GVRG ABRF 2011 Research Study Evaluation of DNA Whole Genome Amplification (WGA) Technologies for Genotyping The evolution of genomic technologies is occurring.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 2 Strachan and Read Chapter 13
Advertisements

Admixture in Horse Breeds Illustrated from Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Data César Torres, Yaniv Brandvain University of Minnesota, Department of Plant.
Vanderbilt Center for Quantitative Sciences Summer Institute Sequencing Analysis Yan Guo.
V Improvements to 3kb Long Insert Size Paired-End Library Preparation Naomi Park, Lesley Shirley, Michael Quail, Harold Swerdlow Wellcome Trust Sanger.
GenVault Overview January The Problem Conventional biosample management will not meet the ensuing demand for access to genetic samples and testing.
Determination of Extra-Pair Fertilization and Inbreeding Using Microsatellite Genotyping in a Captive Population of Zebra Finches Lindsay Miller, Julia.
National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention DBS DNA Extraction, Validation & Quantitation NBS Molecular Training.
INTRODUCTION Genome-wide association studies are now feasible. Measuring allele frequencies of pools of cases and controls, instead of between individuals,
Nucleic Acid Prep Station What we can do for you!.
DNA Fingerprinting and Forensic Analysis
The 454 and Ion PGM at the Genomics Core Facility Dr. Deborah Grove, Director for Genetic Analysis Genomics Core Facility Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Select Sires’
Genomic DNA purification
University of Oklahoma Genome Center4/14/12.
11 © 2009 PerkinElmer © 2010 PerkinElmer November 20, 2012 DNA Services Overview.
Diabetes and Endocrinology Research Center The BCM Microarray Core Facility: Closing the Next Generation Gap Alina Raza 1, Mylinh Hoang 1, Gayan De Silva.
Abstract Automated, High-Throughput Total and Viral RNA Purification Byung-in Lee 1, Seachol Oak 1, Sharon Khietala 2, Beate Schikora 2, and Karl H Hecker.
WTCRF Nursing & Clinical Epidemiology & Statistics Image Analysis
The LightScanner ® System Achieve High Throughput Mutation Discovery and Genotyping.
DNA Analysis Facility User Educational Series December 11, 2009.
Donor / Embryo Genomics Patrick Blondin L’Alliance Boviteq AABP Embryo Transfer Seminar Montréal, 2012 Sept 19 th.
Factors to Consider in Selecting a Genotyping Platform Elizabeth Pugh June 22, 2007.
DNA Methylation mapping
Genomics – Next-Gen sequencing and Microarrays
Chapter 13: DNA Quantitation.  Quantitation determines the amount of human DNA present in an extract  A narrow concentration range is required to “seed”
Investigating the use of Multiple Displacement Amplification (MDA) to amplify nanogram quantities of DNA to use for downstream mutation screening by sequencing.
By: Emily Antonides Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) on Poor Quality or Low Concentration DNA samples.
Chapter : DQA1/PM Chapter 18: Autosomal STR Profiling.
Introduction Over the last two years, the production teams at The Genome Center (GC) have been working to design flexible pipelines that are able to handle.
Manipulation of DNA. Restriction enzymes are used to cut DNA into smaller fragments. Different restriction enzymes recognize and cut different DNA sequences.
CS177 Lecture 10 SNPs and Human Genetic Variation
SNP Haplotypes as Diagnostic Markers Shrish Tiwari CCMB, Hyderabad.
Molecular Techniques in Microbiology These include 9 techniques (1) Standard polymerase chain reaction Kary Mullis invented the PCR in 1983 (USA)Kary.
Comparison of Microarray Data Generated from Degraded RNA using Five Different Target Synthesis Methods and Commercial Microarrays Scott Tighe and Tim.
Finnish Genome Center Monday, 16 November Genotyping & Haplotyping.
Copy Number Variation Eleanor Feingold University of Pittsburgh March 2012.
The DNA Resources Core 518 Light Hall Manager: Cara Sutcliffe Faculty Director: Doug Mortlock
Taqman Technology and Its Application to Epidemiology Yuko You, M.S., Ph.D. EPI 243, May 15 th, 2008.
Epidemiology 217 Molecular and Genetic Epidemiology Bioinformatics & Proteomics John Witte.
Molecular markers Non-PCR based 1courtesy of Carol Ritland.
Proteome and Gene Expression Analysis Chapter 15 & 16.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Select Sires’
Molecular Markers CRITFC Genetics Workshop December 8, 2015.
The International Consortium. The International HapMap Project.
Genotyping and Genetic Maps Bas Heijmans Leiden University Medical Centre The Netherlands.
HRM REAL TIME PCR Presented by: Dadkhah Fahimeh SNP genotyping by HRM REAL TIME PCR.
All rights Reserved Cengage/NGL/South-Western © 2016.
 Types of STR markers- 5 types based on sequence  STR allele nomenclature  Allelic ladder  Serological methods of identity profiling  Identity profiling.
1 The world leader in serving science Toinette Hartshorne, Ph.D. Senior Staff Scientist Genetic Analysis Applications New flexible solutions for high throughput.
Library QA & QC Day 1, Video 3
071126_EAS56_0057_FC – lanes 1-8 read 2 b a _EAS56_0057_FC – lanes 1-8 read 1 Table S1. Summary tables for a read 1 and b read 2 of a.
Draft sequencing of 1,000 genomes to study the genetics of quantitative traits: data production Fabio Busonero1, Brendan J. Tarrier2, Elizabeth A. Ketterer2,
All rights Reserved Cengage/NGL/South-Western © 2016.
Comparison of WGA methods for genotyping fetal nucleated red blood cells for the application of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis Zhouwei Huang­­1, Angela.
All rights Reserved Cengage/NGL/South-Western © 2016.
DNA Extraction of Lung Cancer Samples for Advanced Diagnostic Testing
OHSU Integrated Genomics Laboratory January 2012
Small RNA Sample Preparation
A B Tumour 74 – Whole Genome Tumour 74 – Whole Genome C D
With Genetic Analyzers from Applied Biosystems
ChIP DNA Sample Preparation
Successful STR and SNP typing of FTA Card samples with low amounts of DNA after DNA extraction using a Qiagen BioRobot® EZ1 Workstation  Eszter Rockenbauer,
Andrea Gaedigk, Amanda K. Riffel, J. Steven Leeder 
Digital Gene Expression – Tag Profiling Sample Preparation
DNA Fingerprinting and Forensic Analysis
Rob Ogden, Elizabeth Heap, Ross McEwing 
A dedicated automated system for extraction, quantification and STR amplification of forensic evidence samples  James Stray, Vivian T. Nguyen, Jacquelyn.
Visual Automated Fluorescence Electrophoresis Provides Simultaneous Quality, Quantity, and Molecular Weight Spectra for Genomic DNA from Archived Neonatal.
Genomic & RNA Profiling Core Facility
Toward Accurate and Quantitative Comparative Metagenomics
Presentation transcript:

GVRG ABRF 2011 Research Study Evaluation of DNA Whole Genome Amplification (WGA) Technologies for Genotyping The evolution of genomic technologies is occurring rapidly and often requires large amounts of source DNA. There is also an expanded desire to analyze smaller numbers of cells for higher resolution studies as well as to take advantage of large numbers of archived samples (eg. FFPE, serum, etc.). To provide enough material for the newest genomic technologies, whole genome amplification (WGA) has reemerged as an important and necessary technique. With new WGA products on the market, the GVRG has completed a benchmarking study evaluation of 6 commercially available WGA kits using several QC and genotyping assays. Utilizing 6 samples, the WGA kits were tested following the manufacturer’s protocols. Quality metrics provided measurements on yield, fragment size, and concentration of material derived from each kit. Several widely adopted genotyping methods were then used to evaluate the amplification products, including Illumina Human Omni1 Quad Beadchip, TaqMan copy number and SNP genotyping assays, and STR genotyping. Amy Hutchinson 1, Casey Dagnall 1, Charles Nicolet 2, Helaman Escobar 3, Sean Blake 4, Brian Sanderson 5, Bruce Kingham 6, Karen Jonscher 7 Introduction Samples Amplification Kits Amplified Sample QC TaqMan & Copy Number Genotyping Illumina Infinium Genotyping Discussion 1 Core Genotyping Facility, SAIC-Frederick, Inc., NCI-Frederick, Frederick, MD; 2 Data Production Facility, USC Epigenome Center, Los Angeles, CA; 3 Eurofins MWG|Operon, Huntsville, AL; 4 DNA Core Facility, University of Mis souri, Columbia, MO; 5 Life Technologies, Austin, TX; 6 DNA Sequencing & Genotyping Center, University of Delaware, Newark, DE; 7 SBCF and TATC Proteomics, UC Denver, Denver CO 18 SNP Platform Comparison – TaqMan and Infinium Acknowledgements The ABRF Genomic Variation Research Group (GVRG) is very thankful for the support of its corporate sponsors whose generous help enabled the GVRG 2011 study. Specifically, the GVRG would like to thank GE Healthcare Life Sciences, NuGen Technologies, Qiagen and Sigma-Aldrich, who generously donated the whole genome amplification kits for this study. The GVRG also thanks Bruce Kingham for supplying the FFPE samples used in this study. The samples used for the experiment include Coriell DNA from a trio of CEPH individuals, 2 FFPE DNAs, both from the same individual (1 newly extracted and the other extracted 2 years ago), and 1 sample from the Coriell trio that was fragmented prior to amplification for a total of 6 samples tested. The WGA kits included 6 options from Sigma, NuGen, Qiagen and GE Life Sciences. Samples were amplified as blind duplicates (n = 12) at several GVRG member lab sites using 5 of the kits for a total of 60 products. Additionally, the Ovation FFPE kit provided reagents for the 6 samples only (no duplicates) adding another 6 WGA products for a grand total of 66 samples.  All processing following the manufacturer’s provided protocol  Following amplification, all samples were sent to a single laboratory for QC and genotyping. CEPH/Utah Pedigree 1463 Trio from HapMap Project NA12891 (Father) NA12892 (Mother) NA12878 (Daughter) All amplified and genomic control samples (66 wgaDNA + 6 gDNA) were subjected to several quality control (QC) measures:  Quantification via NanoDrop (OD) and PicoGreen (Invitrogen Quant-iT™ dsDNA Reagent)  Agilent BioAnalyzer analysis  STR Fingerprinting via Applied BioSystem’s AmpFℓSTR® Identifiler® assay Table 1 – WGA Kit List and Comparison Figures 3 & 4 – Average fragment length data by sample and kit (left) and BioAnalyzer traces from amplified sample across kits (right) Figure 2 – Summary of allelic distribution by sample and kit from the Identifiler assay. FFPE Derived Sample Newly Extracted Extracted 2 years ago Fragmented Sample NA12891 (average fragment length: 477 bp) Whole genome amplification is a useful tool, and possibly a necessary step, for amplifying unique and rare samples in order to have enough input DNA material for use with current technology. This study has evaluated the practical use of several commercially available WGA kits in relation to ease of use, quality of amplification and maintenance of genetic integrity across various genotyping platforms in relation to regular, degraded, and FFPE DNA sources. There is excellent performance across the kits tested though there are several things to take into account when selecting a kit for use:  Take into account the downstream application or platform (required input, fragment sizes, etc.)  Consider QC measure to ensure the amplification products meet needs Identifiler assay is representative of LOH and no amplification in samples tested here  FFPE samples can be accurately genotyped using a WGA sample  Ease of kit automation if high-throughput is desired Figure 7 – Call Rates on Infinium platform of all samples run across all SNPs by kit Figure 1 – Fold increase of material yield by sample and kit TaqMan ® SNP Genotyping Assays (18 SNPs chosen from SNPs on Infinium chips) and TaqMan ® Gene Copy Number Assays (2 genes) Figure 5 – 5a)Concordance Rate by Kit and 5b) Discordances by Sample and Type for TaqMan SNP Assays Figure 6 – 6a) Call Rates by Gene and Kit, 6b) Concordance Rate By Kit, and 6c) Types of Discordances by Gene and Kit for TaqMan Copy Number Assays  Infinium Human Omni1Quad Chips Concordance with genomic greater than 99.8% using 90% call rate cut-off Genotypes 100% consistent with Mendelian inheritance among trio Figure 8 – Call rates on Infinium platform of all samples by 18 duplicated SNPs by kit Figure 9 – 9a) Concordance rates of all samples on 18 duplicated SNPs by kit and 9b) Discordance type by kit Figure 10 – Call variance between TaqMan and Infinium across duplicated assays by kit Figure 11 – Breakdown of call variance between TaqMan and Infinium by kit and variance type Fig. 5aFig. 5b Fig. 6a Fig. 6bFig. 6c * 64pg was used as the input amount for the Sigma Single Cell kit (WGA4) For concordance checking, eighteen (18) TaqMan assays were selected and run on all WGA and genomic samples for SNPs also present on the Infinium Omni1 Quad BeadChip. Fig. 9aFig. 9b Kit Required Input Input Types Expected Yield Expected Product Length (in Kb) Process Time Hands-On Processing Time GE Life Sciences GenomiPhi 10 ngPurified gDNA, whole blood, mouth wash, buccal, dried blood cards ugAverage: 10 Range: hours20 min NuGen Ovation10 ngPurified gDNA3 - 6 ugAverage: 0.2 Range: hours2 hours Sigma Complete (WGA2) 10 ngPurified gDNA10 ugAverage: 0.4 Range: hours1 hour Qiagen REPLI-g10 ngPurified gDNA, whole blood, mouth wash, buccal, dried blood cards 10 ugAverage: 10 Range: hours40 min Sigma Single Cell (WGA4) 1 cell or < 100 pg* Single cell or Purified gDNA Million- fold Average: 0.4 Range: hours1 hour NuGen Ovation FFPE 100 ngPurified gDNA ugAverage: 0.2 Range: hours4 hours