Sue Zake, Ph.D. Director of OEC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Six Year Plan Meeting the state targets Region Meeting August 16, 2007.
Advertisements

Presented by Lawrence Dennis Education Consultant for the Office for Exceptional Children October 23, 2014 OCTA Fall Conference.
State Systemic Improvement Plan: Preparing, Planning, and Staying Informed Presentation to Louisiana ICC July 10, 2013.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
Teaching and Learning Special Education Secondary Programs Transition Services.
Individualized Learning Plans A Study to Identify and Promote Promising Practices.
OAPSA Fall Conference Sue Zake, Director of OEC September 26, 2014.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education Overview of Results Driven Accountability Assuring Compliance and Improving Results August.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Office of Special Education Services Instructional Leaders Roundtable Oct. 16, 2014 John R. Payne, Director.
NC SSIP: Top 5 Things We’ve Learned Mid-South Meeting January 7-8, 2015.
RESULTS DRIVEN ACCOUNTABILITY SSIP Implementation Support Activity 1 OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS.
Results-Driven Accountability OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS 1.
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013 Monitoring and Program Effectiveness.
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
Office for Exceptional Children Updates OAPSA February 6, 2015.
State Systemic Improvement Plan March 18,  All components of an accountability system will be aligned in a manner that best supports States in.
California Stakeholder Group State Performance and Personnel Development Plan Stakeholders January 29-30, 2007 Sacramento, California Radisson Hotel Welcome.
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
Dyslexia Pilot Project Bonnie Nelson ∙ October 23, 2014.
Accountability for Results State Performance Plan improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities…
Using State Data to Inform Parent Center Work. Region 2 Parent Technical Assistance Center (PTAC) Conference Charleston, SC June 25, 2015 Presenter: Terry.
SSIP Implementation Support Visit Idaho State Department of Education September 23-24, 2014.
Title I Schoolwide Ray Draghi and Rasha Hetata October 2014.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.
RESULTS-DRIVEN ACCOUNTABILITY IN SPECIAL EDUCATION Ann Moore, State Director Office of Special Education (OSE) January 2013.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Welcome Stakeholders December 5, 2007 Improving Special Education Services (ISES) December 5,
Parent Involvement Jeffrey Tesnow, Rasha Hetata, Chantelle Rose October 2014.
Results Driven Accountability PRT System Support Grant Targeted Improvement Plan Cole Johnson, NDE.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) Building Common Language and Understanding.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs The Legacy of IDEA 2004: Improving Results for all Students Dr. Alexa Posny.
All components of an accountability system will be aligned in a manner that best support States in improving results for infants, toddlers, children and.
Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008.
Georgia Parent Mentor Kickoff: Inform, Imagine, Inspire with Results-Driven Accountability Ruth Ryder DEPUTY DIRECTOR OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
Exceptional Children Updates Wendy Stoica, Assistant Director Office for Exceptional Children.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center Connecting TA for Part B Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14: Working Together to Support States OSEP Project.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction State of California Annual Performance Report Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004.
Chapter 5: Structures that Work. Early Intervention The Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities Program (Part C) of IDEA: Enhance development of infants.
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Office of Service Quality
WHAT A GREAT IDEA!! Focusing on Results and Using IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) Part D Investments to Support Improved Outcomes for.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education State Performance Plan and Annual Performance.
MDE Office of Special Education Teri L. Chapman, Ed.S., Director February 17, 2016 MAASE.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Schoolwide, Multi-Level Prevention System Katie Klingler Tackett National Center on.
Module 1: Policy Requirements and Background Positive Behavior Intervention & Supports Restraint & Seclusion.
1 Stakeholder Engagement State Personnel Development Grantees Directors’ Webinar Beth Moore, Ed.D. June 11, 2015.
LEA Self-Assessment LEASA: Presentations:
INVOLVING STAKEHOLDERS Heather Ouzts, NC DPI Parent Liaison Beverly Roberts, ECAC NC SIP Project Coordinator.
Accountability & Program Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.
Evidence-Based and Promising Practices to Increase Graduation and Improve Outcomes Dr. Loujeania Bost Dr. Catherine Fowler Dr. Matthew Klare.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.
Ensuring the Success of Every Student Sue Zake, Ph.D. ∙ February, 4, 2016.
Time for Change: Examining Utah Data Relating to Student Performance
Office of Special Education
Kristin Reedy, Co-Director June 24, 2016
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
Updates: Office for Exceptional Children
G-CASE Fall Conference November 14, 2013 Savannah, Ga
Ohio Longitudinal Transition Study (OLTS)
Ohio Longitudinal Transition Study (OLTS)
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013
Using Data to Build LEA Capacity to Improve Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

Sue Zake, Ph.D. Director of OEC Achieving Balance … Sue Zake, Ph.D. Director of OEC

Federal and State Requirements Compliance

Ohio’s Determination: Meets Requirements Compliance Indicators are Met

Monitoring & Dispute Resolution Child Find IEP LRE Prior Written Notice

Federal and State Requirements A Shift in Focus: Results Driven Accountability

Statutory Monitoring Focus 20 USC 616(a)(2) Improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities In the past Federal focus: ensuring that states meet IDEA procedural requirements State focus: ensuring that LEAs meet IDEA procedural requirements

OSEPs Vision for RDA All components of an accountability system will be aligned in a manner that best support states in improving results for infants, toddlers, children and youth with disabilities, and their families.

Components of RDA Determinations reflect performance on results, as well as compliance. Differentiated monitoring and technical assistance supports improvement in all districts, but especially low performing districts.

LEA Determinations 2014: Will use the current matrix (based on 2012-13 data) 2015: Will use results data Will change how compliance data is used in state and district determinations

Fall 2013 IF … The New Learning Standards are designed to prepare students for success beyond high school The assessments based on the Standards will measure students’ progress toward readiness for postsecondary opportunities Diverse Learners

Definition of Readiness for College and Careers High school graduates have the necessary knowledge and skills to qualify for and succeed in entry level, credit bearing, college level courses; and postsecondary job training and education for a chosen career

College and Career Ready: Students with Disabilities Ohio Longitudinal Transition Study 2005 – 2013 7 years of Trend Data

OLTS: Trends Students with disabilities: Increased enrollment in two and four-year post-secondary education programs Full-time employment is increasingly less common since 2008

PREDICTORS of POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION Enrollment

PREDICTORS OF EMPLOYMENT

The Compliance ~ Education Connection Aligned courses of study Supervised work experiences Links to postsecondary settings and adult services

Header Font: Arial 42 Bold Supporting text font: Arial 32

Pathway to Employment – A Conversation Starter Realizing Employment First for Youth Chris Filler, Project Manager Chris_filler@ocali.org Sue Beck, Project Coordinator Sue_beck@ocali.org

Instruction & Learning (College & Career Ready)

Progress?

Changes in LEA Performance Index: 2008 to 2013

Diverse Learners: Instruction and Assessment New Learning Standards Universal Design for Learning Evidence Based Practices

Goal: Ensure All Students Can Read Third Grade Reading Guarantee Goal: Ensure All Students Can Read College and Career Ready

Target: Early Intervention/Support for “at risk” K-3 students

USDOE Grant (2010-12)

Alignment as a Systemic Tool Curriculum Classroom Instruction Alignment Standards Assessments

Identifying Successful Practices for Students with Disabilities in Ohio Schools An Ohio Special Education Research Project by the Ohio Coalition for the Education of Children with Disabilities

Recommendations for Practice Leadership for Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices Special Education & General Education Alignment Leveraged Focus

SPDG 2007–2012: Lessons Learned (Brian McNulty, June 2013)

SPDG: 2013 … System-wide inquiry & learning through shared instructional leadership Integrated services (MTSS) OIP Implementation – 5 Step Process Parent – Educator Partnerships

Ohio Academic Content Standards – Extended (OACS-E) and Alternate Assessment for Students with Cognitive Disabilities (AASCD)

OACS-E AASCD Training 2012-2013 2200 online modules 8000 face-to-face 500 Trainers 10,000 TAs OACS-E AASCD

Participation Data Grade Band Students 2013 Students 2012 3-5 7030 7039 6-8 7315 7238 OGT 2220 2326 Total 16,565 16,603

LRE Project a multi-year effort to improve least restrictive environment decisions and supports to students with disabilities

Ohio Rule and Policy on Positive Behavior Intervention and Supports (PBIS) and Restraint and Seclusion

Increase positive academic and behavioral outcomes for all students Purpose Build positive behavior interventions and supports Prevent use of restraint &/or seclusion Protects the safety of all children & adults Mission Increase positive academic and behavioral outcomes for all students

Application Applies to all traditional Ohio school districts Effective: Start of the 2013-2014 school year.

Any school employing physical restraint and/or seclusion practices shall ensure it has: A policy and procedure; Specific training related to the use of restraint and seclusion; A process for collection of each incident.

Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior ~5% Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior ~15% Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings ~80% of Students www.pbis.org

Federal and State Requirements Results Driven Accountability

Indicator 17: State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) … a comprehensive, multi-year State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP), focused on improving results for children with disabilities Broad strategies with detailed improvement activities RDA

RDA - SSIP: Phase 1 - Analysis Phase I Submit in 2015 with SPP/APR for 2013-14 Data Analysis; Identification of the Focus for Improvement; Infrastructure to Support Improvement and Build Capacity; and Theory of Action. Stakeholder involvement!

RDA - SSIP: Phase 2 - Plan Submitted in 2016 with SPP/APR for 2014-15 Infrastructure Development; Support for LEA Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices; and Evaluation Plan

RDA - SSIP: Phase 3 – Evaluation and Revisions Phase 3 submitted in 2017 with SPP/APR for 2015-16 Results of ongoing evaluation of strategies in the SSIP Extent of implementation of strategies Progress toward established goals Any revisions made to the SSIP in response to the evaluation

RDA - Differentiated Monitoring and Support

Technical Assistance in Support of RDA

education.ohio.gov Sue Zake, Director Tom Lather, Associate Director Wendy Stoica, Assistant Director (Diverse Learners) Jo Hannah Ward, Assistant Director (Resource Management) Olivia Schmidt, Interim Assistant Director (Monitoring Services and Supports) Monica Drvota, Interim Assistant Director (Procedural Safeguards) Contact Information: Sue Zake sue.zake@education.ohio.gov 614-752-1012

Social Media Ohio Families and Education Ohio Teachers’ Homeroom ohio-department-of-education storify.com/ohioEdDept @OHEducation OhioEdDept