NWCCU Standards for Accredition The new process. Revised NWCCU Accreditation Standards New Standards: reduced from 9 to 5 Standard One--Mission, Core.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Advertisements

A Practical Guide. The Handbook Part I BCCC Vision of Assessment Guiding Principles of Assessment Part II The Assessment Model Part III A guide on how.
Standard One Core Themes & Objectives Objectives.
A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools
Presenters: Lisa McLaughlin, Institutional Data Coordinator Best Practices: Program Review TCUs Chief Academic Officers Annual Meeting.
BOGDAN HOANCA UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE Plenary II – Mission, Core Themes, & Achievement Indicators.
CARROLL COLLEGE HELENA, MONTANA Mission, Core Themes and Achievement Indicators.
New England Association for Schools and Colleges Re-Accreditation for Brandeis University Marty Wyngaarden Krauss Provost and Senior Vice President for.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
AccreditationEncore New Standards, New Thinking & Next Steps.
The Year Three Report and Visit Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Core Themes, Objectives, Achievement Indicators, Planning, & Effectiveness Carroll College February 19, 2010 NWCCU Plenary II Nominations for Best Picture.
An Assessment Primer Fall 2007 Click here to begin.
President’s Cabinet April 12,  Process review  The “why” for the plan  The draft plan  Q & A  Implementation.
NWCCU Standards for Accreditation The new process.
NWCCU New Accreditation Process Dave James, Gail Griffin Office of the Vice Provost for Academic Affairs.
Pace University Assessment Plan. Outline I. What is assessment? II. How does it apply to Pace? III. Who’s involved? IV. How will assessment be implemented.
Launch of Quality Management System
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
WASC Accreditation Standards and Process August 31, 2006.
New Traditions: NWCCU Standards and Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
MEGAN CARLSON & BOGDAN HOANCA UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE Plenary II – Core Themes, Objectives, Achievement Indicators; Planning; Effectiveness.
Moving on to our Second Report! Due to NWCCU by Fall 2012.
Sub-theme Three The Self-Assessment Process and Embedding QA into the Life of an Institution by Terry Miosi, Ph.D. UAE Qualification Framework Project.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
SAR as Formative Assessment By Rev. Bro. Dr. Bancha Saenghiran February 9, 2008.
MEGAN CARLSON & BOGDAN HOANCA UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE Plenary II – Core Themes, Objectives & Achievement Indicators.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
Mission and Mission Fulfillment Tom Miller University of Alaska Anchorage.
Accreditation Briefing August NWCCU Full Scale Accreditation: Introduction Planning has begun for the 2010 Full Scale Accreditation Self Study and.
University of Alaska Anchorage Institutional Perspectives Standards Process Tom Miller, Vice Provost and ALO.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
Developing the Year One Report: WVC’s Experience as a Pilot College Dr. Susan Murray Executive Director, Institutional Effectiveness.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
Accreditation Liaison Officer WorkshopFebruary 4, 2011 Accreditation Liaison Officer Workshop Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities DoubleTree.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation WorkshopMarch 14, 2012 Year Seven Self-EvaluationWorkshop Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU) DoubleTree.
Moving on to our Second Report! Due to NWCCU by Fall 2012.
Mission and Accreditation Strategic Planning Steering Committee March 9, 2009 Dr. Richard Beck.
Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director, Standards Revision and.
PRESIDENT’S Campus forum November 9, Dr. Shirley Wagner and Dr. Paul Weizer NEASC Self Study Co-Chairs Key Elements of the Self Study Process Demystifying.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Strategic Planning System Sacramento City College Strategic Planning System ….a comprehensive system designed to form a reliable, understood system for.
SPRING 2014 CONVOCATION. AGENDA Organizational Chart Revisions and Reporting Structure Key Elements to Turn Planning Into Action Accreditation.
NWCCU Workshop on Institutional Self Study1February 1-2, 2007 Workshop on Institutional Self Study Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President Northwest Commission.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
Revisions to the nwccu accreditation standards: what does it mean for me? Diane E. Waryas.
Presentation for VELT Guests from China Tuesday, April 27, 2010 by Norma Goldstein, Ph.D., Dean of Humanities, Academic Standards, Accreditation, Articulation.
Year Seven Mission Fulfillment and Sustainability Report and Comprehensive Visit Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU)
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
Council March PREVIOUS Reductionistic Whole = Sum of the Parts A Snapshot of the institution at a specific moment in time NEW Synergistic Whole.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.
Annual Planning Task Force (APTF) Recommendations NOVEMBER 18, 2014.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Standard Two Les Steele Executive Vice President.
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Data You Can Use for Accreditation
Year One/Year Three Self Evaluation Workshop
Presenters: Lisa McLaughlin, Institutional Data Coordinator
Strategic Planning Council (SPC)Update
YEAR ONE SELF-EVALUATION REPORT
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Institutional Effectiveness Presented By Claudette H. Williams
NWCCU update February 13, 2018.
University Community Briefing
ACCREDITATION NEW STANDARDS
Vernon Martin, ASCCC Accreditation Committee, Sierra College
Presentation transcript:

NWCCU Standards for Accredition The new process

Revised NWCCU Accreditation Standards New Standards: reduced from 9 to 5 Standard One--Mission, Core Themes, and Expectations Standard Two—Resources and Capacity Standard Three—Planning and Implementation Standard Four—Effectiveness and Improvement Standard Five—Mission Fulfillment, Adaptation, and Sustainability

New Accreditation Cycle: reduced from 10-year to 7-year cycle 2011 Year One—Submit a Year One Report to address Standard One Panel evaluation 2013 Year Three—Expand Year One Report to include response to Standard Two On-site Visit 2015 Year Five—Expand Year Three Report to include responses to Standards Three and Four Panel evaluation 2017 Year Seven—Expand Year Five Report to include response to Standard Five, plus review and update the response to Standards One, Two, Three, and Four to ensure that the comprehensive Year Seven Report is current and internally consistent On-site Visit

Components of Year One Report Standard One—Mission, Core Themes, and Expectations The institution articulates its purpose in the form of a mission statement and identifies core themes that manifest essential elements of that mission. It defines mission fulfillment in the context of its purpose, characteristics, and expectations. Guided by that definition, it identifies an acceptable threshold or extent of mission fulfillment.

I.A. Mission I.A.l The institution has a widely published mission statement—approved by its governing board—that articulates a purpose appropriate for an institution of higher learning, gives direction for its efforts, and derives from, and is generally understood by, its community. I.A.2 The institution defines mission fulfillment in the context of its purpose, characteristics, and expectations. Guided by that definition, it articulates institutional accomplishments or outcomes that represent an acceptable threshold or extent of mission fulfillment.

I.B. Core Themes I.B.1 The institution identifies core themes that individually manifest essential elements of its mission and collectively encompass its mission. I.B.2 The institution establishes objectives for each of its core themes and identifies meaningful, assessable, and verifiable indicators of achievement that form the basis for evaluating accomplishment of the objectives of its core themes.

What is a Core Theme? A core theme is a manifestation of a fundamental aspect of institutional mission with overarching objectives that guide: 1)Planning for contributing programs and services; 2)Development of capacity and application of resources to accomplish those objectives; 3)Assessment of achievement of those objectives. Collectively, the core themes represent the institution’s interpretation of its mission and translation of that interpretation into practice.

Format of Year One Report Section I: Mission and Mission Fulfillment (3 pp. maximum) Mission Statement Definition of Fulfillment of Mission Interpretation of an Acceptable Threshold or Extent of Mission Fulfillment

Format of Year One Report (cont.) Section II: Core Themes (3 pp max per theme) Descriptive Title Core Theme Objectives Indicators of achievement of the Core Theme Objectives Rationale as to why Indicators are assessable and meaningful measures of achievement Section III: Chapter One Summary (1 page)

University of Alaska--Anchorage Core Themes 1.Teaching and Learning 2.Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activity 3.Student Success 4.The UAA community 5.Public Square (involvement with and contributions to the community)

Carroll College Core Themes 1.Manifest Academic Excellence 2.Embody Catholic Identity 3.Integrate Community Life 4.Exemplify Stewardship

The University of Montana How do we proceed to identify by February 2011 our Core Themes & Objectives and Indicators? Accreditation Committee (from 2010) Academic Strategic Planning Committee Faculty, Staff, and Student Senates Open Forums