Wind farm project “Pakline – Ljubusa – Kupres” Sarajevo, 15 March 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Farmland Values and Leasing Key Questions Chapter 20 §What determines the value of farmland? §What are the advantages and disadvantages of owning vs. leasing?
Advertisements

Case Study 250,000 square foot suburban office building
STUDY: RENEWABLE ENERGY POTENTIAL AND RE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT WITHIN BIHAC MUNICIPALITY Bihać Municipality Bosnia and Herzegovina GTZ Office Sarajevo Splitska.
Managing Finance and Budgets Seminar 7. Follow-up Activities  Read Chapter 14 (including EPNV)  Describe key concepts: Purpose of Investment Appraisal.
CAPITAL BUDGETING CHAPTER 11 Decision Rules Reinvestment Rate Assumptions Sensitivity Analysis.
EWEC 2007 Milano Drs. J.P. Coelingh, senior consultant Wind and power derivatives in project financing.
„We can together use the power of water”. 73,000 Gorazde, Žilići bb, Bosnia and Herzegovina Goražde Sarajevo 55 km.
EE535: Renewable Energy: Systems, Technology & Economics
INVESTMENT DECISION MAKING LEARNING OBJECTIVES Identify the basic types and characteristics of investment properties. Forecast annual cash flows, net of.
Finance Lecture # 4 Jan H. Jansen
Making the Right Wind Power Investment University of Toronto Wind Workshop October 12th, 2005 Mike Crawley, President/CEO AIM PowerGen Corporation.
1 Estimated Cash Flows for Two Projects (S and L) Cost of Capital =.10 YearProject SProject L 0($1,000)($1,000)
NovEnergia II Technical Bureau - Sep08 THE OPPORTUNITIES OF HUNGARIAN WIND ENERGY Álvaro Rodrigues September 2008.
Developing Wind Energy in Indiana: A Case Study of Benton County Ian Van Lieu April 25 th, 2008.
§Simple Risk Analysis Techniques in Real Estate : Break Even Point Risk Absorption Capacity Sensitivity Analysis and Simulation For major reference : read.
Financial Strategies For Property Projects. Development Plan  Residential units – area, no. of units, flat size, target buyers  Car parks – no. of car.
Nova-Eco Ukraine Alexander Fediaev United Nations Climate Change Conference - Nairobi, 14 November 2006 Owner of a 300 MW wind power project developed.
Greta’s Grand Valley Wind Farm Contributing to Ontario’s Energy Future March, 2012 Greta Energy Inc.
Clean Energy Policy Analysis With RETScreen ® Photo Credit: Strong, Steven DOE/NREL.
Small Farm Profitability: Is Wind Energy the Answer? 1
Economics of The Yankee Ridge Wind Farm Project Mark E. Hardwidge Rachael Jabusch.
Fundamentals of Real Estate Lecture 14 Spring, 2003 Copyright © Joseph A. Petry
VALUATION BY INCOME CAPITALIZATION LEARNING OBJECTIVES Explain the difference between appraisal and investment analysis. Estimate the NOI in a reconstructed.
1) Project A: Payback Period = $250,000/$75,000 = 3.3 years.
Wind Engineering Module 6.1: Cost and Weight Models Lakshmi N. Sankar 1.
Project development under the RO Colin Palmer Wind Prospect Group ESRC: Where next for wind? University of Bath 9 May 2008.
IEE/12/064/SI /02/2015. Municipality of Kecskemét - General economic data  Capital of Bács-Kiskun county  Economic, administrative, educational,
Historical Performance Analysis Analysts:. 3-Year Compound Average Growth Rates.
1 27 March 2013 MYPD3 Briefing Session – Portfolio Committee on Energy.
1 Investment activities. 2 - two possible conceptions of investments: From the economic theory: - capital assets, which are not determined for the immediate.
Sarajevo, May Camp Gorcčinovo is located in Kosor, 10 km south from Mostar and only 2 km from Blagaj, Tekija Location.
Geothermal Heating System in the City of Bijeljina Bijeljina, City of Bijeljina City of Bijeljina Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Wind farm Kalin / Bulgaria. Wind farm Kalin / Bulgaria – 99 MW ♦ 55 x Vestas V100 with 1,8 MW rated power ♦ 95 m hub height ♦ average wind speed 5,9 m/s.
+ Parkview Personal Care Home Micheline Gaudet. + Welcome Home.
Registration Fee : 16,900 Baht ( Vat 7% not included ) This fee does not include 7% VAT, accommodation, and transportation, but include 2 break and a lunch.
Health resort project “Bosna - AS” Sarajevo, 2015.
Job number/BT/ serial number/ page number 008 BA003 1 Some thoughts on the cost of wind energy Andrew Garrad Garrad Hassan and Partners Cost effectiveness.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم General Information Total Installed Capacity PLAN 2015 =3155 MAX Load =2296 MW demand– 2015 =11793GWH Number of Customers2014.
Energising your Budgets Bruce Pittingale Carbon Special Reserve
Healthy, Fresh, Food Location What’s it going to Cost? Franchise Fee: $30,000 Leasehold Improvements: $215,000 Furniture and Fixtures: $185,000 Working.
Engineering, Policy, Finance
Invest in Loznica November LOCALITY: 44°33’ N,19°14’ E POPULATION residents (94,1 homogenous Serbian population)
1 CONFIDENTIAL Project information Contact Construction of Solar Power Plant “Kapshagay Solar” 50MWt in Almaty Region Project profitability for the period.
Confidential & Proprietary Internal Kaplan Use Only. CAPITAL PROJECT ANALYSIS Unit 7.
GOVERNMENT OF THE KINGDOM OF LESOTHO Water and Sewerage Company (WASCO) Greater Maseru Water Supply Feasibility Study & Preliminary Design Results of Financial.
Victorian electricity distribution pricing review, 2016–20 Overview of revised proposals January
PV Monastiraki 150kW Presentation September 2010.
TuuliSaimaa Oy (WindSaimaa Ltd) is a Finnish company located at city of Lappeenranta.TuuliSaimaa Oy (WindSaimaa Ltd) is a Finnish company located at city.
Cost of debt = Interest Payments. Debts are the borrowing which company takes to finance the company therefore they have to pay interest on those borrowing.
Land Auction: Year 7 §50 parcels available, 100 acres each §Land is identical to present land §Each parcel goes to the highest bidder §Minimum bid is $2,500.
Managerial Finance Session 5/6
Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria
Financial terminologies
Historical Performance Analysis
CHAPTER 2 VALUE: THE CENTRAL IDEA
Capital Budgeting Decisions
ESCO MODELS IN INDIA Click to begin.
Khuzestan Regional Electric Company
GRALESNOVA L.T.D. MARIBOR SLOVENIA
FIN 467 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
FIN 467 Education for Service/snaptutorial.com
الباب الرابع التحليل المالي وتقدير ربحية المشروع
Engineering, Policy, Finance
Geothermal district heating in the city of Kecskemét MLEI GeoKec – City of Kecskemét (HU) 21/03/ /03/2016 IEE/12/064/SI /03/2016.
Construction of Balkhashskaya TPS
Financial Appraisal of Project
Simulation Competition Who Builds the Best Improvement Plan
Wind Development & Policy Options
Invest in Loznica.
Presentation transcript:

Wind farm project “Pakline – Ljubusa – Kupres” Sarajevo, 15 March 2011.

WF Ljubusa WF Pakline WF Kupres1 WF Kupres2 Location: Bosnia and Herzegovina Tomislavgrad and Kupres municipality

Basic site information: Wind measurement: altitude m good terrain configuration main road and 110 kV line crossing the location WF Pakline - central most windy part, 20km 2 WF Ljubusa - south part, 14km 2 WF Kupres - north part, two separate areas, 25km 2 two 50m masts, one-year measurement during average wind speed 7m/s (50m) three new 60m masts installed at January 2011 (according to IEC standard, with professional calibrated equipment)

Preliminary design and energy yield: Wind turbine class: (2)-3MW Total power planned: 350MW For 1st phase: 102MW Capacity factor without losses (average): 32% Moderate turbulence (WT class IIA) Status of approvals: concession contract signed with county (Hercegbosanska zupanija) contract with Tomislavgrad municipality for land use preliminary measurement done preliminary layout done preliminary grid connection solution proposed environmental approval issued preliminary design almost finished (1st phase) location permit expecting for 1-2 months (1st phase)

CAPEX: €/MW Total (350MW): M€ First phase (102 MW): M€ OPEX: First phase: €/annual Costs Primary depending on feed-in tariff (not known yet) Assumed: 90 €/MWh for 1st year incerased with inflation rate, duration 12 years after 12th years, market prices assumed First phase (102 MW): Net energy: MWh/annual Income: €/annual (1st year) Project valuation (WACC = 10%): Project IRR: 13.95% Project NPV: €/MW (total €) Payback time (from project free cash flow): 11 years Equity return (70/30 debt/equity, interest rate 6%, upfront fee 3%, loan duration 12 years, discount rate 12%): Equity IRR: 23.1% Equity NPV: €/MW (total €) Payback time (from equity free cash flow): 7 years Project /equity valuation (profitability)

Owner/Developer: Kamen – dent d.o.o., Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina Tel: vjetropark.kamen-dent.com Technical support: Fractal d.o.o., Split, Croatia Tel: Contacts: Project financing Equity: 20-25% Developer’s costs and fee: 1/3 of equity Strategic partner: 2/3 of equity Debt: 70-80% Contracitng responsibility: strategic partner Financing