HSM: Celebrating 5 Years Together Brian Ray, PE Casey Bergh, PE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tracy Lovell, PE A FOCUSED APPROACH TO SAFETY. Provide a Transportation System  Safe  Efficient  Environmentally Sound  Fiscally Responsible.
Advertisements

Safety Conversation: NLTAPA Conference Michael S. Griffith Director Office of Safety Technologies Federal Highway Administration.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
HSM Implementation Tools Safety Analyst
Lec 33, Ch.5, pp : Accident reduction capabilities and effectiveness of safety design features (Objectives) Learn what’s involved in safety engineering.
DISTRICT PILOT PROJECT PRESENTATION MAY 2, Highway Safety Manual Implementation.
Spring  Crash modification factors (CMFs) are becoming increasing popular: ◦ Simple multiplication factor ◦ Used for estimating safety improvement.
Enhanced Safety Prediction Methodology and Analysis Tool for Freeways and Interchanges James A. Bonneson August 2012 NCHRP Project
Oregon Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Implementation Plan.
Spring INTRODUCTION There exists a lot of methods used for identifying high risk locations or sites that experience more crashes than one would.
ALDOT HSIP FUNDING OPPORTUNTIES ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF SAFETY OPERATIONS SONYA BAKER TIMOTHY BARNETT MAY 13, 2015.
Incorporating Safety into the Highway Design Process.
Lec 32, Ch5, pp : Highway Safety Improvement Program (objectives) Learn the components of FHWA’s Highway Safety Improvement Program Know typical.
Module Use research and appropriate methods for selecting effective countermeasures and targeting diverse cultural and geographic populations. Countermeasure.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E. Traffic Investigations Engineer, ODOT February 26, 2015.
Session 10 Training Opportunities Brief Overview of Related Courses in USA / Canada Geni Bahar, P.E. NAVIGATS Inc.
US 1 COLLEGE PARK – SEGMENT 1 FROM COLLEGE AVE/REGENTS DRIVE TO MD 193 (UNIVERSITY BLVD) Presentation to College Park City Council August 5,
Road Safety Management Process
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
The Empirical Bayes Method for Safety Estimation Doug Harwood MRIGlobal Kansas City, MO.
Network Screening 1 Module 3 Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment: July 22, Boise, Idaho.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Hot Spot ODOT Region 1 Kick-Off Meeting March 18, 2015.
Selecting Countermeasures 1 Module 5 Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment July 22, Boise, Idaho.
2-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
SR 997 / KROME AVENUE Florida Department of Transportation April 27th, 2006 South Miami-Dade Watershed Study Advisory Committee.
A Systemic Approach to Safety Management NLTAPA Annual Conference July 30, 2012 Hillary Isebrands, P.E., PhD.
Enhancing Highway Safety: Applications of the Human Factors Guidelines (HFG) for Road Systems Presentation to the 2015 Annual Meeting of the Western Association.
City of Henderson Citizens Traffic Advisory Board NDOT SAFETY UPDATE.
Introduction: Overview of Roadway Safety Management Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment: July 22, Boise, Idaho 1 Module.
Jason J. Siwula, PE – Safety Engineer DOES 24+0=22+2? AN INTRO TO HSM METHODS.
Role of SPFs in SafetyAnalyst Ray Krammes Federal Highway Administration.
HSM: Another Tool for Safety Management in Wyoming 1 Excellence in Transportation.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
1 September 28, 2011 Safety Strategies Workshop Brown County Faribault County Martin County Watonwan County.
NC Local Safety Partnership Selecting Interventions.
The Highway Safety Manual: A New Tool for Safety Analysis John Zegeer, PE Kittelson & Associates, Inc. HSM Production Team Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Angela Kargel Region 2 Traffic Manager Oregon Department of Transportation January 2015.
University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research - Results of Crash Analysis University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research.
Unsignalized Intersections Safety at Unsignalized Intersections.
Putting Together a Safety Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E.—Traffic Investigations Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation Traffic—Roadway Section (Salem,
Calibrating Highway Safety Manual Equations for Application in Florida Dr. Siva Srinivasan, Phillip Haas, Nagendra Dhakar, and Ryan Hormel (UF) Doug Harwood.
NCHRP Crash Reduction Factors for Traffic Engineering and ITS Improvements UNC HSRC VHB Ryerson University (Bhagwant and Craig)
The Metropolitan Houston Traffic Safety Program Houston-Galveston Area Council Houston, TX.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 FHWA Safety Core Business Unit Office-Level Structure Develops and manages programs for the safe operation of roadways, bicycle.
Highway Fatalities A National Health Crisis Highway Designers Can Help Turn Around By Anthony Kane Director, Engineering and Technical Services American.
US 421 Centerline Rumble Strips in Chatham Co. Renee B. Roach, P.E. and Al Grandy May 2, 2007.
October 15 th, 2013 The City of Akron SUM – Exchange Street / Cedar Street Corridor Safety Study.
Fall  Crashes are “independent” and “random” events (probabilistic events)  Estimate a relationship between crashes and covariates (or explanatory.
Highway Safety Analysis: Engineering Kenneth Epstein, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety Programs Safety Data and Analysis Tools Workshop.
Oregon’s All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Zahidul Siddique, Ph.D., PE, PTOE Oregon Department of Transportation October 26, st International.
1 THE HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL Michael S. Griffith Federal Highway Administration July 26 th, 2004.
SUCCESSFUL APPLICATION FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) GRANTS Presented By: Patrick V. DeChellis Deputy Director Los Angeles County Department.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
Role of Safety Performance Functions in the Highway Safety Manual July 29, 2009.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
6-1 Module 6: Group Activity Wright County Safety Review Identifying Opportunities for Making Roads Safer 6-1.
Road Safety Audits Road School, 2011 Rick Drumm, P.E. Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration.
SR 44 at Grand Avenue Volusia County, FL River to Sea CAC/TCC Meetings May 17, 2016.
LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
1 The Highway Safety Manual Predictive Methods. 2 New Highway Safety Manual of 2010 ►Methodology is like that for assessing and assuring the adequacy.
District 6 – Safety Applications
MoDOT Highway Safety Manual Implementation
NDOT HSM Nevda Transportation Conference
Highway Safety Team Staff Meeting SMART Portal HSIP Application Demonstration Systemic Safety Improvement (SSI) November 21,2017.
State Road 72 Safety Improvements
Using CMFs in Planning for Virginia’s Project Funding Prioritization
SCOHTS Meeting June 15-17, 2011.
SCOHTS Meeting June 15-17, 2011.
Clark County, WA Safety Management Program
Presentation transcript:

HSM: Celebrating 5 Years Together Brian Ray, PE Casey Bergh, PE

HSM Promotes Quantitative Safety Methods

Source: NCHRP 480

HSM: A Multipurpose Toolbox Planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance System Planning – HSM Part B Project Planning & Preliminary Engineering – HSM Part B and Part C Design and Construction – HSM Part C and Part D Operations and Maintenance – HSM Part B, C and D

Develop understanding of system needs Inform countermeasure selection Prioritize projects with potential for crash reduction Part B - Roadway Safety Management

Multiple performance measures available – Simple to rigorous – Data has limited most agencies Part B Performance Measures

SPFs predict crashes for a base condition Part C CMFs modify the base prediction to reflect physical conditions (e.g., left- turn lanes) Part C – Predictive Method

Provided in Part D and online in FHWA Clearinghouse Estimate change in crash frequency associated with a proposed modification Location - Improvement Expected Crashes/Yr Estimated Percent Reduction Planning Level Cost Estimate $/Crash Mitigated Over Design Life Anderson Road Int. - FHWA Lane Narrowing 2.231%$45,000$13,196 Anderson Road Int. - FHWA Splitter Island 2.268%$112,500$15,040 Moon Road- Access Restriction / Right Turn Lane 1.926%$610,000$61,741 Anderson Road- Single Lane Roundabout 2.271%$3.15 million$100,832 Part D - Crash Modification Factors

ODOT Pedestrian and Bike Safety Plan ODOT ARTS TSPs State/Region Clark County Bend Clackamas County City/County Road Safety Audits Intersection Traffic Control Evaluations US 97 Corridor Safety Study Intersection/ Segment HSM Applications in OR

State/Region Network Screening Identifies Sites with Potential for Crash Reduction Segment screening based on sliding window ODOT ARTS systemic safety network screening focus areas – Roadway Departure – Bicycle and Pedestrian – Intersection

ODOT Region 1 ARTS: Data-informed 300% Systemic Project Locations HSM Performance Measure: Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) average crash frequency – Selected to reflect the severity of reported crashes Applied independently to intersections and segments – Weighting Factors (consistent with SPIS): 100 for Fatal or Injury A 10 for Injury B or C 1 for PDO

Region 1: Data-informed 300% Systemic Project Locations Traditional Systemic Analysis – Use crash history to prioritize intersection crash locations

Statewide Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Implementation Plan Risk-based Systemic Safety Analysis – Crash history is not sufficient to inform pedestrian and bicycle crash risk Identify Risk Factors Traffic and geometric characteristics present at fatal and severe-injury crash sites Select and Prioritize Locations Segments exhibiting one or more risk factors Develop Systemic Safety Projects Apply countermeasures to address risk factors at specific locations

Goal: Establish a safety management program – Understand crash patterns – Prioritize safety projects – Improve collaboration with other agencies Data-Informed Safety Management Plan Example Bend, OR Current Limitations Perceived Safety ReactiveOne-time Individual Efforts Opportunities Objective Safety ProactiveRepeatable Coordinated Efforts

Data-Informed Safety Management Plan Example Bend, OR

Corridor Safety Analysis Example: SR 46 Facility: 7.4 miles of two-lane rural highway in Seminole County, Florida Goal: Evaluate crash history and identify countermeasures to reduce crash frequency and severity – Identify project cost-benefit ratios to justify funding and objectively prioritize projects

Corridor crash trends – 30% rear-end – 24% run-off-road – 45% at night Contributing Factors – Careless Driving – Failure to Yield ROW – Speed Corridor Safety Study Example: SR 46

Location Observed Annual Number of Crashes Predicted Number of Crashes per Year Expected Number of Crashes per Year SR 415 to Richmond Ave SR 46 / Richmond Avenue Richmond Ave to Mullet Lake Park Road SR 46 / Mullet Lake Park Road Mullet Lake Park Rd to Avenue C SR 46 / Avenue C Avenue C to CR SR 46 / CR Total

Corridor Safety Study Example: SR 46

Tier I Projects Low-cost rumble strips, signs Tier II Projects Moderate-cost shoulder widening, turn lanes, intersection lighting, etc. Tier III Projects High-cost passing lane, access management

What’s Next? 2 nd Edition Production through NCHRP – Incorporates Freeway and Ramp Prediction Models (Available now) – Additional Models (e.g., arterials with six or more lanes and one-way arterial streets) – Increased statistical rigor – Exclude Part D CMFs

Questions? Brian Ray – – Casey Bergh – –