7 The ENTHYMEME Arguments from SiGNS, PROBABiLiTiES, & CiRCUMSTANCE.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Deductive Validity In this tutorial you will learn how to determine whether deductive arguments are valid or invalid. Go to next slide.

Advertisements

The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to identify the types of fallacious reasoning discussed in Chapter 6. Chapter 6 discusses fallacies of insufficient.

Inductive Reasoning The role of argument forms in evaluating probabilities.

Logic & Critical Reasoning Identifying arguments.

Deductive Validity In this tutorial you will learn how to determine whether deductive arguments are valid or invalid. Chapter 3.b.

BUS 290: Critical Thinking for Managers

Deduction and Induction

Basic Critical Thinking Skills Essentials of Clear Thinking: Claims and Issues.

Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions and Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.

Inductive Reasoning The role of argument forms in evaluating probabilities.

Clarke, R. J (2001) L951-08: 1 Critical Issues in Information Systems BUSS 951 Seminar 8 Arguments.

Building Logical Arguments. Critical Thinking Skills Understand and use principles of scientific investigation Apply rules of formal and informal logic.

Critical Thinking and Nursing Practice

Debate. Inductive Reasoning When you start with a probable truth, and seek evidence to support it. Most scientific theories are inductive. Evidence is.

Basic Argumentation.

Today’s Quote Use soft words and hard arguments English Proverb.

Basic Critical Thinking Skills Essentials of Clear Thinking: Claims and Issues.

Recognizing Fallacies.  Logic ◦ The study of the methods and principles of reasoning  Premises ◦ Facts or assumptions  Fallacy ◦ A deceptive argument-

Reason “Crime is common, logic is rare” - Sherlock Holmes.

Section 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. Types of Reasoning:

Ch. 4 DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENT Reasoning from the General to the Specific.

Logic in Everyday Life.

Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.

Reasoning. Inductive and Deductive reasoning Inductive reasoning is concerned with reasoning from “specific instances to some general conclusion.” Deductive.

Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.

Mike McGuire MV Community College COM 101 A Closer Look at Logos Syllogism, Enthymeme, and Logical Fallacies ENGL102 Ordover Fall 2008.

The Art of Persuasion Attempts to persuade us – to believe something, to do something – are everywhere. How can we learn to think critically about such.

Theory of Knowledge Ms. Bauer

Thinking Mathematically Problem Solving and Critical Thinking.

Deductive and Inductive Reasoning. Inductive Reasoning involves an observer to look at the evidence around them and draw a conclusion about said evidence.

Philosophical Method  Logic: A Calculus For Good Reason  Clarification, Not Obfuscation  Distinctions and Disambiguation  Examples and Counterexamples.

Critical Thinking, Reading and Writing Part 2 Ed McCorduck CPN 101—Academic Writing II on Computer SUNY Cortland

Philosophy 148 Inductive Reasoning. Inductive reasoning – common misconceptions: - “The process of deriving general principles from particular facts or.

Circular reasoning (also known as paradoxical thinking or circular logic), is a logical fallacy in which "the reasoner begins with what he or she is trying.

Validity, Soundness, Strength, Cogency Jason Chang Critical Thinking.

Section 2.3: Deductive Reasoning

ETHICS: The study of proper behavior, broadly construed. What is the good life? What duties do I have to myself and others? What does good moral reasoning.

Arguments from Authority/False Authority Kelsay Manion & Sean Belding Example: In some cases, the expertise may be just for show -"I'm not a doctor, but.

What is an argument? An argument is, to quote the Monty Python sketch, "a connected series of statements to establish a definite proposition." Huh? Three.

THE NATURE OF ARGUMENT. THE MAIN CONCERN OF LOGIC Basically in logic we deal with ARGUMENTS. Mainly we deal with learning of the principles with which.

SYLLOGISM - FORM & LOGICAL REASONING. WHAT IS A SYLLOGISM? Syllogism – the formal structure of logical argument. Three statements - Major Premise, Minor.

Part One: Assessing the Inference, Deductive and Inductive Reasoning.

Chapter 3 What are the reasons?.

a valid argument with true premises.

2.5 Postulates and Paragraph Proofs

Chapter 1: Good and Bad Reasoning

Critical Thinking Lecture 1 What is Critical Thinking?

Syllogism – logical reasoning from inarguable premises; the conclusion is unarguable if the syllogism is structured correctly. Example: Because Socrates.

Chapter 3: Reality Assumptions

Syllogism, Enthymeme, and Logical Fallacies

Evaluating truth tables

3 Logic The Study of What’s True or False or Somewhere in Between.

Validity and Soundness

Chapter Two, Part Two BOC and IBE Reasoning.

Deductive Reasoning: The process of thought through which a conclusion is reached through a set of premises (assumptions that something is true).

Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 3a Evaluating an argument

Critical Thinking.

Premise: If it’s a school day, then I have Geometry class.

Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1b What is Philosophy? (part 2)

Section 3-6 Inductive Reasoning.

What are the descriptive assumptions?

PROOF SURROGATE Jessica.

Critical Thinking Lecture 2 Arguments

The Persuasive Speech Ch. 24.

“Still I Look to Find a Reason to Believe”

Philosophical Methods

Evaluating Deductive Arguments

If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.

If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.

Presentation transcript:

7 The ENTHYMEME Arguments from SiGNS, PROBABiLiTiES, & CiRCUMSTANCE

Essential Question:

BENCHMARK

CAN YOU GUESS?

DEDUCTION: A process of reasoning in which a conclusion follows necessarily from the premises presented, so that the conclusion cannot be false if the premises are true.

ENTHYMEME

ENTHYMEME (con.)

CIRCULAR REASONING

…More on THE ASSUMPTION

“QUESTION AT ISSUE” = Question about which there is disagreement in the community.

Types of ENTHYMEMES…

2. Arguments from Probabilities

Arguments from Probabilities (con)

3. Arguments from Circumstance

Works Cited

Work Cited (con.)

THE END!!!!! (Hope you enjoyed!!! Though, let’s be honest… I really doubt that!)