.5 Automated Dichotomous Monitor Model SPM-613D ■SPM.
MRPO Nitrate and Organic Speciation Special Studies Donna Kenski National RPO Technical Meeting Dallas, Dec. 3-4, 2002.
1 Overview of the National Monitoring Strategy with an Emphasis on NCore Mike Papp Ambient Air Monitoring Group EPA OAQPS Dec. 12, 2006 Las Vegas.
VISTAS Data / Monitoring Overview Scott Reynolds SC DHEC- Larry Garrison KY DNREP Data Workgroup Co-Chairs RPO National Technical Workgroup Meeting – St.
Model Evaluation Comparing Model Output to Ambient Data Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, California.
Regional Air Quality Modeling Results for Elemental and Organic Carbon John Vimont, National Park Service WRAP Fire, Carbon, and Dust Workshop Sacramento,
Prakash V. Bhave, Ph.D. Physical Scientist PM Model Performance Workshop February 10, 2004 Postprocessing Model Output for Comparison to Ambient Data.
SEARCH & VISTAS Special Studies RPO National Technical Meeting St. Louis, MO November 5, 2003.
CHEMISTRY OF AEROSOLS Analyzing the composition of aerosols collected on Mt. Pico Photo: L. Harkness.
The West is different August 14, 2013 OAQPS. Aerosols causing Worst Visibility Days – East vs. West 2.
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
Attribution of Haze Report Update and Web Site Tutorial Implementation Work Group Meeting March 8, 2005 Joe Adlhoch Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
UPR Preliminary Results from Analysis of Filter and Impactor Samples Collected at FNS during SMOCC Olga L. Mayol-Bracero, Susimar Gonzalez, Lydia Soto.
Fairbanks PM 2.5 Source Apportionment Using the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Model Tony Ward, Ph.D. The University of Montana Center for Environmental Health.
Fairbanks PM 2.5 Source Apportionment Using the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Model Tony Ward, Ph.D. The University of Montana Center for Environmental Health.
BACKGROUND AEROSOL IN THE UNITED STATES: NATURAL SOURCES AND TRANSBOUNDARY POLLUTION Daniel J. Jacob and Rokjin J. Park with support from EPRI, EPA/OAQPS.
2016 TFEIP meeting, Zagreb, 16-18th May 2016 Cross-cutting WG TFMM-TFEIP on SVOC emissions Working document for the workshop on condensables & Semi-Volatiles.
Atmospheric Sciences Research Center University at Albany QA/SAC for the Americas World Data Centre for Precipitation Chemistry QA/SAC of the Americas.
IMPROVE/STN Comparison & Implications for Visibility and PM2.5
Emerging Science EPA’s ORD Supports Regional Haze Program
Sources of the PM10 aerosol in Flanders, Belgium, and re-evaluation of the contribution from wood burning Willy Maenhaut1,2, Reinhilde Vermeylen2, Magda.
Bob Cary and David Smith
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
IMPROVE – CSN Carbon Monitoring Workshop: Overview
Introduction to Tisch Instruments
Source identification of aerosols in Mexico City
Wenche Aas and Karl Espen Yttri (EMEP/CCC)
with EUSAAR NA2 Partners
A Review of Time Integrated PM2.5 Monitoring Data in the United States
On-going developments of SinG: particles
Status of data from EMEP intensive period 2008/2009
Monitoring strategy, technical issues
Time-Integrated Particle Measurements : Status in Canada
Continuous Carbon and NHy Measurements
MEASUREMENT OF PM2.5 SEMI-VOLATILE MATERIAL WITH THE FDMS TEOM MONITOR
Jean-Philippe Putaud, Fabrizia Cavalli
DETERMINATION OF CARBONATE CARBON
Lessons learnt from the EMEP intensive measurements
Measurement Needs for AQ Models
Attribution of Haze Project Update
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
Presentation transcript:

ORD PM Methods Research Proposed Plans Paul Solomon ORD/NERL OC/EC Meeting Durango, CO March 4-5, 2003 This presentation has been subject to Agency peer and administrative review and has been approved for presentation. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

Proposed Research Areas of Highest Priority rDriven by: ORD Clients: OAQPS, States/Local/Tribes, ORD Internal Needs Implementation Needs CENR PM Strategy; NARSTO Assessment rOverall Approach: Fundamental Understanding Focus on Standards and Reference Materials

rCarbonaceous PM, A Major Focus: New and Improved Methods, Quantifying Uncertainty, and Minimizing Artifacts for Collecting and Analyzing PM Collected on Filters for the Determination of:  Organic Aerosol and Semi-Volatile Species with an Emphasis on Source Apportionment Needs  Organic Carbon (OC) and Elemental Carbon (EC)  Biogenic vs. Anthropogenic Carbonaceous Material using Radiocarbon Methods Proposed Research Areas of Highest Priority

rHighest Priority Areas PMcoarse FRM/FEM Organic Carbon and Elemental Carbon Collection and Analysis Methods  Sampling Artifacts for OC When Using Quartz Filters  Artifacts in EC and OC TOA Analysis  Optimization of TOA Protocol - Fundamental Approach  Development of OC and EC Standards; PM on Filters and Synthetic  Proportionality of OC to Organic Material (account for C, H, O, N)

rH ighest Priority Areas (continued) Organic Aerosol Speciation with Focus on Source Apportionment  Development of Calibration Standards and Reference Materials for Source Tracer Species  Comparability Amongst Labs Nationwide Performing the Analyses (OC Workgroup)  OC Collection Methods Minimizing Interferences from SVOC Using Denuders and Reactive Filters Biogenic vs Anthropogenic Sources of Carbon  Radiocarbon Methods Proposed Research Areas of Highest Priority

rHig h Priority Areas Continuous Methods for Mass, Major Components of PM Fine and Coarse,and Physical Properties Gas Phase Precursors: Continuous and Integrated Others Proposed Research Areas of Highest Priority