Multi-Scale Probabilistic Modeling in Geospace Science Zach Thomas The Ohio State University Mentors: Tomoko Matsuo, Doug Nychka Ellen Cousins, Mike Wiltberger.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IEEE BIBE th IEEE International Conference on BioInformatics and BioEngineering, November 10-13, Chania, Greece Towards an Overall 3-D Vector Field.
Advertisements

MURI,2008 Electric Field Variability and Impact on the Thermosphere Yue Deng 1,2, Astrid Maute 1, Arthur D. Richmond 1 and Ray G. Roble 1 1.HAO National.
Budapest May 27, 2008 Unifying mixed linear models and the MASH algorithm for breakpoint detection and correction Anders Grimvall, Sackmone Sirisack, Agne.
Dynamic Bayesian Networks (DBNs)
Anti-parallel versus Component Reconnection at the Magnetopause K.J. Trattner Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center Palo Alto, CA, USA and the Polar/TIMAS,
Peter Boakes 1, Steve Milan 2, Adrian Grocott 2, Mervyn Freeman 3, Gareth Chisham 3, Gary Abel 3, Benoit Hubert 4, Victor Sergeev 5 Rumi Nakamura 1, Wolfgang.
BAYESIAN INFERENCE Sampling techniques
Predictive Automatic Relevance Determination by Expectation Propagation Yuan (Alan) Qi Thomas P. Minka Rosalind W. Picard Zoubin Ghahramani.
Ionospheric Electric Field Variations during Geomagnetic Storms Simulated using CMIT W. Wang 1, A. D. Richmond 1, J. Lei 1, A. G. Burns 1, M. Wiltberger.
Inversion imaging of the Sun-Earth System Damien Allain, Cathryn Mitchell, Dimitriy Pokhotelov, Manuchehr Soleimani, Paul Spencer, Jenna Tong, Ping Yin,
Statistics, data, and deterministic models NRCSE.
1 Integration of Background Modeling and Object Tracking Yu-Ting Chen, Chu-Song Chen, Yi-Ping Hung IEEE ICME, 2006.
Hazırlayan NEURAL NETWORKS Radial Basis Function Networks I PROF. DR. YUSUF OYSAL.
Tracking with Linear Dynamic Models. Introduction Tracking is the problem of generating an inference about the motion of an object given a sequence of.
1 Geomagnetic/Ionospheric Models NASA/GSFC, Code 692 During the early part of April 6, 2000 a large coronal “ejecta” event compressed and interacted with.
Predictions of Solar Wind Speed and IMF Polarity Using Near-Real-Time Solar Magnetic Field Updates C. “Nick” Arge University of Colorado/CIRES & NOAA/SEC.
ElectroScience Lab IGARSS 2011 Vancouver Jul 26th, 2011 Chun-Sik Chae and Joel T. Johnson ElectroScience Laboratory Department of Electrical and Computer.
Competence Centre on Information Extraction and Image Understanding for Earth Observation Matteo Soccorsi (1) and Mihai Datcu (1,2) A Complex GMRF for.
Using Bayesian Networks to Analyze Expression Data N. Friedman, M. Linial, I. Nachman, D. Hebrew University.
ESA DA Projects Progress Meeting 2University of Reading Advanced Data Assimilation Methods WP2.1 Perform (ensemble) experiments to quantify model errors.
3D SLAM for Omni-directional Camera
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss High-resolution data assimilation in COSMO: Status and.
Estimating currents and electric fields in the high-latitude ionosphere using ground- and space-based observations Ellen Cousins 1, Tomoko Matsuo 2,3,
Kp Forecast Models S. Wing 1, Y. Zhang 1, and J. R. Johnson 2 1 Applied Physics Laboratory, The Johns Hopkins University 2 Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory,
Regional climate prediction comparisons via statistical upscaling and downscaling Peter Guttorp University of Washington Norwegian Computing Center
Geo597 Geostatistics Ch9 Random Function Models.
Geographic Information Science
Computational Model of Energetic Particle Fluxes in the Magnetosphere Computer Systems Yu (Evans) Xiang Mentor: Dr. John Guillory, George Mason.
Space-Time Mesoscale Analysis System A sequential 3DVAR approach Yuanfu Xie, Steve Koch John McGinley and Steve Albers Global Systems Division Earth System.
Combining CMORPH with Gauge Analysis over
Ionospheric Electrodynamics & Low-Earth Orbiting Satellites (LEOS) J-M Noël, A. Russell, D. Burrell & S. Thorsteinson Royal Military College of Canada.
Continuous Variables Write message update equation as an expectation: Proposal distribution W t (x t ) for each node Samples define a random discretization.
Specifying Instantaneous Currents and Electric Fields in the High-Latitude Ionosphere FESD-ECCWES Meeting, 21 July 20141/15 Ellen Cousins 1, Tomoko Matsuo.
Solar Shield project - lessons learned and advances made (ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov/Solar_Shield) Pulkkinen, A., M. Hesse, S. Habib, F. Policelli, B. Damsky,
Solar Shield project - lessons learned and advances made Pulkkinen, A., M. Hesse, S. Habib, F. Policelli, B. Damsky, L. Van der Zel, D. Fugate, W. Jacobs,
1 Complex Images k’k’ k”k” k0k0 -k0-k0 branch cut   k 0 pole C1C1 C0C0 from the Sommerfeld identity, the complex exponentials must be a function.
Estimating Component Availability by Dempster-Shafer Belief Networks Estimating Component Availability by Dempster-Shafer Belief Networks Lan Guo Lane.
Distributed Radar Networks Ray Greenwald JHU/APL.
Data Assimilation for the Space Environment Ludger Scherliess Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University Logan, Utah GEM.
Ionospheric Research at USU R.W. Schunk, L. Scherliess, J.J. Sojka, D.C. Thompson & L. Zhu Center for Atmospheric & Space Sciences Utah State University.
Response of the Magnetosphere and Ionosphere to Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure Pulse KYUNG SUN PARK 1, TATSUKI OGINO 2, and DAE-YOUNG LEE 3 1 School of Space.
Sabrina Rainwater David National Research Council Postdoc at NRL with Craig Bishop and Dan Hodyss Naval Research Laboratory Multi-scale Covariance Localization.
Carlos H. R. Lima - Depto. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Brasilia. Brazil. Upmanu Lall - Water Center, Columbia.
Slide 1 NATO UNCLASSIFIEDMeeting title – Location - Date Satellite Inter-calibration of MODIS and VIIRS sensors Preliminary results A. Alvarez, G. Pennucci,
Guest lecture: Feature Selection Alan Qi Dec 2, 2004.
Lecture 2: Statistical learning primer for biologists
EGU General Assembly 2006, 2-7 April, 2006, Wien ST6 Multi-point measurements of solar-terrestrial plasma: results and future perspectives Scientific objectives.
Observed & Simulated Profiles of Cloud Occurrence by Atmospheric State A Comparison of Observed Profiles of Cloud Occurrence with Multiscale Modeling Framework.
Dawn-dusk asymmetry in the intensity of the polar cap flows as seen by the SuperDARN radars A.V. Koustov, R.A.D. Fiori, Z. Abooalizadeh PHYSICS AND ENGINEERING.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 The use of an intensity-scale technique for assessing operational mesoscale precipitation forecasts Marion Mittermaier and.
New Science Opportunities with a Mid-Latitude SuperDARN Radar Raymond A. Greenwald Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
First-principles-based modeling of geomagnetically induced currents (GIC) at mid- and low-latitudes Pulkkinen, A., N. Buzulukova, L. Rastaetter, M. Kuznetsova,
Markov Networks: Theory and Applications Ying Wu Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Northwestern University Evanston, IL 60208
Mike Ruohoniemi 2012VT SuperDARN Remote Sensing of the Ionosphere and Earth’s Surface with HF Radar J. Michael Ruohoniemi and Joseph Baker.
Korea Institute of Atmospheric Prediction Systems (KIAPS) ( 재 ) 한국형수치예보모델개발사업단 Identical Twin Experiments for the Representer Method with a Spectral Element.
Small-scale variability and observational error estimates for gridded analyses of SST data Alexey Kaplan Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University.
>> European Cluster Assimilation Technology.
VT SuperDARN Group Joseph Baker Ground-Based Observations of the Plasmapause Boundary Layer (PBL) Region with.
Baker Tech SuperDARN Large-Scale Observations of the Sub-Auroral Polarization Stream (SAPS) From.
1 MODIS winds assimilation experiments and impact studies to date at the Met Office Howard Berger, Mary Forsythe, Met Office, Bracknell/Exeter, UK UW-CIMSS.
Data-Model Comparisons
(Towards) anthropogenic CO2 emissions through inverse modelling
CEDAR Frontiers: Daytime Optical Aeronomy Duggirala Pallamraju and Supriya Chakrabarti Center for Space Physics, Boston University &
S. Datta-Barua, Illinois Institute of Technology G. S. Bust, JHUAPL
Ionospheric Science and Space Weather
ASTRONOMICAL DATA ANALYSIS
Evidence for Dayside Interhemispheric Field-Aligned Currents During Strong IMF By Conditions Seen by SuperDARN Radars Joseph B.H. Baker, Bharat Kunduri.
CEDAR 2013 Workshop International space weather and climate observations along the 120E/60W meridional circle and its surrounding areas Space weather observations.
Yuki Takagi1*, Kazuo Shiokawa1, Yuichi Otsuka1, and Martin Connors2  
by Andreas Keiling, Scott Thaller, John Wygant, and John Dombeck
Presentation transcript:

Multi-Scale Probabilistic Modeling in Geospace Science Zach Thomas The Ohio State University Mentors: Tomoko Matsuo, Doug Nychka Ellen Cousins, Mike Wiltberger August 1, 2014

Outline of Summer Work.,. Application: Modeling high-latitude ionospheric convection from sparse radar observations

Outline of Summer Work.,. Application: Modeling high-latitude ionospheric convection from sparse radar observations.,. Statistical Methodology: Technique for spatial modeling on the sphere

Scientific Background Motivation.,. Scientific: Obtain better understanding of complex interaction between solar wind and Earth’s magnetic field by studying various ionospheric processes

Scientific Background Motivation.,. Scientific: Obtain better understanding of complex interaction between solar wind and Earth’s magnetic field by studying various ionospheric processes.., Numerical modeling

Scientific Background Motivation.,. Scientific: Obtain better understanding of complex interaction between solar wind and Earth’s magnetic field by studying various ionospheric processes.., Numerical modeling.., Data analysis

Scientific Background Motivation.,. Scientific: Obtain better understanding of complex interaction between solar wind and Earth’s magnetic field by studying various ionospheric processes.., Numerical modeling.., Data analysis.,. Practical/Societal: Understand changes in electromagnetic energy associated with auroras

Scientific Background Motivation.,. Scientific: Obtain better understanding of complex interaction between solar wind and Earth’s magnetic field by studying various ionospheric processes.., Numerical modeling.., Data analysis.,. Practical/Societal: Understand changes in electromagnetic energy associated with auroras.., Disturbances in telecommunication

Scientific Background Motivation.,. Scientific: Obtain better understanding of complex interaction between solar wind and Earth’s magnetic field by studying various ionospheric processes.., Numerical modeling.., Data analysis.,. Practical/Societal: Understand changes in electromagnetic energy associated with auroras.., Disturbances in telecommunication.., Disturbances in power grids

Scientific Background Interaction between Solar Wind and Earth’s Magnetic Field Figure: Output from the Lyon-Fedder-Mobarry model capturing complex interaction between solar wind and Earth’s magnetic field. Image courtesy of

Scientific Background Ionospheric Electric Potential and Plasma Convection Patterns Figure: IMF effect on ionospheric convection. Image courtesy of Cousins et al. (2010)

Modification of LatticeKrig for the Sphere What is LatticeKrig?.,. LatticeKrig is a new R package for fast/flexible spatial modeling based on a statistical methodology in Nychka et al. (2014).

Modification of LatticeKrig for the Sphere What is LatticeKrig?.,. LatticeKrig is a new R package for fast/flexible spatial modeling based on a statistical methodology in Nychka et al. (2014)..,. Key idea is to express the spatial process as a mulitresolution basis function expansion with random coefficients

Modification of LatticeKrig for the Sphere What is LatticeKrig?.,. LatticeKrig is a new R package for fast/flexible spatial modeling based on a statistical methodology in Nychka et al. (2014)..,. Key idea is to express the spatial process as a mulitresolution basis function expansion with random coefficients.,. Random coefficients modeled via a certain Markov random field model called a simultaneous autoregression (SAR) model

Modification of LatticeKrig for the Sphere What is LatticeKrig?.,. Observe a process at n locations within a spatial domain D...call them y ( s 1 ),..., y ( s n ).

Modification of LatticeKrig for the Sphere What is LatticeKrig?.,. Observe a process at n locations within a spatial domain D...call them y ( s 1 ),..., y ( s n )..,. For an arbitrary s ∈ D, we would like to make inference about the process y ( s ) from the observations.

Modification of LatticeKrig for the Sphere What is LatticeKrig?.,. Observe a process at n locations within a spatial domain D...call them y ( s 1 ),..., y ( s n )..,. For an arbitrary s ∈ D, we would like to make inference about the process y ( s ) from the observations..,. Common spatial model: For any s ∈ D (observed or not): y ( s ) = m ( s ) + g ( s ) + e ( s ) Process = Mean + Spatial Process + Ind. Error

Modification of LatticeKrig for the Sphere What is LatticeKrig?.,. Observe a process at n locations within a spatial domain D...call them y ( s 1 ),..., y ( s n )..,. For an arbitrary s ∈ D, we would like to make inference about the process y ( s ) from the observations..,. Common spatial model: For any s ∈ D (observed or not): y ( s ) = m ( s ) + g ( s ) + e ( s ) Process = Mean + Spatial Process + Ind. Error.,. LatticeKrig differs from other methods in its construction of the spatially dependent process g ( s ).

Modification of LatticeKrig for the Sphere What is LatticeKrig?.,. Center basis functions at grid locations on L grids over the observation region.

Modification of LatticeKrig for the Sphere What is LatticeKrig?.,. Center basis functions at grid locations on L grids over the observation region..,. The L grids are obtained by sequentially doubling the resolution of the previous grid.

Modification of LatticeKrig for the Sphere What is LatticeKrig?.,. Center basis functions at grid locations on L grids over the observation region..,. The L grids are obtained by sequentially doubling the resolution of the previous grid..,. The process g ( s ) is then expressed as a basis function expansion: g (s) =g (s) = L n l ) l =1 j =1 c W [ d ( s, s )] l,jl,jl,jl,jl,jl,j ∗

Modification of LatticeKrig for the Sphere What is LatticeKrig?.,. Center basis functions at grid locations on L grids over the observation region..,. The L grids are obtained by sequentially doubling the resolution of the previous grid..,. The process g ( s ) is then expressed as a basis function expansion: g (s) =g (s) = L n l ) l =1 j =1 c W [ d ( s, s )] l,jl,jl,jl,jl,jl,j ∗.,. The c l, j ’s are random coefficients following a certain Markov random field model called a Simultaneous Autoregression (SAR) model.

Modification of LatticeKrig for the Sphere The Geodesic Grid.,. Modifying LatticeKrig for use on the sphere was done in two steps:

Modification of LatticeKrig for the Sphere The Geodesic Grid.,. Modifying LatticeKrig for use on the sphere was done in two steps: 1. Instead of locating basis functions on a rectangular grid over a plane, we center them on a specialized grid on the sphere...called the geodesic grid

Modification of LatticeKrig for the Sphere The Geodesic Grid.,. Modifying LatticeKrig for use on the sphere was done in two steps: 1.Instead of locating basis functions on a rectangular grid over a plane, we center them on a specialized grid on the sphere...called the geodesic grid 2.Modify the construction of the SAR model for the random coefficients (which now live on the geodesic grid)

Modification of LatticeKrig for the Sphere The Geodesic Grid.,. Modifying LatticeKrig for use on the sphere was done in two steps: 1.Instead of locating basis functions on a rectangular grid over a plane, we center them on a specialized grid on the sphere...called the geodesic grid 2.Modify the construction of the SAR model for the random coefficients (which now live on the geodesic grid).,. Result is a tool for spatial modeling over general regions on the sphere...or the entire sphere...to be included in future versions of LatticeKrig.

Modification of LatticeKrig for the Sphere The Geodesic Grid.,. Modifying LatticeKrig for use on the sphere was done in two steps: 1.Instead of locating basis functions on a rectangular grid over a plane, we center them on a specialized grid on the sphere...called the geodesic grid 2.Modify the construction of the SAR model for the random coefficients (which now live on the geodesic grid).,. Result is a tool for spatial modeling over general regions on the sphere...or the entire sphere...to be included in future versions of LatticeKrig..,. This summer, focus on using the procedure for modeling electromagnetic processes in the ionosphere.

Figure: Low Resolution Basis Functions: Capturing Large-Scale Dependence

Figure: Add Medium Resolution Basis Functions: Capturing Medium-Scale Dependence

Figure: Add High Resolution Basis Functions: Capturing Small-Scale Dependence

Try Some Spatial Modeling Spatial Interpolation of Electric Potential from LFM-MIX Model Ouput.,. Key modification for ionosphere problem: variance of the electric potential is clearly nonstationary. We can embed information from numerical model output into the statistical model. Figure: (Left) Region of highest variability; courtesy of Minjie Fan, UC Davis (Right) Weights used to induce nonstationary variance in spatial model.

Try Some Spatial Modeling Spatial Interpolation of Electric Potential from LFM-MIX Model Ouput.,. Experiment: Use LFM-MIX model output of electric potential to study predictive skill of our model

Try Some Spatial Modeling Spatial Interpolation of Electric Potential from LFM-MIX Model Ouput.,. Experiment: Use LFM-MIX model output of electric potential to study predictive skill of our model 1. Randomly select sample of 1000 points (out of 16920) uniformly over the polar region.

Try Some Spatial Modeling Spatial Interpolation of Electric Potential from LFM-MIX Model Ouput.,. Experiment: Use LFM-MIX model output of electric potential to study predictive skill of our model 1.Randomly select sample of 1000 points (out of 16920) uniformly over the polar region. 2.Treat these points as ’The Data’...try to get back the full points using our spatial model on the sphere

Figure: Full electric potential process from model output

Figure: 1000 randomly sampled locations used to inform the interpolation

"True" Electric Potential Process (From LFM-MIX) ° 20° 8 > e min: max:

Spatial Interpolation of Electric Potential ° 20° 8 c0c B min: max:

1818 Error ("True" Process Minus Predicted Process) ·10· ° 20° 0.4 "C min: max: 0.76

1818 Error ("True" Process Minus Predicted Process) ·:·.· ·:·.· ···.···. ·..... · :. ·... :... :. ·... :. :-· · ,...·..·..,...·..·.,.'·..,.'·..... ·. ·· ··.: ,.·....,.·...,...., ·.··.·.....· --:. ·....·.... ::.:....::.:.... :-.:-. ·.· ·.. ·... :.···· : :.· :::.....::: :'-.... · ·.·. ·.. ··..·.,..·..·.,..·..·..· ·:30°:..:. '1 :::·:....::.·:"·.,;;.... o I,-,- :. ·.·:. ·.·.:.: ·::.···.· :·.:· ,.., min: max: 0.76.·:.·: ··:··: "' ::..:.:

Next Step: Modifications for Radar Observations Getting from Observation Space to Electric Potential Space.,. In practice, the electric potential can only be inferred from sparse observations of other (related) processes.

Next Step: Modifications for Radar Observations Getting from Observation Space to Electric Potential Space.,. In practice, the electric potential can only be inferred from sparse observations of other (related) processes..,. We use the methodology in Richmond and Kamide (1988)...transform basis functions into observation space

Next Step: Modifications for Radar Observations Getting from Observation Space to Electric Potential Space.,. In practice, the electric potential can only be inferred from sparse observations of other (related) processes..,. We use the methodology in Richmond and Kamide (1988)...transform basis functions into observation space.,. The radars measure projections of ionospheric plasma drift velocities onto the line-sight-direction: v LOS ( s ) = ✈ ( s ) · ❛ LOS.

Next Step: Modifications for Radar Observations Getting from Observation Space to Electric Potential Space.,. In practice, the electric potential can only be inferred from sparse observations of other (related) processes..,. We use the methodology in Richmond and Kamide (1988)...transform basis functions into observation space.,. The radars measure projections of ionospheric plasma drift velocities onto the line-sight-direction: v LOS ( s ) = ✈ ( s ) · ❛ LOS..,. These LOS velocites are related to the electric potential by the following: v LOS ( s ) = |❇(s)|∂θ|❇(s)|∂θ · 1 ∂ Φ( s ) ∂ Φ( s ), −, − ∂φ∂φ · ❛ LOS θ =Latitude, φ =Longitude, ❇ ( s )=Magnetic Field at s

Next Step: Modifications for Radar Observations Transforming Basis Functions.,. This function L : Φ( s ) 1→ v LOS ( s ) is a linear operator

Next Step: Modifications for Radar Observations Transforming Basis Functions.,. This function L : Φ( s ) 1→ v LOS ( s ) is a linear operator.,. Before: Φ( s ) = ) ) c i, j W i, j [ d ( s, s ∗ j )] l =1 j =1 LnlLnl

Next Step: Modifications for Radar Observations Transforming Basis Functions.,. This function L : Φ( s ) 1→ v LOS ( s ) is a linear operator.,. Before: Φ( s ) = ) ) c i, j W i, j [ d ( s, s ∗ j )] l =1 j =1.,. For Radar Data: LnlLnl L { Φ( s ) } = v LOS (s) =(s) = LnlLnl ) l =1 j =1 c L W [ d ( s, s )] i,ji,j {�{� i,ji,j ∗ j

Next Step: Modifications for Radar Observations Transforming Basis Functions.,. This function L : Φ( s ) 1→ v LOS ( s ) is a linear operator.,. Before: Φ( s ) = ) ) c i, j W i, j [ d ( s, s ∗ j )] l =1 j =1.,. For Radar Data: LnlLnl L { Φ( s ) } = v LOS (s) =(s) = LnlLnl ) l =1 j =1 c L W [ d ( s, s )] i,ji,j {�{� i,ji,j ∗ j.,. The coefficient process is the same...use same estimation procedure but with transformed basis functions

Figure: Full electric potential field from LFM-MIX model output.

Figure: Randomly sampled LOS directions and corresponding velocities used in numerical study.

"True" Electric Potential Process (From LFM-MIX) ° 20· " min: max:

Spatia l Interpolation of Electric Potential from LOS Velocities '10' min: max: · '. 0 0 B 'C 06 J:: "'

1818 Error (True Electric Potential Minus Predictions) ' min:-4.02 max: ' ' 0.50 'wC'wC £ w -i.ooiE

Some Real-Data Examples.,. Data available from Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN). Network of high-frequency coherent backscatter radars providing measurements of line-of-sight velocity of ionospheric plasma Figure: SuperDARN radar coverage a. Northern Hemisphere b. Southern Hemisphere. Image courtesy of Cousins et al. (2012)

Figure: Spatial prediction for high-latitude ionospheric electric potential from sparse radar observations. October 09, 2011, 02:08-02:12.

Figure: Comparison with current methods: LatticeKrig on sphere (LEFT) SuperDARN Assimilative Mapping (CENTER) Map-Potential Algorithm (RIGHT)

Figure: Spatial prediction for high-latitude ionospheric electric potential from sparse radar observations. October 09, 2011, 07:012-07:16.

Figure: Comparison with current methods: LatticeKrig on sphere (LEFT) SuperDARN Assimilative Mapping (CENTER) Map-Potential Algorithm (RIGHT)

Conclusions/Future Work.,. We developed an extension of LatticeKrig model for use on the sphere

Conclusions/Future Work.,. We developed an extension of LatticeKrig model for use on the sphere.., Need to sort out theoretical properties of induced spatial process

Conclusions/Future Work.,. We developed an extension of LatticeKrig model for use on the sphere.., Need to sort out theoretical properties of induced spatial process.., Writing R scripts for inclusion in LatticeKrig package

Conclusions/Future Work.,. We developed an extension of LatticeKrig model for use on the sphere.., Need to sort out theoretical properties of induced spatial process.., Writing R scripts for inclusion in LatticeKrig package.,. Initial performance of model for ionospheric electric potential very promising. Much work left to do:

Conclusions/Future Work.,. We developed an extension of LatticeKrig model for use on the sphere.., Need to sort out theoretical properties of induced spatial process.., Writing R scripts for inclusion in LatticeKrig package.,. Initial performance of model for ionospheric electric potential very promising. Much work left to do:.., Underlying distributions are not gaussian

Conclusions/Future Work.,. We developed an extension of LatticeKrig model for use on the sphere.., Need to sort out theoretical properties of induced spatial process.., Writing R scripts for inclusion in LatticeKrig package.,. Initial performance of model for ionospheric electric potential very promising. Much work left to do:.., Underlying distributions are not gaussian.., Refinements of induced covariance (e.g. allow for stronger latitudinal dependence)

Conclusions/Future Work.,. We developed an extension of LatticeKrig model for use on the sphere.., Need to sort out theoretical properties of induced spatial process.., Writing R scripts for inclusion in LatticeKrig package.,. Initial performance of model for ionospheric electric potential very promising. Much work left to do:.., Underlying distributions are not gaussian.., Refinements of induced covariance (e.g. allow for stronger latitudinal dependence).., Later: Bayesian hierarchical model for combining observations of related processes...improve coverage/identifiability

THANKS!