IPv4 over IEEE 802.16 IP CS draft-ietf-16ng-ipv4-over-802-dot-16-ipcs-02 Syam Madanapalli Ordyn Technologies 71st IETF - Philadelphia, PA, USA (March 9-14,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IP over Ethernet over [draft-ietf-16ng-ip-over-ethernet-over txt] IETF-71, Philadelphia, March 08 Max Riegel (NSN), Hongseok Jeon (ETRI),
Advertisements

Transmission of IP Packets over Ethernet over IEEE draft-riegel-16ng-ip-over-eth-over Max Riegel
Transitioning to IPv6 April 15,2005 Presented By: Richard Moore PBS Enterprise Technology.
CS470, A.SelcukIPsec – AH & ESP1 CS 470 Introduction to Applied Cryptography Instructor: Ali Aydin Selcuk.
Network Layer IPv6 Slides were original prepared by Dr. Tatsuya Suda.
IP over ETH over IEEE draft-riegel-16ng-ip-over-eth-over Max Riegel
Multiple Encapsulation Methods Draft-iab-link-encaps-05.txt Bernard Aboba IETF 67 San Diego, CA.
1 Lecture 15: IPsec AH and ESP IPsec introduction: uses and modes IPsec concepts –security association –security policy database IPsec headers –authentication.
By Rod Lykins.  Background  Benefits  Security Advantages ◦ Address Space ◦ IPSec  Remaining Security Issues  Conclusion.
IETF 80: NETEXT Working Group – Logical Interface Support for IP Hosts 1 Logical Interface Support for IP Hosts Sri Gundavelli Telemaco Melia Carlos Jesus.
IPv4 over IP CS draft-madanapalli-16ng-ipv4-over-802-dot-16-ipcs-00 Soohong Daniel Park Syam Madanapalli 68 – Prague, Czech Republic March 18-23,
IPv4 over IP CS draft-ietf-16ng-ipv4-over-802-dot-16-ipcs-01 Basavaraj Patil, Nokia On behalf of Authors: Syam Madanapalli, Ordyn Technologies Soohong.
IP/ICMP Translation Algorithm (IIT) Xing Li, Congxiao Bao, Fred Baker
Basic Transition Mechanisms for IPv6 Hosts and Routers -RFC 4213 Kai-Po Yang
Shivkumar Kalyanaraman Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 1 ECSE-6600: Internet Protocols Informal Quiz #03 SOLUTIONS Shivkumar Kalyanaraman: GOOGLE: “Shiv.
1 Network Layer Security: Run over non-IP Protocol? Howie Weiss (NASA/JPL/Parsons) San Antonio, TX October 2013.
1 IPFIX Protocol Specifications IPFIX IETF-59 March 3, 2004 Benoit Claise Mark Fullmer Reinaldo Penno Paul Calato Stewart Bryant Ganesh Sadasivan.
IPv6, the Protocol of the Future, Today Mathew Harris.
1 IPv6 Deployment Scenarios in (e) Networks draft-ietf-v6ops deployment-scenarios-01 Myung-Ki Shin, ETRI Youn-Hee Han, KUT Sang-Eon Kim, KT.
Copyright 2005 WiMAX Forum “WiMAX Forum™” and "WiMAX Forum CERTIFIED™“ are registered trademarks of the WiMAX Forum™. * All trademarks are the properties.
PPTP Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP) –Problem: PPP was created for dialing into a local RAS server –But the site’s RAS may be far away –Long-distance.
Chapter 81 Internet Protocol (IP) Our greatest glory is not in never failing, but in rising up every time we fail. - Ralph Waldo Emerson.
Junos Intermediate Routing
IEEE fixed/nomadic IP deployment Max Riegel,
IPv6 Subnet Model Analysis Syam Madanapalli LogicaCMG On-behalf of v6subnet Design Team Presented by Soohong Daniel Park.
V6OPS WG – IETF #85 IPv6 for 3GPP Cellular Hosts draft-korhonen-v6ops-rfc3316bis-00 Jouni Korhonen, Jari Arkko, Teemu Savolainen, Suresh Krishnan.
ICMPv6 Error Message Types Informational Message Types.
Chapter 27 IPv6 Protocol.
MTU Fragmentation process. MTU The Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU) is – the maximum length of data that can be transmitted by a protocol in one instance.
1 Lecture 13 IPsec Internet Protocol Security CIS CIS 5357 Network Security.
By Mau, Morgan Arora, Pankaj Desai, Kiran.  Large address space  Briefing on IPsec  IPsec implementation  IPsec operational modes  Authentication.
Copyright 2006 WiMAX Forum “WiMAX Forum” and "WiMAX Forum CERTIFIED “ are trademarks of the WiMAX Forum. All other trademarks are the properties of their.
IPv4 over IEEE IP CS draft-ietf-16ng-ipv4-over-802-dot-16-ipcs-03 Samita Chakrabarti IP Infusion Syam Madanapalli Ordyn Technologies Daniel Park.
Data Communications and Computer Networks Chapter 4 CS 3830 Lecture 19 Omar Meqdadi Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering University.
Moving HIP to Standards Track Robert Moskowitz ICSAlabs an Independent Div of Verizon Business Systems July 30, 2009 Slides presented.
1 Internetworking: IP Packet Switching Reading: (except Implementation; pp )
IPSec – IP Security Protocol By Archis Raje. What is IPSec IP Security – set of extensions developed by IETF to provide privacy and authentication to.
RFC 4068bis draft-ietf-mipshop-fmipv6-rfc4068bis-01.txt Rajeev Koodli.
Uni Innsbruck Informatik th IETF, PMTUD WG: Path MTU Discovery Using Options draft-welzl-pmtud-options-01.txt Michael Welzl
IPv6 Neighbor Discovery over Syam Madanapalli Samsung ISO IETF 64 – Vancouver, Canada November 8 th 2005.
IETF-53-IPv6 WG- Cellular host draft 1 Minimum IPv6 Functionality for a Cellular Host Jari Arkko Peter Hedman Gerben Kuijpers Hesham Soliman John Loughney.
Per-MS Prefix Model for IPv6 in WiMAX by Frank Xia Behcet Sarikaya Raj Patil Presented by Jonne Soininen.
IETF 80: NETEXT Working Group – Logical Interface Support for IP Hosts 1 Logical Interface Support for IP Hosts Telemaco Melia, Sri Gundavelli, Carlos.
IP Fragmentation. Network layer transport segment from sending to receiving host on sending side encapsulates segments into datagrams on rcving side,
Lecture 13 IP V4 & IP V6. Figure Protocols at network layer.
IPv6 over ’s IPv6 Convergence Sublayer IPv6 over ’s IPv6 Convergence Sublayer draft-madanapalli-ipv6-over ipv6cs-00 Syam Madanapalli.
IPv4 over IP CS Soohong Daniel Park Syam Madanapalli.
GRE.
A Fragmentation Strategy for Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE)
Quality and Value for the Exam 100% Guarantee to Pass Your Exam Based on Real Exams Scenarios Verified Answers Researched by Industry.
Graciela Perera Department of Computer Science and Information Systems Slide 1 of 18 INTRODUCTION NETWORKING CONCEPTS AND ADMINISTRATION CSIS 3723 Graciela.
Max Riegel IP over ETH over IEEE draft-ietf-16ng-ip-over-ethnet-over Max Riegel
Internet Protocol Version 6 Specifications
Booting up on the Home Link
GRE-in-UDP Encapsulation
Syam Madanapalli Basavaraj Patil Erik Nordmark JinHyeock Choi
Multiple Encapsulation Methods
Link Model Analysis for based Networks
IPv6 / IP Next Generation
Dave Thaler A Comparison of Mobility-Related Protocols: MIP6,SHIM6, and HIP draft-thaler-mobility-comparison-01.txt Dave Thaler.
CS 457 – Lecture 10 Internetworking and IP
Guide to TCP/IP Fourth Edition
IEEE fixed/nomadic IP deployment
Network Virtualization
Chapter 20. Network Layer: IP
Chapter 4 Network Layer Computer Networking: A Top Down Approach 5th edition. Jim Kurose, Keith Ross Addison-Wesley, April Network Layer.
Logical Interface Support for IP Hosts
Review of Internet Protocols Network Layer
Data plane round-table Feedback
Presentation transcript:

IPv4 over IEEE IP CS draft-ietf-16ng-ipv4-over-802-dot-16-ipcs-02 Syam Madanapalli Ordyn Technologies 71st IETF - Philadelphia, PA, USA (March 9-14, 2008)

Background  WG item  Currently in WGLC  Issue from the last IETF – Minor: ARP - should be similar to any other P2P modelsARP - should be similar to any other P2P models NAT – No additional requirements for based networksNAT – No additional requirements for based networks – Major: Default MTU - whether it should be 1500 bytes or lessDefault MTU - whether it should be 1500 bytes or less

ARP  ARP text has been reworded to imply that the procedures are same as any other point-to-point link models  But what if a host initiates an ARP packet? – Should we add any text for implementers?

NAT  NAT text has been removed as there is no additional requirements for based networks

Default MTU: Two Approaches  1500 bytes to align with RFC 5121 – Packet fragmentation between BS and ASN GW (AR) in WIMAX – Requires MTU discovery procedures like DHCP Option 26DHCP Option 26 Path MTU discovery (RFC 1191 )Path MTU discovery (RFC 1191 ) Packetization Layer Path MTU Discovery (RFC 4821)Packetization Layer Path MTU Discovery (RFC 4821) But it these are not mandatory/widely implementedBut it these are not mandatory/widely implemented  1400 bytes to accommodate GRE/IPSec overhead – Avoids fragmentation in most cases

Default MTU: Mailing List Discussion  Recommendation to choose maximum possible value i.e bytes for MTU – Only air-link consideration is not sufficient as the IP link represent to host to AR

Way Forward  We need WG inputs for default MTU value

Backup Slides Details to arrive at 1400 bytes

ESP Overhead  ESP Header – 8 bytes  Initialization Vector – 0 to 16 bytes  ESP Trailer – 16 bytes  Total overhead = 40 bytes (max) – Tunnel mode: adds 20 more bytes  Padding – 0 to 255 bytes – DES/3DES – upto 7 bytes – AES – upto 15 bytes – SHA1/MD5 – upto 63 bytes

GRE Overhead  GRE Header – 4 bytes  IP Header – 20 bytes  Optional Headers – 12 bytes  Total GRE Header – 24 to 36 bytes

Typical GRE+IPSec Overhead Tunnel Combination Specific MTU Required Recommended MTU GRE+IPSEC (Transport Mode) GRE+IPSEC (Tunnel Mode) Source: Resolve IP Fragmentation, MTU, MSS, and PMTUD Issues with GRE and IPSEC

Thank You