Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Review of Epidemiologic Studies on Cardiovascular Risk with Selected NSAIDs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Advertisements

How would you explain the smoking paradox. Smokers fair better after an infarction in hospital than non-smokers. This apparently disagrees with the view.
Allen Jeremias MD MSc, Sanjay Kaul MD, Luis Gruberg MD, Todd K. Rosengart MD, David L. Brown MD Divisions of Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardiothoracic.
NSAIDs and GI and Renal Complications Lessons from Tennessee Medicaid population studies (and selected others)
Does Preoperative Hemoglobin Value Predict Postoperative Cardiovascular Complications after Total Joint Arthroplasty? Kishor Gandhi MD, MPH, Eugene Viscusi.
Principles of case control studies Part I Nature of the design of case control studies Odds ratio as the measurement of association Piyanit Tharmaphornpilas.
Case-Control Studies (Retrospective Studies). What is a cohort?
1 Recent Observational Studies of Antidepressants (ADs) and Suicidal Behavior Diane K. Wysowski, Ph.D. Office of Drug Safety FDA.
Epidemiological evidence for a protective role for statins in Community Acquired Pneumonia British Thoracic Society Winter Meeting 2012, London Yana Vinogradova.
Is low-dose Aspirin use associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer ? a QResearch primary care database analysis Prof Richard Logan, Dr Yana Vinogradova,
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence March-April 2007.
Measures of association
1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2011.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence March–April 2010.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2004.
Cohort Studies Hanna E. Bloomfield, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine Associate Chief of Staff, Research Minneapolis VA Medical Center.
P H Y S I C I A N S ’ A C A D E M Y F O R C A R D I O V A S C U L A R E D U C A T I O N Oral drugs for type 2 diabetes and all cause mortality in General.
1 The Chemoprevention of Sporadic Colorectal Cancer Issues Surrounding a Benefit/Risk Analysis in Clinical Trials Mark Avigan MD CM Medical Officer Division.
NON-STEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUGS AND PANCREATIC CANCER RISK: A NESTED CASE-CONTROL STUDY Marie Bradley, Carmel Hughes, Marie Cantwell and Liam Murray.
THE PREVALENCE AND PREDICTORS OF LOW-COST GENERIC PROGRAM USE IN A NATIONALLY REPRESENTATIVE ADULT POPULATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENTS, RESEARCH, AND.
HSTAT1101: 27. oktober 2004 Odd Aalen
An Update on NSAID Labeling and Data Review DSaRM Advisory Committee February 10, 2006 Sharon Hertz, M.D. Deputy Director Division of Anesthesia, Analgesia,
Dr. Abdulaziz BinSaeed & Dr. Hayfaa A. Wahabi Department of Family & Community medicine  Case-Control Studies.
Evidence-Based Medicine 4 More Knowledge and Skills for Critical Reading Karen E. Schetzina, MD, MPH.
Racial Differences in the Impact of HMO Coverage of Diabetes Blood Glucose Monitors on Self-Monitoring Connie A. Mah, M.S. Department of Ambulatory Care.
Risk of colorectal cancer in patients taking statins and NSAIDS Dr Yana Vinogradova, Prof Julia Hippisley-Cox, Dr Carol Coupland and Prof Richard Logan.
Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel for Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients Managed without Revascularization — the TRILOGY ACS trial On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS.
An epidemiologic perspective on etoricoxib David J. Graham, MD, MPH Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology April 12, 2007.
Design and Analysis of Clinical Study 6. Case-control Study Dr. Tuan V. Nguyen Garvan Institute of Medical Research Sydney, Australia.
Population-Based Epidemiologic Safety Studies: Overview and Challenges Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee Silver Spring, Maryland June.
Critical Appraisal Did the study address a clearly focused question? Did the study address a clearly focused question? Was the assignment of patients.
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Joint Meeting of the Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee and the Drug Safety and Risk Management.
VIOXX ™ Gastrointestinal Outcome Research (VIGOR) Arthritis Advisory Committee Meeting February 8, 2001 Lourdes Villalba, M.D. DAAODP, CDER, FDA.
Case-control study Chihaya Koriyama August 17 (Lecture 1)
Design and Analysis of Clinical Study 2. Bias and Confounders Dr. Tuan V. Nguyen Garvan Institute of Medical Research Sydney, Australia.
Cardiovascular Risk and NSAIDs Arthritis Advisory Committee Meeting November 29, 2006 Sharon Hertz, M.D. Deputy Director Division of Analgesia, Anesthesia,
Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee May 18-19, Overview of Drug Safety Challenges Gerald J. Dal Pan, MD, MHS Director Division of.
LEADING RESEARCH… MEASURES THAT COUNT Challenges of Studying Cardiovascular Outcomes in ADHD Elizabeth B. Andrews, MPH, PhD, VP, Pharmacoepidemiology and.
Understanding Medical Articles and Reports Linda Vincent, MPH UCSF Breast SPORE Advocate September 24,
Lecture 9: Analysis of intervention studies Randomized trial - categorical outcome Measures of risk: –incidence rate of an adverse event (death, etc) It.
Adverse Outcomes After Hospitalization and Delirium in Persons with Alzheimer Disease Charles Wang, PharmD Candidate.
Interpreting observational studies of cardiovascular risk of NSAIDs. Richard Platt, MD, MS Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care HMO Research.
Cardiovascular Risk and NSAIDs Arthritis Advisory Committee Meeting April 12, 2007 Sharon Hertz, M.D. Deputy Director Division of Analgesia, Anesthesia,
Describing the risk of an event and identifying risk factors Caroline Sabin Professor of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Research Department of Infection.
Background There are 12 different types of medications to lower blood sugar levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. It is widely agreed upon that metformin.
1 ADHD drugs and CV outcomes: Preliminary feasibility results and potential observational studies David J. Graham, MD, MPH on behalf of the FDA Epidemiology.
A Claims Database Approach to Evaluating Cardiovascular Safety of ADHD Medications A. J. Allen, M.D., Ph.D. Child Psychiatrist, Pharmacologist Global Medical.
Advisory Committee Presentation on Vioxx (Rofecoxib) Discussion on the meta analyses for cardiovascular risk assessment Qian Li, Sc. D.
NDAs /772 Etoricoxib Robert B. Shibuya, M.D. Medical Officer Division of Anesthesia, Analgesia, and Rheumatology Products.
Diabetes Mellitus 101 for Cardiologists (and Alike): 2015
Effect of Rosiglitazone on the Risk of Myocardial Infarction And Death from Cardiovascular Causes Alternative Interpretations of the Evidence George A.
NSAIDs: Risk of acute MI compared with remote use Largest NSAID database study ever casts doubt on entire coxib controvers [Rheumawire > News; Jun 10,
Case-Control Studies September 2014 Alexander M. Walker MD, DrPH With Sonia Hernández-Díaz MD, DrPH.
Drug Regulation in Controversy: Vioxx November 10, 2004 Sandra L. Kweder, M.D. Deputy Director, Office of New Drugs Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
Carina Signori, DO Journal Club August 2010 Macdonald, M. et al. Diabetes Care; Jun 2010; 33,
Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research 1 Issues in Projecting Increased Risk of Cardiovascular Events to the Exposed.
Case Control study. An investigation that compares a group of people with a disease to a group of people without the disease. Used to identify and assess.
ADHD drugs and CV outcomes: Preliminary feasibility study results David J. Graham, MD, MPH on behalf of the FDA Epidemiology Contracts Study Team DSARM.
Tumor necrosis factor antagonist use and associated risk reduction of cardiovascular events among patients with rheumatoid arthritis The Annals of the.
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2017
Impact of Triglyceride Levels Beyond Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol After Acute Coronary Syndrome in the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 Trial Michael Miller MD,
Cost effectiveness of COX 2 selective inhibitors and traditional NSAIDs alone or in combination with a proton pump inhibitor for people with osteoarthritis.
Epidemiological Methods
Donald E. Cutlip, MD Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Presenter: Wen-Ching Lan Date: 2018/08/01
NSAIDs: Risk of acute MI compared with remote use
Drug used within 3 months of index date Adjusted odds ratio* p
PRECISION Trial design: Patients with arthritis and increased cardiovascular risk were randomized to celecoxib 100 mg twice daily (n = 8,072) vs. ibuprofen.
Diabetes Journal Club March 17, 2011
Perspectives on hormone replacement therapy: the Women's Health Initiative and new observational studies sampling the overall population  Richard L. Tannen,
Presentation transcript:

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Review of Epidemiologic Studies on Cardiovascular Risk with Selected NSAIDs David J. Graham, MD, MPH Office of Drug Safety Center for Drug Evaluation and Research February 17, 2005

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Purpose and Methods To evaluate epidemiologic data from the published literature plus 2 currently unpublished studies evaluated by this reviewer Focus: studies providing estimates of risk of acute myocardial infarction in the setting of use of COX-2 selective NSAIDs or naproxen –PubMed search by specific NSAID, with cross-checking of cited references

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Comments on Estimation of Excess Cases of AMI Tomorrow, FDA will present its estimation of the number harmed by rofecoxib, modeling RCT survival curves Assumes “grace period” based on VIGOR & APPROVe –Unreliable due to extremely low statistical power –Based on total of small # MI events over duration of trial –Epi studies based on 3- to 50-fold more events: more power –Based on epi data, rofecoxib risk begins early in therapy –No “grace period” Patients enrolled in RCTs are generally healthier than “real-world” –Therefore, RCTs will underestimate true risk and population impact because their background rate is lower

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Overview of Epidemiologic Studies on COX-2 AMI Risk (1) Source Ref Popln Person-Yrs Study Popln Design Group Size Observed Age Ray Medicaid Cohort Nonuse 454 K 428 K Graham HMO NCC Remote 1.4 M 2.3 M Celecoxib Solomon Medicare CC Multiple 54 K -  65 Mamdani Ontario Cohort Nonuse 167 K 76 K  66 Kimmel Community CC Remote Ingenix MCO Cohort Ibu/Diclo 424 K 177 K Medi-Cal Medicaid NCC Remote 651 K 2.4 M 18-84

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Overview of Epidemiologic Studies on COX-2 AMI Risk (2) Number of Cases Case Rofecoxib Celecoxib Study Defn Cases All doses  25 mg >25 mg All doses Ray +SCD 5, Graham +SCD 8, Solomon HAMI 10, Mamdani HAMI Kimmel HAMI * 1, Ingenix +SCD 628 * 124 * 83 * 9 * 139 * Medi-Cal HAMI 15,343 1, ,862

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Overview of Epidemiologic Studies on COX-2 AMI Risk (3) Special Study Aspirin Smoking Features Limitations Ray No No New-user analysis Low rofecoxib use; no med recs possible dose misclassification Graham No * No * Inception cohort Low rofecoxib use; * Survey of controls Solomon No No Duration analysis No SCD; multiple comparisons; Beneficiary survey no med recs; possible dose misclassification Mamdani No No - Low rofecoxib use; prevalence cohort; excluded < 30 d users; no SCD; no dose/duration analysis; no med recs Kimmel Yes Yes Direct interview Low rofecoxib use, very low high dose use; 55% case/50% control participation; no fatal AMI or SCD; self-report-?recall bias Ingenix No No NDI search Identified 1798 cases; included only 628; New-user analysis no non-user reference; low high-dose use; Med record review possible dose misclassification Medi-Cal Yes No Inception cohort New database for research purposes; no med recs; possible dose misclassification

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research California Medicaid Strengths –Large sample size – over 7 million persons per year –OTC aspirin data –No censoring at age 65 (dual coverage with Medicare) –Matching with multiple cause-of-death data –Long durations of follow-up with low drop-out rates –Sicker population than private-payors, so easier to detect drug safety signals Limitations –No access to medical records (HIPAA) –Very complicated data – difficult to understand and analyze. Therefore, not used often for drug safety research.

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Unmeasured CV Risk Factors and NSAID Use GrahamCelecoxib Rofecoxib Naproxen Remote Aspirin 19% 23% 28% 24% Smoking 9% 7% 11% 11% OTC NSAIDs 15% 14% 12% 13% SolomonCelecoxib Rofecoxib NSAIDs BMI Aspirin 8.2% 11.5% 10.2% Smoking 8.7% 7.0% 9.8% College+ 29.6% 31.8% 26.5% Income Same Same Lower KimmelCelecoxib Rofecoxib NSAIDs Remote BMI Aspirin 27.6% 32.1% 21.7% 28.8% Smoking Current 17.2% 6.5% 19.9% 21.2% Past 43.7% 42.9% 31.8% 32.0% Physical activity

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Risk of AMI with Rofecoxib Study Ref All doses  25 mg >25 mg Ray Non ( ) 1.93 ( ) Graham Rem 1.34 ( ) 1.23 ( ) 3.00 ( ) Solomon Rem 1.14 ( ) - - Mamdani Non 1.00 ( ) - - Kimmel Rem 1.16 ( ) - - Ingenix Active 1.41 ( ) 1.54 ( ) 0.81 ( ) * Medi-Cal Rem 1.32 ( ) 1.29 ( ) 1.56 ( )

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Preliminary Results: Medi-Cal Study Dose Response for AMI Risk with Rofecoxib Odds Ratio Singh et al.

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Risk of AMI for Rofecoxib vs Celecoxib Rofecoxib Study All doses  25 mg >25 mg Ray ( ) Graham 1.59 ( ) 1.47 ( )3.58 ( ) Solomon 1.24 ( ) 1.21 ( )1.70 ( ) Kimmel 2.72 ( ) - - Medi-Cal 1.22 ( ) - -

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Individual Excess Risk of AMI or SCD per Year from Rofecoxib Use for an Average Year Old US Man, based on Epidemiolgic Data Based on Based on point estimate 95% upper bound  25 mg Ray 1/2500 1/135 Graham 1/217 1/70 Ingenix 1/93 1/48 Medi-Cal 1/172 1/125 >25 mg Ray 1/54 1/21 Graham 1/25 1/7 Medi-Cal 1/89 1/56

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Excess Population Risk of AMI or SCD in 1 Million US Men Years Old Treated with Rofecoxib per Year, Based on Epidemiolgic Data Based on Based on point estimateupper 95% bound  25 mg Ray 400 7,400 Graham 4,600 14,200 Ingenix 10,800 20,800 Medi-Cal 5,800 8,000 >25 mg Ray 18,600 48,000 Graham 40, ,200 Medi-Cal 11,200 18,000

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research AMI Risk with Rofecoxib and Duration of Use Graham et al. 50% 75% 95%  25 mg <2 m 5 m 13 m >25 mg <3 m 6 m 9 m Solomon et al. Days 1-90  25 mg1.37 ( ) >25 mg1.38 ( ) Kimmel et al. 25/27 cases  25 mg 102/105 patients  12 m Days 1-30 Solomon et al ( ) Ingenix 1.51 ( )

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Risk of AMI with Celecoxib Relative Risk

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Risk of AMI with Celecoxib – the effect of dose Relative Risk

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Preliminary Data Risk of AMI with Valdecoxib # casesOR (95% CI) Medi-Cal ( ) Mostly 10 and 20 mg. Medi-Cal only reimburses 10 mg tabs

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Overview of Epidemiologic Studies on Naproxen AMI Risk (1) Source Ref Person-Yrs Study Popln Design Group Observed Age Ray Medicaid Cohort Nonuse 428 K Graham HMO NCC Remote 2.3 M G Rodriguez GPRD NCC Nonuse Rahme Quebec NCC Other NSAIDs -  65 Mamdani Ontario Cohort Nonuse 76 K  66 Schlienger GPRD NCC Nonuse Kimmel Community CC Remote Solomon Medicaid/Medicare CC Remote -  - Watson GPRD NCC Nonuse Ingenix MCO Cohort Ibu/Diclo 177 K Medi-Cal Medicaid NCC Remote 52 K 18-84

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Overview of Epidemiologic Studies on Naproxen AMI Risk (2) Case Naproxen Study Defn Aspirin Smoking Cases Ray +SCD No No 201 Graham +SCD No * No * 367 G Rodriguez +SCD No Yes 49 Rahme HAMI Yes * No 397 Mamdani HAMI No No 15 Schlienger HAMI No Yes 19 Kimmel HAMI * Yes Yes ? Solomon HAMI No No ? Watson Composite No * Yes 26 * Ingenix +SCD No No 179 * Medi-Cal HAMI Yes No 368

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Overview of Epidemiologic Studies on Naproxen AMI Risk (3) Study Limitations Ray Poisson assumption of constant hazard G Rodriguez Definition of current exposure included potentially unexposed time (Rx ended within 30d of index date) Rahme Excluded past AMI; relied on current exposure to another NSAID as reference; no external reference Schlienger Small # events; excluded patients with underlying CV disease Kimmel 2 o or 3 o analysis; small # events Solomon Misclassified exposure (any exposure in past 6 mos); excluded patients with CV risk; adjustment based on diagnoses rather than Rxs Watson Small # events; excluded prior CV disease & Rxs; composite outcome (AMI, CVA, SAH, SDH); failed to adjust, or poorly adjusted for CV risk

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Risk of AMI with Naproxen Relative Risk

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research A Closer Look at 4 “Positive” Naproxen Studies Solomon Any use Current use Recent use Remote use 0.84 ( ) 0.86 ( ) 0.84 ( ) 0.76 ( ) Watson Age Sex Yr DM CVrisk Comorb Smoke DMARDs Steroids 0.61 ( ) ( ) ( ) Rahme Current naproxen vs other NSAIDs: 0.79 ( ) Reanalyzed, current naproxen vs nonuse: 1.28 ( ), p=.001 Kimmel 0.48 ( ) Small #s; 50% participation rate; mixing of Rx & OTC use; “reverse” recall bias

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Preliminary Data: Medi-Cal Study Other NSAIDs # casesOR (95% CI) Ibuprofen ( ) Indomethacin ( ) Meloxicam ( ) Nabumetone ( ) Sulindac ( ) Non-coxib NSAIDs 2, ( )

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Dose-Response Relationship of AMI risk with NSAIDs Odds Ratio

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Preliminary Data: Medi-Cal Study Risk of AMI Compared to Non-Coxib NSAIDs OR (95% CI) Celecoxib0.97 ( ) Rofecoxib1.18 ( ) Valdecoxib0.88 ( )

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Conclusions Regarding Risk of Acute MI: COX-2 Selective NSAIDs Celecoxib  200 mg: no apparent effect > 200 mg: probable increased risk Rofecoxib  25 mg: probable increased risk >25 mg: definite increased risk Risk begins early in therapy, and is apparent during days 1-30 of use Valdecoxib  20 mg: no apparent effect

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Conclusions Regarding Risk of Acute MI: “Non-selective” NSAIDs As a class, non-coxib NSAIDs may increase risk Differences exist between non-coxib NSAIDs with respect to risk Naproxen is not cardio-protective

Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Open Questions Differential NSAID risk Dose response Duration effect Persistency of risk Actual benefit in the population CHF Stroke