Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level 1 Riverside County - Orange County.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Click to edit Master title style »Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level Fifth level Construction Update 11/13/2012 Larry.
Advertisements

Previously Evaluated Alternatives Out of Corridor October 2005.
Click to edit Master title style. Click to edit Master subtitle style.
Orange County Transportation Authority Measure M2 M2020 Update and Select Project Highlights Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December.
New I-65 Interchange at Worthsville Road Welcome!.
JANUARY 9, 2002 SCAJAQUADA CORRIDOR STUDY Grant Street to Parkside Avenue City of Buffalo Fisher Associates Joseph Passonneau & Partners In Association.
January 31 st, 2012 North Coast Corridor A Better Environment for the Future.
South Side Red River Bridge Corridor Study Phase III Preliminary Geotechnical Study Phase IV New Alignment Alternatives Evaluation.
The US 101 Mobility Study will -  Examine current and future conditions, identify key deficiency areas and propose multi-modal improvement packages along.
Transportation Infrastructure Bond Corridor Mobility Improvement Account.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Metro Green Line Eastern Extension Summary of January 1993 Final Environmental Impact Report.
Tysons 1 Operational Analysis of Dulles Toll Road Ramps to Tysons Board Transportation Committee Meeting September 17, 2013 Seyed Nabavi Fairfax County.
State of Florida Department of Transportation SR 7 (US 441) Value Engineering Study September 24-28, 2001 Segment III - From North of Hollywood Blvd to.
Elk Grove – Rancho Cordova – El Dorado Connector Project Elk Grove – Ranch Cordova – El Dorado Connector Joint Powers Authority Project Briefing JPA Board.
© 2003 TranSystems Corporation Advisory Committee Meeting January 19, 2010.
Ross Valley Flood Protection and Watershed Program Flood Zone 9 Advisory Board April 16, 2015 Flow Reduction Study Preliminary Results 1.
Environmental Assessment Public Information Meeting – September 2010 Realignment of a Portion of a Utah Lake Drainage Basin Water Delivery System (ULS)
Intersection & Interchange Geometrics (IIG) Innovative Design Considerations for All Users Module 8 Intersection- Interchange Evaluation Process.
Steven C. Braun, P.E. Senior Project Manager. A Master Plan identified a Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) for the corridor … This LPA was adopted by.
Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Transportation Policy Board Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
1 Senate Transportation & Housing Committee December 13, 2005 Orange County Transportation Authority.
WELCOME! July 31, 2012 ODOT District July 31, 2012 PURPOSE OF TONIGHT’S MEETING Introduce the project –Reconstruct I-75.
PROJECT UPDATE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #3 OCTOBER 17 4:30 PM – 6:30 PM Dakota County Northern Service Center.
N. Hancock Road Traffic Signals October 14 th, 2014 Presentation Prepared By Lake County Public Works Department.
Purpose To develop and evaluate a range of transit and transportation alternatives throughout the MPO area, considering: u Regional Goals and Objectives.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level o Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level CHARLESTONMOBILE WILMINGTON SAVANNAH.
CEMEX Open Discussion March 10, Outline Background Background Issue Issue Proposed Actions Proposed Actions.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation VDRPT Route 1 Multimodal Alternatives Analysis: Recommendations for Next Steps Board Transportation.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Fairfax County Parkway Corridor Study Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee December 1,
I-15 Express Lanes Project January 2012 I-15 Express Lanes Project January 2012.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee Overview of RCTC’s Major Projects December 8, 2015.
Metropolitan Council 1 Twin Cities Region Transportation Policy Plan Nacho Diaz Metropolitan Council Evaluating Economic and Community Impacts of Transit.
A Sketch Planning Assessment of Managed-Lane Options for the I-5 Freeway Corridor Master Plan William R. Loudon, DKS Associates.
ALACHUA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIES FOR FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WORK PROGRAM Fiscal Year 2015 – 2019 Presentation to Board of County.
Real Estate Taxes pp SECTION. Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 2 SECTION Copyright © Glencoe/McGraw-Hill.
Biosimilar (Insulin) – Competitive Landscape and Market & Pipeline Analysis, 2016 DelveInsight’s, “Biosimilar (Insulin) – Competitive Landscape and Market. Request for sample of this research report:
Title of Presentation May Go Here Department Name Presentation for March 4, 2014 University Marketing.
Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee June 25, 2013 (6/18 presentation draft) Proposed High Quality Transit Network Concept 1.
STEERING COMMITTEE JANUARY 24, INTRODUCTIONS 2 WHO IS ON THE PROJECT TEAM?  Dakota County Regional Railroad Authority  Ramsey County Regional.
Planning Commission Study Session: Preferred Plan July 23, 2015.
Waterdown Road Corridor Class Environmental Assessment (Phase 3 & 4) Community Services Committee May 9, 2012.
Public Input Meeting April 16, Meeting Schedule Housekeeping Meeting Schedule – Open House – 6:00-6:30 pm – Presentation – 6:30-7:00 pm – Q&A –
Headline sample style Intro sample style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level o Fifth level.
Central Polk Parkway PD&E Study
Click to Add Title Click to Add Subtitle.
NGTA Halton Planning and Public Works Committee
Click to Add Title Click to Add Subtitle.
Technical and Public Advisory Committee Meeting #3
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
Click to edit Master text styles
Click to Add Title Click to Add Subtitle.
Click to Add Title Click to Add Subtitle.
Author names here Author association names here
Click to edit Master text styles
Insert Session Title of Up to Three Lines of Text and Information
TITLE SLIDE GOES HERE Optional subhead.
Click to edit Master text styles
Slide Title Edit Master text styles Second level Third level
ОПШТЕСТВО ТЕМА: МЕСТОТО ВО КОЕ ЖИВЕАМ Скопје
Author names here Author associations here
Author names here Author associations here
Stockton City Council December 6, 2007 Land Use Diagram Changes
Click to edit Master text styles
Lorem ipsum dolores Lorem ipsum dolores.
Presentation Title Presenter’s Name.
Author names here Author associations here
Click to edit Master text styles
Title Layout SUBTITLE. Title and Content Layout with List Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level.
Northeast Area Transit Evaluation (NATE) II Update FasTracks Monitoring Committee August 5, 2014.
Presentation transcript:

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level 1 Riverside County - Orange County MIS Riverside County - Orange County Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1 Riverside County - Orange County Major Investment Study Policy Committee Meeting February 4, 2005

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level 2 Riverside County - Orange County MIS Outline Key Study Objectives Conceptual Corridors –Proposed Connection Areas Strategic Options Screening and Evaluation Process Initial Fatal Flaw Criteria Proposed Policy Direction Next Steps

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level 3 Riverside County - Orange County MIS Key Study Objectives Maximize improvements to the SR-91 Identify new corridors that meet P&N Include multi-modal alternatives Plan for 2030 growth –50% capacity over existing

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level 4 Riverside County - Orange County MIS Conceptual Corridors Five broad corridors identified Many specific alignments/options to be evaluated in each corridor Using route optimization tools to define viable alignments in new corridors Costs, impacts, and benefits of screened alternative will be assessed in detail

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level 5 Riverside County - Orange County MIS Conceptual Corridors

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level 6 Riverside County - Orange County MIS Conceptual Corridors Existing SR-91 facility Corridor A (Santa Ana Canyon) Corridor B I-15/Cajalco Road to SR-241/SR-133 Corridor C I-15 North of Lake Elsinore to SR-241/SR-133 Corridor D (Ortega Highway)

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level 7 Riverside County - Orange County MIS Proposed Connection Areas West End – Vicinity of SR-241/SR-133 –Between Jeffrey Road and Portola North Avoids East Orange development area Avoids Frank R. Bowerman Landfill Avoids Irvine Lake/park East End – Along I-15 –Vicinity of Cajalco Road Future Mid-County Parkway –Vicinity of Lake St./Nichols Rd. Undeveloped area (supported by City of Lake Elsinore)

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level 8 Riverside County - Orange County MIS Sample Strategic Options

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level 9 Riverside County - Orange County MIS

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level 10 Riverside County - Orange County MIS Improve Existing SR-91 Additional General Purpose (GP) lanes Additional carpool lanes (HOV) lanes Additional auxiliary lanes Collector/distributor roads Convert Express Lanes to GP Extend Express Lanes into Riverside County Direct connectors SR-241/SR-71 Elevated structures Special purpose lanes (e.g., truck, transit)

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level 11 Riverside County - Orange County MIS Corridor A Truck bypass lanes Prado Expressway concept Direct connectors Collector-distributor roads

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level 12 Riverside County - Orange County MIS Corridor C Various alignments/capacities to be studied for the following concepts: Tunnel only Tunnel/surface roads Surface roads

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level 13 Riverside County - Orange County MIS Corridor D (Ortega Highway) Tunnel/surface roads Surface roads only

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level 14 Riverside County - Orange County MIS Options Previously studied but not recommended for further consideration

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level 15 Riverside County - Orange County MIS Previously Studied Options

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level 16 Riverside County - Orange County MIS Corona Bypass –Disruptive to existing communities BIA Alternative –High cost to benefit Carbon Canyon Road –Adverse impacts to existing communities and environment –High cost to benefit

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level 17 Riverside County - Orange County MIS Screening and Evaluation Process

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level 18 Riverside County - Orange County MIS

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level 19 Riverside County - Orange County MIS

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level 20 Riverside County - Orange County MIS Initial Fatal Flaw Criteria Extensive displacements to existing and planned communities –Large area/number of residential property takings Constructability issues –Physical barriers (e.g., lakes, landfills, faults) –Groundwater Inadequate capacity in relation to cost –Low capacity/high cost facility (e.g., elev. truck lanes) –Low capacity tunnels

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level 21 Riverside County - Orange County MIS Proposed Policy Direction Approve five conceptual corridors –SR-91 (SR-55 to I-15) –Corridors A, B, and C –Corridor D, Ortega Hwy (SR-241 to I-15) Approve connection areas –West End Vicinity of SR-133/SR-241 –East End along I-15 Cajalco Road; Lake Street – Nichols Road

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level 22 Riverside County - Orange County MIS Next Steps March 4, 2005 Policy Committee Meeting –Recommended screening alternatives –Specific alignments/options