The Protection of Human Subjects in Research Piece Presenter: Roxana Killian.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

HIPAA – Privacy Rule and Research USCRF Research Educational Series March 19, 2003.

Advertisements

The Research Application Process Charles Morgan, Ph.D. Clinical Investigation Department (CID) Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, VA.

THE UW HEALTH SCIENCES IRB S OVERVIEW PRACTICAL REGULATORY ISSUES IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.

Protecting the Privacy of Family Members in Survey and Pedigree Research Jeffrey R. Botkin, MD, MPH University of Utah.

Implementation of Privacy Board Reviews at PCMC Mary Thomason, Intermountain Healthcare Privacy Board Chair.

The IRB Process Tony Medure, M.A., CIP, RAC Vanderbilt Human Research Protection Program.

Institutional Review Board Guidance.  Independent Ethics Committee  Ethical Review Board  Research Ethics Committee 2.

TODAY’S TOPIC: Ethics – deconstructing consent and participation with “vulnerable” populations.

Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.

Protecting Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and.

Exempt Research Mary Banks BS, BSN IRB Director CRC IRB and BUMC IRB.

IRB 101: Introduction to Human Subject Research

Protecting Human Participants in Research syr

1 HIPAA, Researchers and the IRB: Part Two Alan Homans, IRB Chair and Nancy Stalnaker, IRB Administrator.

IRB-Investigator/ Research Coordinator Mtg. “What You Can Do to Facilitate an Efficient IRB Review” January 13, 2004 George Gasparis.

CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting November 9, 2004 Research Use of Stored Data and Tissues.

IRB Basics Helen Panageas New York University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board Portion of slides courtesy of Suzanne M. Smith, University.

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)

An Overview of Research Ethics & The Tri-Council Policy Statement 2

Lisa Denney, MPH HRPP Assistant Director Melanie Mace, MA HRPP Education and Training Coordinator Bill Woods, PhD CAPS Policy and Ethics Core November.

1 Wheaton College INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB)

Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.

International Research & Research Involving Children K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development.

 Understanding the IRB Process University of Tennessee Health Science Center Institutional Review Board.

Primary Care and Community Outreach Research VCOM Institutional Review Board Jim Mahaney, PhD Associate Dean for Biomedical Affairs, Virginia Campus Past.

What is your Acronym IQ? ASC DOC DOS FYS SACS NEH NIH OSHA IRB TGIF.

Help us Help you: IRB Policy Updates Susan Bankowski, MS, JD IRB Chair.

Brief Introduction to Review of Human Subjects Research in the Health Sciences Presentation to Primary Care Faculty Development Program Nichelle Cobb,

What is your Acronym IQ? ASC DOC DOS FYS SACS NEH NIH OSHA IRB TGIF.

HIPAA and Research Basics for IRB Tim Atkinson Director, Research and Sponsored Programs Director, Institutional Review Board Research Privacy Officer.

The Human Subjects Institutional Review Board Workshop Part 1: An Introduction to Human Subjects Research Ethics and the IRB Process Presented by Alena.

Human Subjects Research Cynthia Edmonds Director, Office of Research Support Committees.

H I P A A T R A I N I N G Self Directed Module 7 Research Disclosures For Data Custodians START Click to begin…

 The IRB: Why, what and how  Core Concerns: Subject selection, subject consent to participate, confidentiality  IRB Protocol Forms  Contact Information.

How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.

IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.

SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.

Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.

Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Institutional Review Board Protecting Human Research Subjects.

Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,

Getting Your Research Through IRB (UCHS) Review Elaine Wethington, Chair Cornell University Committee on Human Subjects (Ithaca)

NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.

Human Subjects Research Office of Responsible Research Practices Human Subjects Research Vanessa Hill, MSHS, CCRC Senior Quality Improvement Specialist.

Student Proposal Preparation and IRB Basics Rebecca Novak UTSPH Office of Research October 20, 2015.

TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.

WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.

Paul Kelly Facility Research Compliance Officer for the Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center.

Institutional Review Board “IRB Snapshot”. IRB Team Annabelle Casas—Institutional Coordinator for Research Review (extension 7939) Irene Holguin—Grants.

Welcome New IRB Member! This brief presentation covers: Your Role in the IRB: What to Know The IRB Review Process Resources Human Research Protections.

Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.

Protecting Human Subjects in Research A Primer on Understanding the Scope, Purpose, and Process of the Kaplan University IRB Prepared by the Office of.

SoTL Research and the IRB Process Kathleen McKinney, Cross Chair in SoTL Nancy Latham, Campus IRB Executive Committee Phyllis McCluskey-Titus, SoTL Scholar.

THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.

 The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected  In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.

 The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected  In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.

CSBS Faculty Workshop: The IRB – Institutional Review Board for the Protection of Human Subjects PRESENTED BY: FRANCES SOLANO WITH SPECIAL GUEST: DR. DANIEL.

COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight

IRB BASICS Ethics and Human Subject Protections Summer 2016

University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization

Conducting Human Subjects Research

Research with human participants at Carnegie Mellon University

Conducting Human Subjects Research

University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization

Disability Services Agencies Briefing On HIPAA

IRB The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.

Conducting Human Subjects Research

Everything You Wanted to Know about UOPX IRB

Office of Research Integrity and Protections

Research with Human Subjects

Presentation transcript:

The Protection of Human Subjects in Research Piece Presenter: Roxana Killian

Purpose of the Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects (CPHS) To protect the rights of human subjects involved in research projects History of human subject abuses Nazi experiments Tuskegee experiment Prisoner research

CPHS Membership Volunteers Up to 13 members Researchers Community members Representatives of vulnerable populations Prisoners Children Pregnant women and fetuses

CPHS Legal Authority and Scope CPHS is an institutional review board Mandated by federal and State statutes and regulations Committee of the CA Health and Human Services Agency Organizationally located in OSHPD

CPHS Review Mandated by Federal Regulations In 1970s Common Rule (45 CFR 46) Most federal agencies comply with Common Rule

CPHS Reviews Projects Involving human subjects Funded by Health and Human Services Agency departments, including OSHPD Directed by or with the assistance of employees who work for these departments

CPHS Reviews Projects Using personally identifiable data or specimens held by CHHSA departments OSHPD has decided that all research requests for non-public data must be reviewed by CPHS Using subjects for which CHHSA has custodial responsibility (DMH State mental hospital patients)

Common Rule Review Research/Exemptions Researchers may submit to CPHS to determine If project is research vs. public health practice or program evaluation If project is research, but exempt from CPHS review De-identified data Form is on website (

Common Rule Review Research design (ethical) Risks minimized Benefits Consent process (voluntary and non-coercive) and waiver of consent)

Common Rule Review HIPAA waivers Surveys Recruitment materials Instructions and forms on website (

Common Rule Review Full Committee review Primary Reviewer assigned Human subject contact -first submission Moderate risk (few projects) Meetings every two months – researchers must attend In person By phone

Common Rule Review Expedited review Two reviewers Primary Reviewer Chair or Vice Chair Data-Only projects Human subject contact projects after first review if minimal risk Turnaround time four weeks

Common Rule Review Yearly review, if on-going project No ability to provide extensions to CPHS approval No approval, no work on project Turnaround is four weeks Completed and Withdrawn projects also submitted

Common Rule Review Data-Only Change? May be changes to CPHS review of data- only projects due to federal guidance changes in definition of engagement in research by department releasing data Add requirements for data security Limit reviews to new, revisions, completed and withdrawn projects – not yearly

CPHS Review Process for OSHPD Data CPHS and OSHPD have agreed to require researchers requesting OSHPD data to: Submit a draft protocol to OSHPD prior to CPHS submission Initial protocol Any revisions Provides a more streamlined process Prevents delays in approvals

CPHS Review Process for OSHPD Data OSHPD data is second most utilized State database utilized for research reviewed by CPHS OSHPD data linked to other databases, birth and death records Data linkages also reviewed by CPHS If using linked database, include project approval letter Again, changes in CPHS requirements for review of data-only project

CPHS Review Mandated by State Law 2005 Senate Bill 13 amended Information Practices Act (CC ) Due to a breach in data security at UCB Expanded CPHS role to review all State releases of personal information to educational institutions for research

SB 13 review Data security Plan to return or destroy data Minimum necessary Unique subject codes instead of using SS# whenever possible Agency conduct data processing if possible

SB 13 review Letter of support from department releasing data Submit to CPHS Initial protocol More concise than Common Rule Revisions Complete or withdrawn Instructions and forms on website ( )

CPHS Website Provides All necessary instructions and forms for submitting protocols to CPHS Deadlines and meeting dates Links to other sites HIPAA Office of Human Research Protections Common Rule SB 13 phs

CPHS Contact Information Roxana Killian, Administrator Joan Mock, Assistant Administrator Larry Dickey, MD, MPH,MSW, Chair Web site is Phone number: Fax: