1 Reoptimization of Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Loosely Routed LSPs draft-tsaad-mpls-p2mp-loose-path-reopt-00 Author list: Tarek Saad

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RSVP-TE Extensions for SRLG Configuration of FA
Advertisements

71st IETF Philadelphia, March 2008 ERO Extensions for Path Key draft-bradford-ccamp-path-key-ero-01.txt Richard Bradford : JP Vasseur.
1 68th IETF, Prague, March 2007 Graceful Shutdown in MPLS Traffic Engineering Networks draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-graceful-shutdown-02.txt Zafar Ali
1 Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol For Fast Reroute of Traffic Engineering GMPLS LSPs draft-tsaad-ccamp-rsvpte-bidir-lsp-fastreroute-05 Author.
Requirement and protocol for WSON and non-WSON interoperability CCAMP WG, IETF 81th, Quebec City, Canada draft-shimazaki-ccamp-wson-interoperability-00.
1 draft-ali-ccamp-rc-objective-function-metric-bound-02.txt draft-ali-ccamp-rsvp-te-include-route-02.txt draft-ali-ccamp-xro-lsp-subobject-02.txt CCAMP.
Inter-Domain Path Computation in MPLS Authors: Faisal Aslam, Zartash Afzal Uzmi, Adrian Farrel, and Michal Pioro Zartash Afzal Uzmi Department of Computer.
1 LSP-Trace over MPLS tunnels draft-nitinb-lsp-ping-over-mpls-tunnel-00 Nitin BahadurJuniper Networks Kireeti KompellaJuniper Networks IETF 69, MPLS WG,
61st IETF Washington DC November 2004 Detecting P2MP Data Plane Failures draft-yasukawa-mpls-p2mp-lsp-ping-00.txt Seisho Yasukawa -
1 Fabio Mustacchio - IPS-MOME 2005 – Warsaw, March 15th 2005 Overview of RSVP-TE Network Simulator: Design and Implementation D.Adami, C.Callegari, S.Giordano,
IETF 68, MPLS WG, Prague P2MP MPLS-TE Fast Reroute with P2MP Bypass Tunnels draft-leroux-mpls-p2mp-te-bypass-01.txt J.L. Le Roux (France Telecom) R. Aggarwal.
Extensions to G/RSVP-TE for Point to Multipoint TE LSPs R.Aggarwal, D.Papadimitriou, and S.Yasukawa (Editors) and contributors (L.Berger, I.Bryskin, D.Cheng,
P2MP MPLS-TE FRR with P2MP Bypass Tunnel draft-leroux-mpls-p2mp-te-bypass-00.txt J.L. Le Roux (France Telecom) R. Aggarwal (Juniper) IETF 67, MPLS WG,
64th IETF Vancouver Nov Graceful Shutdown in MPLS Traffic Engineering Networks draft-ali-ccamp-mpls-graceful-shutdown-02.txt Zafar Ali
UNI Extensions for Diversity and Latency Support 13-Mar-13IETF 86 Orlando1 Don Dieter.
1 Reoptimization of Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Loosely Routed LSPs draft-tsaad-mpls-p2mp-loose-path-reopt-03 Author list: Tarek Saad
Extensions to OSPF-TE for Inter-AS TE draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-interas-te-extension-01.txt Mach Renhai
Forward-Search P2P/P2MP TE LSP Inter-Domain Path Computation draft-chen-pce-forward-search-p2p-path-computation draft-chen-pce-forward-search-p2mp-path.
1 IETF-61 – Washington DC Path Computation Element (PCE) BOF-2 Status - CCAMP Co-chairs: JP Vasseur/Adrian Farrel ADs: Alex Zinin/Bill Fenner.
WG Document Status 192nd IETF TEAS Working Group.
62nd IETF Minneapolis March 2005 CCAMP Working Group Online Agenda and Slides at:
PCE-based Computation Procedure To Compute Shortest Constrained P2MP Inter-domain Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths draft-zhao-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures-02.txt.
Extensions to G/RSVP-TE for Point to Multipoint TE LSPs R.Aggarwal, D.Papadimitriou, and S.Yasukawa (Editors) and contributors (L.Berger, I.Bryskin, D.Cheng,
1 IETF-81, MPLS WG, Quebec City, Canada, July, 2011 draft-ali-mpls-inter-domain-p2mp-rsvp-te-lsp-06.txt MPLS WG IETF-81 Quebec City, Canada July, 2011.
1 CCAMP Working Group Status Chairs: Lou Berger Deborah Brungard Secretary: Dan King 80th IETF CCAMP WG.
1 Role based Auto Mesh IETF86 CCAMP Mar Orlando draft-li-ccamp-role-based-automesh-00.
PCE-based Computation for Inter-domain P2MP LSP draft-zhao-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures-00.txt Quintin Zhao, Huawei Technology David Amzallag,
IETF-74, San Francisco, March 2009 PCE Working Group Meeting IETF-74, March 2009, San Francisco Online Agenda and Slides at:
1 Ping and Traceroute for GMPLS LSPs in Non-Packet Switched Networks draft-ali-ccamp-gmpls-lsp-ping-traceroute-01.txt Zafar Ali, Roberto Cassata (Cisco.
67th IETF San Diego, November 2006 CCAMP Working Group Online Agenda and Slides at: Charter page:
1 RSVP-TE Signaling For GMPLS Restoration LSP draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp-03 Author list: Rakesh Gandhi Zafar Ali
1 77th IETF, CCAMP WG, Anaheim, CA, USA March 2010 Signaling RSVP-TE P2MP LSPs in an Inter- domain Environment draft-ali-mpls-inter-domain-p2mp-rsvp-te-lsp-03.txt.
1 68th IETF, Prague, March 2007 Address Resolution for GMPLS controlled PSC Ethernet Interfaces draft-ali-arp-over-gmpls-controlled-ethernet-psc-i-04.txt.
Draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-07 draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initated-lsp-03 Stateful PCE - update Ina Minei Ed Crabbe Jan Medved Robert Varga Siva Sivabalan.
Forward-Search P2P TE LSP Inter- Domain Path Computation draft-chen-pce-forward-search-p2p-path-computation Huaimo Chen
Extensions to PCEP for Hierarchical Path Computation Elements PCE draft-zhang-pcep-hierarchy-extensions-00 Fatai Zhang Quintin Zhao.
The Application of the Path Computation Element Architecture to the Determination of a Sequence of Domains in MPLS & GMPLS draft-king-pce-hierarchy-fwk-01.txt.
Establishing P2MP MPLS TE LSPs draft-raggarwa-mpls-p2mp-te-02.txt Rahul Aggarwal Juniper Networks.
RSVP Setup Protection draft-shen-mpls-rsvp-setup-protection-00 Yimin Shen (Juniper Networks) Yuji Kamite (NTT Communication) IETF 83, Paris, France.
82 nd Taipei Protection Mechanisms for LDP P2MP/MP2MP LSP draft-zhao-mpls-mldp-protections-00.txt Quintin Zhao, Emily Chen, Huawei.
1 RSVP-TE Extensions For Fast Reroute of Bidirectional Co-routed LSPs draft-tsaad-mpls-rsvpte-bidir-lsp-fastreroute-00.txt Author list: Mike Taillon
1 draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-02.txt CCAMP – IETF 84 – Vancouver July - August 2012 Zafar Ali Cisco Systems Clarence Filsfils  Cisco Systems Kenji.
1 MPLS Source Label Mach Chen Xiaohu Xu Zhenbin Li Luyuan Fang IETF87 MPLS Aug Berlin draft-chen-mpls-source-label-00.
1 RSVP-TE Signaling For GMPLS Restoration LSP draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp-04 Author list: Rakesh Gandhi - Presenter Zafar.
RSVP Setup Protection draft-shen-mpls-rsvp-setup-protection-03
BGP extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery in a BGP/MPLS IP-VPN draft-kumaki-pce-bgp-disco-attribute-03.txt Kenji Kumaki KDDI R&D Labs,
PCE-based Computation Procedure for P2MP Inter-domain TE LSP draft-zhao-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures-06 Quintin Zhao, Zafar.
Zhenbin Li, Li Zhang(Huawei Technologies)
IETF 67, MPLS WG, San Diego 11/08/2006
Jean-Philippe Vasseur – Cisco Systems Raymond Zhang - Infonet
Author list: Rakesh Gandhi Zafar Ali
RSVP-TE Extensions for Associated Co-routed Bidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs) draft-gandhishah-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-01 Author list: Rakesh.
MPLS LSP Instant Install draft-saad-mpls-lsp-instant-install-00
Use Cases for Using PCE to act as a Central Controller (PCECC) Component draft-zhao-teas-pce-central-controller-use-cases-00.txt 95th Buenos Aires.
RSVP Setup Protection draft-shen-mpls-rsvp-setup-protection-02
Francois Le Faucheur Cisco
78th IETF Meeting - Maastricht 27th, July 2010
Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol For Fast Reroute of Traffic Engineering GMPLS LSPs draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-lsp-fastreroute-06 Authors: Mike Taillon.
TEAS Working Group IETF 99 - Prague Online Agenda and Slide:
Signaling RSVP-TE P2MP LSPs in an Inter-domain Environment draft-ali-mpls-inter-domain-p2mp-rsvp-te-lsp-01.txt Zafar Ali, Cisco Systems.
draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-01
draft-gandhi-pce-pm-07
YANG Data Models for TE <draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-16> Latest YANG
Technical Issues with draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed
Path Computation Element WG Status
draft-ali-spring-srv6-oam-02.txt SRv6 OAM
Jia He Italo Busi Jeong-dong Ryoo Bin Yeong Yoon Peter Park
draft-gandhi-spring-sr-mpls-pm-03
YANG Data Models for TE and RSVP draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-21 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-11 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-te-07 Tarek Saad, Juniper Networks Rakesh.
Presentation transcript:

1 Reoptimization of Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Loosely Routed LSPs draft-tsaad-mpls-p2mp-loose-path-reopt-00 Author list: Tarek Saad Rakesh Gandhi Zafar Ali - Presenter Robert H. Venator Yuji Kamite 89th IETF, MPLS WG, London, England (March 2014)

222 Outline Scope and Requirements Problem Statement Signaling Extension IETF Update and Next Steps

333 Scope P2MP-TE LSP [RFC4875] Signaled with Loose Hop ERO or no ERO [RFC3209] Inter-domain LSP reoptimization [RFC4736] The ingress node does not have visibility of the transit/egress area topology PCE is not used

444 Requirements As per P2MP-TE [RFC4875], an ingress node may: 1.Reoptimize the entire P2MP-TE LSP by resignaling all its S2L sub-LSP(s), i.e. all destinations, OR, 2.Reoptimize individual S2L sub-LSP, i.e. individual destination. [RFC4875] does not define mechanisms to reoptimize loosely routed (inter-domain) P2MP-TE LSPs.

555 Agenda Scope and Requirements Problem Statement Signaling Extension IETF Update and Next Steps

666 RFC4736 For P2P LSP Reoptimization [RFC4736] defines following query/notify messages for loosely routed (inter-domain) P2P LSP reoptimization. 1.An ingress node sends “Path Re-evaluation Request” to query a border node.  Ingress node sets a flag (0x20) in SESSION_ATTRIBUTES object in the Path message. 2.A border node sends “Preferable Path Exists" to notify the ingress node to trigger reoptimization (which may be solicited or unsolicited).  Border node sends a PathErr code 25 (notify error defined in [RFC3209]) with sub-code 6. [RFC4736] does not define mechanism for P2MP-TE LSP Reoptimization.

777 RFC4736 For P2MP-TE LSP Reoptimization [RFC4736] mechanisms can be used for loosely routed (inter- domain) P2MP-TE for individual S2L sub-LSP (i.e. individual destination) reoptimization as follows:  Send “Path Re-evaluation Request" query and ”Preferable Path Exists" notify messages on each individual S2L sub-LSP, i.e. destination. However, to reoptimize the entire P2MP-TE LSP Tree, node will have to send query and notify messages on all (typically 100s of) S2L sub-LSPs. Such requirement can force ad-hoc methods of implementation that may produce undesired results especially when inter-operating. Please see the next slide for the specific issues. This can be avoided by extending the query/notify messages for P2MP-TE LSP Tree reoptimization.

888 RFC4736 For P2MP-TE LSP Tree Reoptimization: Issues Specific issues that may arise when [RFC4736] query/notify messages are used for loosely routed (inter-domain) P2MP-TE LSP Tree reoptimization: 1.A border node has to accumulate received queries on all S2L sub-LSPs (using a wait timer) and interpret them as a reoptimization request for the P2MP-TE LSP Tree.  A border node may prematurely notify “Preferable Path Exists” for a sub-set of S2L sub-LSPs. 2.Similarly, the ingress node has to accumulate received notifications on all S2L sub-LSPs (using a delay timer) to determine to perform P2MP- TE LSP Tree reoptimization or per S2L sub-LSP reoptimization (especially for the unsolicited notifications).  Ingress node may prematurely start reoptimization of sub-set of S2L sub-LSPs, which may result in data traffic duplication [RFC4875] [Section 14.2]. 3.This method may produce undesired results when inter-operating due to timing related issues and different implementations.

999 Agenda Scope and Requirements Problem Statement Signaling Extension IETF Update and Next Steps

10 Signaling Extension For Loosely Routed P2MP-TE LSP Tree Reoptimization New RSVP query and notify messages are defined for loosely routed (inter-domain) P2MP-TE LSP Tree reoptimization. 1.An ingress node sends “P2MP-TE Tree Re-evaluation Request" to query a border node for a preferable P2MP-TE LSP tree.  A new “P2MP-TE Tree Re-evaluation Request” flag is defined in Attributes Flags TLV of the LSP_ATTRIBUTES object [RFC5420] that is carried in a Path message. 2.A border node notifies "Preferable P2MP-TE Tree Exists" to the ingress node to trigger reoptimization (which may be solicited or unsolicited).  Border node sends a PathErr code 25 (notify error defined in [RFC3209]) with new sub-code "Preferable P2MP-TE Tree Exists”. 3.Any S2L sub-LSP of the LSP Tree transiting through the border node can be selected to send the query to that border node. Notification should be sent back on the S2L sub-LSP on which the query was received.

11 Agenda Scope and Requirements Problem Statement Signaling Extension IETF Update and Next Steps

12 IETF Update Proposed signaling extension was originally part of the following IETF draft: draft-ietf-mpls-inter-domain-p2mp-rsvp-te-lsp WG chairs suggested to submit a new individual draft for this work to avoid feature creep and with simplified procedure. snippets from Loa and Ross: On :45 AM, "Loa Andersson" wrote: We don't want to feature creep our wg docs, starting with a brand new individual draft would have much better chances to succeed. We see it as a much better path to give the re-optimization aspects a fresh start. /Loa On :03 PM, "Ross Callon" wrote: If resubmitted as an individual draft, we are free to put it in front of the WG again for consideration to be adopted as a WG draft. Ross

13 Next Steps We like to make this draft a WG Document. Currently this draft is published with Intended status: Informational. We like to get input from the WG if this document should be:  Informational and updates [RFC4736] which is Informational and was developed by MPLS WG or  Standards Track and updates [RFC4875] which is Standards Track and was developed by the CCAMP WG.

14 Thank You.