Single Stream Recycling Brown-Outagamie-Winnebago Counties City of Oshkosh Common Council, June 10, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Solid Waste Management In the Thompson-Nicola Regional District Presented By Mr. Peter Hughes and Mr. Martin Dickson City of Merritt Council Meeting May.
Advertisements

October 22, 2009The Upside of Waste Management NEIA Workshop Central Newfoundland Waste Management Facilities BAE Newplan Group Ltd. Wayne Manuel P.Eng.
January 20 th, BudgetActual% YTDChange from prior year Ad Valorem Taxes $ 36,469,256$ 27,782, %$ 1,020,143 Sales Taxes 10,781,313 2,638,615.
Prepared by Denese Ballew and Brian Taylor from Land-of-Sky Regional Council Solid Waste Management Study for the Town of Waynesville.
WAUKESHA COUNTY RECYCLING Waukesha County Department of Parks & Land Use.
Sustainability at Sarah’s Oasis! E. Who are we? E.
Municipality of South Huron. Agenda Welcome and opening remarks Presentation - Francis Veilleux, President Bluewater Recycling Association Benefits of.
San Juan County Solid Waste: Funding. Solid Waste Funding Current Solid Waste Revenue Current Solid Waste Revenue Rate Structure used to collect revenue.
Presented to SWAC February 16, 2012 City of Cleveland Automated Waste Collection And Curbside Recycling Program.
Hub and Spoke Recycling Systems in North Carolina NC SWANA Fall Conference Rob Taylor NC Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Service.
Waste Collection. Lesson Objectives  Understand problems and concerns associated with MSW collection.  Compare and contrast privately and publicly operated.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues Uncertain federal revenue + Increasing construction.
Travis Unified School District Preliminary Budget May 8,
ERIN MILLER, ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARD May 17, 2012 Solid Waste Advisory Council Meeting.
Building a Recycling Program Through Innovation and Creativity instead of Big Budgets Financial Sustainability – Recycling in the City.
Proposed Equipment Acquisition Plan FY2012 Finance Department Kelly Dowe, Director Presented By: Jennifer Olenick, Deputy Assistant Director of Public.
Feb 17, 2010 Revised Blue Box Program Plan Draft for Consultation.
Albuquerque Recycling Now & In the Future Mayor Martin J. Chávez __ Ed Adams, P.E., Chief Administrative Officer Irene García, Chief Operations Officer.
The most efficient Waste to Energy Technology Henry A. Melendez, Ph.D.
2012 Operating Budget Electric Division Water Division Wastewater Division.
Overview effect of Single Stream on Plastics Recycling and Recycling in General By Tamsin Ettefagh Of Envision Plastics.
1 Bringing Curbside Recycling to Delaware A Proposal by: The Recycling Public Advisory Council (RPAC) The Delaware Solid Waste Authority (DSWA) The Department.
1 Best Practices in Single Stream Recycling Susan Kinsella & Richard Gertman Conservatree Environmental Planning Consultants CRRA Conference Workshop August.
“Conversation in Commodities”
City of Loveland Solid Waste Division Diversion Versus Disposal: Determining the Costs Diversion Versus Disposal: Determining the Costs.
Fourth Meeting June 26, 2012 "The Cleaner Greener Lincoln initiative will make the City of Lincoln an active leader in the area of sustainability, building.
Single Stream Recycling Where are We? NRRA Annual Conference June 7, 2011.
Westford’s Current Solid Waste Program Total costs in FY10 : $1.56 million Trash collection contract with ACME Waste Systems until August 2010 at annual.
1 FY09 Diversion Rates. 2 University City 3 Implementation - Feasibility 5,579 (74%) of University City properties receive municipal trash service $118.
Changing the Way South Carolina Values Trash Kristen Brown – Green Waste Solutions April 10, 2013 Turning waste into new products that can be sold to consumers.
Recycle America ® “ Sustainable Recycling Programs” Municipal Waste Management Association 2002 Fall Summit November 2002.
Town of Plymouth Solid Waste Management Town of Plymouth Department of Public Works November 26, 2012.
Let’s Talk Trash Reducing Solid Waste and Increasing Recycling LVW Public Forum November 20, 2008 Presented by Brooke Nash, MassDEP.
Department of Solid Waste Management FY11 Budget Update Mayor’s Report Harry J. Hayes, Director January 19, 2011.
Stability technology quality focused diverse customization refined.
Monroe County Solid Waste Management District June 10 th, 2010 Brian O’Neill & Patrick O’Neill Strategic Development Group Inc.
DSM E NVIRONMENTAL S ERVICES, I NC. Analysis of Enhanced Residential Recycling System for New Castle County Prepared for the Delaware Recycling Public.
ENTERPRISE FUND City of Springfield Trash Fee. FY12 Solid Waste Services Includes: Weekly Trash Collection Bi-Weekly Recycling Collection Bi-Weekly Curbside.
Utilities Department Solid Waste Transfer Station Update December 1, 2009.
1 11/8/ Waste Pro of South Carolina and Greenspace Louis J. Diaz Region Vice President South Carolina and Coastal Georgia.
Single Stream Recycling Material Recovery Facilities
Single Stream Works for Us! 2006 ANNUAL MEETING COLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAIN SWANA CHAPTER October 5th and 6th, 2006 Alamosa, Colorado Tom Strickland, Recycling.
Board of County Commissioners October 16, 2012 Solid Waste Study Update.
More Waste, Less Money The Challenge of Waste Management James Potter Acting Head of Waste, Planning & Environment.
CASELLA RESOURCE SOLUTIONS ZERO-SORT® RECYCLING COLLECTION ORGANICS ENERGY LANDFILLS casella.com 1 Bob Cappadona Vice President Casella November 5, 2015.
Department Mission 2 The mission of the Department of Solid Waste Management is to provide cost effective environmentally sound and safe solid waste management.
Region 2000 Solid Waste Management Initiative January 18, 2007 Virginia’s Region 2000 Local Government Council Briefing Region 2000 Solid Waste Management.
40 by 2020 “Pay As You Throw” A Phased In Approach.
FY 2015/16 Financial Overview Revenues: Operating revenues for FY 2015/16 are projected to be approximately $116,550 or 1.6% higher than operating revenues.
A Fairfax County, VA, publication Department of Public Works and Environmental Services Working for You! Return to Source Separated Recyclables Fairfax.
Recycling of Solid Waste February 10, 2016 Russell Schreiber, P.E. Director of Public Works.
2016 PROPOSED BUDGET: FINAL BUDGET PRESENTATION & SUMMARY NOVEMBER 17, 2015 MATTHEW MORTON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR.
Rumpke of Ohio, Inc Recycling Initiatives Steve Sargent Director of Recycling.
G enesee County: Material Recovery Facility Feasibility Study Michigan State University UP 494: Planning Practicum April 29th, 2016 Vincent Chen Hank Hong.
Fayetteville adopted a goal of a 80% Diversion rate with resolution Resolution passed with an 8-0 Council vote – Tons of waste to.
Curbside Recycling: Home. Work. Play. Kate Bailey, June 2016.
1 REFUSE AND RECYCLING STUDY COLLECTION ALTERNATIVES AND COST COMPARISONS May 18, 2009.
Solid Waste Proposal Options Council Workshop March 5, 2014.
“Reducing Green Waste from the MSW Stream”
Portsmouth Solid Waste Disposal Critical Decisions
Solid Waste Service Delivery
Pay-as-You-Throw for Kingston MA
CITY OF GAINESVILLE SOLID WASTE DIVISION
Standard Containers and Curbside Collection for
Curbside Waste Collection on Private Roads
Developing a MRF Public-Private Partnership in the City of Dallas
Town of Cary Curbside Computer Recycling Program
Haywood County Fiscal Year 2012 – 2013 Budget Public Hearing
Central Elgin Waste Management Service Delivery
City of Denison Automated trash collection
Presentation transcript:

Single Stream Recycling Brown-Outagamie-Winnebago Counties City of Oshkosh Common Council, June 10, 2008

What is Single Stream Recycling? At the curb: place all recyclables including paper fiber & food-beverage containers together for collection (normally in a cart or bin) Cart Bin

Why Consider Single Stream Recycling? Because of benefits single stream is the nationwide trend Single stream already in Wisconsin Local municipalities have been requesting single stream

Single Stream Collection Benefits Liked by municipalities & households: Easier - more convenient - no separation Allows collection methods to be upgraded to automated pickup with carts Cleaner neighborhoods if material is collected with a cart

Automated Collection is Proven & Efficient City of Menasha in Winnebago County City of Appleton and Various Townships in Outagamie

Benefits of Automated Collection Fewer personnel Improved worker safety Reduced workman’s comp Larger workforce available

Challenges of Automated Collection Higher initial purchase price and maintenance expenses for trucks Cart purchase cost/charge to resident? Re-education on ‘how and when to recycle’ Cart size fixed- overflow recyclables Access restrictions to carts in narrow streets or where blocked by parked cars

Single Stream Processing Benefits Consolidate recycling facilities from 2 to 1 (3 in 1993 > 2 in 2003 > 1 in 2009) Avoid spending $2 million to replace worn out equipment Invest in future with new technology New Single Stream Technologies

Single Stream Processing Facility Capital cost $8 million (preliminary) –Avoid spending $2 million on old technology –Incremental $6 million will provide modern equipment with strategic value –Cost shared between 3 Counties Single stream processing estimated cost same as or less than dual stream Single Stream

Glass/Paper Contamination Significant issue for counties due to strong paper mill industry in NE WI Met with reps from SCA Tissue & Georgia Pacific Already buy paper from single stream sources Mills: good MRFs and bad MRFs, regardless of single or dual stream status Counties will be building, operating & maintaining the MRF; paper quality completely within the Counties’ control

Now (tonnages depend upon municipalities receiving services desired)

Single Stream Other Benefits Increased recycling (save natural resources) (10-30% is common) Decreased landfilling (save landfill space) Single Stream Recycling Landfilling

Single Stream Other Benefits Keep Tri-County Partnership strong for over 60 municipalities Keep municipality costs down Allows for maximum collection flexibility

Conclusions Single Stream Processing More tonnage will be retained Processing cost per ton will remain the same or decrease Strong system Likely viable beyond 10 years Dual Stream Processing Tonnage will decline Processing cost per ton will likely increase Weak & declining system Likely not viable beyond 5 or 10 years

Single or Dual Stream Collection Each WC community can choose collection method best suited for them. For automated collection, carts cost approx. $50 ea. Winnebago County do large volume procurement? Winnebago Co recently rebated $200,047; could be used for single stream carts. Phase out of ‘blue bags’ with development of single stream processing facility. City of Madison Cart Distribution

Phasing Out Blue Bags: Cut Costs and Reduce Waste Residents save money in not having to buy one time use bags County saves money in not having to employ inmate labor to de-bag material, provide safety supplies to inmates, maintain de-bag line, transport bags to Landfill and Landfill tip fees These cost savings passed to municipalities via reduced recycling tip fees (estimated to be approx. $2.50/ton) Increases space at Transfer Station for other materials (electronic rcy, trash when landfill closes) Bags cannot be recycled (waste) Bags incompatible with single stream processing

Single Stream Processing Facility All 3 Counties received necessary approvals to proceed in Dec. 2007/Jan Will be located at the present Outagamie County Recycling Facility, Appleton, WI Existing building will be expanded. Existing dual stream processing equipment will be either reused or sold and removed.

Preliminary Schedule July 2008: begin construction Sept 2008-Jan 2009: equipment delivery, installation Feb/Mar 2009: construction complete; begin start-up, testing and training By July 1, 2009 begin full-scale operation

Questions? Jennifer Semrau Recycling Specialist (920) John Rabe Director, Solid Waste (920)