Asphalt Specification Changes July 2005 Contractor Asphalt Training Rich Hewitt, PE District Bituminous Engineer District Five Materials & Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Paving Potpourri 2015 Spec Changes and More! Bob Dyer Assistant State Construction Engineer WAPA Joint Training March 2015 Lynn Peterson Secretary of Transportation.
Advertisements

2014 Washington Asphalt Conference “Specification Update & Initiatives” Joe DeVol Assistant State Materials Engineer State Materials Laboratory.
Section Cross Slope District 1 Your logo here.
2015 State Aid Conference Ramsey County Office Arden Hills, Mn February 19, 2015.
HMA Design (Surface) The surface course is the layer in contact with traffic loads and normally contains the highest quality materials. It provides characteristics.
BASICS OF A GOOD ROAD ASPHALT AND AGGREGATES
Extending the Life of Asphalt Mixes David Lee, P.E. - ARAC Chair, Salem District Materials Kevin McGhee, P.E. – ARAC Secretary, VCTIR.
2014 AAPA Conference March 11-12, 2014 Curtis Vincent, P.E. Construction Engineer Lyndi Davis Blackburn, P.E. Assistant Materials and Tests Engineer Specification.
Steve Jackson, PE Technical Manager NB West Contracting As seen on shinglerecycling.org 6 th Asphalt Shingle Recycling Forum Denver, CO With Solutions.
Caltrans Changes SECTION 39 “Hot Mix Asphalt”
SMA Mixture Design Requirements
1 Final Estimates and Asphalt Reports. 2 Setting Spread Rate For Asphalt Base.
QUALITY CONTROL More Makes Money Less Leads Losses
Tolerances and Price Impacts Presented by:- Er. Bhagawan Shrestha.
PRESENTATION TO 34 TH ANNUAL AIRPORTS CONFERENCE 3/02/11 By: Casimir J. Bognacki, PE, FACI Chief of Materials Engineering.
PPTG Thin Overlays Task Group (TOADS) Team Overlay Asphalt Debaters Presented by Basem Muallem (CT) - Tony Limas (Industry) April 19, 2005.
Aggregate Properties HMA
Pavement Performance Specifications Research.
Bituminous Street Recertification Initiatives. Initiative Items n Stone Matrix Asphalt (SMA) n Longitudinal Joint Spec and other methods for longitudinal.
Guillermo Felix P.E Eastern Region Paving Engineer
MICHIGAN RIDES ON US 2015 Local Roads Workshop Gaylord March 12, 2015.
1 Quality Control Program. 2 Objectives To know: To know: –How the QC Program is Doing –Effect of Specification Changes on the QC Program –Contractor.
Asphalt Rubber Related Specifications Arizona Department of Transportation.
2015 APAM Conference Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Update Kevin Kennedy HMA Operations Engineer Michigan Department of Transportation
SUPERPAVE MIX DESIGN Superpave Mix Design.
1 Asphalt Quality Assurance Program & Construction Inspection 2015 Asphalt Regional Seminars Rob Crandol, P.E. VDOT – Materials Division Assistant State.
 Embankment Construction – LOTs  What is the maximum length of a LOT? Mainline pavement lanes, turn lanes, ramps, parking lots, concrete box.
Proportioning of Concrete Mixtures
1 Overview CQC Asphalt Specifications.  Payment based on Contractor’s Quality Control tests.  FDOT runs verification tests at a lesser frequency. 
Asphalt Quality Assurance Program
SB Certification for Mixture-Based Specification for Flexible Base Summary of Spec Test Procedures Actions to Take for Non-Compliance October 31, 2012.
Quality Control Testing
2002 FDOT/FTBA Construction Conference
2013 Year In Review APAI Winter Conference January 9, 2014 Matt Beeson, P.E. Asphalt Engineer.
Item 346 Item 346 is a QCQA specification for Stone-Matrix Asphalt (SMA) and Asphalt Rubber Stone-Matrix (SMAR) mixtures.
Florida Department of Transportation 1 Overview of CQC Asphalt Specifications.
Asphalt QC 2000 The Adventure Begins….. Topics Terminology Specifications Sampling and Testing Reporting/CQR Who Does What? Lube & Oil Change All in 20.
Porous Asphalt The Specs Tim Horton, Skillings Connolly Jessica Knickerbocker, City of Tacoma Mark A. Palmer, P.E., LEED AP, City Engineer, City of Puyallup.
Overview of the New Hot Mix Specifications Dale A. Rand, P.E. TxDOT Construction Division Flexible Pavements Branch TRB AFK10 Committee Meeting April 20-21,
Developing a Mixture-Based Specification for Flexible Base.
Pavement Performance Specifications Research.
Allen Hughes State Materials Office
 Have an approved mix design before paving.  The department has eliminated the use of PG -22 Asphaltic Material and replaced it with PG -28.  Tack.
Asphalt Roadway Daily Report of Quality Control (Form No ) A step by step guide.
Guidelines for Use of Highway Specifications for Airport Pavements
1 Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in Arizona - Application and Verification October 3, 2008 Arizona Association of County Engineers.
Session #3 Asphalt 103- Materials: Basics of RAP, Usage and Specifications.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program. Superpave Mixture and Aggregate Expert Task Group Las Vegas, Nevada 16 – 18 September 2003.
REVISED May 2009STATE MATERIALS OFFICE Goals in this Session To understand:  The Sampling & Testing process  The Project Certification process  The.
3 - 1 Holding The Contractor to 105% of the Target Spread Rate!
Asphalt Concrete Mix Design
ERLPM Workshop Statistical Analysis
Trenton M. Clark, P.E. Director of Engineering Virginia Asphalt Association.
LLP HMA Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement ( RAP) Pre-Bid Meeting District 4 Oakland, CA September 14, 2012 Peter Vacura Chief, Office of Asphalt Pavement Division.
Nilesh Surti, PE NCDOT State Pavement Construction Engineer.
Extending the Life of Asphalt Mixes David Lee, P.E. - ARAC Chair, Salem District Materials Kevin McGhee, P.E. – ARAC Secretary, VCTIR.
Project Materials Usage and Concerns. Project Materials and Acceptance QC/QA Specifications QC/QA Specifications Quality Control Plans Quality Control.
Submitted By- Amandeep Singh Roll No
Marshall & Superpave Mix Design
Quantity Calculations Module 3. Quantity Calculations  Specifications  Post Bid Quantity Calculations  Production Quantity Calculations –Checking Yield.
VDOT’S PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE TECHNIQUES & EXPECTATIONS
Alabama Asphalt Pavement Association
CONCRETE MIX DESIGN.
Research Implementation WHRP Flexible Group
ALDOT Specification Updates
Quality Assurance: Pay Factors and Dispute Resolution
2018 Revisions to NYCDOB Code
Materials and Tests Engineer
Presentation 2 Phase A – Deformation Studies
Superpave5 Superpave Design at Five Percent Air Voids
Presentation transcript:

Asphalt Specification Changes July 2005 Contractor Asphalt Training Rich Hewitt, PE District Bituminous Engineer District Five Materials & Research

Asphalt Specification Changes July 2005 What are we going to talk about? What are we going to talk about? Background & General Information Background & General Information Specifics on 334 Changes…a bunch! Specifics on 334 Changes…a bunch! Specifics on 337 Changes…a few! Specifics on 337 Changes…a few! Specifics on 234 Changes…one slide! Specifics on 234 Changes…one slide! Questions & Discussion Questions & Discussion

Asphalt Specification Changes July 2005 CQC Asphalt Specification Task Team CQC Asphalt Specification Task Team Industry, FHWA, FDOT Industry, FHWA, FDOT Fall 2004 Fall 2004 Statistical evaluation of data Statistical evaluation of data Review significant changes to… Review significant changes to… 334 Superpave Asphalt Concrete 334 Superpave Asphalt Concrete 337 Asphalt Concrete Friction Courses 337 Asphalt Concrete Friction Courses 234 Superpave Asphalt Base 234 Superpave Asphalt Base

Asphalt Specification Changes Section 334 General reorganization: General reorganization: Description Description Materials Materials General Composition of Mixture General Composition of Mixture Contractor Process Control Contractor Process Control Acceptance of the Mixture Acceptance of the Mixture Comparison Testing Comparison Testing Method of Measurement Method of Measurement Basis of Payment Basis of Payment

Asphalt Specification Changes Section Acceptance of the Mixture Acceptance of the Mixture General General Lot Sizes Lot Sizes Initial Production Requirements Initial Production Requirements Quality Control Sampling and Testing Quality Control Sampling and Testing Verification Testing Verification Testing Resolution System Resolution System Independent Sample Verification Testing Independent Sample Verification Testing Surface Tolerance Surface Tolerance Minimum Acceptable Quality Levels Minimum Acceptable Quality Levels

Asphalt Specification Changes Section Thickness Thickness Specify thickness instead of spread rate Specify thickness instead of spread rate Old: 200 lbs/yd 2 Old: 200 lbs/yd 2 New: 2 inches New: 2 inches Control based on spread rate Control based on spread rate Convert thickness to spread rate: Convert thickness to spread rate: Spread rate (lbs/yd 2 ) = t x G mm x 43.3 Spread rate (lbs/yd 2 ) = t x G mm x 43.3 Plan quantities based on G mm of Plan quantities based on G mm of Approximately 110 lbs/yd 2 – granite mix Approximately 110 lbs/yd 2 – granite mix

Asphalt Specification Changes Section Thickness Thickness Fine Mixes (Nearest ½ inch) Fine Mixes (Nearest ½ inch) Type SP-9.51 – 1½ inches Type SP-9.51 – 1½ inches Type SP-12.51½ - 2½ inches Type SP-12.51½ - 2½ inches Type SP inches Type SP inches Permits two layers of SP-9.5 (fine) Permits two layers of SP-9.5 (fine) Stacking Stacking Can’t use SP-9.5 (fine) on Traffic Level D & E Can’t use SP-9.5 (fine) on Traffic Level D & E

Asphalt Specification Changes Section Thickness Thickness Coarse Mixes (Nearest ½ inch) Coarse Mixes (Nearest ½ inch) Type SP-9.51½ - 2 inches Type SP-9.51½ - 2 inches Type SP inches Type SP inches Type SP ½ inches Type SP ½ inches

Asphalt Specification Changes Section Superpave Asphalt Binder: Superpave Asphalt Binder: PG – Standard Binder Grade PG – Standard Binder Grade Traffic Level D – PG top structural layer Traffic Level D – PG top structural layer PG is polymer modified PG is polymer modified Traffic Level E – PG top two structural layers Traffic Level E – PG top two structural layers Mix Design: Mix Design: 3 mix designs/NMAS/traffic level/binder grade/contract year 3 mix designs/NMAS/traffic level/binder grade/contract year Coarse and fine allowed for all Traffic Levels Coarse and fine allowed for all Traffic Levels

Asphalt Specification Changes Section Process Control Process Control Address in QC Plan how PC failures will be handled Address in QC Plan how PC failures will be handled Basically need to address problem, then resample Basically need to address problem, then resample Second failure stop production, contact Engineer Second failure stop production, contact Engineer Acceptance Testing Exceptions: Acceptance Testing Exceptions: Less than 500 tons of any mix type, visual inspection Less than 500 tons of any mix type, visual inspection Engineer may require PC tests or IV tests Engineer may require PC tests or IV tests

Asphalt Specification Changes Section Lot Sizes Lot Sizes If a Lot is terminated on QC failure, Lot sizes go to 2000 tons If a Lot is terminated on QC failure, Lot sizes go to 2000 tons Partial Lots will not be redefined Partial Lots will not be redefined Individual Test Tolerances for Quality Control Testing: Individual Test Tolerances for Quality Control Testing: Revised Master Production Range Revised Master Production Range

Asphalt Specification Changes Section 334 Table Master Production Range Characteristic Tolerance (1) Asphalt Binder Content ( percent) Target ± 0.55 Passing No. 8 [2.36 mm] Sieve ( percent) Target ± 5.50 Passing No. 200 [75 µm] Sieve ( percent) Target ± 1.50 Air Voids ( percent) Coarse Graded 2.00 – 6.00 wider Air Voids ( percent) Fine Graded 2.30 – 6.00 wider Density, percent G mm (2) Coarse Graded (minimum) Coarse Graded (minimum)93.00 Fine Graded (minimum) new (1) Tolerances for sample size of n = 1 from the verified mix design (2) Based on an average of 5 randomly located cores

Asphalt Specification Changes Section Individual Test Tolerances for Quality Control Testing: Individual Test Tolerances for Quality Control Testing: Added single density value < 91.00% Added single density value < 91.00% Coarse mixes Coarse mixes Single low density value – correct problem Single low density value – correct problem Two in same sublot - stop Two in same sublot - stop Any Lot terminated on QC failure is limited to a maximum pay factor of 1.00 per characteristic Any Lot terminated on QC failure is limited to a maximum pay factor of 1.00 per characteristic Verification Testing: Verification Testing: Single non-comparison → Resolution Single non-comparison → Resolution

Asphalt Specification Changes Section Resolution Determination: Resolution Determination: No additional time granted No additional time granted Defective Material: Defective Material: “Cleaned up” “Cleaned up” Better describes actual process Better describes actual process Allows delineation testing Allows delineation testing

Asphalt Specification Changes Section Pay Factors: Pay Factors: Modified Small Quantity Pay Table Modified Small Quantity Pay Table Modified PWL Spec Limits Modified PWL Spec Limits

Table Specification Limits Quality CharacteristicSpecification Limits Passing No. 8 [2.36 mm] sieve ( percent)Target ± 3.1 Passing No. 200 [75  m] sieve ( percent) Target ± 1.0 Asphalt Content ( percent)Target ± 0.40 Air Voids – Coarse Mixes ( percent)4.00 ± 1.40 Air Voids – Fine Mixes ( percent) tighter 4.00 ± 1.20 tighter Density – Coarse Mixes ( percent of G mm ):94.50 ± 1.30 Density – Fine Mixes ( percent of G mm ): , wider (1) wider Note (1): If the Engineer (or Contract Documents) limits compaction to the static mode only, the specification limits are as follows: , No additional compensation, cost or time, shall be made.

Asphalt Specification Changes Section 337 Asphalt Concrete Friction Courses Asphalt Binder: Asphalt Binder: Use PG when called for in Contract, otherwise ARB Use PG when called for in Contract, otherwise ARB Individual Test Tolerances for FC-5 Production: Individual Test Tolerances for FC-5 Production: Single binder content out = stop Single binder content out = stop Two out on gradation = stop Two out on gradation = stop Address IAW “Defective Material” Address IAW “Defective Material” Note: no longer exists, was intended.

Asphalt Specification Changes Section Thickness of Friction Courses Thickness of Friction Courses FC-9.5 & FC-12.5: use FC-9.5 & FC-12.5: use Spread rate (lbs/yd 2 ) = t x G mm x 43.3 Spread rate (lbs/yd 2 ) = t x G mm x 43.3 FC-5: FC-5: Spread rate (lbs/yd 2 ) = t x G sb x 40.5 Spread rate (lbs/yd 2 ) = t x G sb x 40.5 G sb = combined aggregate bulk specific gravity of the verified mix design G sb = combined aggregate bulk specific gravity of the verified mix design Plan quantities based on G sb of Plan quantities based on G sb of Spread rate of 80 lbs/yd 2 Spread rate of 80 lbs/yd Hydrated Lime Pretreatment: Hydrated Lime Pretreatment: Allow lime pretreated aggregate Allow lime pretreated aggregate 45-day window for use after pretreatment 45-day window for use after pretreatment Spec addresses QC and certification requirements for blending operations Spec addresses QC and certification requirements for blending operations

Asphalt Specification Changes Section 234 Superpave Asphalt Base Thickness Requirements Thickness Requirements. Convert thickness to spread rate: Convert thickness to spread rate: Spread rate (lbs/yd 2 ) = t x G mm x 43.3 Spread rate (lbs/yd 2 ) = t x G mm x 43.3

Questions?