NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholde r to insert your own image. RICHMOND.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Advertisements

Santa Rosa County District Schools Evaluation Systems.
PORTFOLIO.
New Mexico Teachscape Reflect for Teachers Collaborative Norms Equity of voice Active listening Safety to share different perspectives Commitment.
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY12/13 Governing Board Presentation May 10, 2012.
Most current teacher evaluations provide little information that can be used to give teachers the training and tools they need to be effective; better.
In traditional educational practice, classroom observation has been the primary tool to document teacher performance (Weade & Evertson, 1991). However,
What’s new? What’s accepted? What’s the easiest way to do this? Tutorial created by Devin Arms, 2013.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
EPSS Part 2.  Learn the process for uploading artifacts to EPSS  Learn the process of aligning artifacts to components  Learn the process of editing.
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP: CLASSROOM WALKTHROUGHS
Part II: Strategic Planning for a Successful 1:1 Program
E-Portfolios for Students
School’s Cool in Childcare Settings
Discover America Project Overview Teacher Planning & Reflection Teaching Resources Assessment & Standards Classroom Teacher Guide Pre-service Teacher Guide.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing 1 Accreditation Overview.
Mississippi Teacher Evaluation System (MTES) Updates
 PAS…. Learning Targets: Administrators will be able to: Understand and Articulate the First Observation Cycle Review and Approve Student Achievement.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Getting Engaged in Evaluation: How to Develop an Evidence-based Offense for Your Evaluation Presented by Ellen Holmes, NBCT
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
NEW TEACHER PRINCIPAL EVALUATION. RACE TO THE TOP AND ESSB 5895  The principles guiding the change  Quality teaching and leading is critically important.
Leadership Team July 24, Learning Targets 1. Familiarize and use The Framework of Teaching in the areas of engagement and questioning to observe.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
Building Collaborative Learning Communities a division of Computer Strategies, LLC Your professional development solution.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. PROFESSIONAL.
Secaucus Reflect Live Observation Process Observer Guide.
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
1 Educator Performance and Support System (EPSS) Information Session April 4 th, 2012.
Walter G. Byers Doughnuts for Dad November 19, 2015 NOTE: To change images on this slide, select a picture and delete it. Then click the Insert Picture.
 Nuts & Bolts 2015/16 PAS…. Learning Targets: Administrators will be able to: Understand and Articulate the First Observation Cycle Review and Approve.
EVAL Introduction RIG 2 – Cohort 1 October 29, 2012 Cathey Frederick ESD 189 eVAL Specialist.
Teachscape Reflect User Guide Teacher Observation and Evaluation Howard County Public School System.
MSBSD Teacher Evaluation
Educator Effectiveness Updates April Updates Closing up Looking forward to
Agenda Debrief on past module development Tools for online content development Module development template Timeline Suggested guidelines for developing.
Teaching and Learning Courageous Journey Presentation by: Glenn Maleyko, Ph.D December 9, 2013.
GEA TOOL KIT PRESENTATION STAR ORULLIAN – EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR GRANITE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION.
Washoe County School District Mike Paul- Director of Professional Growth Systems and TIF3 & TIF4 Grants Yvette Deighton- TIF4 Program Coordinator Jim Grace.
TESS & LEADS Implementation Awareness for End-of-Year Success Office of Educator Effectiveness Arkansas Department of Education Spring, 2016.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. PROFESSIONAL.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Aspen HomeCare Service, LLC
Nuts & Bolts 2015/16 PAS…. Learning Targets: Administrators will be able to: Understand and Articulate the First Observation Cycle Review and Approve Student.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
StaffTrac By Educational Vistas, Inc.
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Standard for Success Teacher Training.
Picture with Caption layout
Educator Effectiveness System Overview
Title layout Subtitle.
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012
State Board of Education Progress Update
MSBSD Principal Evaluation
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Design Brief.
Evaluation Information
Standard for Success Teacher Training.
Onslow County Schools Head Start
Picture with Caption layout
Album Title Subtitle NOTE:
Presentation transcript:

NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholde r to insert your own image. RICHMOND COMMUNITY SCHOOLS STANDARD FOR SUCCESS

Changes at RCS PL 90 implemented the new evaluation model We were Learning AND Doing School District Reconfiguration and building closures SEA 1 - Bargaining law changed at the same time….salary schedule went away…compensation model that nobody understood New Pearson 2013– Reading and Math

Kubler – Ross Five Stages of Grief Denial – “This too shall pass.” Anger – “Lawmakers are NOT teachers.” Bargaining – “We could just use our current tool and change the performance level ratings to match what is required.” Depression – “This is not possible! How can principals do 5 observations and pre and post conference meetings?” Acceptance – Year 2….we are doing this, but we are making modifications to create a workable model and validating principal and teacher efforts

Keeping track of documentation RCS utilized the Danielson model prior to PL 90 and the adoption of RISE. This is one file for one teacher in a school with multiple drawers in a filing cabinet to store documentation.

All electronic files for all teachers at our fingertips At home, at the office, on an airplane….IPADS and laptops can go with us and we can work on observations, artifacts, professional development tasks, mapping…… anywhere, anytime.

Keeping Track of observations and documentation IPADS and Laptops make the process streamlined. All data in one place and a year’s worth of work for every staff member easily accessible. Opportunities to work on own evidence and artifacts for uploading and mapping.

Each teacher has a page with all files in one place Rubric is always available for reference and areas that have evidence are easily and visually noted for quick understanding. Use for multiple years, you can go back to see how and where each staff member performed previously….historical value.

Implementation in Richmond Fall 2011 Train the trainer for RISE Spring 2012 – RISE training for teacher evaluation coupled with Standard For Success software training Visit to Greensburg….pilot site for discussion of implementation Summer 2012 – RISE training for Principal evaluation Fall 2012 – Get to work….spend a lot of time practicing and learning to use the software at the same time learning the RISE rubric.

Training for Teachers Spring 2012 While principals are being trained, they are introducing RISE to staff…study, reflect, dialogue during reconfiguration….maybe lost in the shuffle Fall 2012 – Introduce SFS added to RISE, utilize PD time for training…..small steps – What is an artifact….evidence of practice – Number of observations – Scripting – In PLC’s – Studied “Principles of Instruction – Research- Based Strategies that all Teachers Should Know” (Rosenshine, 2012) (Handout) A close read aligned with RISE Rubric – Instructional Techniques developed to assist teachers with evidence for artifacts aligned with RISE Rubric competencies (Handout)

Training for Teachers Spring 2013 – Continue dialogue with teachers regarding uploading artifacts, what is evidence, mapping…..walking through each step together….very time consuming but worth the effort. Fall 2013 – – RCS trims # of observations – Revisit rubric with staff….this year, gradual release….upload and map Domain 1 and 3 on their own Post observation meetings….

Training for Teachers Spring 2014 – – Develop checklist for each trimester (Handout) – Reflection of concerns regarding teacher understanding….back to the drawing board for continued training opportunities Fall 2014 – – Revisit rubric and the practice of evaluation for standardization across the district – New staff to train After 2 years of implementation…….

NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholde r to insert your own image. Q & A Teacher and Principal Evaluation Model