Observations of an Eruptive Flux Rope, CME Formation, and Associated Blast Wave V.Grechnev 1, A.Uralov 1, I.Kuzmenko 2, A.Kochanov 1, V.Fainshtein 1, Ya.Egorov.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NBYM 2006 A major proton event of 2005 January 20: propagating supershock or superflare? V. Grechnev 1, V. Kurt 2, A. Uralov 1, H.Nakajima 3, A. Altyntsev.
Advertisements

Observational evidence of a magnetic flux rope eruption associated with the X3 flare on 2002 July 15 Liu Yu Solar Seminar, 2003 June 16.
Lecture 9 Prominences and Filaments Filaments are formed in magnetic loops that hold relatively cool, dense gas suspended above the surface of the Sun,"
Observations on Current Sheet and Magnetic Reconnection in Solar Flares Haimin Wang and Jiong Qiu BBSO/NJIT.
Flare energy release and wave dynamics in nearby sunspot Solar and Stellar Flares, Observations, simulations and synergies June , 2013, Prague,
The magnetic nature of solar flares Paper by E.R. Priest & T.G. Forbes Review presented by Hui Song.
The Relationship Between CMEs and Post-eruption Arcades Peter T. Gallagher, Chia-Hsien Lin, Claire Raftery, Ryan O. Milligan.
Hot Precursor Ejecta and Other Peculiarities of the 2012 May 17 Ground Level Enhancement Event N. Gopalswamy 2, H. Xie 1,2, N. V. Nitta 3, I. Usoskin 4,
Energy and Helicity Budget of Four Solar Flares and Associated Magnetic Clouds. Maria D. Kazachenko, Richard C. Canfield, Dana Longcope, Jiong Qiu Montana.
Observations and Magnetic Field Modeling of CMEs’ Source Regions Yingna Su Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Collaborators: Adriaan van Ballegooijen,
TRACE and RHESSI observations of the failed eruption of the magnetic flux rope Tomasz Mrozek Astronomical Institute University of Wrocław.
Lecture 4 The Formation and Evolution of CMEs. Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) Appear as loop like features that breakup helmet streamers in the corona.
CME/Flare Mechanisms Solar “minimum” event this January For use to VSE must be able to predict CME/flare Spiro K. Antiochos Naval Research Laboratory.
A flare compilation Lots of people including Louise Harra, Lidia van Driel Gesztelyi, Chris Goff, Sarah Matthews, Len Culhane, Cristina Mandrini, Pascal.
MHD modeling of coronal disturbances related to CME lift-off J. Pomoell 1, R. Vainio 1, S. Pohjolainen 2 1 Department of Physics, University of Helsinki.
Coronal Mass Ejections without photospheric/chromospheric signatures Session organizers: Alexei Pevtsov (NSO) and Vasyl Yurchyshyn (BBSO) Discussion leaders:
Low-Energy Coronal Sources Observed with RHESSI Linhui Sui (CUA / NASA GSFC)
Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures N. Gopalswamy, S. Yashiro, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, and P. Mäkelä IHY – ISWI Regional meeting.
Hard X-ray Production in a Failed Filament Eruption David, Alexander, Rui Liu and Holly R., Gilbert 2006 ApJ 653, L719 Related Paper: Ji. H. et al., 2003.
A full view of EIT waves Chen, P.F., Fang, C. & Shibata, K. ApJ, 2005, 622, Solar seminar Shiota.
Coronal Loop Oscillations and Flare Shock Waves H. S. Hudson (UCB/SSL) & A. Warmuth (Astrophysical Institute Potsdam) Coronal loop oscillations: introduction.
Modeling the Magnetic Field Evolution of the December Eruptive Flare Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Intense Flares Without Solar Energetic Particle Events N. V. Nitta (LMSAL), E. W. Cliver (AFRL), H. S. Hudson (UCB) Abstract: We study favorably located.
CAWSES December 10, CMEs H.S. Hudson Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley.
Observations of the failed eruption of the magnetic flux rope – a direct application of the quadrupolar model for a solar flare Tomasz Mrozek Astronomical.
Center for Space Environment Modeling Ward Manchester University of Michigan Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory SHINE July.
Homologous large-scale activity in the solar eruptive events of November 24–26, 2000 I. M. Chertok a, V. V. Grechnev b, H. S. Hudson c, and N.V. Nitta.
Coronal Loop Oscillations and Flare Shock Waves H. S. Hudson (UCB/SSL) & A. Warmuth (Astrophysical Institute Potsdam) Coronal loop oscillations: (Fig.
NEWS, RESOURCES, AND MOST RECENT SOLAR WORKING DRAFTS (1) Mauna Loa Solar Observatory Newsletter Feb 2009 (2) Introduction to the Solar and Space Weather.
Working Group E: The Pre-CME Sun - Pre-eruption structure, evolution & energy release - Global issues: helicity, homologous CMEs - Inputs to CME initiation.
Twist & writhe of kink-unstable magnetic flux ropes I flux rope: helicity sum of twist and writhe: kink instability: twist  and writhe  (sum is constant)
Kinematics and coronal field strength of an untwisting jet in a polar coronal hole observed by SDO/AIA H. Chen, J. Zhang, & S. Ma ILWS , Beijing.
Coronal Heating of an Active Region Observed by XRT on May 5, 2010 A Look at Quasi-static vs Alfven Wave Heating of Coronal Loops Amanda Persichetti Aad.
What multi-wave observations of microwave negative bursts tell us about solar eruptions? V. Grechnev 1, I. Kuzmenko 2, A. Uralov 1, I. Chertok 3 1 Institute.
High-Cadence EUV Imaging, Radio, and In-Situ Observations of Coronal Shocks and Energetic Particles: Implications for Particle Acceleration K. A. Kozarev.
Shock wave formation heights using 2D density and Alfvén maps of the corona ABSTRACT Coronal shock waves can produce decametric radio emission known Type.
The Sun and the Heliosphere: some basic concepts…
1 THE RELATION BETWEEN CORONAL EIT WAVE AND MAGNETIC CONFIGURATION Speakers: Xin Chen
Radio obsevation of rapid acceleration in a slow filament eruption/fast coronal mass ejection event Kundu et al ApJ, 607, 530.
On the February 14-15, 2011 CME-CME interaction event and consequences for Space Weather Manuela Temmer(1), Astrid Veronig(1), Vanessa Peinhart(1), Bojan.
Observations of Eruptive Events with Two Radioheliographs, SSRT and NoRH V.V. Grechnev, A.M. Uralov, V.G. Zandanov, N.Y. Baranov, S.V. Lesovoi Kiyosato,
Flare Energy Build-Up in a Decaying Active Region Near a Coronal Hole Yingna Su Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Collaborators: A. A. van Ballegooijen,
1 SPD Meeting, July 8, 2013 Coronal Mass Ejection Plasma Heating by Alfvén Wave Dissipation Rebekah M. Evans 1,2, Merav Opher 3, and Bart van der Holst.
A comparison of CME-associated atmospheric waves observed in coronal (Fe XII 195A) and chromospheric ( He I 10830A) lines Holly R. Gilbert, Thomas E. Holzer,
Properties of CME Acceleration in the Low Corona Jie Zhang George Mason University SHINE June 28 – July 2, 2004 Big Sky - Montana Address.
Fast Magnetosonic Waves and Global Coronal Seismology in the Extended Solar Corona Ryun Young Kwon, Jie Zhang, Maxim Kramar, Tongjiang Wang, Leon Ofman,
White light coronagraph showing prominances and streamers The Coronal Magnetic Field.
Observations and nonlinear force-free field modeling of active region Y. Su, A. van Ballegooijen, B. W. Lites, E. E. DeLuca, L. Golub, P. C. Grigis,
III. APPLICATIONS of RECONNECTION Yohkoh Bright Pts Loops Holes A magnetic world T=few MK 1. Coronal Heating.
SHINE Formation and Eruption of Filament Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen 1 & D. H. Mackay 2 1 Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge,
IMAGING AND SPECTOROPIC INVESTIGATIONS OF A SOLAR CORONAL WAVE: PROPERTIES OF THE WAVE FRONT AND ASSOCIATED ERUPTING MATERIAL L OUISE K. HARRA AND A LPHONSE.
Shock heating by Fast/Slow MHD waves along plasma loops
ISSI, Beijing, China. The famous example of the decaying kink oscillations of coronal loops observed with the TRACE ISSI, Beijing,
Eruptions, shock waves, and major flare in the event V. Grechnev, V. Kiselev, A. Uralov, N. Meshalkina Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics.
1 P. C. Liewer, E. M. DeJong, J. R. Hall, JPL/Caltech; K. E. J. Huttunen, Y. Li, J. Luhmann, B. Lynch, UCB/SSL; Angelos Vourlidas & R. A. Howard, NRL;
Observations and Magnetic Field Modeling of the Flare/CME Event on 2010 April 8 Yingna Su Bernhard Kliem, Adriaan van Ballegooijen, Vincent Surges, Edward.
Observations –Morphology –Quantitative properties Underlying Physics –Aly-Sturrock limit Present Theories/Models Coronal Mass Ejections (CME) S. K. Antiochos,
Shine 2004, A. Sterling CME Eruption Onset Observations: Dimmings Alphonse C. Sterling NASA/MSFC/NSSTC.
Data-constrained Simulation of CME Initiation and Propagation Antonia Savcheva ESPM 2014 September 11, 2014 Collaborators: R. Evans, B. van der Holst,
On Coronal Mass Ejections and Configurations of the Ambient Magnetic Field Yang Liu Stanford University 3/17/ COSPAR 2008.
Axel Brandenburg & Jörn Warnecke NorditaStockholm  loop emergence –Buoyant rise –Many scale heights –Twist needed Dynamo –bi-helical field Emergence.
Observations of Filament Channels by Hinode/XRT and STEREO
N. Gopalswamy, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, P. Mäkelä, S. Yashiro, I. Usoskin
Corona Mass Ejection (CME) Solar Energetic Particle Events
SMALL SEP EVENTS WITH METRIC TYPE II RADIO BURSTS
The CME-Flare Relationship in Homologous Eruptive Events
Solar Sources of Wide Coronal Mass Ejections during the Ascending Phase of Cycle 24 Sachiko Akiyama1,2, Nat Gopalswamy2, Seiji Yashiro1,2 , and Pertti.
High-cadence Radio Observations of an EIT Wave
On the nature of EIT waves, EUV dimmings and their link to CMEs
V. Grechnev1, A. Uralov1, I. Kuzmenko2, A. Kochanov1, V
Presentation transcript:

Observations of an Eruptive Flux Rope, CME Formation, and Associated Blast Wave V.Grechnev 1, A.Uralov 1, I.Kuzmenko 2, A.Kochanov 1, V.Fainshtein 1, Ya.Egorov 1, D.Prosovetsky 1 1 Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics (Irkutsk, Russia) 2 Ussuriysk Astrophysical Observatory (Ussuriysk, Russia) SDO/AIA 193 Å From Gopalswamy et al.: 2012, ApJ 744, 72

2010 June 13 Event A number of aspects were previously addressed by: 1.Patsourakos, Vourlidas, Stenborg: 2010, ApJL 724, L188 2.Kozarev et al.: 2011, ApJL 733, L25 3.Ma et al.: 2011, ApJ 738, Gopalswamy et al.: 2012, ApJ 744, 72 5.Downs et al.: 2012, ApJ 750, Eselevich & Eselevich: 2012, ApJ 761, 68 7.Vasanth et al.: 2014, Solar Phys. 289, Kouloumvakos et al.: 2014, Solar Phys. 289, 2123, etc… Genesis of the flux rope and its properties How was the CME formed? Where and how was the wave excited? Major unanswered questions - Common issues for many similar events

CME Lift-off in 171 Å. Outer boundary green a) Usual representation: fixed field of view b) Resizing images to compensate for expansion What drove the CME? Looks mainly similar in 171, 193, 211, and 304 Å

SDO/AIA 131 Å images 1.Initial dark prominence 2.Prominence activates and brightens up  heating up to ~10 MK 3.Transforms into bundles of loops, which erupt 4.Rope expands, turns aside by 20 , and rotates Visible only –in 131 Å (10 MK) faint –in 94 Å (6.3 MK) still poorer

Flux rope in resized movie Top: SDO/AIA 131 Å Bottom: acceleration Initial dark prominence 1.Brightens  heats 2.Transforms into bundles of loops, i.e., flux rope 3.Rope sharply erupts, 3 km/s 2 4.Rope turns aside by 20 , rotates, and decelerates, -1 km/s 2 Red arc outlines the top

Kinematics of the Flux Rope Hot ~10 MK flux rope developed from structures initially associated with compact prominence Flux rope appeared as a bundle of intertwisted loops It sharply erupted with an acceleration up to  3 km/s 2 1 min before HXR burst and earlier than any other structures, –reached a speed of 450 km/s –then decelerated to  70 km/s Flare onset

CME development CME was driven by flux rope expanding inside it. Arcade loops above the rope a)were sequentially involved into expansion from below upwards, b)approached each other, and c)apparently merged, constituting the visible rim Flux rope rotated inside the rim, which has become an outer boundary of the cavity –Different event led Cheng et al. (2011, ApJL 732, L25) to similar conclusions 193 Å

CME formation. Development of Rim rimImages are resized to keep rim fixed 131 Å 171 Å

The rim: red Below rim (304 & 171 Å): blue Above rim (211 Å): green different orientations: rim was associated with a separatrix surface –Not permeable, like a membrane Expanding separatrix surface –swept up structures & plasmas ahead –left rarefied volume behind  dimming Formation of rim: due to successive compression of structures above active region into CME’s frontal structure When the rim was formed completely, it looked like a piston What was the Rim?  40  LPS 304 Å 171 Å 211 Å

193 Å arc sec ‘elastic collision’ Distance–Time History Disturbance responsible for consecutive CME formation episodes –was excited by flux rope inside the rim –propagated outward Structures at different heights accelerated, when their trajectories were crossed by trajectory of this disturbance Flux rope transmitted part of its energy to structures above it -36  193 Å Wave

Kinematics of Rope, Loops and Wave Wave with v 0  1000 km/s was excited by a subsonic piston, v P = 240 km/s v 0  1000 km/s is usual Alfvén speed above an active region Acceleration of the piston was 3 km/s 2 at that time Impulsively excited wave decelerated like a blast wave

Type II burst Wave signatures were leading portion of the EUV wave and type II radio burst Also wave traces: onset of dm bursts recorded at fixed frequencies (white) Outline: power-law density model and fit Shock: see cited papers and talk by Fainshtein & Egorov Method: Grechnev et al. (2011, Sol. Phys., 273, 433 & 461)

Eruption and Wave AIA 211 Å base diff.AIA 171 Å no subtraction

Plots of CME & Wave and LASCO data Symbols: measurements from CME catalog Lines: analytic fit Main part of EUV transient became CME’s frontal structure (FS) –consisted of 1.8 MK coronal loops on top of the expanding rim Wave strongly dampened and decayed into weak disturbance, being not driven by trailing piston, which slowed down

Conclusion… Hot flux rope developed from structures associated with a compact prominence. It sharply erupted earlier than any other structures and strongly accelerated. Then it decelerated, having transmitted a part of its energy to the CME structures above it. The relaxed flux rope became the CME core. CME development was driven from inside by the expanding flux rope. Arcade loops above it were sequentially involved into expansion being compressed from below. They apparently approached each other, constituting the visible rim. The rim was separated from the active flux rope by a cavity. The rim was not pronounced in the white-light CME. Contd…

…Conclusion The rim was associated with an expanding separatrix surface. It swept up magnetoplasmas ahead, forming the main part of EUV transient (future CME frontal structure) and left rarefied volume behind, producing dimming. The impulsively erupting flux rope produced inside the forming CME a disturbance, which propagated outward like a blast wave. Being not driven by the decelerating piston, it dampened and decayed into weak disturbance. A number of events demonstrates a similar history of a wave. If a CME is fast, then such a blast-like wave should transform into bow shock afterwards. Scenario of Hirayama (1974, Sol. Phys. 34, 323) appears to match the event.

Thanks For your attentionFor your attention To organizers of this meeting for the opportunity to attend it and supportTo organizers of this meeting for the opportunity to attend it and support To the instrumental teams of SDO/AIA, SOHO (ESA & NASA), USAF RSTN, NICT (Japan), STEREOTo the instrumental teams of SDO/AIA, SOHO (ESA & NASA), USAF RSTN, NICT (Japan), STEREO To the team maintaining the SOHO/LASCO CME CatalogTo the team maintaining the SOHO/LASCO CME Catalog To L. Kashapova and S. Anfinogentov for their assistance in data handlingTo L. Kashapova and S. Anfinogentov for their assistance in data handling To A. Kouloumvakos & co-authors for useful discussionTo A. Kouloumvakos & co-authors for useful discussion

Comments

Scenario of T. Hirayama (1974, Sol. Phys. 34, 323). Our colored comments blink Rising filament causes Shock wave Flare cusp

3D CSHKP model + Toroidal force van Ballegooijen & Martens 1989, ApJ 343, 971 Inhester, Birn, Hesse 1992, Solar Phys. 138, 257 Longcope & Beveridge 2007, ApJ 669, 621

Toroidal force 3D curvature – toroidal force: Anzer (1978, Sol. Phys. 57, 111) Chen (1989, ApJ 338, 453; JGR 1996, 101, A12, 27499)

Cf. Simulations by Kliem et al.

Impulsive Acceleration Stage One of possible scenarios:  Reconnection between filament threads and in envelope arcade increases poloidal flux and plasma pressure  Propelling toroidal force develops  Filament transforms into “mainspring”  Torus instability, possible kink-like instability: mainspring straightens Synchronously with HXR burst Sheared field of initial filaments Reconnection  twist increases  flux rope completely forms Field lines tend to straighten N S Toroidal force develops van Ballegooijen & Martens 1989, ApJ 343, 971; Inhester, Birn, Hesse 1992, Sol. Phys. 138, 257; Qiu et al. 2007, ApJ 659, 758; etc. Zhang et al. (2001, ApJ 559, 452), Temmer et al. (2008, ApJ 673, L95; 2010, ApJ 712, L1410); etc.

Development of shock waves Waves are excited by sharply erupting filaments as impulsive pistons at ~50 Mm during rise of HXR/microwave bursts, but not by flares Waves rapidly steepen into shocks in region of steep falloff of V fast in AR Waves are transmitted by arcades, enveloping filaments, as monopole acoustic antennas Then waves propagate like decelerating blast waves (cf. Parker 1961; Pomoell et al. 2008) Pre-eruptive filaments Arcade Not easy to recognize expanding arcade and appearing wave Arcade Eruptive filaments High V fast domain Low V fast environment

Type II

Wave in STEREO-A/EUVI 195 Å images Top: yellow ellipses represent circular surface trail of the expanding spheroidal wave front Bottom: surface wave speed

CME & Wave in LASCO images Flux rope red, Frontal structure white, Wave yellow