New England Association for Schools and Colleges Re-Accreditation for Brandeis University Marty Wyngaarden Krauss Provost and Senior Vice President for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Advertisements

Cedarville University Accreditation Self-Study Plan Presented by Dr. Thomas Mach.
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes In the Context of SACS Re-accreditation Standards Presentation to the Dean’s Council September 2, 2004.
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
The Periodic Review Report at the Community College: Opportunities for Collaborative Institutional Renewal Valarie Avalone, Director of Planning Dr. Michael.
An Assessment Primer Fall 2007 Click here to begin.
ACCREDITATION INSTITUTE ACADEMIC SENATE FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES MARCH 18, 2011 PRESENTED BY DR. JUDY C. MINER PRESIDENT, FOOTHILL COLLEGE EMBRACE.
WASC Accreditation Process DUE Managers Meeting December 2, 2009 Sharon Salinger and Judy Shoemaker.
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
WASC Accreditation Standards and Process August 31, 2006.
Institutional Accreditation Review by Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
1 Accreditation and Reaffirmation of Accreditation: An Overview David S. Adegboye, Ph.D. Professor of Biology Associate Vice-Chancellor for Academic Affairs.
The Accreditation: The Policies on Distance Learning.
Professor Dolina Dowling
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Chancellor’s Cabinet September 28, 2004.
The Faculty Leadership Role on Accreditation Julie Bruno, Sierra College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College Chris Hill, Grossmont College Richard Mahon, Riverside.
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
Overview Changes in the re-accreditation process since 2007 Assessment Resources.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Fall 2014.
Mission and Mission Fulfillment Tom Miller University of Alaska Anchorage.
PERIODIC ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAMS AT UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL Office of the Provost Hélène David, associate vice-rector academic affairs Claude Mailhot, Professor.
Developing the Year One Report: WVC’s Experience as a Pilot College Dr. Susan Murray Executive Director, Institutional Effectiveness.
STUDENT SERVICES REVIEW January 8, Context – Administrative Unit Reviews Objectives Roles Unit Self-Study Internal Review Committee External Reviewers.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
Middle States Steering Committee Overview of Standards March 20, 2008.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
NEASC FIVE YEAR REPORT FITCHBURG STATE COLLEGE JANUARY 2007.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Middle States Self-Study Process : 2013 College Senate SUNY Oneonta October 15, 2012.
Student Support Services Standard II B & C. II.B. The institution recruits and admits diverse students who are able to benefit from its programs, consistent.
PRESIDENT’S Campus forum November 9, Dr. Shirley Wagner and Dr. Paul Weizer NEASC Self Study Co-Chairs Key Elements of the Self Study Process Demystifying.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
Yes, It’s Time!  10 years after the most recent visit ( )  (probably spring semester)  SMSU proposes dates; HLC replies  Much to be.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Plenary III Assessment and Evaluation Standards One and Nine Dave Hubin, Ph.D. Executive Assistant President University of Oregon.
CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY OPEN SESSION MARCH 25 Higher Learning Commission Re-accreditation.
Higher Learning Commission Accreditation Process Update.
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
October 20 – November 6, 2014 Alovidin Bakhovidinov Alina Batkayeva
Criterion 1 Mission A. The institution's mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. B. The mission is articulated.
Office of Academic Affairs July 18, 2012 Faculty Focus Newsletter O Purpose: To keep faculty informed about key academic policies and college wide issues,
30/10/2006 University Leaders Meeting 1 Student Assessment: A Mandatory Requirement For Accreditation Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chair-Person National Quality.
DEEP DIVING INTO THE REVISED MSCHE STANDARDS FOR RE-ACCREDITATION ​ Brigitte Valesey, Ph.D. Widener University ​ Drexel Assessment Conference ​ September.
Jerry E. Trapnell, PhD, CPA Executive Vice President and Chief Accreditation Officer AACSB International A BRIEFING ON AACSB INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION.
Facult Retreat January 2010 Graham Benton, WASC Coordinator, Accreditation Liaison Officer
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
New Faculty Orientation Provost’s Report August 22, 2016
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
Curriculum & Accreditation: You Can Get There from Here
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Reaccreditation and Illinois
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
Fort Valley State University
Open Forum Founder’s Hall 12/5/2016
Open Forum SC Sprague Carleton 10/19/2017
Presentation transcript:

New England Association for Schools and Colleges Re-Accreditation for Brandeis University Marty Wyngaarden Krauss Provost and Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs February Faculty Meeting, 2005 Brandeis University

2 Elements of Brandeis Re-Accreditation Preparation of the Brandeis Self-Study Ongoing Brandeis Community Feedback NEASC Team Visits Campus Evaluation of Our Accreditation Status Re-Accreditation for Brandeis Brandeis University

3 Principles for Self-Study Faculty and Senior Administration: Leadership Staff: Draft, Organize, Facilitate Outreach Faculty and Students: Review Drafts and Revisions, Give Feedback Rely on Existing University Faculty Committees Entire Brandeis Community Informed about Process, Given Opportunities for Feedback Brandeis University

4 University Advisory Council is the Steering Committee for Re-Accreditation Co-Chairs Marty Krauss and Peter French 3 School Deans and Senior VP Students and Enrollment Chair of the Faculty Senate, Dagmar Ringe 7 Faculty from all 3 Schools with 2 Student Government Presidents (Student Union and the GSA) Brandeis University

5 Timeline for Brandeis Spring 2005: Appoint Committee Chairs, Identify Faculty Reviewers Fall 2005: Information Collection and Community Outreach, Committees Draft Spring 2006: Drafts Reviewed, Integrated, Public Forum Summer 2006: Self-Study Submitted to NEASC Fall 2006: NEASC Team Visit to Campus Brandeis University

NEASC Visiting Team Chair, President of Dartmouth, James Freedman Yale University Librarian President Emeritus, College of Holy Cross Dean of Student Affairs, Washington University Head, Physics Department, University of Illinois VP, Maryland Independent College & Univ. Association Professor of History, Wesleyan VP for Budget & Planning, University of Rochester Professor of Mathematics, Trinity College Brandeis University

7 11 NEASC Standards 1.Mission and Purposes (5 items) 2.Planning and Evaluation (7 items) 3.Organization and Governance (12 items) 4.The Academic Program (50 items) 5.Faculty (23 items) Brandeis University

8 11 NEASC Standards 6.Students (17 items) 7.Information Resources and Technology (12 items) 8.Physical and Technological Resources (6 items) 9.Financial Resources (14 items) 10.Public Disclosure (15 items) 11.Integrity (11 items ) Brandeis University

9 New Revised NEASC Standards Emphasis on institutional capacity Institutional effectiveness integrated through all standards Quality of the academic program in all locations, formats Integrity: retaining the public trust in higher education and accreditation Brandeis University

10 Institutional Effectiveness=Assessment Assessment is a type of “action research” intended to gather indicators and evidence to inform decision-making (Walvoord, Barbara) “Assessing for learning is a systematic and systemic process of inquiry into what and how well students learn over the progression of their studies and is driven by intellectual curiosity...” (Maki, Peggy) Brandeis University

11 Challenges of Assessment Linking assessment to institutional goals and mission Articulating goals for student learning in departments, majors and minors, degree areas, residence life Understanding what we are already doing, even if it isn’t called assessment Gathering both direct and indirect evidence of student learning Brandeis University

New England Association for Schools and Colleges (NEASC) Reaccreditation Self-Study Standards Standards Comprising the Self-Study Marty Wyngaarden Krauss Provost and Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs February, 2005 Brandeis University

14 Brandeis University Standard 1: Mission and Purposes The institution’s mission and purposes are appropriate to higher education, consistent with its charter or other operating authority, and implemented in a manner that complies with the Standards of the Commission on Institutions of Higher Education. The institution’s mission gives direction to its activities and provides a basis for the assessment and enhancement of the institution’s effectiveness.

15 Brandeis University Standard 2: Planning and Evaluation The institution undertakes planning and evaluation appropriate to its needs to accomplish and improve the achievement of its mission and purposes. It identifies its planning and evaluation priorities and pursues them effectively.

Brandeis University Standard 3: Organization and Governance The institution has a system of governance that facilitates the accomplishment of its mission and purposes and supports institutional effectiveness and integrity. Through its organizational design and governance structure, the institution creates and sustains an environment that encourages teaching, learning, scholarship, and where appropriate research and service. It assures provision of support adequate for the appropriate functioning of each organizational component.

Brandeis University Standard 4: The Academic Program The institution’s academic programs are consistent with and serve to fulfill its mission and purposes. The institution works systematically and effectively to plan, provide, oversee, evaluate, improve, and assure the academic quality and integrity of its academic programs and the credits and degrees awarded. The institution develops the systematic means to understand how and what students are learning and to use the evidence obtained to improve the academic program. A.Undergraduate Degree Programs, General Education and the Major or Concentration B.Graduate Degree Programs C.Integrity in the Award of Academic Credit D.General Academic Program and Assessment

Brandeis University Standard 5: Faculty Faculty qualifications, numbers, and performance are sufficient to accomplish the institution’s mission and purposes. Faculty competently offer the institution’s academic programs and fulfill those tasks appropriately assigned them. A.General, Teaching and Advising, Research and Scholarship

Brandeis University Standard 6: Students Consistent with its mission, the institution defines the characteristics of the students it seeks to serve and provides an environment which fosters the intellectual and personal development of its students. It recruits, admits, enrolls, and endeavors to help ensure the success of its students, offering the resources and services that provide them the opportunity to achieve the goals of their program as specified in institutional publications. The institution’s interactions with students and prospective students are characterized by integrity. A.Admissions, Retention, and Graduation B.Student Services

Brandeis University Standard 7: Information Resources and Technology The institution demonstrates sufficient and appropriate information resources and services and instructional and information technology and utilizes them to support the fulfillment of its mission.

Brandeis University Standard 8: Physical and Technological Resources The institution has sufficient and appropriate physical and technological resources necessary for the achievement of its purposes. It manages and maintains these resources in a manner to sustain and enhance the realization of institutional purposes.

Brandeis University Standard 9: Financial Resources The institution’s financial resources are sufficient to sustain the achievement of its educational objectives and to further institutional improvement now and in the foreseeable future. The institution demonstrates through verifiable internal and external factors its financial capacity to graduate its entering class. The institution administers its financial resources with integrity.

Brandeis University Standard 10: Public Disclosure In presenting itself to students, prospective students, and other members of the interested public, the institution provides information that is complete, accurate, accessible, clear and sufficient for intended audiences to make informed decisions about the institution.

Brandeis University Standard 11: Integrity The institution subscribes to and advocates high ethical standards in the management of its affairs and in all of its dealings with students, faculty, staff, its governing board, external agencies and organizations, and the general public. Through its policies and practices, the institution endeavors to exemplify the values it articulates in its mission and related statements.