Randomized Experimental Design

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Educational Research: Causal-Comparative Studies
Advertisements

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. Part Three SOURCES AND COLLECTION OF DATA.
Comparing Two Means: One-sample & Paired-sample t-tests Lesson 12.
Randomized Complete Block and Repeated Measures (Each Subject Receives Each Treatment) Designs KNNL – Chapters 21,
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon (2007) Single-Variable, Independent-Groups Designs Graziano and Raulin Research Methods: Chapter 10 This multimedia product and.
Experimental Design True Experimental Designs n Random assignment n Two comparison groups n Controls threats to internal validity n Strongest evidence.
PSYC512: Research Methods PSYC512: Research Methods Lecture 13 Brian P. Dyre University of Idaho.
Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research
Experimental Design I. Definition of Experimental Design
Defining Characteristics
Experimental Design 1
GROUP-LEVEL DESIGNS Chapter 9.
Control Any means used to rule out threats to validity Example –Hypothesis: Rats learned to press a bar when a light was turned on. –Data for 10 rats bar.
Design Supplemental.
Jeff Beard Lisa Helma David Parrish Start Presentation.
Experimental Designs.
Experimental Research Independent variable Dependent variable Causation.
Chapter 10 Experimental Research Design ♣ ♣ Introduction   Research Designs with Threats to Internal Validity   Requirements of Experimental Research.
Sampling and Experimental Control Goals of clinical research is to make generalizations beyond the individual studied to others with similar conditions.
Experimental Designs.
Educational Research by John W. Creswell. Copyright © 2002 by Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Slide 1 Chapter 11 Experimental and Quasi-experimental.
DOCTORAL SEMINAR, SPRING SEMESTER 2007 Experimental Design & Analysis Further Within Designs; Mixed Designs; Response Latencies April 3, 2007.
CHAPTER OVERVIEW Experimental Designs
Chapter 9 Experimental Research Gay, Mills, and Airasian
McGraw-Hill © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Experimental Research Chapter Thirteen.
L1 Chapter 11 Experimental and Quasi- experimental Designs Dr. Bill Bauer.
Experimental Research
Nasih Jaber Ali Scientific and disciplined inquiry is an orderly process, involving: problem Recognition and identification of a topic to.
EVALUATING YOUR RESEARCH DESIGN EDRS 5305 EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH & STATISTICS.
Experimental Design The Gold Standard?.
Chapter 8 Experimental Design.
1 Experimental Designs HOW DO HOW DO WE FIND WE FIND THE ANSWERS ? THE ANSWERS ?
Copyright © 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. John W. Creswell Educational Research: Planning,
Chapter 11 Experimental Designs
Design Experimental Control. Experimental control allows causal inference (IV caused observed change in DV) Experiment has internal validity when it fulfills.
1)Test the effects of IV on DV 2)Protects against threats to internal validity Internal Validity – Control through Experimental Design Chapter 10 – Lecture.
Some terms Parametric data assumptions(more rigorous, so can make a better judgment) – Randomly drawn samples from normally distributed population – Homogenous.
Experimental Design: One-Way Correlated Samples Design
Psychology 301 Chapters & Differences Between Two Means Introduction to Analysis of Variance Multiple Comparisons.
Statistics Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
Types of Research and Designs This week and next week… Covering –Research classifications –Variables –Steps in Experimental Research –Validity –Research.
Introduction section of article
Single-Factor Studies KNNL – Chapter 16. Single-Factor Models Independent Variable can be qualitative or quantitative If Quantitative, we typically assume.
Chapter 10 Experimental Research Gay, Mills, and Airasian 10th Edition
Research Design. Time of Data Collection Longitudinal Longitudinal –Panel study –Trend study –Cohort study Cross-sectional Cross-sectional.
Chapter 11.  The general plan for carrying out a study where the independent variable is changed  Determines the internal validity  Should provide.
Pretest/Posttest/Group ANCOV The Univariate Approach.
T tests comparing two means t tests comparing two means.
Chapter Eight: Quantitative Methods
Comparing Two Means: One-sample & Paired-sample t-tests Lesson 13.
ANOVA Overview of Major Designs. Between or Within Subjects Between-subjects (completely randomized) designs –Subjects are nested within treatment conditions.
© 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Chapter 11 Testing for Differences Differences betweens groups or categories of the independent.
PS Research Methods I with Kimberly Maring Unit 9 – Experimental Research Chapter 6 of our text: Zechmeister, J. S., Zechmeister, E. B., & Shaughnessy,
Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research
Experimental Research Designs
Single-Variable, Independent-Groups Designs
Part Three SOURCES AND COLLECTION OF DATA
Research Design & Analysis II: Class 10
12 Inferential Analysis.
Internal Validity – Control through
Review of Research Types
2 independent Groups Graziano & Raulin (1997).
Designing an Experiment
Between-Subjects Experimental Designs
Pre-post Double Blind Placebo Control Group Design
12 Inferential Analysis.
Experimental Design I. Definition of Experimental Design
Chapter 11 EDPR 7521 Dr. Kakali Bhattacharya
Types of Designs: R: Random Assignment of subjects to groups
Factorial Designs Factorial design: a research design that includes two or more factors (Independent Variables) A two-factor design has two IVs. Example:
Presentation transcript:

Randomized Experimental Design

What is an Experiment? Campbell & Stanley stressed random assignment to experimental treatments. I stress manipulation of the independent variable. Quasi-Experiments: C&S’s term for research where there is a manipulated IV but not random assignment to groups

Random Selection Refers to the selection of data points from a population into a random sample. This selection procedure will be random if each possible sample of size N is equally likely to be sampled. Random samples should be representative of the population. Our inferential statistics assume random sampling.

Note. The tabled values are probabilities. Y is random, X is not. In Y, each time a single score is sampled, all scores in the population are equally likely to be sampled.

Random Assignment Refers to the assignment of subjects to treatment conditions. Allows us to consider the populations (subjects who will get special treatment and those who will not) as equivalent prior to treatment. The samples will likely differ a little.

Two Basic Randomized Designs Randomized Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design R  O  X  O R  O     O Randomized Posttest Only Control Group Design R  X  O R     O

Noise Reducing Designs These designs reduce noise (error variance) and thus increase power.

Randomized Blocks Designs Matched pairs, randomized blocks, split-plot. Repeated measures or within-subjects. Variance due to the blocking variable is removed from error variance.

Analysis of Covariance Change a noise-producing extraneous variable into a covariate that is included in the statistical model. Must be able to measure the covariate. Variance due to covariate is removed from the error variance. Can have more than one covariate.

Factorial ANOVA Convert a categorical extraneous variable to an ANOVA factor. Variance due to that factor will be removed from the error term. 2 x 2 Factorial Design R  X11  O R  X12  O R  X21  O R  X22  O

Other Randomized Designs Solomon Four Group Design Controls threats to internal and external validity as well as the posttest only control group design. But has greater power. And greater cost Need more data More complex analysis R  O  X  O R  O     O R     X  O R        O

Solomon Four Group Design ANOVA Arrange all four groups’ posttest scores into a 2 x 2 ANOVA. Pretested or Not x Experimental Treatment or Not. Significant Interaction – Testing x Treatment threat to External Validity Main effect of pretesting. Main effect of treatment

Treatment effect but no testing or Testing x Treatment interaction Pretest means in parentheses

Treatment and testing effects but no Testing x Treatment interaction

Treatment and testing effects and a Testing x Treatment interaction

Solomon Four Group Design Pretest-Posttest Analysis To gain power, analyze the pretest-posttest portion of the design with ANCOV, using pretest scores as covariate Mixed factorial ANOVA planned comparisons using t control versus treatment change scores (independent t) pre versus post for control group (correlated t) pre versus post for treatment group (correlated t)

Randomized Switching- Replications Design R  O  X  O     O R  O     O  X  O Attempt to control social threats to internal validity. Both groups get the special effect, one early, one later. May still be social effects with respect to who gets it first.

Switching Replications Temporary Treatment Effect Group 1 got the treatment first. Treatment is anxiety-reducing drug DV = measure of anxiety reported by patient

Switching Replications Persistent Treatment Effect Treatment is psychotherapy DV = measure of anxiety reported by patient A third posttest could show the effect does not last indefinitely.

Switching Replications Continuing Treatment Effect Treatment = cognitive psychotherapy Anxiety continues to decline beyond the first post-treatment observation, as patients get better at employing the cognitive technique.