Caltrans Changes SECTION 39 “Hot Mix Asphalt”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Paving Potpourri 2015 Spec Changes and More! Bob Dyer Assistant State Construction Engineer WAPA Joint Training March 2015 Lynn Peterson Secretary of Transportation.
Advertisements

Long-Life Pavements Concepts and Lab Testing
Highway Engineering Pavement Types
MODULE 4 ASPHALT MIX DESIGN*
HMA Design (Surface) The surface course is the layer in contact with traffic loads and normally contains the highest quality materials. It provides characteristics.
LECTURE NO. 18 (Handout) ASPHALT CONCRETE MIXTURES
CALTRANS EXPERIENCE WITH WARRANTIES. WHY WARRANTY The Right Strategy at the Right Time Shift Responsibility of Quality Control to Contractor State Responsibility.
Asphalt Specification Changes July 2005 Contractor Asphalt Training Rich Hewitt, PE District Bituminous Engineer District Five Materials & Research.
Pavements. Concrete –Rigid pavement Used where strength is an issue Runways, interstates and major roads –Continuous reinforcing Must have a good base.
2014 AAPA Conference March 11-12, 2014 Curtis Vincent, P.E. Construction Engineer Lyndi Davis Blackburn, P.E. Assistant Materials and Tests Engineer Specification.
Asphalt Issues AASHTO SCOC Virginia Beach, Va. By Victor (Lee) Gallivan FHWA August 2, 2011.
Asphalt-Rubber Systems Types and Uses. Types SAM Stress Absorbing Membrane SAMI Stress Absorbing Membrane Interlayer ARC - DG Asphalt Rubber Concrete.
Properties of Asphalt Important properties of asphalt include: Adhesion Consistency Specific Gravity Durability Rate of curing Ductility Aging and.
Asphaltic Concrete Mix Design
Asphalt Rubber Asphalt Concrete Friction Course Overlay as a Pavement Preservation Strategy K. Kaloush, K. Biligiri, M. Rodezno, M. Belshe Arizona State.
PPTG Thin Overlays Task Group (TOADS) Team Overlay Asphalt Debaters Presented by Basem Muallem (CT) - Tony Limas (Industry) April 19, 2005.
Bases, Subbases, & Low Cost Surfaces
Asphalt Rubber Mixture Design ADOT’s AR-ACFC and ARAC.
CHAPTER 3 PAVEMENT COMPONENTS
Pavement Design Terms and Concepts
Construction of LLP HMA Pavements Pre-bid Meeting Solano 80; 04-4A0104 District 4 Oakland, CA September 14, 2012 Bob Humer.
Bituminous Street Recertification Initiatives. Initiative Items n Stone Matrix Asphalt (SMA) n Longitudinal Joint Spec and other methods for longitudinal.
California Asphalt Rubber Case Studies – Reduced Thickness Jack Van Kirk Basic Resources.
MICHIGAN RIDES ON US 2015 Local Roads Workshop Gaylord March 12, 2015.
Asphalt Rubber Related Specifications Arizona Department of Transportation.
Surface Rehabilitation Treatments
SUPERPAVE MIX DESIGN Superpave Mix Design.
1 Asphalt Quality Assurance Program & Construction Inspection 2015 Asphalt Regional Seminars Rob Crandol, P.E. VDOT – Materials Division Assistant State.
CIVL 598 Asphalt Paving Materials Asphalt Rubber.
1 Overview CQC Asphalt Specifications.  Payment based on Contractor’s Quality Control tests.  FDOT runs verification tests at a lesser frequency. 
Asphalt Quality Assurance Program
SB Certification for Mixture-Based Specification for Flexible Base Summary of Spec Test Procedures Actions to Take for Non-Compliance October 31, 2012.
Introduction to Asphalt Pavement Construction and Compaction For ODOT District 3 presented by.
03-0F2204 Sly Park Road UC (Replace) Prebid Outreach Meeting: CIP Structural Concrete Materials Specification Overview John Yang, P.E. Office of Structural.
2013 Year In Review APAI Winter Conference January 9, 2014 Matt Beeson, P.E. Asphalt Engineer.
Pavement Maintenance II
Saving Your Asphalt! 36 th Annual Rocky Mountain Asphalt Conference & Equipment Show February 18-20, 2009.
Item 346 Item 346 is a QCQA specification for Stone-Matrix Asphalt (SMA) and Asphalt Rubber Stone-Matrix (SMAR) mixtures.
Pavement Distresses Flexible Pavement
 Materials – Highest & Best Use  Public Health  Safety  The Environment  Safety  Reliability  Performance  Flexibility  Productivity Improve Mobility.
Florida Department of Transportation 1 Overview of CQC Asphalt Specifications.
Asphalt QC 2000 The Adventure Begins….. Topics Terminology Specifications Sampling and Testing Reporting/CQR Who Does What? Lube & Oil Change All in 20.
Porous Asphalt The Specs Tim Horton, Skillings Connolly Jessica Knickerbocker, City of Tacoma Mark A. Palmer, P.E., LEED AP, City Engineer, City of Puyallup.
Overview of the New Hot Mix Specifications Dale A. Rand, P.E. TxDOT Construction Division Flexible Pavements Branch TRB AFK10 Committee Meeting April 20-21,
Developing a Mixture-Based Specification for Flexible Base.
Thin and Ultra-Thin Overlays. 1.List benefits of thin and ultra-thin HMA overlays 2. Describe recommended materials 3. Describe recommended construction.
Research Findings from the NCAT Test Track APAI Winter Conference Indianapolis, December 14, 2010.
 Have an approved mix design before paving.  The department has eliminated the use of PG -22 Asphaltic Material and replaced it with PG -28.  Tack.
AFK10 April 21, Structural Study at the NCAT Test Track R. Buzz Powell Dr. David Timm.
1 Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in Arizona - Application and Verification October 3, 2008 Arizona Association of County Engineers.
Session #3 Asphalt 103- Materials: Basics of RAP, Usage and Specifications.
Pavement Types Dr. TALEB M. Al-ROUSAN.
Bases, Subbases, & Low Cost Surfaces Dr. TALEB M. AL-ROUSAN.
Session 4 Preventive Maintenance Treatments. Learning Objectives 1.Identify typical preventive maintenance techniques used on HMA and PCC pavements 2.Identify.
LLP HMA Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement ( RAP) Pre-Bid Meeting District 4 Oakland, CA September 14, 2012 Peter Vacura Chief, Office of Asphalt Pavement Division.
Using Reflective Crack Interlayer-
Find Find Let’s go to 逢甲 night market! Let’s find.
Project Materials Usage and Concerns. Project Materials and Acceptance QC/QA Specifications QC/QA Specifications Quality Control Plans Quality Control.
PROJECT SELECTION RIGHT TOOLS, RIGHT TIME, RIGHT PROJECT Presented by Joe Ririe, PE PAVEMENT ENGINEERING INC. September 9, 2015.
Marshall & Superpave Mix Design
1 6.3 Asphalt Mixtures and HMA Marshall mix design method T RANSPORTATION S YSTEM E NGINEERING 1,
VDOT’S PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE TECHNIQUES & EXPECTATIONS
Alabama Asphalt Pavement Association
Thin Hot Mix Asphalt Overlays PennDOT Research Findings
Research Implementation WHRP Flexible Group
ACP Inspector Certification Homework (oops, not homework) Solutions
Operation, Production, and Trouble Shooting
PAVEMENTS CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Introduction to Pavement Design
Pavement Structural Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Caltrans Changes SECTION 39 “Hot Mix Asphalt” Presented by: Terrie Bressette Caltrans

What Changed? TERMS Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) = Asphalt Concrete (AC) Rubberized HMA (RHMA) = Rubberized AC (RAC) Open Graded Friction Course (OGFC) = OGAC RHMA-G = RAC (Type G) RHMA-O & -O-HB = RAC (Type O) & (Type O-HB) Tack Coat = Paint Binder (Tack Coat) Geosynthetic Pavement Interlayer = Pavement Reinforcing Fabric (PRF)

What Changed? Section 39 – AC vs. HMA Old Standard Specifications Section 39 – AC = 12,000 Words New “Amended to Read” Section 39 – HMA = 18,000 Words SSPs Section 39 AC = 21 SSPs 58,000 Words Section 39 HMA = 12 SSPs 28,500 Words

What Changed? Standard Special Provisions 12 SSPs from 30+ Old SSPs 39-AAA – HMA Type A & B 39-BBB – OGFC 39-CCC – RHMA-G 39-DDD – RHMA-O & RHMA-O-HB 39-EEE – HMA (Misc. Areas) 39-FFF – Minor HMA 39-GGG – Rumble Strips (Ground in) 39-HHH – HMA-Lime Slurry 39-III – HMA-Dry Lime 39-JJJ – HMA-Liquid Anti-Strip 39-KKK – Prime Coat 39-LLL – Replace AC Surface

What Changed? Standard Special Provisions New SSPs 39-MMM – Large Stone Mix 39-NNN – High Stability Mix 39-OOO – Bonded Wearing Course (Gap-Graded) 39-PPP – Bonded Wearing Course (Rubberized) District Requested Extra testing required by aggregate issues Lime-slurry marination required

Section 39 – CHANGES Mix Designs Still Hveem Method of Mix Design Dense Graded – HMA (Type A & B) Rubberized HMA – RHMA-G Mix Design by Producer State Verifies JMF with Plant Mix Mix design good for 12-months Flat & Elongated Open Graded – OGAC, RHMA-O & O-HB Aggregate qualities and gradation by Producer State determines asphalt content

Section 39 – CHANGES Materials Aggregate Qualities Gradation (TV ± Tolerance) LA Rattler Sand equivalent % Crushed Particles (2-face – New) Fine Aggregate Angularity (New) Flat & Elongated (New)

Section 39 – CHANGES Materials Mix Qualities Binder Content Air voids content Stability (Mix & Production) HMA moisture content Voids in Mineral Aggregate (Mix Design & Verification) Voids Filled with Asphalt (Mix Design Only) Dust Proportion (Mix Design Only)

Section 39 – CHANGES Materials CT371 Pilot California Test (CT) 371  AASHTO T283-03 In QC/QA projects for 2 years Estimate approx 25 projects / year Producer tests mix with CT371 Chooses treatment choice (TSR  70) Test HMA at least once during production District & Translab tests also (FIO) Data analysis – repeatability, lab / lab, mix vs. production

Section 39 – CHANGES Construction Processes – Standard HMA (Type A & B) RHMA-G OGAC & RHMA-O Method Small quantities QC/QA - >10,000 tons

Section 39 – CHANGES (3 Construction Processes) Standard – Applies to the majority of HMA. Contractor QC plan & tests at least twice daily Compaction (91 – 97% of Rice) State will test and results will be used for acceptance and pay

Section 39 – CHANGES (3 Construction Processes) Method – Applies to very small quantities of HMA The contractor will not perform QC Method compaction with roller and temperature requirements State will test and results will be used for acceptance and pay. Default for compaction when layer <0.15-ft

Section 39 – CHANGES (3 Construction Processes) QC/QA – All HMA quantities greater than 10,000 tons. QC tests for each 750 tons of HMA State will verify gradation & % binder 1 verification per 5 QC tests Statistical evaluation of gradation, % binder and compaction for pay. Verified contractor QC for gradation & % binder Sate cores for compaction (92 – 96% of Rice)

Section 39 – CHANGES Production Materials Production Quality Program – HMA & PCC (soon) Weights and Measures Safety Limited production unit requirements

Section 39 – CHANGES Placement Lift Thickness > 3 X NMAS e.g. ¾-inch mix = 0.20-ft layer and above ½-inch mix = 0.125-ft layer Must comply for compaction Contractor may change gradation of mix if ¾” mix and 0.15 to 0.20 layer Not required for Method Thin blanket – Maintenance Leveling, etc.

Section 39 – CHANGES HMA must meet all specification requirements throughout production and placement. First out of spec = Contractor Fix Second out of spec = Stop, test, show RE before starting up In-place & out-of-spec material RE determines status on case-by-case

Thank you Any Questions?