RATIONALE Why should we raise student achievement? EXTERNAL MANDATES Indiana Public Law 221 Federal No Child Left Behind Act.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
Advertisements

1 Overview: What is “No Child Left Behind”?. 2 Reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (“ESEA”) of ’65 Money to states for specific.
No Child Left Behind The New Age: No Child Left Behind.
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) “No Child Left Behind” Act of 2001 Public Law (NCLB) Brian Jeffries Office of Superintendent of.
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
EDU 221.  Group Presentation Reflections due for 7 & 8  Quiz #2 (Tuesday, Nov. 16 th ) – Problem- based ◦ What makes an outstanding response? Referring.
Annual Parent Meeting Klein Road Elementary. © Not for use of distribution without permission. Why are we here?  NCLB law requires that Title I Schools.
Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Data for Student Success Comprehensive Needs Assessment Report “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County May 2011.
The Special Education Leadership Training Project January, 2003 Mary Lynn Boscardin, Ph.D. Associate Professor Preston C. Green, III, Ed.D., J.D., Associate.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
STAR (Support through Assistance & Reforms) Report.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
1 Indiana Student Achievement Institute InSAI MEETING 3 SELECTING DATA FIELDS InSAI Raising the bar: Meeting the challenge.
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
Tacoma School District - 1 Student Achievement Board Study December 6, 2007 Michael Power Assist. Superintendent Program and Learning Support Tel
A Guide to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County April 2010.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
1 No Child Left Behind Critical Research Findings For School Boards Ronald Dietel UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
May 25,  MSP scores are compared against a uniform bar.  The MSP scores compared against the uniform bar are not representative of individual.
Program Improvement/ Title I Parent Involvement Meeting October 9, :00 p.m. Redwood City School District.
SAISD Principal’s Meeting September 17, 2003 Office of Research and Evaluation.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Indiana Student Achievement Institute Indiana Student Achievement Institute InSAI USING DATA TO INFORM DECISION-MAKING Sue Reynolds Executive Director.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
SELECTING DATA FIELDS FOR IMPROVEMENT Local Presentation.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Ware County High School State of the school. 12 th grade 448 students entered the 9 th grade in 2003/ students have left the county or state 243.
Accreditation and AMO I.ACCREDITATION (Virginia’s Accountability System) – ACCREDITATION is Virginia’s Accountability System – No membership groups, no.
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind  NCLB Overview  Assessment and Accountability Requirements  Educator Quality.
August 1, 2007 DELAWARE’S GROWTH MODEL FOR AYP DETERMINATIONS.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Title I What Parents Need to Know!. What is Title I? Title I is a program that provides funds from the federal government to improve student learning.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Sandpiper Elementary School Mrs. Camille LaChance.
Indiana Student Achievement Institute InSAI INDIANA STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT INSTITUTE Updates.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
Adequate Yearly Progress By Allyson, Brette, and Riley.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents Highland Renaissance Academy.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
Steering Team: SETTING DATA TARGETS. Add to each specific and broad data field a.target % b. deadline for achieving the target Ex: 66% of 8th graders.
 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). About AYP  Initiated by NCLB  Student performance and participation rates on ISTEP+ in English/language arts and mathematics.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
School Report Card and Identification Progression
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
WELCOME TO THE TITLE I ANNUAL MEETING FOR PARENTS
Michigan School Report Card Update
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Presentation transcript:

RATIONALE Why should we raise student achievement? EXTERNAL MANDATES Indiana Public Law 221 Federal No Child Left Behind Act

FEDERAL SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM No Child Left Behind Elementary and Secondary Education Act Signed into law on January 8, 2002

To Meet AYP Indiana Improvement Intervals Year (Fall)EngMath 2002, 2003, , 2006, , 2009,

To Make AYP* – Yes in Every Box Eng / LAMath 2 nd Indicator 95% Test in E/LA 95% Test in Math Overall IEP LEP Econ Dis A. Indian Black Asian Hispanic White * AYP = Annual Yearly Progress

Title I Failure to Meet AYP # of Yrs AYP Not Met School in Improvement Consequence 1No 2 Yes 1st Year School Improvement Plan School Choice 3 Yes 2nd Year School Improvement Plan School Choice Supplemental Services 4 Yes 3rd Year School Improvement Plan School Choice Supplemental Services Corrective Action & Restructuring May include: Government take-over of the school Complete reorganization

INDIANA SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM Public Law 221

ACCREDITATION REQUIREMENTS 1.Legal standards 2.School Improvement Plan 3.Student Achievement

PART ONE LEGAL STANDARDS  Health and safety  Minimum time requirements  Staff to student ratios  Curriculum offerings  Instructional staff  ISTEP participation  Mandatory annual assessments  Accurate & timely submissions of reports  Annual performance report

PART TWO SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PL221 REQUIREMENTInSAI REPORT Description & location of curriculumCurriculum Force Field Report Title & description of assessmentsAssessment Force Field Report Mission, vision or beliefsVision Statement Parent ParticipationParent Participation Strategy Technology as a learning toolTechnology Strategy Safe / disciplined environmentSafe / Disciplined Strategy Goals for attendanceAttendance Strategy Goals for ISTEPISTEP Data Target Goals for graduation rateGraduation Rate Data Targets Areas needing improvementAreas of Concern

PART TWO (cont.) SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PL221 REQUIREMENTInSAI REPORT Benchmarks for progressAchievement Data Targets Provisions to offer Core 40 and Honors Diploma courses Core 40 Course Strategy Encouragement for Core 40 and Honors Diploma Courses Core 40 Encouragement Strategy Professional Development Professional Development in every strategy plan Cultural competencyCultural competency strategy Statutes and rules to be waivedEnvironment Force Field Report Three-year timelineOne-year timeline

ONE READ Department of Education review of the plan is not required IF school implements a quality-focused planning process such as the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award for Education, a national or regional accreditation agency that the State Board has approved, or a planning model the State Board has approved.

PART THREE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT SCHOOL PERFORMANCE % of all ISTEP tests that are passing All subjects All grade levels SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT Increase in the % of all ISTEP tests that are passing Non-mobile group (70% of previous year) 3-year rolling average

Improvement Performance Exemplary Progress Commend- able Progress Academic Progress Academic Watch (Priority) Academic Probation * (High Priority) ≥ 90% Exemplary School ≥ 80%≥ 1% Commendable School ≥ 70%≥ 3%≥ 2%≥ 1%< 1% ≥ 60%≥ 4%≥ 3%≥ 2%< 2% ≥ 50%≥ 5%≥ 4%≥ 3%< 3%< 0% ≥ 40%≥ 6%≥ 5%≥ 4%< 4%< 1% <40%≥ 6%≥ 5%≥ 3%< 3% School Performance & Improvement Categories

PL221 Link to No Child Left Behind Schools that do not make AYP for two consecutive years cannot be placed in top two categories.

Probation Category Consequences Consequence 1st Year State notifies school School issues public notice School holds a public hearing Committee revises the school’s plan School may request state board to appoint outside team to manage school or help develop a plan (school immediately moves to third year consequence) 3rd year after initial placement State assigns expert team to the school 5th year after initial placement State holds public hearing in the school corp State may opt to:  merge the school with a nearby school  assign a management team  other options including closing the school  revise the school’s plan

CENTRAL OFFICE REQUIREMENTS Areas of Concern Achievement Data Targets Strategies

EXTERNAL REQUIREMENTS required by optional programs Title I NCA Accreditation Grants

RATIONALE Why should we raise student achievement? EXTERNAL MANDATES Indiana Public Law 221 Federal No Child Left Behind Act