Prepared by Denese Ballew and Brian Taylor from Land-of-Sky Regional Council Solid Waste Management Study for the Town of Waynesville.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Barnstable County Commissioners Summary Report Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Alternatives Analysis April 7, 2010.
Advertisements

January 20 th, BudgetActual% YTDChange from prior year Ad Valorem Taxes $ 36,469,256$ 27,782, %$ 1,020,143 Sales Taxes 10,781,313 2,638,615.
WAUKESHA COUNTY RECYCLING Waukesha County Department of Parks & Land Use.
Wake County Experience with Alternative Landfill Land Use Presented by: John Roberson, P.E. Director of Solid Waste Management Division.
Town of Cape Elizabeth Recycling and Municipal Solid Waste Overview.
San Juan County Solid Waste: Funding. Solid Waste Funding Current Solid Waste Revenue Current Solid Waste Revenue Rate Structure used to collect revenue.
Presented to SWAC February 16, 2012 City of Cleveland Automated Waste Collection And Curbside Recycling Program.
Waste Collection. Lesson Objectives  Understand problems and concerns associated with MSW collection.  Compare and contrast privately and publicly operated.
MULTI-FAMILY SOLID WASTE COLLECTION WHY FOOD SCRAPS IN GARBAGE ARE A PROBLEM ? More than 40% of garbage is food scraps Tipping fee for garbage $109/MT.
Building a Recycling Program Through Innovation and Creativity instead of Big Budgets Financial Sustainability – Recycling in the City.
Albuquerque Recycling Now & In the Future Mayor Martin J. Chávez __ Ed Adams, P.E., Chief Administrative Officer Irene García, Chief Operations Officer.
TIA Solid Waste Consultants, Inc.1 Presented by Miriam Zimms, Senior Consultant TIA Solid Waste Consultants, Inc. Tampa, Florida Pollution Prevention Conference.
1 Bringing Curbside Recycling to Delaware A Proposal by: The Recycling Public Advisory Council (RPAC) The Delaware Solid Waste Authority (DSWA) The Department.
San Juan County Solid Waste Program Rate Workshop 12/10/02.
City of Houston City Council Budget Workshop FY12 Budget Presentation Department of Solid Waste Management Harry J. Hayes, Director June 7, 2011 Mayor.
Westford’s Current Solid Waste Program Total costs in FY10 : $1.56 million Trash collection contract with ACME Waste Systems until August 2010 at annual.
Improving Public Works Efficiency. Evaluating what we do: Are we doing the right work?
Waste Management Opportunities and Service Offerings for Lake County.
Department of Public Works Non-Exclusive Solid Waste Collection Franchise System – Review April 28, 2014.
LBA ASSOCIATES 2003 Colorado SWANA Annual Mtg CO SOLID WASTE SURVEY  By LBA Associates (with CAFR)  Collected 2002 program data  Disclaimer – quality.
A Comparison of Estimated Costs of Waste Disposal Options Is there a Future for Waste-to-Energy? Jeffrey F. Clunie R. W. Beck, Inc. N O V E M B E R 2 0.
Laura J. Weber President The Lydia Company Serving our clients to build a better tomorrow.
Town of Plymouth Solid Waste Management Town of Plymouth Department of Public Works November 26, 2012.
WTE & Recycling in Massachusetts Municipal Waste Management Association October 22, 2003 Shawn Worster Executive Director, NESWC Director, KEMA- Xenergy,
California Integrated Waste Management Board March 16, 2004 San Jose, CA City of San Jose Diversion Programs.
RECYCLING IN THE SOUTHEAST: WHAT’S UP WITH OUR NEIGHBORS? Presented by Abby Goldsmith A. Goldsmith Resources, LLC Georgia Recycling Coalition Annual Meeting.
Environmental Quality Restricted Account (EQRA) Background Bill Sinclair Acting Executive Director Utah Department of Environmental Quality May 28, 2009.
Utilities Department Solid Waste System Tipping Fees November 11, 2008.
California Roundtable May 23, 2005 Sacramento, California Donna Perala City of San Jose Single Stream & Beyond.
DSM E NVIRONMENTAL S ERVICES, I NC. Analysis of Enhanced Residential Recycling System for New Castle County Prepared for the Delaware Recycling Public.
ENTERPRISE FUND City of Springfield Trash Fee. FY12 Solid Waste Services Includes: Weekly Trash Collection Bi-Weekly Recycling Collection Bi-Weekly Curbside.
Utilities Department Solid Waste Transfer Station Update December 1, 2009.
County and Municipal Solid Waste Programs in Colorado David Snapp Environmental Protection Specialist Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment.
1 11/8/ Waste Pro of South Carolina and Greenspace Louis J. Diaz Region Vice President South Carolina and Coastal Georgia.
Solid Waste – Exclusive Commercial Franchise P RESENTATION TO B OARD OF C OUNTY C OMMISSIONERS M ARCH 30, 2010 S PECIAL M EETING.
Board of County Commissioners October 16, 2012 Solid Waste Study Update.
Regional Recycling Solutions, LLC.   County purchased 103 acres in July of 1993 from Greene Land Company  Elchin Inc purchases 40 acres in April 1998.
Kindersley Waste & Recycle: Landfill Impacts SWANA Regional Waste Management Workshop November 16, 2015 – Saskatoon, SK.
Full Cost Accounting for Solid Waste Management September 2015 for the town of Lisbon.
SWANA - Saskatchewan Landfill Capital and Operational Costs By Steve Johnson M.Eng., P.Eng. November 2015.
Department Mission 2 The mission of the Department of Solid Waste Management is to provide cost effective environmentally sound and safe solid waste management.
Region 2000 Solid Waste Management Initiative January 18, 2007 Virginia’s Region 2000 Local Government Council Briefing Region 2000 Solid Waste Management.
FY 2015/16 Financial Overview Revenues: Operating revenues for FY 2015/16 are projected to be approximately $116,550 or 1.6% higher than operating revenues.
1. FY Proposed Budget Jamie Justice, Town Manager & Piet Swart, Finance Director April 26, 2016 Fiscal Year Proposed Budget 2.
1 Briefing on Yard Waste Collection Policy March 2, 2010.
City Council July 1, Solid Waste Services Request for Proposals published February 11, 2014 Republic Services’ Proposals were Ranked First Council.
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CAPITAL PROJECTS ASSESSMENT Board of County Commissioners FEBRUARY 24, 2009.
Town of Bethlehem Dan Rain, Recycling Coordinator.
Solid Waste Study Board of County Commissioners March 20, 2012 Orange County.
1 REFUSE AND RECYCLING STUDY COLLECTION ALTERNATIVES AND COST COMPARISONS May 18, 2009.
SUMMIT COUNTY ZERO WASTE TASK FORCE August 27, 2012.
SUMMIT COUNTY COUNCIL WORK SESSION -Solid Waste Financials- Jaren Scott Solid Waste Department.
Solid Waste Proposal Options Council Workshop March 5, 2014.
Sonoma County Waste Management Agency Alternatives and Next Steps
Solid Waste Service Update
City and County of Broomfield Solid Waste Task Force
Sustainable Management
CITY OF NEW SMYRNA BEACH
Developing a MRF Public-Private Partnership in the City of Dallas
Mecklenburg County Solid Waste FY 2018.
Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project Doing More with Our Waste
Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project Doing More with Our Waste
2017 Total Revenues were: $9,165, Revenues by program:
Tribal Solid Waste “So, How much does it cost…?”
Public Works Department October 2016
SWAC – Agenda 11/27/18 1. City of Bend – Southeast Development Plan
SWAC – Agenda 3/12/19 Introduction / Approval of Minutes
SWAC – Agenda 1/22/19 1. Introduction / Approval of Minutes
Utilities Department Solid Waste Business Plan and Tipping Fees
SWAC – Agenda 10/23/18 Chapter 6 – Alternative Technology – Draft Findings 2. Chapter 7 – Draft Landfill Disposal Existing Disposal System Disposal Options.
Presentation transcript:

Prepared by Denese Ballew and Brian Taylor from Land-of-Sky Regional Council Solid Waste Management Study for the Town of Waynesville

Land-of-Sky Regional Council  Land-of-Sky is one of 16 regional planning and development organizations created by the state to serve County and Municipal governments  Town of Waynesville is part of the Southwestern Commission  turned to Land-of-Sky because of expertise in solid waste planning

Presentation Outline  Background  Purpose of the Study  Solid Waste Program Baseline  Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Disposal Scenarios  Cost-effectiveness of Solid Waste Program Services  Privatization  Summary

Background  May 2010: Haywood County announces intention to privatize White Oak Landfill (WOLF) and close Transfer Station  Town of Waynesville projects large cost increases associated with hauling solid waste directly to WOLF and possibly paying tipping fees on residential waste  August 2011: Haywood County announces that Transfer Station will close on 6/30/12  October 2011: Haywood County signs contract with Santek to manage WOLF starting 12/1/11

Purpose of the Study  Establish a baseline of the Town’s Solid Waste Program costs and tonnages  Project the cost of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) disposal options  hauling MSW to the White Oak Landfill (WOLF)  hauling MSW to an alternative waste disposal site  constructing a new transfer station in Waynesville  privatizing the Town’s Solid Waste Program services  Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of overall Solid Waste Program and opportunities for cost reductions

Solid Waste Program Baseline Town of Waynesville Solid Waste Services Solid Waste Services SW Expenses, FY Annual Tons Managed Cost per Ton Destination Commercial Solid Waste$396,024 2,896$137Haywood T-Station Residential Solid Waste$291,342 2,902$100Haywood T-Station Recycling$110, $319Haywood County MRF Yard Waste*$441,256 1,360$324Bible Baptist Rd Site Street Waste$133, White Oak Landfill Bulky Waste**$74,066 4 Haywood County MRF TOTAL$1,446,4947,697 * Yard waste tonnage is from FY figure in 2009 Haywood County Solid Waste Management Plan (HCSWMP) ** Bulky waste tonnage only includes FY white goods tonnages from 2009 HCSWMP

Solid Waste Program Baseline

MSW Disposal Baseline  MSW expenses projected to exceed revenues after closure of Haywood County Transfer Station  Commercial revenues  $16.59/month  Dumpster lease fees  Residential revenues  $6.50/month to 4,650 hhlds

MSW Disposal Scenarios White Oak Landfill (WOLF) Haywood County Transfer Station Waste Management Transfer Station Site for Possible New Transfer Station, 144 Calhoun Rd Point of Origin, 129 Legion Dr., Waynesville Map of Possible MSW Transfer Stations and Disposal Sites in Proximity of Waynesville

MSW Disposal Scenarios ScenarioScenario Description Assumptions Round trip Miles Comm. Tipping Fee Res. Tipping Fee A Haul MSW to Haywood County Transfer Station and pay $55/ton tipping fee on commercial waste only. NOT AN OPTION AFTER JUNE $55/ton$0/ton B Haul MSW to White Oak Landfill and pay $55/ton tipping fee on commercial waste only. 41$55/ton$0/ton C Haul MSW to White Oak Landfill and pay $55/ton tipping fee on commercial and residential waste 41$55/ton D Haul MSW to Waste Management Transfer Station and pay $48/ton tipping fee on commercial and residential waste 54.8$48/ton E Construct a new transfer station on Town property to be operated by a private contractor 3.6$55/ton

MSW Disposal Scenarios, Year 1 Hauling Scenarios +1 rear loader +1 driver + residential tip fee+$60K in diesel +$80K in diesel + 27% + 55% + 49%

MSW Disposal Scenarios, New Transfer Station E Construct a new transfer station on Town property to be operated by a private contractor

MSW Disposal Scenarios, New Transfer Station $1.3 5% interest $55/ton tip fee

MSW Disposal Scenarios

MSW Disposal Recommendations ScenarioScenario Description AssumptionsProjections Round trip Miles Comm. Tipping Fee Res. Tipping Fee Cumulative Cost in Year 20 (millions) A Haul MSW to Haywood County Transfer Station NOT POSSIBLE AFTER JUNE $55/ton$0/ton $19.9 B Haul MSW to White Oak Landfill and pay no residential tipping fee 41$55/ton$0/ton $26.8 C Haul MSW to White Oak Landfill and pay tipping on all waste 41$55/ton $33.5 D Haul MSW to Waste Management Transfer Station 54.8$48/ton $32.9 E Construct a new transfer station on Town property to be operated by a private contractor 3.6$55/ton $27.7

MSW Disposal Recommendations  Haul MSW to the White Oak Landfill  If a residential tipping fee is NOT charged at WOLF Most likely scenario based on recent discussions with the County Takes advantage of County sanitation fee to Town residents  Consider constructing a new transfer station  If a residential tipping fee is charged at WOLF, and  If sufficient tonnage is available for a new transfer station  Consider hauling to Waste Management Transfer Station  If a residential tipping fee is charged at WOLF, and  If insufficient tonnage to justify new transfer station construction

Cost-effectiveness of Solid Waste Program Town of Waynesville Solid Waste Services Solid Waste Service SW Expenses, FY Annual Tons Managed Cost per Ton Destination Commercial SW$396,024 2,896$137Haywood T-Station Residential SW$291,342 2,902$100Haywood T-Station Recycling$110, $319Haywood County MRF Yard Waste*$441,256 1,360$324Bible Baptist Rd Site Street Waste$133, White Oak Landfill Bulky Waste**$74,066 4 Haywood County MRF TOTAL$1,446,4947,697 * Yard waste tonnage is from FY figure in 2009 Haywood County Solid Waste Management Plan (HCSWMP) ** Bulky waste tonnage only includes FY white goods tonnages from 2009 HCSWMP

Cost-effectiveness of Solid Waste Program, MSW  Town MSW cost of $119/ton is below NCLM average of $135/ton  Hauling to WOLF could increase Town’s MSW cost to at least $150/ton  NCLM benchmarks based on 2010 data from similarly sized municipalities in North Carolina

Cost-effectiveness of Solid Waste Program, MSW  Increase tonnage per trip on rear loaders  Find overnight parking area with leachate containment  Reduce trips to landfill from 9 to 6  Reduce staffing levels on rear loaders  Evaluate efficiency of collection & disposal routes

Cost-effectiveness of Solid Waste Program, Recycling  Recycling costs the Town $319/ton  above NCLM average of $210/ton  High cost per ton reflects low recycling rate  Higher recycling rate could reduce MSW costs by reducing trips to the landfill and tipping fees

Cost-effectiveness of Solid Waste Program, Recycling  Increase recycling rate  Roll-out cart pilot program grants from NC DEAO  Assistance with recycling education & outreach from WRP  Encourage businesses using Town solid waste services to increase recycling with Town or private contractor  Use rear loader to reduce trips to the MRF  Work with County to keep recycling staging area open

Cost-effectiveness of Solid Waste Program, Yard Waste  Yard waste is the most expensive service in the Town’s Solid Waste Program  High labor and equipment costs

Cost-effectiveness of Solid Waste Program, Yard Waste  Charge for yard waste collection above a certain volume (e.g. roll-out cart purchased from Town)  Implement backyard composting program  Yard waste cost of $95/household is well above NCLM average of $39

Privatization of Town Solid Waste Program Services  Privatization could lower the Town’s solid waste costs  Privatization of MSW often coupled with recycling  Issues with Town’s capital investments and cross-trained personnel

Recommendations  Municipal Solid Waste Disposal  Haul commercial and residential solid waste to WOLF estimated to increase the Town’s MSW costs by 25%  Negotiate written agreements with Haywood County to waive residential tipping fees at WOLF and reimburse the Town for the increased cost of hauling to WOLF

Recommendations  Cost-effectiveness of the Town’s Solid Waste Program  Municipal Solid Waste Increase MSW tons per trip on rear-loaders Minimize staff on rear-loaders Re-evaluate routing efficiency after June 2012 Increase recycling rates to divert MSW from WOLF  Recycling Increase recycling tons per trip with rear loader Work with County to maintain staging areas for recyclables  Yard Waste Charge for yard waste service above a certain volume Implement backyard composting program

Questions  Denese Ballew,  Brian Taylor,