LOCKE’S ATTACK ON INNATISM Text source: Essay Concerning Human Understanding, book 1, chapters 1-3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Innate ideas Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Advertisements

Locke v. Leibniz on innate knowledge
© Michael Lacewing A priori knowledge Michael Lacewing
The Euthyphro dilemma.
Knowledge innatism Michael Lacewing
Charting the Terrain of Knowledge-1
Idealism.
LOCKE ON SUBSTANCE (Part 1 of 2) Text source: Essay Concerning Human Understanding, bk. 2 ch. 23.
Knowledge empiricism Michael Lacewing
Rationalism: Knowledge Is Acquired through Reason, not the Senses We know only that of which we are certain. Sense experience cannot guarantee certainty,
Ways of Knowing Augsburg College NUR 306 Week One.
Epistemology: the study of the nature, source, limits, & justification of knowledge Rationalism: we truly know only that of which we are certain. Since.
Concept innatism I Michael Lacewing
The Problem of Knowledge. What new information would cause you to be less certain? So when we say “I’m certain that…” what are we saying? 3 things you.
Chapter 3: Knowledge The Congenial Skeptic: David Hume
Parsing Categories of Belief Why Early Modern M&E divides belief into two types: Sensory & Mathematical.
MARK PEREZ JULY 29, 2012 What is a Worldview?. A worldview is the set of beliefs about fundamental aspects of reality that ground and influence all one's.
Definitions of Reality (ref . Wiki Discussions)
Rationalism and empiricism: Concept innatism
 According to philosophical skepticism, we can’t have knowledge of the external world.
KNOWLEDGE What is it? How does it differ from belief? What is the relationship between knowledge and truth? These are the concerns of epistemology How.
Theories of Perception: Empirical Theory of Perception Berkeley’s Theory of Reality Direct Realism Moderate Thomistic Realism.
© Michael Lacewing Reason and experience Michael Lacewing
Philosophical Influences on Psychology
Chapter 2: Reality Modern Metaphysics: Descartes
Can you learn this? You have 2 minutes. Then you will try and write it down word for word “if you can conceive it to be possible for any mixture or combination.
Entity Theories of Meaning. Meaning Talk Theory should make sense of meaning talk Theory should make sense of meaning talk What sorts of things do we.
LOCKE ON THE ORIGIN AND STRUCTURE OF IDEAS Text source: Essay Concerning Human Understanding, bk. 2, ch. 1-3, 5-7.
Philosophy.
An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding
What is a “Worldview”? A worldview is the set of beliefs about fundamental aspects of reality that ground and influence all one's perceiving,
Morality in the Modern World. Where does morality come from?
Idealism PowerPoint. What is Idealism??? Some philosophers hold that if we push our investigation of matter far enough, we end up with only a mental world.
KANT ON THE SYNTHETIC A PRIORI
1/9/2016 Modern Philosophy PHIL320 1 Kant II Charles Manekin.
L ECTURE 15: C ERTAINTY. T ODAY ’ S L ECTURE In Today’s Lecture we will: 1.Review Hume’s radical empiricism and its consequences 2.Outline and investigate.
Cartesian Rationalism: A Critical Analysis Lecture 5: (fin) Philosophy of Knowledge.
The Greatest Mistake: A Case for the Failure of Hegel’s Idealism.
Further criticisms of Concept Empiricism Focus: To consider further criticisms of Concept Empiricism, alongside the criticism from Innatism.
1 John Locke’s Theory of Knowledge ( ). 2 Empiricist All knowledge is derived from experience.
What are the strengths and weaknesses of Descartes’ Trademark Argument? StrengthsWeaknesses p , You have 3 minutes to read through the chart you.
KANT ON THE POSSIBILITY OF METAPHYSICS Text source: Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, introduction.
An Outline of Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy
UNIT6: PHILOSOPHY: PERSONAL IDENTITY
The Nature of God Nancy Parsons. Attributes- Nature of God Candidates should be able to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of: 1.God as eternal,
You may work in pairs, with one person acting as a researcher and one person acting as a recorder. All of the answers can be found either in the PowerPoint.
This week’s aims  To test your understanding of substance dualism through an initial assessment task  To explain and analyse the philosophical zombies.
Seeing the Father John 14:5-11.
GRADING: First essay 25% Second essay 35% Exam 25%
What is a Worldview?.
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
Knowledge Empiricism 2.
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
PHILOSOPHY OF HUMAN PERSON
Concept Innatism.
Concept Empiricist Arguments against Concept Innatism
Locke’s argument against innate concepts
Descartes’ conceivability argument for substance dualism
Theory of Knowledge Review
Rationalism.
Remember these terms? Analytic/ synthetic A priori/ a posteriori
March, 26, 2010 EPISTEMOLOGY.
Reasoning about Reasoning
Modern Philosophy PHIL320
01 4 Ethical Language 4.1 Meta-Ethics.
Introduction to Epistemology
Branches of Philosophy
March, 26, 2010 EPISTEMOLOGY.
Pictures and Nonsense Wittgenstein.
Presentation transcript:

LOCKE’S ATTACK ON INNATISM Text source: Essay Concerning Human Understanding, book 1, chapters 1-3

THE DOCTRINE(S) OF INNATISM ‘INNATISM’, a.k.a. ‘NATIVISM’ The patron saint of innatism is Plato (see his dialogue Meno); its great early modern (17 th C) champion is Descartes Innatism credits the human mind with certain inborn or pre-programmed contents, contents that the mind comes equipped with prior to and independently of experience One might endorse an innatist account of ideas, or of knowledge, or (the most common innatist position) of both ideas and knowledge

KNOWLEDGE INNATISM  This doctrine asserts that we have access to knowledge that is possessed innately (rather than being derived from experience) E.g. ‘All events have a cause’, ‘God exists’, ‘lying is wrong’  It is invoked to explain how we can have knowledge of certain propositions that seems to go beyond experience, either (i) because of its universal applicability, or because (ii) its subject matter transcends experiential reality  Common candidates for innate knowledge: Knowledge of the laws of nature, logical and mathematical truths, ethical truths, metaphysical truths concerning transcendent objects like God, the soul, and Plato’s Forms

IDEA INNATISM (a.k.a. CONCEPT INNATISM)  This doctrine asserts that we have certain inborn ideas (ideas which are built into the mind prior to experience, rather than being derived from experience)  It is invoked to explain how we can have ideas that do not correspond to anything in experience, and are not even constructable from materials that are given in experience  Common candidates for innate ideas: ideas of God, causation, substance, basic mathematical and logical ideas, perhaps moral rightness and wrongness Knowledge innatism seems to entail idea innatism. But idea innatism does not (obviously) entail knowledge innatism.

LOCKE’S ATTACK ON INNATISM The attack on innate knowledge:  Book 1 chapters 1-2 attack the theory of knowledge innatism in both its ‘speculative’ and ‘practical’ variants The attack on innate ideas:  Book 1 chapter 3 argues that certain paradigmatic candidates for innate ideas (God, substance, identity) aren’t really innate at all  Book 2 will present the positive theory of the origin of our ideas, showing how all the ideas we do in fact have are explicable in terms of experience. Since this theory is simpler and more elegant than the rival theory of innate ideas, it should replace it. (‘Ockham’s razor’?)

THE ATTACK ON INNATE KNOWLEDGE (ECHU bk. 1 ch. 1-2) Locke’s dilemma for the knowledge innatist: Is their claim (a) that everyone actually has this knowledge at their fingertips all along, or (b) that everyone has the innate potential or capacity to come this knowledge? If (a) then it is empirically false, since children and ‘idiots’ do not have the putative knowledge. Moreover, consider the disagreements in ethics and theology. (ECHU 1.1, 1.2) If (b) then it is trivialized, for every proposition we come to know (even those we come to know through experience) is innate in this trivial sense. (ECHU 1.1.5)