Measuring policy influence: like measuring thin air? John Young:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reasons for Monitoring and Evaluation at the Project Level
Advertisements

Other models. A Practical Framework External Influences political context evidence links Campaigning, Lobbying Politics and Policymaking Media, Advocacy,
Action Research for Maximum Impact
RAPID Programme Civil Society Organizations and Policy Entrepreneurship Julius Court & Enrique Mendizabal Overseas Development Institute, London.
Bridging Research and Policy An Overseas Development Institute Seminar 9th October 2003.
Linking research to policy in Vietnam: how can complexity concepts help?
An introduction to ODI, RAPID and Evidence Based Policy.
Mapping Political Contexts
Research and Policy in Development Aim for the bulls eye How to maximise the impact of development research John Young Overseas Development Institute,
The Analytical Framework
Bridging the Gap between Research and Policymaking in India Seminar, Workshop, 4 rd January 2004 Some Specific Tools Political context (Engaging Policymakers)
Tools for Policy Influence. RAPID Programme SMEPOL, Cairo, February, Practical Tools.
Role of CSOs in monitoring Policies and Progress on MDGs.
Towards a model M&E system for AIDS programs Kampala April
Maximising the impact of research: experience from ODI’s RAPID Programme John Young Overseas Development Institute
CAIM Start up Workshop Knowledge Management Ankita Handoo, IFAD India.
Monitoring and Evaluation of Influence John Young.
MINISTRY OF DEVOLUTION AND PLANNING. M&E DEPARTMENT WELIME Using Technology in Monitorin g and Evaluation (e-ProMIS)
Theories of Change John Young. A Theory of Change is… locates a programme or project within a wider analysis of how change comes about; draws on external.
IMPACT AND LEARNING Evaluation of Research Impact: Options and Challenges 18 October 2012 Simon Batchelor (IDS & Gamos)
RBM Communications Assessment Challenges and Opportunities in Ghana, Mali, Senegal, Tanzania and Uganda.
Communication and interactive policy development Wednesday 2nd of July.
Dissemination pathways Science and policy
Impact Measurement and You Understanding Impact Measurement, Practical Tools, Key Questions.
Isabel Vogel for ESPA. Isabel Vogel for ESPA, 24 January 2012 What is theory of change? Structured technique for understanding how and why a programme.
Making the case: using research-based evidence for policy advocacy John Young, ODI, London BOND Advocacy and Capacity Building Group.
Making Knowledge Count Maximising the value of Research for Development John Young: ODI, London
1 M&E SUPPORT TO PLANNING & BUDGET IN GHANA Presentation by CAPT. P.I DONKOR (rtd) National Development Planning Commission, Ghana.
3ie Grantees Communication for Policy Influence Clinic Negombo 16 th – 18 th July 2012.
Lessons from RAPID’s work on research-policy links John Young.
Philip Davies Making Evidence Accessible and Relevant for Policy and Practice Philip Davies International Initiative for Impact Evaluation.
“Opening the Doors of Policy-Making: Central Asia and South Caucasus” (UDF- GLO ) Skills Development Training for CSOs Istanbul, June 2-3, 2011 In-depth.
Indo-Gangetic Basin Impact Pathways Workshop 30 June - 2 July, 2006 Himalaya Hotel, Kathmandu, Nepal Boru Douthwaite and Cristina de Leon CPWF-BFP Impact.
Developing Indicators
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
Inclusive Business in Agrifood Markets: Evidence and Action FANRPAN Model – A Regional Multi-stakeholder Platform for Research, Knowledge Sharing and Policy.
Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT Cross-Cutting Advocacy Issues Data Collection Monitoring and Evaluation.
Effective Research for Development Policy John Young & Louise Shaxson CFHSS Congress 2006 York University
+ Conceptualizing Influence and Impact in Development Research Katie Wright.
Development Hypothesis or Theory of Change M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Maputo 19 and 20 September 2011 Arif Rashid, TOPS.
RAPID Outcome Mapping Approach Simon Hearn, ODI 16 April 2010 Bern, Switzerland.
Tony Karbo, Ph.D. AHSI/UPEACE Africa Program.  Action or inaction taken by interested entities such as NGOs, Think Tanks, government departments, ministries,
Knowledge Translation Curriculum Module 2: Situation Analysis Lesson 3 - Political Context Analysis.
ODI work on Cash Transfer Programmes Rebecca Holmes, ODI Regional workshop on cash transfer activities in southern Africa 9-10 October 2006, Johannesburg,
Workshop on VHL and HEN, Sao Paulo, April 2006 Workshop on VHL and HEN Sao Paulo, April 2006 Anca Dumitrescu, M.D. WHO Regional Office for.
M&E of policy influence some guidance thoughts…. Elements of a monitoring frame.. Policy objective and theory of change Indicators Data collection tools.
The Next Stage for Results in Africa. Context 2005 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness 2006 Mutual Learning Events Uganda & Burkina Faso 2007 Hanoi.
October 8 & 9 th, 2008 Conference on the Economy (COTE) University of the West Indies Programme Management Office Ministry of Planning, Housing and the.
ILRI Process and Partnership for Pro-Poor Policy Change Learning lessons from the Kampala urban agriculture policy process Process and Partnerships for.
(1) Bridging research, policy and politics the RAPID+ framework This presentation is based on: Court, J., and Young, J Bridging research and policy.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Using results frameworks to shift the focus of evaluation to a strategic level Emerging research on the principles underpinning results frameworks Kate.
Evaluation design and implementation Puja Myles
Lesson 4: Evaluation Plan Macerata, 29 th October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
Influencing Policy through Research: Introduction to Principles and Tools Arnaldo Pellini:
Capacity Development Results Framework A strategic and results-oriented approach to learning for capacity development.
Scottish Improvement Science Collaborating Centre Strengthening the evidence base for improvement science: lessons learned Dr Nicola Gray, Senior Lecturer,
A donor’s perspective in Aid for Trade Roles, Realities & Shared Responsibilities Elena Immambocus International Trade Department DFID.
RAPID Outcome Mapping Approach Enrique Mendizabal.
S3.1 session day 5 2 Programme management download resources from Approved by the Advisory Group: Programme management Programme and project.
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
What is Advocacy? ]thepressuregroup[.
Module 1: Introducing Development Evaluation
RAPID Outcome Mapping Approach
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
Strategic Communication Planning
Session 2 First steps in the LFA.
Poverty Reduction: Are the Strategies Working?
BACKGROUND Department for International Development (DFID)
Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.
Presentation transcript:

Measuring policy influence: like measuring thin air? John Young:

Monitoring and Evaluation Agenda Setting Decision Making Policy Implementation Policy Formulation The policy cycle Civil Society Donors Cabinet Parliament Ministries Private Sector 2

Research plays a minor role Kate Bird et al, Fracture Points in Social Policies for Chronic Poverty Reduction, ODI WP242, 2004 (

There are many other factors Scientific Evidence Experience & Expertise Judgement Resources Values and Policy Context Habits & Tradition Lobbyists & Pressure Groups Pragmatics & Contingencies Source: Phil Davies Impact to Insight Meeting, ODI, 2005

Example: health care in Tanzania “The results of household disease surveys informed processes of health service reform which contributed to a 43 and 46 per cent reduction in infant mortality between 2000 and 2003 in two districts in rural Tanzania.” TEHIP Project, Tanzania:

What is policy change? 6 Discursive: Client-focused services Attitudinal: Farmers have good ideas Procedural: Participatory approaches to service development Content: UU20, UU25. New guidelines and programmes Behavioural: Approach being applied in practice

It’s all about behaviour change 7 InputsActivitiesOutputs By the Project OutcomeImpact Outcomes Impact Outcomes Impact Behaviour Change By other Actors Level of Activity

Professionalisation of Public Services. Structural Adjustment → collapse of services. Paravet projects emerge. ITDG projects. Privatisation. ITDG Paravet network. Rapid spread in North. KVB letter (January 1998). Multistakeholder WSs → new policies. Still not approved / passed! 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s Professionalisation of Public Services. Structural Adjustment Privatisation ITDG Paravet network change of DVS. KVB letter (January 1998). Multistakeholder WSs → new policies. ITDG projects – Action-research. The Hubl Study Dr Kajume Animal Healthcare in Kenya International Research

Lots of methods Classical case studies (IDRC, IFPRI) Episode studies (ODI/RAPID) Stories of Change (Denning) Most Significant Change (Davies) Micro-Narratives / Sensemaker (Snowden) Outcome Mapping (IDRC) Impact matrices (Davies) Peer evaluations (CHSRF) HERG Payback Framework (Brunel) Systematic reviews (DFID) RCTs (IDS) 9

1.Strategy and direction –are you doing the right thing? 2.Management –are you doing what you planned to do? 3.Outputs – are the outputs appropriate for the audience? 4.Uptake – are people aware of your work? 5.Outcomes and impacts –are you having any impact? A systematic approach 1.Strategy and direction 2.Management 3.Outputs 4.Uptake 5.Outcomes and impacts 10

1.Strategy and direction - Logframes; Social Network Analysis; Impact Pathways etc 2.Management –‘Fit for Purpose’ Reviews; Quality Audits; Horizontal Evaluation; 3.Outputs – Peer review; Evaluating websites; Evaluating networks; After Action Reviews 4.Uptake – Impact Logs; New Areas for Citation Analysis; User Surveys 5.Outcomes and impacts –Outcome Mapping; RAPID Outcome Assessment; Most Significant Change; Innovation Histories; Episode Studies A systematic approach 1.Strategy and direction 2.Management 3.Outputs 4.Uptake 5.Outcomes and impacts 11

Logical frameworks GoalIndicatorMOV PurposeIndicatorMOVAssumptions/Risks Output 1IndicatorMOVAssumptions/Risks Output 2IndicatorMOV Output 3IndicatorMOV Output 4IndicatorMOV √ √

Theories of change Causal Chain - succession of elements with logical links (eg log- frame approach) Dimensions of influence - overlapping domains which interact, where it is possible to influence (eg RAPID CEL Framework) Actor-centred theories - where the behaviour of actors can be influenced (eg Outcome Mapping) 13

14 Theories of change

After Action Review What was supposed to happen? What actually happened? Why was there a difference? What can we learn from it? 15 minute team debrief, conducted in a “rank-free” environment. 15

ODI CommStats 16

Stories of change 1.Essential elements: Situation before Context Situation after What changed and why 2.Most Significant Change (Davies) Stories of change from different stakeholders Systematic analysis of significance. 3.Micro-narratives (Snowden) 17

RAPID Outcome Assessment 18

M&E in ODI

Think Tank Initiative evaluation 20 Theory of Change and Assumptions Theory of Change and Ass Theory of Theory of Change and Assumptions ImpactUptakeManagement

Review of ToC: testing the assumptions – Literature review – (Desk-based) political economy analysis – Interviews Assessment of capacity change – Quantitative analysis of M&E data – Interviews and focus-groups – Stories of change Policy impact – (In country) political economy analysis – Case studies – Stories of change – Interviews and focus-groups 21 Think Tank Initiative evaluation