Health Neighborhoods 101 Provider Information Forum October 4, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DDRS Health Homes Initiative: Meeting the Triple Aim through Care Coordination. Shane Spotts Director, Indiana Division of Rehabilitation Services May.
Advertisements

Medicaid Division of Medicaid and Long-Term Care Department of Health and Human Services Managed Long-Term Services and Supports.
Presentation to the Medicaid Care Management Oversight Council April 8, 2011.
Medicaid Health Homes Presented by: Jayde Bumanglag, Quinne Custino & Sean Mackintosh.
Illinois Human Service Commission Rebalancing Workgroup August 2, 2012.
MEDICAID – CONTEXT FOR CHANGE Mike Cheek Vice President, Medicaid and Long Term Care Policy.
SUPPORTING THE INTEGRATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKERS IN MINNESOTA JUNE 5, 2014 The Minnesota Accountable Health Model (SIM Minnesota)
1 Medicaid Long-Term Services and Supports Eric Saber, Health Policy Analyst Long Term Care and Community Support Services Maryland Department of Health.
FLORIDA SENIOR CARE Improving Medicaid Services for Florida’s Seniors Beth Kidder Chief, Bureau of Medicaid Services Agency for Health Care Administration.
Paying for Primary Care: Robert Graham Center Primary Care Forum Washington, DC Two CMS/CMMI payment experiments Jay Crosson March 25, 2014.
Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and FinancingColorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing 1 CCT & MDS 3.0 Section Q Return to the.
Planning Phase June 30, 2010 from 2PM to 4PM One Ashburton Place, 11 th Floor Matta Conference Room Boston, Massachusetts Integrating Medicare and Medicaid.
1 Wisconsin Partnership Program Steven J. Landkamer Program Manager Wisconsin Dept. of Health & Family Services July 14, 2004.
Pioneer ACO Overview to NYSDOH ACO Workgroup March 6, 2014.
It’s All About MME Tasia Sinn September 18, 2014 Understanding Colorado’s New Medicare- Medicaid Enrollee (MME) Program.
HHS HUD Housing Capacity Building Initiative for Community Living Programs of the Administration on Aging Department of Health and Human Services.
SoonerCare and National Health Care Reform Oklahoma Health Care Authority Board Retreat August 26, 2010 Chad Shearer Senior Program Officer Center for.
Deploying Care Coordination and Care Transitions - Illinois
Health Homes for People with Chronic Conditions: A Discussion with Dr. Moser 10/24/2013Dr. Robert Moser Webinar.
On the Horizon for Affordable Housing: What the Research Says Alisha Sanders LeadingAge Center for Housing Plus Services LeadingAge Maryland Annual Conference.
Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting March 28, 2013 Money Follows the Person.
Patient Centered Medical Homes Marcia Hamilton SW722 Fall, 2014.
Presented by: Kathleen Reynolds, LMSW, ACSW
Overview Community Care of North Carolina. Our Vision and Key Principles  Develop a better healthcare system for NC starting with public payers  Strong.
Affordable Care Act Aging Network Opportunities Judy Baker Regional Director Health and Human Services October 18, 2010.
MaineCare Value-Based Purchasing Strategy Quality Counts Brown Bag Forum November 22, 2011.
Delaware Health and Social Services NAMI Delaware Conference: January 24, 2013 Rita Landgraf, Secretary, Department of Health and Social Services ACA and.
Primary Care and Behavioral Health 2/4/2011 CIBHA.
UPDATE NOVEMBER 10, 2011 Money Follows the Person Rebalancing Demonstration.
Medicaid and Behavioral Health – New Directions John O’Brien Senior Policy Advisor Disabled and Elderly Health Programs Group Center for Medicaid and CHIP.
Balancing Incentive Program and Community First Choice Eric Saber Health Policy Analyst Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
An Integrated Healthcare System’s Approach to ACOs Chuck Baumgart, M.D., Chief Medical Officer Presbyterian Health Plan David Arredondo, M.D., Executive.
The Challenges of the Medicaid Modernization Mandate – Part 1 Joel L. Olah, Ph.D., LNHA Executive Director Aging Resources of Central Iowa Iowa Assisted.
Improving Care for Medicare-Medicaid Enrollees Medicare-Medicaid Coordination Office Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services August 19, 2015.
1 South Carolina Medicaid Coordinated Care and Enrollment Counselors Programs.
© Copyright, The Joint Commission Integration: Behavioral and Primary Physical Health Care FAADA/FCMHC August, 2013 Diana Murray, RN, MSN Regional Account.
HEALTH HOMES ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES LONG-TERM CARE POLICY SUMMIT SEPTEMBER 5, 2012.
MassHealth Managed Care for Older Members and Members with Disabilities Lori Cavanaugh Director of Purchasing Strategy NASHP Annual Conference October.
Health Care Reform Primary Care and Behavioral Health Integration John O’Brien Senior Advisor on Health Financing SAMHSA.
Kathleen Reynolds, LMSW, ACSW Vice President for Health Integration and Wellness Health Care Reform: Opportunities and Challenges for Behavioral Health.
Medi-Cal 1115 Demonstration Waiver 14 th Annual ITUP Conference February 10, 2010.
Richard H. Dougherty, Ph.D. DMA Health Strategies Recovery Homes: Recovery and Health Homes under Health Care Reform 4/27/11.
Healthier Washington Through a Medicaid Lens
1 Health Care Reform: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) Impact on Medicaid John G. Folkemer Deputy Secretary Health Care Financing.
Iowa’s Section 2703 Health Home Development October 04, 2011 Presentation to: 24 th Annual State Health Policy Conference Show Me…New Directions in State.
Child/Youth Care Management 2015 training. WELCOME!
Rhode Island Health Home Initiative NASHP 24 th Annual State Health Policy Conference, October 4, 2011 Deborah J. Florio, Administrator Medicaid Division.
Section 1115 Waiver Implementation Plan Stakeholder Advisory Committee May 13, 2010.
“Reaching across Arizona to provide comprehensive quality health care for those in need” Our first care is your health care Arizona Health Care Cost Containment.
Consumer-focused Meeting September 27, 2011 Integrating Medicare and Medicaid for Individuals with Dual Eligibility.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 8 Healthcare Delivery Systems.
Money Follows the Person Demonstration Grant & Waivers May 18, 2012.
Medical Assistance Program Oversight Council September 13, 2013.
Community Paramedic Payment Reform December 2 nd,2015 Terrace Mall- North Memorial.
Mark Leeds Director of Long Term Care and Community Support Services April 26, 2012 Maryland Medicaid Advisory Committee: Balancing Incentive Program.
Transition to Reform in Wisconsin Donna McDowell, Director Bureau of Aging & Disability Resources Department of Health Services D. McDowell1.
Virginia Health Innovation Plan 2015: State Innovation Model (SIM) Design December 3, 2015 Beth A. Bortz | President & CEO.
A NEW REIMBURSEMENT STRUCTURE FOR AMERICA ADVANCED DISEASE CONCEPTS.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act The Greens: Elijah, Amber, Kayla, Patrick.
UPCOMING STATE INITIATIVES WHAT IS ON THE HORIZON? MERCED COUNTY HEALTH CARE CONSORTIUM Thursday, October 23, 2014 Pacific Health Consulting Group.
Behavioral Health Transition to Managed Care Update APRIL 2015 Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics (CCBHC) Planning Grant and Demonstration.
National Health Reform State Level Issues for NAMI Consideration Presented by Technical Assistance Collaborative, Inc. July 8, 2011.
Supporting Families Community of Practice Meeting December 14,
1 State of Vermont Demonstration to Integrate Care for Dual Eligible Individuals Financing Model Workgroup Meeting #1: July 26, 2011.
State of Vermont Demonstration to Integrate Care for Dual Eligible Individuals Service Delivery Workgroup Meeting #2: August 10, 2010.
Medicare/Medicaid Eligibles Integrated Care Initiative June 28, 2012
Trends & Transitions: Future for Long Term Care
Payment Reform to Transform Advanced Illness Care
Student loan support to strengthen the health care workforce:
West Virginia Bureau for Medical Services (BMS)
Presentation transcript:

Health Neighborhoods 101 Provider Information Forum October 4, 2013

Goals of the Provider Information Forum To help health care providers understand:  the Demonstration to Integrate Care for Medicare- Medicaid Enrollees (MMEs) (the Demonstration); and  opportunities to participate in new care delivery networks called “Health Neighborhoods” (HNs) 2

Background As part of the Affordable Care Act, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) issued a procurement opportunity for states to develop innovative healthcare models and provider reimbursement strategies for those individuals who are eligible for Medicare and Medicaid (MMEs) Connecticut was one of 15 states to be awarded the demonstration planning grant from CMS which includes an opportunity to implement the model developed during the year long planning grant process Connecticut is now preparing to implement the Demonstration Model 3

Background Continued In partnership with the Departments of Mental Health and Addiction Services (DMHAS) and Developmental Services (DDS), the Department of Social Services (DSS) intends to implement a Demonstration to Integrate Care for Medicare-Medicaid Enrollees (MMEs) for MMEs age 18-64, and age 65 and older Establish a person-centered multi-disciplinary provider network that will coordinate services across Medicare and Medicaid in order  Improve the care experience for the beneficiaries  Improve the quality of care and outcomes  Decrease the total cost of care for beneficiaries 4

Profile of Population to be Served 5

Population Profile Connecticut MMEs have complex, co-occurring health conditions  roughly 88% of individuals age 65 and older has at least one chronic disease, and 42% has three or more chronic diseases  58% of younger individuals with disabilities has at least one chronic disease  38% has a serious mental illness (SMI) 6

Population Profile (cont.) Connecticut MMEs use a disproportionate amount of Medicaid resources and Connecticut is spending much more than the national average on MMEs  the 57,568 MMEs eligible for the Demonstration represent less than 10% of Connecticut Medicaid beneficiaries yet they account for 38% of all Medicaid expenditures 7

Population Profile (cont.)  per capita Connecticut Medicaid spending for the 32,583 MMEs age 65 and over and the 24,986 MMEs with disabilities under age 65 is 55% higher than the national average 8

Population Profile (cont.) comparatively high spending alone on MMEs has not resulted in better health outcomes, better access or improved care experience  illustratively, in SFY’10 almost 29% of MMEs were re- hospitalized within 30 days following a discharge, and almost 10% were re-hospitalized within 7 days following a discharge 9

Population Profile (cont.)  MMEs have reported in Demonstration-related focus groups that they have trouble finding doctors and specialists that will accept Medicare and Medicaid, and often do not feel that the doctor takes a holistic approach to their needs 10

The Demonstration Model 11

Demonstration Model  The goal of the Demonstration is to improve MMEs’ health and care experience outcomes by integrating Medicare and Medicaid long-term care, medical and behavioral services and supports, promoting provider practice transformation, and creating pathways for information sharing  Key strategies for achieving these results include multi-disciplinary care coordination and use of a provider portal to support care planning and to share data on beneficiaries 12

Demonstration Model (cont.)  The Demonstration will be implemented by the Department of Social Services (DSS), in collaboration with the Departments of Mental Health and Addiction Services (DMHAS) and Developmental Services (DDS)  It will serve all MMEs who are age 18-64, or age 65 and older, who are not being served by: a Medicare Advantage (MA) Plan; a Medicare Accountable Care Organization (ACO); or a “health home” 13

Demonstration Model (cont.) The Demonstration will build on Connecticut Medicaid reforms including:  Person-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) initiative  ASO-based Intensive Care Management (ICM)  “re-balancing” efforts that are enabling more people to receive home and community-based long-term services and supports 14

Demonstration Model (cont.)  The Demonstration will use two models: Model 1 will build on the existing strengths of the Connecticut Medicaid medical Administrative Services Organization Model 2 will create local, multi-disciplinary networks called “Health Neighborhoods” (HNs) 15

Demonstration Model (cont.) The Demonstration is motivated by the concept of person- centeredness. The model seeks to empower members by: providing the Medicare/Medicaid Eligible individual (MME) with needed information, education and support required to make fully informed decisions about his or her care options and, to actively participate in his or her self-care and care planning; 16

Demonstration Model (cont.) supporting the MME, and any representative(s) whom he or she has chosen, in working together with his or her non-medical, medical and behavioral health providers and care manager(s) to obtain necessary supports and services; and reflecting care coordination under the direction of and in partnership with the MME and his/her representative(s); that is consistent with his or her personal preferences, choices and strengths; and that is implemented in the most integrated setting. 17

Demonstration Model (cont.)  This Demonstration will improve on past efforts in several important ways: providers will receive care coordination payments providers will be eligible for performance payments providers will have access to a provider portal that will support cross-disciplinary care coordination and will provide integrated Medicare and Medicaid data on beneficiaries 18

Demonstration Model (cont.)  The Demonstration is a “shared savings” initiative  The federal government will share a percentage of any Medicare savings that are achieved under the Demonstration, net of an increase in Medicaid spending, with Connecticut  A portion of these shared savings payments will be paid to participating HN providers who meet identified standards on Demonstration quality measures 19

Context CMS health reform initiatives 20 ModelPerformance Incentives Accountable Care Organization (ACO)  Medicare savings are shared with MDs and key partners  CMS defines value through performance measures  Mandatory enrollment (attribution) Health Homes  Not a shared savings model  CMS defines value through performance measures  Mandatory enrollment (attribution) based on SPMI diagnosis and service through an LMHA or affiliate Connecticut’s proposed model for Integrated Care Demonstration Health Neighborhoods Net Medicare/Medicaid savings will be shared with MDs and broad array of providers CT stakeholders define value Passive enrollment with opt-out

Key Features of Integrated Care Demonstration 21

Structure Connecticut’s Demonstration will feature three key elements:  Enhancement of the current Administrative Services Organization (ASO) model  Expansion of the Person-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) pilot to serve MMEs  Procurement of 3-5 “Health Neighborhoods” (HNs) 22

Structure – Enhanced ASO Model Under the Demonstration, CHN-CT will provide extensive technical and other support to HNs, including: use of integrated Medicaid and Medicare data to support enrollment in HNs and to risk stratify MMEs for purposes of HN care coordination member services (e.g. referrals to Medicaid- participating providers, coverage questions) utilization management for Medicaid services 23

Structure – Enhanced ASO Model (cont.) CHN-CT will also support the care coordination needs of MMEs who do not participate in the HN model by tailoring its current Intensive Care Management (ICM) service to meet the needs of MMEs 24

Structure – Expansion of PCMH Pilot Under the Demonstration, the Department will:  extend the PCMH enhanced reimbursement and performance payments to primary care practices that serve MMEs  convert the current enhanced fee-for-service add-on payments to a per member per month (PMPM) payment to the primary care practices that serve MMEs: the APM I payment 25

Structure – Procurement of HNs Under the Demonstration, the Department plans to procure 3-5 HNs:  HNs will be made up of a broad array of providers, including primary care and physician specialty practices, behavioral health providers, LTSS providers, hospitals, nursing facilities, home health providers, and pharmacists 26

Structure – Minimum Participation  HNs will be expected to serve a minimum of 5,000 eligible MMEs  The Department will provide “cluster analysis” information based on integrated Medicare and Medicaid data to inform formation of HNs  The cluster analysis will show where there are groups of MMEs served by common sets of providers 27

Structure – Enrollment  As noted previously, the Demonstration will not serve MMEs who are participating in: a Medicare Advantage (MA) plan; a Medicare Shared Savings Program Accountable Care Organization (ACO); or a health home for individuals with Serious and Persistent Mental Illness (SPMI) who are receiving their services from a Local Mental Health Authority (LMHA) or affiliate, unless that MME opts out of the health home and into a HN 28

Structure – Enrollment (cont.)  For all other MMEs, the Demonstration will use a passive enrollment method to engage participation in HNs  MMEs who have received their primary care or behavioral health care from an HN participating provider within the twelve months preceding implementation of the Demonstration will be passively enrolled with that HN  An MME who is passively enrolled will have the choice to opt out of participation 29

Structure – HN Leadership  Each HN must identify an “ Administrative Lead Agency” that will be responsible for: establishing an integrated service network within its geographic area, linked by care coordination contracts ensuring compliance with contract requirements informed by the Department distributing shared savings dollars to HN providers using a pre-determined distribution methodology 30

Structure – HN Leadership (cont.)  Each HN must also identify a Behavioral Health Partner Agency (BHPA) with expertise in serving MMEs with behavioral health conditions 31

Structure – HN Leadership (cont.) the ALA and the BHPA will be jointly responsible for:  ensuring adherence to Demonstration care coordination standards and procedures  developing a quality improvement program for care coordination  collecting and reporting Demonstration data 32

Structure – HN Leadership (cont.)  providing or contracting for and monitoring Demonstration supplemental services  creating forums for core curriculum learning collaborative activities for providers  developing client education and outreach materials and strategies 33

Structure – HN Leadership (cont.)  To serve as an ALA, an entity must: be a Connecticut-based provider of ambulatory healthcare services, with a preference for non- institutional entities have extensive knowledge or expertise in care/case management for Medicare and Medicaid Eligible (MME) individuals 34

Structure – HN Leadership (cont.) have experience providing ambulatory/non- institutional services that reduce the likelihood of institutional care have demonstrated experience of data analysis and reporting capability 35

Structure – HN Composition  HN must include: primary care providers; identified specialists extender staff behavioral health professionals Access Agency(ies) for the Connecticut Home Care Program for Elders and LMHA or LMHA affiliates that serves the health neighborhood’s coverage area occupational, physical and speech/language therapists 36

Structure – HN Composition (cont.)  HN must include (cont.): dentists pharmacists community-based long-term services and supports including home health agencies, homemaker- companion agencies, and adult day care centers hospitals that serve the health neighborhood’s coverage area nursing facilities hospice providers 37

Structure – HN Composition (cont.)  HN may also include: Durable Medical Equipment (DME) providers Emergency Response System (ERS) providers hearing aid providers ophthalmologists 38

Structure – HN Composition (cont.)  HNs must also include the following information & assistance affiliates:  Infoline  the CHOICES program that serves the health neighborhood’s coverage area  the Aging & Disability Resource Center that serves the health neighborhood’s coverage area 39

Structure – HN Composition (cont.)  HN membership may also include social services affiliates, non-exclusive examples of which include: housing organizations home renovation/accessibility contractors bill payment/budgeting services employment services local organizations serving minority, non-English speaking, and underserved populations 40

Structure- HN Composition (cont.) Providers who are part of an Accountable Care Organization or participating in the Medicare Advantage Plan may participate in the Demonstration MMEs cannot participate in more than one model 41

Structure – Care Coordination Model  The most important role of an HN will be to coordinate care for all of its MME members.  For purposes of the Demonstration, Care Coordination is defined as a person-centered, assessment-based interdisciplinary approach to integrating health care and social support services in which an individual’s needs and preferences are assessed, a comprehensive care plan is developed, and services are managed and monitored by an identified care coordinator following evidence-based standards of care 42

Structure – Care Coordination Model (cont.) Under the Demonstration, Lead Care Managers (LCMs), employed by Lead Care Management Agencies (LCMAs), will be responsible for acting as single points of contact for MMEs who participate in HNs. An LCM must be an APRN, RN, LCSW, LMFT or LPC and must complete Demonstration training. 43

Structure – Care Coordination Model (cont.) LCMs will be responsible for assessing, coordinating and monitoring an MME’s Demonstration Plan of Care (POC) for medical, behavioral health, long-term services and supports (LTSS), and social services. The Department will make risk-adjusted PMPM care coordination payments directly to LCMAs (the APM II payment). 44

Structure - Payments  Under the Demonstration, the Department will make the following types of payments: Start-up payments to support formation of HNs  DSS proposal to CMS includes $250,000 for each HN APM I: PMPM payment to PCMH practices (replaces current add-on payment) APM II: risk-adjusted PMPM payments to Lead Care Management Agencies for care coordination 45

Structure - Payments Supplemental service payments: payments to ALAs to contract for supplemental services including nutrition counseling, falls prevention, medication therapy management, peer support and recovery assistant 46

Structure – Payments Performance payments:  Year 1:  a portion of actuarially determined savings in aggregate amongst all participating HNs will fund a Performance Payment Pool  payments from the pool will be based solely on HN performance on quality measures 47

Structure - Payments  Years 2 & 3:  a portion of actuarially determined savings in aggregate amongst all participating HNs will fund a Quality Bonus Pool and a Value Incentive Pool  the Quality Bonus Pool will be distributed based on HN-specific performance against benchmarks (performance incentive payment) and improvement (performance improvement payment) over time  the Value Incentive Pool will be distributed to each HN proportionate to its achieved cost savings 48

Next Steps Continue technical assistance calls with CMS  Accountable Care Organizations  Medicare Advantage Plan Finalize MOU with CMS Issue Cluster Analysis to stakeholders/providers Submit state plan/waiver documents to CMS Convene Health Neighborhood formation training Issue Health Neighborhood RFP 49

Questions or comments? 50