EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive Descriptor 11: Underwater Noise

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Towards the UKs MSFD Initial Assessment and Data Management M. Charlesworth (BODC)
Advertisements

Sif Johansson Marine unit, DG Environment
The state of the Gulf of Finland- gaps in our present knowledge
Gianna Casazza European Commission DG Environment, Marine Unit La Direttiva Quadro sulla Strategia per l’Ambiente Marino (Direttiva 2008/56/CE) Marine.
Click to edit Master title style 1 marinescotland science Marine Strategy Framework Directive Programme of Measures Consultation Descriptor 7: Hydrographical.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Goals and Challenges
MARINE STRATEGY FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE (MSFD) STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION Summary of MSFD Requirements; EU project management arrangements; Descriptors of most.
The integrated management of human activities under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive Carlos Berrozpe Garcia European Commission (DG ENV) Greenwich,
Marine Strategy Framework Directive Consultation on Good Environmental Status Descriptor 7 – Hydrographical Conditions Dr Alejandro Gallego Marine Scotland.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
Implementation process at EU level Marine Strategy Framework Directive: implementation process at EU level Gert Verreet – submitted to EMECO meeting -
(03 JUNE 2013) WP Leader: Neil Holdsworth, ICES EMODnet Chemistry II ( ) WP5 Analysis and Recommendations.
Anna Donald Marine Planning and Strategy Marine Scotland
MEDITERRE 2012 – Bari, 1 st February - SHAPE Project International Conference Roberto Bertaggia - Direzione Progetto Venezia - Regione del Veneto Approaching.
MSFD Programme of Measures Consultation Event Anna Donald Head of Marine Planning & Strategy.
Marine and coastal thematic assessment for the EEA’s 2010 State of the Environment report Trine Christiansen (EEA)
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
Rodney Forster Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas) Lowestoft, UK Products from the EMECO North Sea Observatory: an EU policy.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive Consultation on Good Environmental Status How the Impact Assessment was developed Kevin Brady Marine Analytical Unit,
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Michel André MEUST: Real-time Monitoring of Noise and Acoustic Events in Cetacean Acoustic Niches.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive “good environmental status” and the Water Framework Directive “good ecological/chemical status/potential” ECOSTAT.
Counselor dr. Otilia Mihail Ministry of Environment, Water and Forest Constanta 17 June
WP6 trends in biodiversity - Review impacts - Explore trends in catch data - Explore trends in survey data - Options for assessing trends in invertebrates.
ML management within the MSFD framework: current status and recommendations Ognjen Škunca Conference on regional cooperation in Marine Litter.
Stela Barova, senior expert, “Marine environmental protection and Monitoring” Department, “Plans and Permits” Directorate State of play of MSFD implementation.
COCONET SUMMER COURSE “GES & MPAs” Good Environmental Status and Marine Protected Areas in the Mediterranean and Black Sea Rabat, 8-13 september
Dutch program offshore wind energy Cumulative effects and Mitigation measures ORELG 4 february 2016.
Workshop IST Ambiente 2012 – Oceanos 29 de Novembro 2012 As Zonas Costeiras e Mares Europeus O que nos dizem hoje sobre o amanhã Constança Belchior, AAE.
EMODnet Biology Kick-off Meeting – VLIZ, Oostende September 2013 EMODnet Biology Work Package 2 Mark Costello & Dan Lear
Deltares, Delft, Netherland
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: progress report
1.
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
EU Biodiversity Strategy and its mid-term review
Introduction of energy, including underwater noise, is at levels that do not adversely affect the marine environment Mark Tasker for TG11.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: implementation process at EU level Gert Verreet – WFD CIS SCG meeting of 11 March 2009.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: an introduction
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
EU Biodiversity Strategy in context
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive
Marine Strategy Framework Directive & Aquaculture
In-Depth Assessment (IDA) of MS submissions for MSFD article 8, 9 & 10 compiled and presented by Nikolaos Zampoukas based on material provided by V.
Annex III Annex I Qualitative descriptors Characteristics
Progress Works, recommendations and future work programme
16 april 2009 Draft OSPAR’s MSFD Advice Manual on Biodiversity approaches to determining GES, setting of environmental targets and selecting indicators.
Technical guidance for assessment under Article 8 MSFD
Reporting for MSFD Article 13 and 14 –
Progress in the implementation of D11
European Commission DG Environment
Draft examples of possible GES Decision criteria Descriptor 9
Revision of MSFD Decision 2010/477/EU - overview
MSFD 2018 reporting outputs
Marine Strategy Framework Directive 2008/56/EC
Mark Tasker Joint Nature Conservation Committee, UK EU TG Noise
Marine Strategy Framework Directive:
Information on projects
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: implementation process at EU level Gert Verreet – WFD WG Reporting - 31 March 2009.
Marine Environment and Water Industry
1.
A Sea for Life The Marine Strategy Framework Directive
1.
1.
European Commission, DG Environment, Marine Unit
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
WG GES Drafting Group June 2013 Berlin
Article 8 Guidance – Integration levels and methods
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive
Preparatory meeting for the establishment of the Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD 13 November :00-13:30 European.
Presentation transcript:

EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive Descriptor 11: Underwater Noise Lindy Weilgart, Ph.D.

EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive Established in 2008 by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union In 2010, the European Commission set the criteria for Good Environmental Status (GES) by various Descriptors—11 in total Targets of MSFD are: protection of marine environment Sustainable use of marine goods and services GES in European seas by 2020

EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive First regulation that specifically mentions noise A major effort in addressing underwater noise at a large scale Ecosystem scale of management Regional approach to implementation

EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive Preparatory steps are an initial assessment of actual status in national marine waters Next step is determination of what GES would look like Comparison of actual and desired status leads to establishment of environmental targets These three steps must be reported to European Commission in 6-yr cycles, for the first time in July 2012

Implementation Steps Initial assessment of environmental status of MS waters (2012) Determination of GES (2012) Establishment of environmental targets and indicators (2012) Monitoring programme for ongoing assessment and regular updating of targets (2014) Programme of measures designed to achieve or maintain GES (design 2015, operational 2016) Initial assessment, objectives, targets & indicators 2012 (+ 6 years) Monitoring Programmes 2014 Programmes of Measures 2015 Implementation of the marine strategy 2016 Six year review of the different elements of the strategy 2018 – 2021 GES 2020 Courtesy of: René Dekeling Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, NL

EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive Laws from the Council of the European Union bind Member States (MS) to implement them. This can be achieved through Council Regulations or Council Directives. - For Regulations, MS directly apply the statements of the regulations; - For Directives, they need to be transposed into national laws

EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive Sets framework—structure and timeline—but no details Details are developed within a common implementation strategy Details of implementation left to MS to decide how to turn (“transpose”) EU Directive into national laws Qualitative descriptors are “translated” into quantitative criteria and indicators

EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive Coordination and cooperation between EU countries is key Does not replace existing legislation that regulates at smaller scales (SEA, EIA and Habitats Directives) No overarching EU targets but this may change Does not apply to naval activities, but MS should try to conduct them with objectives of Directive 11 Descriptors, 29 Criteria, 56 Indicators

EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive GES Descriptors: 1: Biodiversity 2: Invasive species 3: Overfishing 4: Maintenance of marine food webs 5: Eutrophication 6: Benthic ecosystems 7: Hydrographic conditions 8: Contaminants not giving rise to pollution effects 9: Seafood contaminants safe for human consumption 10: Marine litter 11: Introduction of energy, including underwater noise

2 indicators described: Descriptor 11: Introduction of energy, including underwater noise, is at levels that do not adversely affect the marine environment 2 indicators described: - short duration: low and mid-frequency impulsive* noise *includes sonars - long lasting: low frequency continuous noise Clarification/guidance required  Expert group formed (TSG Noise)

Indicators Criterion 11.1. Distribution in time and place of loud, low and mid frequency impulsive sounds - The proportion of days and their distribution within a calendar year, over geographical locations whose shape and area are to be determined, and the spatial distribution in which source level (or suitable proxy) of anthropogenic sound sources, measured over the frequency band 10 Hz to 10 kHz, exceeds a value that is likely to entail significant impact on marine animals (11.1.1).

Impulsive noise indicator Main effect: “considerable” displacement, habitat loss CI of activities, not indiv projects Most MS no quant. descr. of GES due to insufficient knowledge of CI As an indicator, behav. change possibly more relevant than injury, because it affects larger part of the pop and area Assess pressure of piling, seismic, sonar cumulatively (not achieved previously at this scale), then evaluate effects and set targets Assess area impacted Set up register of impulsive noise activities at regional and EU level, use to establish current level and trend in impulsive sounds

Impulsive Activities Included in Register Register can be used for noise mapping Most important sources for inclusion: seismic, pile-driving, explosives, sonar, some ADDs For impact pile-drivers and multiple explosions, no minimum threshold, all should be registered For sonars, airguns, acoustic deterrents and single explosions, minimum thresholds used: - Non-impulsive sources 176 dB re 1 μPa m - Impulsive sources 186 dB re 1 μPa² m² s (SEL) , airguns 209 dB re 1 μPa m (0-p)

Options for Impulse Target Setting: A target on the maximum allowable number of pulse-block days in an assessment area A no-deterioration (i.e. stable or negative trends) target on the number of pulse-block days in an assessment area A percentage target on the assessment area that is affected due to noise disturbance -i.e. at any given day less than x% of the assessment area is lost due to noise disturbance

Impulse Noise Indicator Use as baseline where there is negligible pop displacement from noise Insufficient knowledge when too much disturbance would compromise GES Realistic target setting only possible once baseline known and more info on noise impacts TSG Noise will continue to work in 2013 and 2014 to provide advice on thresholds and targets Setting actual threshold level is up to MS

Indicators Criterion 11.2. Continuous low frequency sound - Trends in the annual average of the squared sound pressure associated with ambient noise in each of two third octave bands, one centred at 63 Hz and the other at 125 Hz, expressed as a level in decibels, in units of dB re 1 μPa, either measured directly at observation stations, or inferred from a model used to interpolate between or extrapolate from measurements at observation stations (11.2.1).

Continuous LF Noise “The ambient noise level measured by a statistical representative set of observation stations in Regional Seas where noise within the 1/3 octave bands 63 and 125 Hz (centre frequency) should not exceed the baseline values of year [2012] or 100 dB (re 1μPa rms; average noise level in these octave bands over a year).” Tasker ML, Amundin M, Andre M, Hawkins A, Lang W, Merck T. 2010. Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Task Group 11 Report, Underwater noise and other forms of energy. JRC and ICES.

Continuous LF Indicator TSG Noise suggested: Trends ONLY are NOT sufficient to describe GES: Trends indicate whether the actual pressure on the environment (e.g., shipping noise) is rising or falling. To describe actual GES levels, a combination of measurements and modelling/ mapping will be needed.

Summary First reg. that specifically mentions noise GES in European seas by 2020 Ecosystem scale of management No overarching EU targets but this may change 2 indicators: MF and LF impulsive & LF contin. Impulsive: “considerable” displ., habitat loss CI of activities, not indiv projects Set up register of impulsive noise activities For LF continuous, trends with measurements/ mapping/modelling needed