Transverse dynamics Selected topics, University of Oslo, Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2014,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
Advertisements

Bunch compressors ILC Accelerator School May Eun-San Kim Kyungpook National University.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
Study of the Luminosity of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel CERN June F. Willeke, DESY.
Synchrotron Radiation What is it ? Rate of energy loss Longitudinal damping Transverse damping Quantum fluctuations Wigglers Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP)
Particle Accelerators
A. Bay Beijing October Accelerators We want to study submicroscopic structure of particles. Spatial resolution of a probe ~de Broglie wavelength.
Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation 11 December 2006 CLASSE 1 Focusing and Bending Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation M. Forster Mike Forster 11 December.
Luminosity Prospects of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel DESY Colloquium May F. Willeke, DESY.
Transverse dynamics Transverse dynamics: degrees of freedom orthogonal to the reference trajectory x : the horizontal plane y : the vertical plane Erik.
Beam Dynamics Tutorial, L. Rivkin, EPFL & PSI, Prague, September 2014 Synchrotron radiation in LHC: spectrum and dynamics The Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Lattice calculations: Lattices Tune Calculations Dispersion Momentum Compaction Chromaticity Sextupoles Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende.
Accelerator Physics  Basic Formalism  Linear Accelerators  Circular Accelerators  Magnets  Beam Optics  Our Accelerator Greg LeBlanc Lead Accelerator.
Lecture 5: Beam optics and imperfections
LHeC Test Facility Meeting
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture.
Introduction to particle accelerators Walter Scandale CERN - AT department Roma, marzo 2006.
The LHC: an Accelerated Overview Jonathan Walsh May 2, 2006.
March 2011Particle and Nuclear Physics,1 Experimental tools accelerators particle interactions with matter detectors.
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
January 13, 2004D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c BESIII/CLEO-c Workshop, IHEP January 13, 2004 D.Rubin for the CESR operations group.
New Progress of the Nonlinear Collimation System for A. Faus-Golfe J. Resta López D. Schulte F. Zimmermann.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Analytical considerations for Theoretical Minimum Emittance Cell Optics 17 April 2008 F. Antoniou, E. Gazis (NTUA, CERN) and Y. Papaphilippou (CERN)
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
1 EPIC SIMULATIONS V.S. Morozov, Y.S. Derbenev Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility A. Afanasev Hampton University R.P. Johnson Muons, Inc. Operated.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
Rüdiger Schmidt1 The LHC collider project I Rüdiger Schmidt - CERN SUSSP Sumer School St.Andrews Challenges LHC accelerator physics LHC technology Operation.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Lecture 5 Damping Ring Basics Susanna Guiducci (INFN-LNF) May 21, 2006 ILC Accelerator school.
Adams Accelerator Institute 10 - E. Wilson - 1/24/ Slide 1 Lecture 14 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2004 E. J. N. Wilson.
HST 2009 Introduction to AcceleratorsD. Brandt 1 The LHC: Physics without mathematics ! D. Brandt, CERN.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Chapter 10 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU , version E 2.4 Acceleration and longitudinal phase space.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Longitudinal.
Beam-beam Simulation at eRHIC Yue Hao Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory July 29, 2010 EIC Meeting at The Catholic University.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Lattice design for FCC-ee Bastian Haerer (CERN BE-ABP-LAT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)) 1 8 th Gentner Day, 28 October 2015.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Workshop on Accelerator R&D for Ultimate Storage Rings – Oct Nov.1 – Huairou, Beijing, China A compact low emittance lattice with superbends for.
Optics with Large Momentum Acceptance for Higgs Factory Yunhai Cai SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Future Circular Collider Kick-off Meeting, February.
Hybrid Fast-Ramping Synchrotron to 750 GeV/c J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory MAP Collaboration Meeting March 5, 2012.
Lecture 3 Transverse Optics II
Accelerator Laboratory OPTICS BASICS S. Guiducci.
Professor Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University ACAS School for Accelerator Physics January 2014 Longitudinal Dynamics.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz IDS- NF Acceleration Meeting, Jefferson Lab,
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
Multi-Turn Extraction studies and PTC
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Large Booster and Collider Ring
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Introduction to particle accelerators
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Progress of SPPC lattice design
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Physics 417/517 Introduction to Particle Accelerator Physics
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

Transverse dynamics Selected topics, University of Oslo, Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2014,

Dispersion Off-momentum : p=p 0 +  p = p 0 (1+  p/p 0 ). Hill’s equation : Solution gives a extra dispersion term to the homogenous solution x  p  (s) So far, we have studied particles with reference momentum p = p 0. A dipole field disperses particles according to their energy. This introduces an x-E correlation in the beam. D(s): “dispersion function”

Lattice elements may add or subtract to the dispersion in the beam (x-E correlation). Assuming we know the dispersion at one location, we can calculate how the dispersion propagates through the lattice : The dispersion propagates the in the same manner as a particle. To add dispersion generation from dipoles and offset quadrupoles to the framework, we add a third dimension to the matrix framework : Dispersion in linear lattices represents here a dipole "kick" D(s) > 0 D(s) = 0

Dispersion in rings In rings, the design dispersion is uniquely defined by the lattice Without quadrupole focusing, assuming constant bending field, the circumference would increase by  p / p 0 yielding a constant dispersion, D(s) =  x(s) / (  p/p 0 ) =  / (  /  ) =  With quadrupole focusing the dispersion function will be modified. The momentum compaction factor, earlier discussed, can be expressed as  The momentum compaction factor can be calculated by computer codes. The value is usually >0 and <<1. The dispersion can be locally suppressed, i.e. no increase in beam-size due to energy spread. This is the case at a collider interaction region. “weak focusing”“strong focusing”

Dispersion suppression Rms beam size increases with dispersion, calculated as :  rms (s) = √(  rms  (s) + (D(s)  p/p 0 ) 2 ) D = 0D > 0 By tuning the lattice, a collider interaction point has zero design dispersion. n is normally

Chromaticity Particles with  p ≠ 0 focuses differently in quadrupoles –Optics analogy, “chromatic aberration” Focal length: f = 1/kl  p=p 0 (1+  p/p 0 ). Affects performance : –Focusing (beta function) depends on energy: “projected” emittance growth in lines –The accelerator tunes, Q, depends on energy; energy-spread -> tune-spread. Unstable resonance values might be hit. Chromaticity in rings is defined by the tune shift per momentum change : The linear lattice naturally generates a negative chromaticity,  since  p>0 will lead to weaker focusing and thus  Q<0 The natural chromaticity may be adjusted using sextupoles magnets

Magnet multipole expansion QuadrupoleDipole We discussed earlier the normalized magnet strengths : We can generalize this concept to magnetic multipole components k n for a 2(n+1) - pole : Furthermore, the kicks of a magnetic 2(n+1) - pole can be expressed as a combination of multipole components : k n = e/p d n B/dx n, with unit [m -(n+1) ] n=1: the quadrupole linear terms n=2: sextupole terms :  x’ = (1/2)lk 2 (x 2 -y 2 )  y’ = (1/2)lk 2 xy kl is the integrated magnet strength See V. Ziemann’s compendium

Sextupole chromaticity correction Chromaticity correction principle: compensate chromaticity with lenses with position-dependent focal length, at positions of high dispersion, D. p = p 0 p 1 < p 0 D > 0 In the quadrupole the difference in focal length is f 1 /f 0 = p 1 /p 0. The trajectory at a position with D>0 is x(s) = x p=p0 + D  p/p 0. The sextupole kick term (in x) at this position is : The correction term in bold corresponds to a kick with a focal length dependence : By adjusting k 2 and placing sextupoles at positions with appropriate dispersion, D, we can correct the chromaticity from the quadrupoles.  x’ = (1/2)lk 2 ( (x p=p0 + D  p/p 0 ) 2 -y 2 ) = lk 2 x p=p0 D  p/p 0 + f(x 2, y 2 …) 1/f sext = l k 2 D  p/p 0

Non-linear terms Sextupoles also introduces higher order non-linear terms, f(x 2, y2…), some of which can be cancelled by symmetric sextupole placements, some which can not. These terms adds non-linear terms to the particle dynamics in the accelerator Real magnets contain small amount of higher order multipole fields, which also adds to the non- linear terms. For circular accelerators, the orbit stability now becomes as non-linear problem. This can be studied analytically, but we will not do this here The part of the transverse phase-space which is stable can be studies by particle tracking for many, many turns. The resulting stable phase-space is called the dynamics aperture Example of LHC dynamic aperture simulation study

Example: LHC lattice We have studied the transverse optics of a circular accelerator and we have had a look at the optics elements, –the dipole for bending –the quadrupole for focusing –the sextupole for chromaticity correction –In LHC: also octupoles for controlling non-linear dynamics The periodic structure in the LHC arc section

?

Synchrotron radiation Charged particles undergoing acceleration emit electromagnetic radiation Main limitation for circular electron machines –RF power consumption becomes too high The main limitation factor for LEP... –...the main reason for building LHC However, synchrotron radiations is also useful

Characteristic of SR: power

Characteristics of SR: distribution Electron rest-frame: radiation distributed as a "Hertz-dipole" Relativist electron: Hertz-dipole distribution in the electron rest-frame, but transformed into the laboratory frame the radiation form a very sharply peaked light-cone

Synchrotron radiation has a broad spectrum, due to short pulses as seen by an observer in the lab frame. 50% of radiation power is contained within a well defined "critical frequency” : Advantages of synchrotron radiation as a light source : 1.High intensity 2.Spectrum that cannot be covered easy with other sources 3.Critical frequency is tunable Characteristics of SR: spectrum Radiation spectrum for different electron beam energies See Wille (2000) for a derivation of the full spectrum

Synchrotron radiation centers Some applications of photon science with Synchrotron Radiation: material/molecule analysis (UV, X-ray) crystallography; photo voltaic Life sciences; protein compositon Example: the synchrotron SOLEIL, France About ~40 synchrotron light sources exists throughout the world, and more are under constructions. Synchrotrons, or storage rings with boosters, which circulate low-emittance electron beams of with beam energy of ~1 GeV to ~8 GeV.

Radiation damping in storage rings Synchrotron radiation: particle loses momentum on very close to direction of motion (within angle 1/  ) : Rf cavities replenishes momentum in longitudinal direction : The net effect is damping of the transverse phase-space of an electron beam in a storage ring – radiation damping. The emittance can be reduced by a several orders of magnitude in ~10 ms. A topic for the Linear Collider lectures.

Case study: the LHC

CERN accelerator complex LHC is responsible for accelerating protons from 450 GeV up to 7000 GeV 450 GeV protons injected into LHC from the SPS PS injects into the SPS LINACs injects into the PS The protons are generated by a proton source where a H 2 gas is heated up to provide protons The limitations in the earlier part of the acceleration chain originates from space charge -> collective effects lecture

LHC layout Circumference = m Four interactions points, where the beams collide, and massive particle physics experiments record the results of the collisions (ATLAS, CMS, ALICE, LHCb) Eight straight sections, containing the IPs, around 530 m long Eight arcs with a regular lattice structure, containing 23 arc cells Each arc cell has a periodic FODO-lattice, m long

LHC dipole magnets 8.3 T maximum field (allows for 7 TeV per proton beam). Generated by a current of 12 kA in the superconducting Rutherford coils.

LHC cavities Superconducting RF cavities. Standing wave, f = 400 MHz Each beam: one cryostat at 4.5 K, 4+4 cavities in each cryostat 5 MV/m accelerating gradient, 16 MeV energy gain per turn

LHC transverse beam size beta in drift space:  (s) =  * + (s-s*) 2 /  

LHC proton-proton collisions  two vacuum chambers, with opposite bending field Proton chosen as particle type due to low synchrotron radiation Magnetic field-strength limiting factor for particle energy RF cavities  bunched beams Superconducting lattice magnets and superconducting RF cavities Synchrotron with alternating-gradient focusing; regular FODO arc- sections with sextupoles for chromaticity correction and octupoles for controlling the non-linear dynamics

LHC nominal parameters at collision energy Particle typep, Pb Proton energy E p at collision7000 GeV Peak luminosity (ATLAS, CMS) 1 x cm -2 s -1 Circumference C m Bending radius  m RF frequency f RF MHz # particles per bunch n p 1.15 x # bunches n b 2808