Monitoring analysis preview 3 rd October, Rakhine State WASH Cluster meeting 1. Record 2. Report 3. ANALYSIS 4. dissemination

Access to water supply

Objective 2 – Sanitation,…latrines and hand wash Objective 4 – security for women Objective 5 community ownership

Objective 5 - Self-maintained functional water supplies and cleaned latrines

Objective 4 - Access for disabled, (expressed in terms of satisfaction)

Indicator 4.3a Women are represented and participate in decisions affecting WASH service delivery

Initial analysis Database highlights and identified problems  Only CCCM data, not incl. WASH data.  Water test results will improve CCCM data and database analysis  SWM methodology revised  Ownership of maintenance  Evolving design  Consistent reporting format  Gaps, trends, quality, avoiding comparisons Identifiable assumptions  Water supply is sufficient, however, distance needs to be introduced in criteria  Large gaps in access to functional latrines  SWM seems not to be a priority in some sites  ODF communities are possible  TLS has some total WASH gaps  Women, and whole communities are under represented in WASH  There is no evidence of MHM facilities  There are encouraging signs of community ownership

Priorities and further analysis Priorities  OBJECTIVE 2 - Achieve latrine minimum SPHERE  OBJECTIVE 4 - Raise standard of TLS WASH services  OBJECTIVE 5 - Promote community ownership (maintenance – tools & training)  OBJECTIVE 4 – access for disabled  OBJECTIVE 4 – access to MHM  OBJECTIVE 5 – establish user groups with equitable representation, tors, etc Further expected analysis  Trends of increases, stagnation or decreases in services  More detailed water supply quantity + quality results  “WASH Cluster input,…”

Wow,…the end! For now!