2  Identify the study question › What is already known on the topic? 3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Outbreak investigation report Agnes Hajdu EpiTrain III, Jurmala, Latvia Based on EPIET material.
Advertisements

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Yiu-fai Cheung, MD Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine LKS Faculty of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong, China Sharing in GRF.
Ask a Question What are we testing? Step 1. Step 2 Research your topic. Look at the past work of others to see if this problem has already been tested.
Study Designs in Epidemiologic
Introduction to Epidemiology
Mother and Child Health: Research Methods G.J.Ebrahim Editor Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, Oxford University Press.
Writing for Publication
8. Evidence-based management Step 3: Critical appraisal of studies
Elements of a clinical trial research protocol
Biostatistics ~ Types of Studies. Research classifications Observational vs. Experimental Observational – researcher collects info on attributes or measurements.
Writing a Research Protocol Michael Aronica MD Program Director Internal Medicine-Pediatrics.
Reviewing the Literature P9419 Class #4 October 20, 2003.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2004.
Cohort Studies.
Research Proposal Development of research question
A HIERARCHY OF EVIDENCE WITHIN THE SCHOLARLY LITERATURE Shelly Warwick, Ph.D – Permission is granted to reproduce and edit this work for non-commercial.
By Dr. Ahmed Mostafa Assist. Prof. of anesthesia & I.C.U. Evidence-based medicine.
Cohort Studies Hanna E. Bloomfield, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine Associate Chief of Staff, Research Minneapolis VA Medical Center.
How do cancer rates in your area compare to those in other areas?
Principles of Research Writing & Design Educational Series Fundamentals of Study Design Lauren Duke, MA Program Coordinator Meharry-Vanderbilt Alliance.
How to Write a Scientific Paper Hann-Chorng Kuo Department of Urology Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital.
The Chicago Guide to Writing about Multivariate Analysis, 2 nd edition. Paper versus speech versus poster: Different formats for communicating research.
Evidence-Based Medicine 4 More Knowledge and Skills for Critical Reading Karen E. Schetzina, MD, MPH.
Reading Scientific Papers Shimae Soheilipour
Study Design. Study Designs Descriptive Studies Record events, observations or activities,documentaries No comparison group or intervention Describe.
Study Designs Afshin Ostovar Bushehr University of Medical Sciences Bushehr, /4/20151.
Systematic Reviews.
Study Designs in Epidemiologic
Field Epidemiology Fall 2000 Patty Kissinger, PhD John L. Clayton, MPH Megan O’Brien, MPH.
Critical Appraisal of the Scientific Literature
Landmark Trials: Recommendations for Interpretation and Presentation Julianna Burzynski, PharmD, BCOP, BCPS Heme/Onc Clinical Pharmacy Specialist 11/29/07.
Clinical Writing for Interventional Cardiologists.
Case Control Study: An example Depression and the Risk of Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest July, 2005.
The Discussion Section. 2 Overall Purpose : To interpret your results and justify your interpretation The Discussion.
Causal relationships, bias, and research designs Professor Anthony DiGirolamo.
System error Biases in epidemiological studies FETP India.
Overview of Study Designs. Study Designs Experimental Randomized Controlled Trial Group Randomized Trial Observational Descriptive Analytical Cross-sectional.
Anatomy of a Research Article Five (or six) major sections Abstract Introduction (without a heading!) Method (and procedures) Results Discussion and conclusions.
Study designs. Kate O’Donnell General Practice & Primary Care.
1 Basic epidemiological study designs and its role in measuring disease exposure association M. A. Yushuf Sharker Assistant Scientist Center for Communicable.
Master’s Essay in Epidemiology I P9419 Methods Luisa N. Borrell, DDS, PhD October 25, 2004.
Sifting through the evidence Sarah Fradsham. Types of Evidence Primary Literature Observational studies Case Report Case Series Case Control Study Cohort.
Title Page The title page is the first page of your psychology paper. In order to make a good first impression, it is important to have a well-formatted.
BY DR. HAMZA ABDULGHANI MBBS,DPHC,ABFM,FRCGP (UK), Diploma MedED(UK) Associate Professor DEPT. OF MEDICAL EDUCATION COLLEGE OF MEDICINE June 2012 Writing.
CHP400: Community Health Program - lI Research Methodology STUDY DESIGNS Observational / Analytical Studies Cohort Study Present: Disease Past: Exposure.
Design of Clinical Research Studies ASAP Session by: Robert McCarter, ScD Dir. Biostatistics and Informatics, CNMC
Research Design Evidence Based Medicine Concepts and Glossary.
Unit 11: Evaluating Epidemiologic Literature. Unit 11 Learning Objectives: 1. Recognize uniform guidelines used in preparing manuscripts for publication.
LMMHC Medicine Research rotation B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine Associate Director of Graduate Medical Education.
How to Read a Journal Article. Basics Always question: – Does this apply to my clinical practice? – Will this change how I treat patients? – How could.
Questions to Committee about Potential Cancer Risk with Use of Topical Immunosuppressants (Calcineurin Inhibitors) Question 1: Messages about Risk A. Based.
Clinical Effectiveness Journal Club Template Topic: Presenter(s):
How to write a Research Proposal Dr. Areefa Albahri.
Corso di clinical writing. What to expect today? Core modules IntroductionIntroduction General principlesGeneral principles Specific techniquesSpecific.
Developing a Research Question and Writing a Proposal GH531/ Epi
Critiquing Quantitative Research.  A critical appraisal is careful evaluation of all aspects of a research study in order to assess the merits, limitations,
Article Title Resident Name, MD SVCH6/13/2016 Journal Club.
Critical Appraisal of a Paper Feedback. Critical Appraisal Full Reference –Authors (Surname & Abbreviations) –Year of publication –Full Title –Journal.
“Reading and commenting papers” (Scientific English) Alexis Descatha INSERM, UMS UVSQ- Unité de pathologie professionnelle, Garches.
Significance of Findings and Discussion
Writing Scientific Research Paper
The Goal: Add New Information To The Scientific Knowledge Base
Assign membership into BFO/OBI branches
Assessing Bias 1.
Clinical Effectiveness Journal Club Template
Project Title Subtitle: make sure you specify it is a research project
Chapter 4 Summary.
Level of Evidence Lecture 4.
Presentation transcript:

2

 Identify the study question › What is already known on the topic? 3

 Identify the study question › What is already known on the topic? › What remains to be known? 4

 Identify the study question › What is already known on the topic? › What remains to be known? › What are the expected results/hypotheses? 5

 Identify the study question › What is already known on the topic? › What remains to be known? › What are the expected results/hypotheses? 6

 Identify the study population › Who? › What? › When? › Where? 7

 Identify the study population › Who? › What? › When? › Where? 8

 Case-control  Cohort  Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)  Surveillance  Cross-sectional  Chart Review  Case Study 9

 “Cause → Effect” 10

 “Cause → Effect” 11

 “Cause → Effect” 12

 “Cause → Effect” 13

 Other Variables 14

15

16

17

18

 Possible clinical implications of results 19

 Possible public health implications of results 20

Publication tips 21

 Literature/Critical Review  Study Question  Study Population  Study Design  Exposure, Outcome, Covariates  Results  Strengths, Limitations, Implications  Future Directions 22

 Write down the main idea (research question) of your project  Look for key components in each article; do they fit? › Stay within the boundaries of your research question  Keep your review in a notebook or spreadsheet  File the literature in a logical way › Reference managers can assist with this  Flag or highlight key content 23

Author, yearPopulationMethodsKey findings Foraker, 2011ARIC cohort, ages at baseline, Assessed 30-day readmission accounting for death as a competing risk Predictors of 30- day readmission were nSES and comorbidity score Binkley, 2009Heart failure patients at OSUMC, ages 55+, Assessed predictors of readmission Elevated glucose predicted 90- day readmission 24

 Validity of author’s approach  Potential sources of bias  External influences on study findings  Communication of study message  Implications for your research › Background for grant proposal or manuscript › Limitations of existing studies › Strengths of your study 25

 Study question › Is the central hypothesis clear?  Study design › Are there other approaches?  Study population › Selection of subjects: enrollment, retention  Definition of exposure, outcome, covariates  Results  Strengths, limitations, implications 26

Other issues 27

28

29

30

31

32

 Be prompt  Address each point consecutively › Restate reviewers’ concerns  Cut and paste manuscript edits into the letter, or point to text (page, paragraph, line number) 33

Literature review suggestions 34

35

36

37

38