District-Level Data from 2005-06 Tom Watkins Director of Research, Evaluation and Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bethware Elementary School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Advertisements

North Shelby School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Turning Point Grades Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Burns Middle School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
North Elementary School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Fallston Elementary School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Casar Elementary School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Union Elementary School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Kings Mountain Middle School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular.
* Princeton Public Schools State School Performance Report Interpretive Guide *Based upon data.
Rules and Legislation Regarding A-F Report Cards June 2013 Jennifer Stegman, Program Manager CTB.
Achievement of Hmong Students in Saint Paul Public Schools Hmong Youth Educational Services Banquet – June 2006 Tom Watkins Director of Research, Evaluation.
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
Using MAP for College and Career Readiness
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
Latino Students in the Worcester Public Schools March 30, 2010 Miren Uriarte Mauricio Gaston Institute for Latino Community Development and Public Policy.
1 Utah Performance Assessment System for Students U-PASS Accountability Plan Judy W. Park Assessment & Accountability Director Utah State Office of Education.
MINNEAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS. Instructional Core Adapted from Harvard University PELP Framework.
School Performance Measure Calculations SY Office of Achievement and Accountability.
K-12 Student Performance and Efficiency Commission July 18, 2014 School Year Data.
November 7, 2014 WILLMAR PUBLIC SCHOOLS WORLD’S BEST WORKFORCE SUMMARY.
OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT “CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES - MORE THAN PSSA AND AYP”
New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) Summary of October 2011 Results Developed for the Providence School Board February 27, 2012 Presented by:
School Performance Index School Performance Index (SPI): A Comprehensive Measurement System for All Schools Student Achievement (e.g. PSSA) Student Progress.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
How Does Secondary Education in Louisiana Stack up? Presented by Dr. Bobby Franklin January 31, 2005.
2012 Traditional SPF Background & Measures September 17, 2012.
2013 Accountability System Design Assessment & Accountability, Plano ISD.
EMBARGOED UNTIL WEDNESDAY September 14, :00 AM NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE UNTIL EMBARGO HAS EXPIRED.
September 2015 Amanda Grinager, Director of Teaching and Learning.
2015 Texas Accountability System Overview and Updates August 13, 2015.
Instruction, Teacher Evaluation and Value-Added Student Learning Minneapolis Public Schools November,
August Accountability Gateway Training. August Who we are Greg Marcus  MDE  (651) John Lindner  Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan 
College and Career Preparation 1 College and Career Preparation Lodi Unified School District September 2, 2008 Prepared by the Assessment,
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Student Achievement Gains and Gaps in Saint Paul Public Schools Tom Watkins Director of Research, Evaluation and Assessment Saint Paul Public Schools May.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015.
RI High School Diploma Requirements. Coursework Performance- Based Assessments State Assessment Performance assessments are real- life experiences that.
Asian-American Student Data Discussion and MCA-II Preparation Hmong Parents Advisory Council Meeting - April 7, 2008 Tom Watkins Director of Research,
Academic Excellence Indicator System Report For San Antonio ISD Public Meeting January 23, 2006 Board Report January 23, 2006 Department of Accountability,
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
Iowa School Report Card (Attendance Center Rankings) December 3, 2015.
Introduction to the New Washington State Achievement Index Jack B. Monpas-Huber, Ph.D. Director of Assessment & Student Information Board of Directors.
Salem High School AP, SAT, ACT, Graduation & Dropout Rate Data.
1 Mitchell D. Chester Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education Report on Spring 2009 MCAS Results to the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and.
MCC MCA Data Discoveries. What does Minnesota think is important? What do we want kids to do?  Pass important tests “Be Proficient”  Grow.
Input High School Name Houston Independent School District School Profile 2014 – 2015 CEEB Code: School Address Houston, Texas ##### Tel ###-###-####
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
C R E S S T / CU University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Measuring Turnaround Success October 29 th, 2015 Jeanette P. Cornier, Ph.D.
MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.
Minnesota’s Graduation Exams: An Ongoing Journey... High School Graduation Exit Exams and Other Requirements: Impact On Students and Instruction Kate Beattie.
American Education Research Association April 2004 Pete Bylsma, Director Research/Evaluation/Accountability Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Kentucky Board of Education OCTOBER 9, 2012 College/Career Readiness, Proficiency and Achievement Gap Update.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
EMBARGOED UNTIL WEDNESDAY September 14, :00 AM NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE UNTIL EMBARGO HAS EXPIRED.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Spring 2016 MCAS Data Overview
2012 Accountability Determinations
Marshall Public SchoolS MCA Results
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Milton Public Schools 2013 Accountability Status
Richland School District One ACT/SAT/AP/IB Report
School Performance Measure Calculations SY
Impact of EL Students and TELPAS Performance on State Accountability
Presentation transcript:

District-Level Data from Tom Watkins Director of Research, Evaluation and Assessment

Strategic Plan Outcomes 1A: MCA-II Achievement Gaps 1B: MCA-II Apples to Apples 2: MCA-II Proficiency 3: Dropout Rate 4: Higher Education Enrollment 5: Satisfaction with SPPS Experience 6: Strategic Partnerships to Support Students 7: Efficiency and Effectiveness of Systems 8: Staff Composition

Where SPPS Stands on the Draft Strategic Plan Outcomes Binder – Section 4 – District-Wide Data Overview of Demographics Outcome 1A (proxy): SAT10 Results for 2006 Outcome 1B (proxy): Summary of MCA Apples to Apples for 2005 Outcome 2: MCA-II Index Targets for 2006 Outcome 3: Dropout Rate Outcome 4: Higher Education Enrollment Updates Let’s Celebrate!

Overview of Demographics Changes among the three largest demographic groups in SPPS over the past 7 years:  Stability in total number of Asian-American students, who are primarily limited English Proficient (LEP) and receive Free or Reduced Price Lunch (FRL). However, there is an increased proportion of Asian-American students who are immigrant.  Significant decline in Caucasian students who are primarily non-LEP and do not receive FRL  Significant increase in African-American students who are non-LEP and receive FRL.

Outcome 1A (proxy): SAT10 Results for 2006 Administered each spring since 2003 In 2006, this was given after the MCA-II and the TEAE (Many ELL students took all three tests) In 2006, most of the new immigrants were included for the first time

Handout in Binder, Tab 4

National Average = 77%

Outcome 1B (proxy): SAT10 Results for 2006

Handout in Binder, Tab 4

Outcome 1B (proxy): Summary of MCA Apples to Apples for 2005 Compares students in SPPS with their Minnesota peers Matching students on:  Ethnicity  Free/Reduced Lunch Eligibility  ELL Status  Special Education students excluded Groups with 100 or more students tested per grade

Outcome 2: MCA-II Index Targets for 2006 Scaled Score Cut-Offs for Half and Full Point Reading Index Targets Math Index Targets Special Ed Alternate Assessment Targets

Grade and Subject½ Index Point 1 Index Point Grade 3 Math Grade 3 Reading Grade 5 Math Grade 5 Reading Grade 7 Math Grade 7 Reading Grade 10 Reading Grade 11 Math MCA-II Scaled Score Cut-Offs for Full and Half Index Point for AYP Handout in Binder, Tab 4

MCA-II MATH Index Targets Grd These are preliminary and may change slightly after all AYP data are corrected Handout in Binder, Tab 4

Grd MCA-II READING Index Targets These are preliminary and may change slightly after all AYP data are corrected Handout in Binder, Tab 4

GradeSubject Partial (.5 index pt) Proficient (1 index pt) 3 Reading 1.2 – 1.39  1.4 Math 1.9 – 2.19  2.2 Functional Skills 1.4 – 1.69  Reading 1.8 – 1.99  2.0 Math 2.3 – 2.59  2.6 Functional Skills 1.6 – 1.89  Reading 2.4 – 2.69  2.7 Math 2.5 – 2.79  2.8 Functional Skills 1.9 – 2.09  Reading 2.5 – 2.99  3.0 Functional Skills 2.2 – 2.49  Math 2.7 – 3.19  3.2 Functional Skills 2.3 – 2.59  2.6 Index Points Based on Alternate Standards Handout in Binder, Tab 4

Improvement on the Four-Year Dropout Rate Targets for Annual Dropout Rates by Grade Outcome 3: Dropout Rate

Outcome 4: Higher Education Enrollment Data from National Clearinghouse of College Enrollment Data Three years of data collected

Handout in Binder, Tab 4

Update on Data Outline of Information Available on Data Center – in Binder Most of the Administrator’s Academy data is either on the Data Center now or will be by the end of the week AIP Rosters coming as counselors arrive in buildings ViewPoint - handout

Update on the Basic Skills Test This year’s ninth graders and the classes following them will need to pass the GRAD test instead of the BST 2005 BST scoring error  12 items on the test were previously released  28 items will be used to estimate full 40 item test  September re-test opportunity

Let’s Celebrate Some of Our Successes!

“Schools That Work” (Pioneer Press – May 2006) “Beating the Odds” study using MCA scores, accounting for impact of low- income, ELL and other factors. Schools in SPPS Recognized:  Dayton's Bluff  Farnsworth Aerospace Magnet  Roosevelt  Museum Magnet  John A. Johnson

“Top 1,200 High Schools” (Newsweek – May 2006) Number of Advanced Placement and/or International Baccalaureate tests taken by all students at a school in 2005 divided by the number of graduating seniors. All of the schools on the list are in the top 5 percent of public schools measured this way. Schools Recognized:  Como Park Senior High School (#294 in Nation, #3 in Minnesota)  Highland Park Senior High (#726 in Nation, #8 in Minnesota)

Standard and Poor’s Top Minnesota Schools Narrowing Achievement Gaps on the MCA from to Schools Recognized:  Capitol Hill  Expo Elementary  Hazel Park Middle  Highland Park Junior  Ramsey Junior