What is a TMDL Project and Why Are We Conducting One on the Root River? Root River Turbidity TMDL Stakeholder’s Introduction Meeting November 20 th, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water Pollution. Definitions Impaired Waters Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act requires states to develop lists of impaired waters, those that do.
Advertisements

What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Lake Studies Impaired Waters Waters are classified as impaired when they fail to meet state water quality standards and have been placed on the federal.
7:00 pmWelcome and introductions 7:05pmHLWD planning overview Plan update process 7:25 pmStakeholder involvement Watershed problems 7:40 pmPublic comment.
Prioritization Workgroup Summary. Workgroup Topics Nutrient results What is a watershed? What is a TMDL? Prioritization methods Basin framework and management.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality TMDLs 101 An Explanation of the Federal Clean Water Act’s TMDL Requirements and How they Impact Carter Lake.
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Presented to the Environment Committee November 9, 2010 Information Item Master Water.
Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Imperial River: Water Quality Status and Basin Management Action Plan.
H 2 whOa! The Governor’s Institute of Environmental Science & Technology- Water Group.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Incorporating Climate Change Adaptation in EPA Region 10 Programs: An example based on a newly initiated pilot in the Office of Water and Watershed’s Total.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality A TMDL Training Program for Local Government Leaders and Other Water Resource.
Water Quality Monitoring : Galla Creek Bayou Bartholomew L’Anguille River Presented By: The Ecological Conservation Organization.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality A TMDL Training Program for Local Government Leaders and Other Water Resource.
Item No. 13 Recommendation to the State Water Resources Control Board Regarding the Section 303(d) List Lahontan Water Board June 19, 2014 Carly Nilson.
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Turbidity and Water. Turbidity is a measure of water clarity, how much the material suspended in water decreases the passage of light through the water.
Lake Erie HABs Workshop Bill Fischbein Supervising Attorney Water Programs March 16, 2012 – Toledo March 30, Columbus.
Loudoun Watershed Watch “ Restoring Loudoun Streams” LCSA Water Forum Presented by: Darrell Schwalm Loudoun Watershed Watch Loudoun Wildlife Conservancy.
Catoctin Creek: A Stream in Distress Catoctin Watershed Project A Partnership of County and Citizen Organizations.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
Name of presenter Date of presentation.  To help preserve and protect Wisconsin’s over 15,000 lakes and 86,000 miles of rivers.
Policy Considerations in the Lower Poplar River Turbidity TMDL Study Greg Johnson, Karen Evens, and Pat Carey, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, St.
Predicting Sediment and Phosphorus Delivery with a Geographic Information System and a Computer Model M.S. Richardson and A. Roa-Espinosa; Dane County.
1 ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information Webcast Sponsored by EPA’s Watershed Academy June 18, 2008, 11:30am-1:30pm EST Shera Bender,
TMDLs on the Clearwater River Fecal Coliform Impairment of the Trout Stream Portion of the Clearwater River By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red.
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
Federal Clean Water Act Monitoring and assessments completed statewide Standards not met? Section 303 (d) requires placing the water body on the “Impaired.
Brent Mason, Mackenzie Consoer, Rebekah Perkins BBE 5543 November 8, 2011.
Red Lake Watershed District Water Quality Monitoring.
Taking the Next Step: Implementing the TMDL. What IDEM Provides to Help With Implementation  Compiling all the data in one place  Data-driven recommendations.
Nicole Reid, Jane Herbert, and Dean Baas MSU Extension Land & Water Program W. K. Kellogg Biological Station Transparency tube as a surrogate for turbidity,
STATUS OF GREEN LAKE. Status of Green Lake Lake Management Plan Approved Lake Management Plan Approved Three Grants Awarded Three Grants Awarded.
Clayton County Watershed Projects Update Turkey River Watershed Alliance January 31, 2013.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Redwood River TMDL Critique David De Paz, Alana Bartolai, Lydia Karlheim.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Staci Goodwin Senior TMDL Project Manager Office of Water Quality
Poplar River Sediment Source Assessment John L. Nieber Bruce N. Wilson Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering University of Minnesota July.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
Type Your Poster Title Here School name and Watershed name (e.g. Sand Hill River Watershed) Date Insert school logo up here Picture of team? Natural Resource.
State of the Streams Loudoun County: 2005 Loudoun Strategic Watershed Management Planning Conference February 23, 2006 Presented by: Darrell Schwalm Loudoun.
Critique of North Branch of Sunrise River TMDL Nate Topie and Taylor Hoffman.
West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.
76. The central U.S. law regulating water quality is the Clean Water Act (CWA), adopted in The Act initially focused on point sources, which it.
Water Quality Monitoring on Larkin Creek St. Francis County, AR JL Bouldin RA Warby Arkansas State University.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
Is algae bad? No! Algae helps us by; taking in waste from the water (ex. Animal poop) providing oxygen and being a food resource for animals.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor,
St. Johns County Water Quality Program Update March 15,
IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE Rice County Local Water Management Plan BOARD PRESENTATION JUNE 16, 2015.
Dodge County Water Monitoring Update
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Water Pollution.
Watersheds and Polluted Runoff
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
Phosphorus and Suspended Solids TMDL For the Lower Fox River/Green Bay Area of Concern – Putting the Pieces Together Bud Harris, P. Sager, D. Scheberle,
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
ADEQ Approaches to the Assessment Methodology
Watersheds and Polluted Runoff
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Presentation transcript:

What is a TMDL Project and Why Are We Conducting One on the Root River? Root River Turbidity TMDL Stakeholder’s Introduction Meeting November 20 th, 2008

Meeting Outline Part One: Project Introduction – MPCA –Background on TMDL process –Root River Turbidity TMDL Specifics Part Two: Project Details – Fillmore SWCD –Monitoring sites: responsibilities and locations –Sampling protocol and equipment Break out session for questions and discussion Comment Box Sign up for Stakeholder Advisory Group

Presentation Outline What does ‘TMDL’ mean? The TMDL Process –How are waters assessed? –What makes a water impaired? –What are water quality standards? –What are designated uses? –What does a TMDL study entail? Root River Turbidity Impairments –What is turbidity? –Why are they impaired? What happens after the TMDL?

What does TMDL mean? Total Maximum Daily Load What ‘load’ of a pollutant can the water body take before it can’t be used for it’s designated uses?

The TMDL Process Assess the state’s waters List those that do not meet standards Identify sources and reductions needed (TMDL study) Implement restoration activities (Implementation Plan) Evaluate water quality

How Does the MPCA Assess? 1.Call for Data –MPCA compiles data that has been collected from them, other state agencies, local government and volunteers –Data must meet rigorous quality assurance protocols 2.Data Analysis –MPCA analyzes to identify potential impairments 3.Professional Judgment Teams –MPCA staff, data collectors, other regional and local experts –Confirm or refine preliminary impairment listings 4.Informational Meetings –Held across state to review list and answer questions 5.Public Notice and Comment Period 6.US EPA Approval to place on Impaired Waters 303(d) List This happens every two years

What is “Impaired”? A water is “impaired” or polluted if it does not meet one or more of the water quality standards Therefore, they are “impaired” for one or more of their designated uses As of 2008, MN has 1,475 impairments on 336 rivers and 510 lakes

What Are Water Quality Standards? Define how much of a pollutant can be in a water and still let it meet its designated uses Water Quality Standards from EPA Criterion –state can adopt more stringent, or more lenient standard based on local information –state can develop standard for something EPA has not if there is a need (ex: certain herbicides in MN)

What Are Designated Uses? Each MN stream and lake was assigned a designated beneficial use in the 1970s Some uses: aquatic life, recreation, drinking water, agriculture, wildlife, other Aquatic Life –‘fishable’ –all reaches impaired in the Root River are impaired for aquatic life Root River Outfitters

Aquatic Life in the Root Watershed Brown Trout Brook Trout Small Mouth Bass Caddis fly larvae Stone fly larvae Dragon fly larvae Crayfish Red tail hawk Directly dependant on aquatic life: Swallow Mussels

The TMDL Study Identifies sources of a pollutant and sets reductions needed to meet designated use

What is a TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Process: 2-4 years of technical study –Number: calculation of the maximum amount of a pollutant the water body can receive and still meet water quality standards –Results in a pollution reduction plan Identifies sources (point and non-point) and allocates reductions Total Maximum Daily Load = Non Point Source Loads + Point Source Loads + Margin of Safety + Reserve Capacity

Point Sources Non Point Sources Point Sources Non Point Sources Map out current sources -why is the water not meeting the water quality standards? Implement strategies to reduce load and meet water quality standards IMPLEMENTATION IDENTIFICATION (TMDL STUDY)

Why Do A TMDL? Federal requirement under the Clean Water Act –State required to identify and restore impaired waters Public support for clean water is strong -Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment Restores beneficial uses of surface waters Protects community assets and quality of life –development potential –protects property values –tourism benefits –opportunity for local leadership

Root River Turbidity TMDL 11 turbidity listings affecting aquatic life –listed on 2008 impaired waters list Contract between MPCA and Fillmore County SWCD –sub contracts with: DNR (fisheries and waters); modeling portion 3 years of technical study ( ) Final report due June 2011

Turbidity Measure of water clarity (transparency tube) Indicator of water quality Caused by suspended and dissolved matter –clay, silt, organic matter and algae Measured in NTUs (Nephelometric Turbidity Units) –25 NTU is State standard High levels limit light penetration in water –Can inhibit aquatic plant growth, fish gill function, damage spawning habitat, make it difficult for aquatic organisms to find food 5, 50, 500 NTUs 1.5 cm >60 cm

Turbidity Visuals ~0-3 NTU ~12-20 NTU ~12-30 NTU??

Sources of Turbidity 1.Erosion: –construction sites –stream banks –farm fields 2.Urban run off during precipitation events 3.Bottom feeders such as carp 4.Excessive algal growth

1.Root River Main Stem - Thompson Creek to Mississippi River 2.Root River South Fork - T102 R9W S26, west line to Wisel Creek 3.Money Creek - T105 R7W S21, north line to Root River 4.Root River South Branch - Willow Creek to Camp Creek 5.Root River South Branch - Canfield Creek to Willow Creek 6.Root River South Branch – T102 R12W S21, north line to Canfield Creek 7.Judicial Ditch #1 – Unnamed Creek to South Branch Root River 8.Forestville Creek - Unnamed Creek to South Branch Root River 9.Root River South Branch – Headwaters to T102 R12W S16, south line 10.Root River North Branch – Unnamed Creek to Mill Creek 11.Root River North Branch – Headwaters to Carey Creek Listings for Turbidity in the Root River

How were the Root River turbidity listings assessed? For transparency, a transparency tube measurement of less than 20 centimeters indicates a violation of the 25 NTU turbidity standard. For TSS, a measurement of more than 60 mg/L in the Western Corn Belt Plains eco-region indicates a violation. Turbidity is a highly variable water quality measure. Because of this variability, and the use of TSS and transparency as surrogates, a total of 20 independent observations (rather than 10) are now required for a turbidity assessment. If sufficient turbidity measurements exist, only turbidity measurements will be used to determine impairment. If there are insufficient turbidity measurements, any combination of independent turbidity, transparency, and total suspended solids observations may be combined to meet assessment criteria. If there are multiple observations of a single parameter in one day, the mean of the values will be used in the assessment process. If there are observations of more than one of the three parameters in a single day, the hierarchy of consideration for assessment purposes will be turbidity, then transparency, then total suspended solids. For a water body to be listed as impaired for turbidity, at least 3 observations and 10% of observations must be in violation of the turbidity standard. This is an increase in the number of violations required, which was previously 10% of 10 required observations. From MPCA’s Guidance Manual for Assessing the Quality of Minnesota’s Surface Waters:

Transparency tube data: need 10% to list, had 21% at Money Creek (25 exceedences of the 25 NTU standard) From the Document: Data Summary Report, 305b/303d Preliminary Assessments Assessment Cycle, MPCA

Identification of sources (TMDL study) Point Sources Non Point Sources What happens after the study?... Assessed Listed

What Happens After the TMDL study? TMDL Implementation Plan –Strategy for implementing practical management measures for the Root River to achieve needed reductions to restore water quality Some examples of implementation strategies: (from Lower Cannon River Turbidity TMDL) –Erosion Control: ex. conservation tillage –Landscape Buffers –Rotational Grazing –Cover Crops –Water Retention Projects –Urban Stormwater Management –Point Source Permits Evaluation

What Makes a Good TMDL study? Citizen involvement is a key component to a successful TMDL Need local expertise to develop a management strategy that will work for the area

For More Information on Monitoring Sites as Data Comes In: Environmental Data Access:

Root River Watershed North Boundary

End of Part One

Part Two Joe Magee – Fillmore SWCD