INTRODUCING THE RELIEF REGISTRY Dr. Jaron Rabinovici Sheba Medical Center, Israel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chronic disease self management – a systematic review of proactive telephone applications Carly Muller Dean Schillinger Division of General Internal Medicine.
Advertisements

MEDICAL HOME 1/2009 Mary Goldman, D.O., President of MAOFP.
Analysis of Electronic Medical Record Systems Jonathan S. Schildcrout.
The Physician Asthma Care Education (PACE) Study Michael D. Cabana, MD, MPH Implementation Research: Epi 245 October 9, 2008 Department of Pediatrics,
What is going on with psychotherapy today? Carolyn R. Fallahi, Ph. D.
CLEVER Trial: 6 Month Outcomes Discussant: Michael S. Conte MD, FAHA University of California, San Francisco AHA Scientific Sessions 2011 Late-Breaking.
The management of outpatients with stable coronary artery disease in clinical practice.
UOG Journal Club: September 2012 Perinatal outcome in women treated with progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth: a meta-analysis Sotiriadis A,
Update on Therapies: Clinical Trials Timothy PM Whelan Assistant Professor of Medicine Medical Director, Interstitial Lung Disease Program University of.
The ICH E5 Question and Answer Document Status and Content Robert T. O’Neill, Ph.D. Director, Office of Biostatistics, CDER, FDA Presented at the 4th Kitasato-Harvard.
1 Points to Consider of Protocol on Multinational Trial Masaaki Kuwahara, Ph.D. Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. The 4th Kitasato-Harvard symposium,
Cohort Studies Hanna E. Bloomfield, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine Associate Chief of Staff, Research Minneapolis VA Medical Center.
Improving Decision-Making for Medications in Rheumatoid Arthritis Edward Yelin, Ph.D. Jennifer Barton, M.D. Laura Trupin, M.P.H. Gina Evans-Young University.
The Bree Collaborative’s Role in Spine/Low Back Pain Care: A Proposal
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
NANDA International Investigating the Diagnostic Language of Nursing Practice.
Studying treatment of suicidal ideation & attempts: Designs, Statistical Analysis, and Methodological Considerations Jill M. Harkavy-Friedman, Ph.D.
As noted by Gary H. Lyman (JCO, 2012) “CER is an important framework for systematically identifying and summarizing the totality of evidence on the effectiveness,
C-REACTIVE PROTEIN, FIBRINOGEN, AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE PREDICTION By Patrick Whitledge PA-S2 South University Physician Assistant Program.
Daniel Flynn 1, Mary Kells 1, Mary Joyce 1&2, Catalina Suarez 1&2 1. Health Service Executive 2. National Suicide Research Foundation The National Dialectical.
1 Tolvaptan for the Treatment of Hyponatremia Aliza Thompson, MD Medical Officer Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting June 25, 2008.
® Introduction Low Back Pain Remedies and Procedures: Helpful or Harmful? Lauren Lyons, Terrell Benold, MD, Sandra Burge, PhD The University of Texas Health.
Enhanced MR guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery (MRgFUS) Guidelines Demonstrates Improved Efficacy and Durability for the Treatment of Uterine Myoma Phyllis.
1 Advancing Recovery: Baltimore Buprenorphine Initiative Tucson Presentation July 29, 2009 Baltimore Substance Abuse Systems.
A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Safety and Toxicity of Sparing Radiation to the Pathologic N0 Side of the Neck in Squamous Cell.
The potential impact of adherence to a guideline on the utilization of head CT scans in traumatic head injury patients. Frederick K. Korley M.D.
Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients Assessment.
Quality of life improves after patients switch to biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (BIAsp 30): IMPROVE™ Study data from 39,015 patients M. Benroumpi 1, T.
Clinical Trial Designs An Overview. Identify: condition(s) of interest, intended population, planned treatment protocols Recruitment of volunteers: volunteers.
A randomized crossover trial of venlafaxine (V) versus gabapentin (G) for hot flashes in breast cancer survivors Louise J Bordeleau 1, Olivera Jugovic.
DRAFT SLIDES FOR NDA ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENATIONS.
Registry Data Collection in Pediatric VADs: Challenges and Opportunities INTERMACS Eighth Annual Meeting May 5, 2014 David Rosenthal, MD Stanford Children’s.
Supporting Informed Formulary Decision Making: CADTH’s Common Drug Review Denis Bélanger, Director, CADTH New Brunswick Stroke Summit November 27, 2010,
® Introduction Changes in Opioid Use for Chronic Low Back Pain: One-Year Followup Roy X. Luo, Tamara Armstrong, PsyD, Sandra K. Burge, PhD The University.
Evidence-Based Medicine Presentation [Insert your name here] [Insert your designation here] [Insert your institutional affiliation here] Department of.
AAMC HIPAA Survey Project Steering Committee Members Academy for Health Services Research American College of Epidemiology International Society of Pharmaco-
CI-1 Zelnorm ® (tegaserod maleate) Gastrointestinal Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting July 14, 2004 Gastrointestinal Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting July.
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Department of Radiology
Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee May 1, 2007 FDA Presentation Advair Diskus 500/50 Carol Bosken, MD, ScM, MPH Medical Officer Division of Pulmonary.
Adverse Outcomes After Hospitalization and Delirium in Persons with Alzheimer Disease Charles Wang, PharmD Candidate.
® Changes in Opioid Use Over One Year in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Alejandra Garza, Gerald Kizerian, PhD, Sandra Burge, PhD The University of.
UC c EN. Through Medtronic sponsored research, the Transcatheter Aortic Valves clinical portfolio is studying over 11,000 subjects at over 125.
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
Is the conscientious explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decision about the care of the individual patient (Dr. David Sackett)
1 EFFICACY OF SHORT COURSE AMOXICILLIN FOR NON-SEVERE PNEUMONIA IN CHILDREN (Hazir T*, Latif E*, Qazi S** AND MASCOT Study Group) *Children’s Hospital,
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
Stakeholder Engagement for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Vanessa Jacoby, MD, MAS Associate Professor Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences.
EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE AND PHARMACY 1. Evidence-based medicine 2. Evidence-based pharmacy.
D Monnery, R Ellis, S Hammersley Leighton Hospital, Crewe.
Methodological Issues in Implantable Medical Device(IMDs) Studies Abdallah ABOUIHIA Senior Statistician, Medtronic.
Evidence-Based Mental Health PSYC 377. Structure of the Presentation 1. Describe EBP issues 2. Categorize EBP issues 3. Assess the quality of ‘evidence’
Clinical trials in the Elderly What are we missing? Jan C. Buckner, MD Chicago, IL May, 2015.
Advancing Health Economics, Services, Policy and Ethics Collecting Real World Evidence: HTA’s perspective Dr. Kelvin Chan, MD FRCPC MSc (Clin Epi) MSc.
Health Management Information Systems Unit 3 Electronic Health Records Component 6/Unit31 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010.
Table 1. Methodological Evaluation of Observational Research (MORE) – observational studies of incidence or prevalence of chronic diseases Tatyana Shamliyan.
Joseph A. Sclafani MD1,2, Kevin Liang PhD 2, Choll W Kim MD,PhD1
These slides highlight a presentation at the Late Breaking Trial Session of the American College of Cardiology 52nd Annual Scientific Sessions in Chicago,
Enrolling in Clinical Trials
Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany
PMA Analysis of the CREST Trial Approvability of the RX Acculink Carotid Stent System for Revascularization of Carotid Artery Stenosis in Standard Surgical.
Crucial Statistical Caveats for Percutaneous Valve Trials
Parkinson’s progression markers initiative
Snapshot of the Clinical Trials Enterprise as revealed by ClinicalTrials.gov Content downloaded: September 2012.
Elizabeth A. Stewart, M. D. , Jaron Rabinovici, M. D. , Clare M. C
Tim Auton, Astellas September 2014
Society Perspective 07 SEPT 2018
MTN-037 Protocol Overview
Comparing Options for Management:PAtient-centered REsults for Uterine Fibroids Evan R. Myers, MD, MPH Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Duke Clinical.
ULTRA (Uterine Leiomyoma Treatment with Radiofrequency Ablation)
Presentation transcript:

INTRODUCING THE RELIEF REGISTRY Dr. Jaron Rabinovici Sheba Medical Center, Israel

Personal Experience with Focused Ultrasound  Performed the second uterine fibroid FUS treatment (First treatment at Harvard Medical School) Participated in the first studies, pivotal study Since then more than 300 uterine fibroid treatment at our Center  Treated the first patient who got pregnant after FUS Published the first “pregnancy paper” on 52 pregnancies after  Introduced the possibility to treat adenomyosis First study to demonstrate clinical efficacy and safety  Head of gynecological activity of Insightec Focused Ultrasound Center at Sheba Medical Center, Israel  Many invited lectures © 2013 by Focused Ultrasound Foundation

Acceptance of Focused Ultrasound Treatment for Uterine Fibroids  Over the last decade ~ 10,000 treatments in ~ 100 centers!  Centers that managed to obtain some form of reimbursement managed to perform many procedures! © 2013 by Focused Ultrasound Foundation

Problems in the Implementation of Focused Ultrasound for Fibroids  New technology Physicians are conservative and “afraid” of new/unfamiliar approaches Focused Ultrasound is available only in a limited number of centers High “entry fee” Need for good and extensive scientific data Most data based on one center, limited observational studies Need for extensive post-marketing experience Lack of extensive long-term experience/data  Multiple Alternatives Big competition, “difficult sale”  Treatment price Limited adoption by insurance carriers © 2013 by Focused Ultrasound Foundation

Problems in the Implementation of Focused Ultrasound for Fibroids  New technology Physicians are conservative and “afraid” of new/unfamiliar approaches Focused Ultrasound is available only in a limited number of centers High “entry fee” Need for good and extensive scientific data Most data based on one center, limited observational studies Need for extensive post-marketing experience Lack of extensive long-term experience/data  Multiple Alternatives Big competition, “difficult sale”  Treatment price Limited adoption by insurance carriers © 2013 by Focused Ultrasound Foundation

“Needed” Studies for Focused Ultrasound Randomized Controlled Studies?  RCT’s vs “gold standard” (which?) Difficult to impossible to perform. Random decision of invasive versus non-invasive treatment? Difficult recruitment, very expensive, variable results from various centers can affect outcome, examines a predefined patient population. © 2013 by Focused Ultrasound Foundation

Prospective entry of consecutive patients can provide data on clinical procedures – “real life” Able to gather data on many patients within a limited time frame and follow them up for a prolonged period of time The resulting reports and publications should provide a large body of evidence that will be difficult to disregard “Needed” Studies for Focused Ultrasound Registry Studies? © 2013 by Focused Ultrasound Foundation

Gathering Evidence, Expanding Access Focused Ultrasound for Uterine Fibroids  Registry Goal: Provide large scale evidence on safety, efficacy and long-term durability of Focused Ultrasound, to facilitate reimbursement and drive rapid patient and physician acceptance © 2013 by Focused Ultrasound Foundation

 REgistry for Leiomyoma: International Efficacy of Focused Ultrasound  3-year, single-arm, prospective, global registry  1,000 women treated with MR-guided FUS at 30+ treatment sites  Led by Steering Committee of international, leading experts  Funded by philanthropy and industry © 2013 by Focused Ultrasound Foundation

Steering Committee  Chair: Jaron Rabinovici, MD, Sheba Medical Center, Israel  Anne Roberts, MD, University of California, San Diego  Elizabeth A. Stewart, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester  Robert K. Zurawin, MD, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston  Elizabeth David, MD, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada  Wladyslaw M. Gedroyc, MD, St. Mary's Hospital, London, UK  Young-Sun Kim, MD, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea  Matthias Matzko, MD, Amper Kliniken, Dachau, Germany  Harsh Rastogi, MD, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India © 2013 by Focused Ultrasound Foundation

 Hypothesis: Focused Ultrasound will provide a durable improvement for women with symptomatic uterine fibroids. RELIEF Registry Hypothesis © 2013 by Focused Ultrasound Foundation

 Primary Objectives: Provide large scale evidence on the safety and long term efficacy of Focused Ultrasound for the indication of symptomatic uterine fibroids  Secondary Objectives: Assess the impact of the treatment on medical resource utilization and pregnancy outcomes RELIEF Registry Objectives © 2013 by Focused Ultrasound Foundation

 Primary endpoints: Treatment effectiveness using UFS-SSS Need/reason for alternative treatments Treatment safety using adverse events  Secondary endpoints: Treatment satisfaction Recovery using return to work and/or normal activities  Exploratory endpoints: Medical resources utilization Pregnancy outcomes General health-related quality life RELIEF Registry Outcomes of Interest © 2013 by Focused Ultrasound Foundation

 Target –1,000 women in two years, three years follow-up.  Approximately 30 sites in: North America - U.S., Canada Europe - Germany, United Kingdom Asia - Korea, India, Israel  Each site will enroll approximately 50 consecutive patients who receive Focused Ultrasound RELIEF Registry Registry Design © 2013 by Focused Ultrasound Foundation

~30 Sites Treatment form completed Self-report 1 month, 6 month, year surveys 1 month, 6 month, year surveys Complete study Complete study Baseline: Demographics Gynecologic history Uterine, fibroid anatomy Future fertility Symptoms and QoL Follow-up Measures: Additional treatments Treatment Satisfaction Resource utilization Pregnancy outcomes AEs Symptoms and QoL Treatment Information: Duration, Number of fibroids Treated fibroids Fibroid volume, NPV AEs P ROTOCOL Treatment Complete baseline Survey Complete baseline Survey 1,000 planning to be treated using focused ultrasound 1,000 planning to be treated using focused ultrasound © 2013 by Focused Ultrasound Foundation

 Inclusion Patient is —Intended to be treated for symptomatic uterine fibroids by focused ultrasound (consistent with local labeling) —Able to communicate over the phone/internet and can complete study questionnaires —Willing to be followed for three years  Exclusion Patient is —Pregnant at time of treatment —Post-menopausal RELIEF Registry Patient Population © 2013 by Focused Ultrasound Foundation

 Treatment guidelines  Structure  Baseline data  Short-term results  Mid-term results  Long-term results  Other analyses TBD RELIEF Registry Publications © 2013 by Focused Ultrasound Foundation

 Enrollment to begin second half this year  Sites to come onboard soon – potential US locations to include: Bethesda, MD Boca Raton, FL Boston, MA Charlottesville, VA Chicago, IL Columbus, OH Houston, TX Nashville, TN Rochester, MN San Diego, CA San Francisco, CA Stanford, CA RELIEF Registry Status © 2013 by Focused Ultrasound Foundation

REFERRING PATIENTS TO RELIEF  Every patient treated in the U.S. will be eligible for the registry  RELIEF will systematically collect data and provide evidence-based recommendations for patient selection and outcomes © 2013 by Focused Ultrasound Foundation