Steve Jackson, PE Technical Manager NB West Contracting As seen on shinglerecycling.org 6 th Asphalt Shingle Recycling Forum Denver, CO With Solutions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kenneth Ray Hobson, P.E. – Bituminous Engineer
Advertisements

2014 Washington Asphalt Conference “Specification Update & Initiatives” Joe DeVol Assistant State Materials Engineer State Materials Laboratory.
CUPGA 2008 Western Canada Perspective on State – of - the Canadian Technology Challenges and Solutions John Berti, P. Eng.
Advanced Asphalt Technologies, LLC “Engineering Services for the Asphalt Industry” WHRP Project Effect of Recovered Binders from Recycled Shingles.
1Volumetric Analysis of HMA Mixtures VOLUMETRIC ANALYSIS OF HMA MIXTURES.
HMA Design (Surface) The surface course is the layer in contact with traffic loads and normally contains the highest quality materials. It provides characteristics.
Asphalt Specification Changes July 2005 Contractor Asphalt Training Rich Hewitt, PE District Bituminous Engineer District Five Materials & Research.
BASICS OF A GOOD ROAD ASPHALT AND AGGREGATES
Extending the Life of Asphalt Mixes David Lee, P.E. - ARAC Chair, Salem District Materials Kevin McGhee, P.E. – ARAC Secretary, VCTIR.
Recycled Asphalt Program & Environmental Stewardship Program (Post Consumer Content) Robert C. Rea Nebraska Department of Roads WASHTO – Omaha, Nebraska.
Office of Infrastructure R&D U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration High Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Use in Asphalt Mixtures Canadian.
2014 AAPA Conference March 11-12, 2014 Curtis Vincent, P.E. Construction Engineer Lyndi Davis Blackburn, P.E. Assistant Materials and Tests Engineer Specification.
Presented at: Rutgers Asphalt Paving Conference March 8, 2011 Presented by: Eileen Sheehy, P.E. Manager, Bureau of Materials NJDOT.
Asphalt Issues AASHTO SCOC Virginia Beach, Va. By Victor (Lee) Gallivan FHWA August 2, 2011.
Maximizing the Service Life of Dense Graded Asphalt Mixes David Lee, P.E. - ARAC Chair Salem District Materials.
Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience Joe Schroer, PE Construction and Materials Division March 30, 2005.
Greening the Blacktop Going Green with Sustainable Asphalt RAP, Recycling, Energy and the Carbon Footprint.
SMA Mixture Design Requirements
Advanced Asphalt Technologies, LLC “Engineering Services for the Asphalt Industry” WHRP Project HMA Fatigue and Low Temperature Properties to.
John A. D’Angelo US Federal Highway Administration CUPGA 2008 Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.
Michigan Department of Transportation Perpetual Pavement Rep. Rick Olson’s 2012 Best Practices Conference on Road and Bridge Maintenance Curtis Bleech.
Evaluation of Cracking Resistance of Superpave Mixtures Using Texas Overlay Test Syeda Rubaiyat Aziz Mustaque Hossain Greg Schieber Department of Civil.
Bituminous Street Recertification Initiatives. Initiative Items n Stone Matrix Asphalt (SMA) n Longitudinal Joint Spec and other methods for longitudinal.
High Recycle with WMA Fatigue Cracking Experiment AFD40(2) - April 11, 2013 Nelson Gibson, Ph.D., P.E. FHWA Office of Infrastructure R&D.
Asphalt Rubber Related Specifications Arizona Department of Transportation.
Recycled Asphalt Shingles in Texas Dale Rand, P.E.
Warm Mix for a Cold Climate Colorado DOT’s 2007 WMA Project.
HMA Pavement Recycling and Reconstruction
Asphalt Quality Assurance Program
1 Green Roadway Design from a Pavements Perspective Rene’ Renteria, P.E. ODOT Pavement Design Engineer April 13, 2010.
Recycling and Reclamation of Airfield Pavements 35 th Airports Conference FAA Eastern Region, Hershey, PA April 4, 2012 Campbell & Paris Engineers, 35.
2013 Year In Review APAI Winter Conference January 9, 2014 Matt Beeson, P.E. Asphalt Engineer.
Reclaimed Asphalt Pavements “RAP” Pete Coffman. RAP ◊Uses ◊Mix Methods ◊Cost Savings ◊Concerns ◊Case Studies ◊Uses ◊Mix Methods ◊Cost Savings ◊Concerns.
Characterization of Alaskan Hot-Mix Asphalt containing RAP
Warm Mix for a Cold Climate Update on Colorado DOT’s 2007 WMA Project on I Rocky Mountain Asphalt Conference and Equipment Show.
Saving Your Asphalt! 36 th Annual Rocky Mountain Asphalt Conference & Equipment Show February 18-20, 2009.
Item 346 Item 346 is a QCQA specification for Stone-Matrix Asphalt (SMA) and Asphalt Rubber Stone-Matrix (SMAR) mixtures.
World of Asphalt Pavements Feedback Sydney Stephen Emery.
Porous Asphalt The Specs Tim Horton, Skillings Connolly Jessica Knickerbocker, City of Tacoma Mark A. Palmer, P.E., LEED AP, City Engineer, City of Puyallup.
Recycling shingles since 1996 Presentation at the March 16, 2005 CONEXPO-CON/AGG By Dusty Ordorff Bituminous Roadways, Inc.
Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.
Research Findings from the NCAT Test Track APAI Winter Conference Indianapolis, December 14, 2010.
1 Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in Arizona - Application and Verification October 3, 2008 Arizona Association of County Engineers.
Session #3 Asphalt 103- Materials: Basics of RAP, Usage and Specifications.
Mix Designs with RAS Dr. Richard Willis National Center for Asphalt Technology at Auburn University Asphalt Shingle Recycling Forum November 8 th, 2013.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program. Superpave Mixture and Aggregate Expert Task Group Las Vegas, Nevada 16 – 18 September 2003.
Paving the way for over 60 years Presentation at the January 10, 2007 NCAUPG Technical Conference By Dusty Ordorff Bituminous Roadways, Inc.
Asphalt Concrete Mix Design
National Performance of High Recycled Mixtures. 2 Outline Trends in RAP and RAS usage and practices Motivations for higher recycled contents Barriers.
Using Reflective Crack Interlayer-
Volumetric Properties of High RAP Mixtures Based on Calculated Bulk Specific Gravities of RAP and Constituent Aggregates Nassim Sabahfer Mustaque Hossain,
Nilesh Surti, PE NCDOT State Pavement Construction Engineer.
AMERICA RIDES ON US HMA ECONOMICS 101 Minimizing Project Costs without Sacrificing Quality Purdue Road School March 09, 2011 M. Dudley Bonte PE Regional.
Extending the Life of Asphalt Mixes David Lee, P.E. - ARAC Chair, Salem District Materials Kevin McGhee, P.E. – ARAC Secretary, VCTIR.
Russian Engineers Training March 2011
Marshall & Superpave Mix Design
Alabama Asphalt Pavement Association
Critical Factors Affecting Asphalt Concrete Durability
Indiana Experience with Water Injected Foaming Device Rick Flint
Thin Hot Mix Asphalt Overlays PennDOT Research Findings
Haritha Musty and Mustaque Hossain Kansas State University MATERIALS
Research Implementation WHRP Flexible Group
Presenters: Sumon Roy1 and Badrul Ahsan1
Rebecca McDaniel KDOT/KAPA Fall Forum November 5, 2014
2018 Pavement Workshop May 23-24, 2018
Best Practices on the Use of RAS
Dr. Randy West, P.E. Director / Research Professor
Effect of Recovered Binder From Recycled Shingles
Materials and Tests Engineer
Superpave5 Superpave Design at Five Percent Air Voids
Presentation transcript:

Steve Jackson, PE Technical Manager NB West Contracting As seen on shinglerecycling.org 6 th Asphalt Shingle Recycling Forum Denver, CO With Solutions

Joe Schroer, PE Field Materials Engineer Missouri Department of Transportation Steve Jackson, PE Excellence Engineer NB West Contracting

 B.S. of Civil Engineering  B.S. of Economics  University of Missouri- Rolla  Professional Engineer  23 years in construction  15 years in asphalt

 First shingle research in 2003  2.5%, 5%, 7.5%, 10%, 15%  First shingle project 2004  First MoDOT shingle project 2005  First MoDOT shingle – WMA project 2009

 Most contractors were using RAP & RAS concurrently ( )  18% RAP and 2% RAS  17% RAP and 3% RAS  Due to the Smooth Road Initiative most work was being done on interstates  Superpave mixes  Percent Within Limits (Pay Factors)

Tonnage

 Can we eliminate the fibers in SMA (Stone Matrix Asphalt) and replace them with shingles?  Can we use shingles and PG asphalt cement in lieu of polymer modified asphalt?

PG PG 76-22

 Iowa State, Dr. Chris Williams, P.I.  Missouri Lead State  FHWA, MN, IA, IN, CA, CO, IL, WI (IL Tollway)  Binder & Mixture Properties  QC/QA  Grind Size  RAP & FRAP  Preconsumer vs. Postconsumer  Demonstration Projects

COARSEFINE

COARSEFINE

(139) (145) (159)

_ _ _ _ _

 At the same time we introduced shingles we also made other changes:  Warm Mix Asphalt to eliminate joint bumps  Added an elastic recovery specification for asphalt binder  AASHTO Mechanistic – Empirical Design ▪ AMPT/SPT – Mixture evaluation led to thinner pavements  9.5 mm Superpave mixture laid 1 ¼” thick

 Shingle size is key to success  Overheating shingle mixes to “melt” the shingles (370° - 390° F)  Variability in RAS asphalt content  Real and perceived  Inflated specific gravities impact mixes*

 Emphasis shifted from Primary Routes to Secondary Routes  Bituminous Pavements (MoDOT Section 401) in lieu of Superpave (MoDOT Section 403)  Less advanced quality control testing ▪ Gradation, deleterious, asphalt content and density ▪ No Percent Within Limits

 Contractor Perspective  Asphalt Cement prices are high  Supply of shingles is high  Less “Mill & Fill” projects ▪ Less RAP from projects ▪ Large amounts of RAP stockpiled  Fiercely competitive market  Longer haul distances

 Base, BP-1 and BP-2 mixtures shall have the following properties, when tested in accordance with AASHTO T 245. The number of blows with the compaction hammer shall be 35 or the number of gyrations shall be 50 with the gyratory compactor. Air Voids Stability lb (N) VMA (3350) 13.0

SievePercent Passing by Weight (Mass) BaseBP-1BP-2 1 inch (25.0 mm) 100 ¾ inch (19.0 mm) ½ inch (12.5 mm) No. 4 (4.75 mm) No.8 (2.36 mm) No. 30 (1.18 mm) No. 200 (75 µm)

SievePercent Passing by Weight (Mass) BP-1BP-2 1 inch (25.0 mm) 100 ¾ inch (19.0 mm) 100 ½ inch (12.5 mm) No. 4 (4.75 mm) No.8 (2.36 mm) No. 30 (1.18 mm) No. 200 (75 µm) 5-12

 Reclaimed Asphalt Shingles. Reclaimed Asphalt Shingles (RAS) may be used in any mixture specified to use PG in accordance with AASHTO PP 53 except as follows: When the ratio of virgin effective binder to total binder in the mixture is between 60 and 70 percent, the grade of the virgin binder shall be PG or PG  Shingles shall be ground to 3/8-inch minus.

 Higher percentages of recycled materials  Less virgin binder in the mixes  Dryer looking mixes  Rut resistant roadways  Fatigue cracks earlier?  Is there a limit on recycled materials?  Contractors attempted to run up to 12% RAS  Not the mix Ron Sines spoke about yesterday

 Changed design air voids to 3.5%  Increased VMA requirements:  Bit Base 13.0%  BP %  BP % (Surface Leveling)  50 gyration mix design was eliminated and replaced with a 35 gyration mix design  Requires a higher asphalt content

 Corelok specific gravities were used in lieu of traditional AASHTO T 84/T 85  Gse values were variable  to  Could be impacted by reported asphalt content  No significant change in virgin binder content in some areas, but some higher quality aggregates were used

Volumetric Properties of High RAP Mixtures Based on Calculated Bulk Specific Gravities of RAP and Constituent Aggregates Nassim Sabahfer Mustaque Hossain, Ph.D.,P.E. Department of Civil Engineering Kansas State University

VMA Obtained Using Gsb from Different Methods (Shilling RAP)

Reclaimed Asphalt Shingles. Reclaimed Asphalt Shingles (RAS) may be used in any mixture specified to use PG in accordance with AASHTO PP 53 except as follows: When the ratio of virgin effective binder to total binder in the mixture is between 60 and 70 percent, the grade of the virgin binder shall be PG or PG

71%

58%

 Sporadic Mixing Problems  Confined to Plants not Mixture  Harder to Place in Cool Weather  Low Voids on Long Haul  Tenderness  Asphalt Foamers Run at HMA Temps.  Shingle Pancakes – Clumps, Wads, Clinkers

 No shingles were permitted to be used in the surface leveling mixtures for the May and June contracts.  Not very many contracts - 2  Did not impact Superpave or other low volume route mix designs

 Contractors got together in a morning session, worked together to provide recommended specification changes.  Met with MoDOT representatives after lunch and discussed the recommendations.  Adopted as a job special provision for the next bid letting.

 Set Gsb of RAS at  Changed the gradation of the Surface Leveling mix design: % passing the 3/8” sieve.  Set Gsb of RAP at the Gsb of the virgin aggregates*  VMA minimum: 14.5%

 Mixtures containing a combination of RAS and RAP may have a 30 to 40 percent effective virgin replacement under the following conditions: (1) with a virgin binder grade change from a PG64-22 to a PG or (2) with a combination of a PG64-22 binder and a rejuvenator provided testing demonstrates that a PG58-28, meeting the requirements of AASHTO M320, is achieved.

 Compaction Aid  Surfactant  Anti-Strip

56 th ANNUAL ASPHALT CONFERENCE December 3-4, 2013 Havener Center, Campus of Missouri S&T Rolla, MO asphalt.mst.edu

Steve Jackson