INVESTIGATING MILESTONES AND COMPLETIONS AT A LOCAL INSTITUTION BASED ON ADELMAN’S STUDY, “THE TOOLBOX REVISITED.” What’s in YOUR toolbox? DANIEL MARTINEZ,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACHIEVING THE DREAM Kauai Community College Convocation Fall 2008.
Advertisements

Achieving the Dream: Baseline Data Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment December 2007 Research Report No
Success is what counts. A Better Way to Measure Community College Performance Presentation about the ATD Cross-State Data Workgroup NC Community College.
S TUDENT COHORT TRACKING CLINIC Presenter: Rick Voorhees.
Institutional and Student Characteristics that Predict Graduation and Retention Rates Braden J. Hosch, Ph.D. Director of Institutional Research & Assessment.
Institutional Research & Effectiveness Who Are the Freshmen at Austin Peay? Institutional Research & Effectiveness Ellen Smyth May 2009.
Illinois High School to College Success Report High School Feedback Reporting In Cooperation with ACT, Inc. Illinois Community College Board Illinois Board.
COLORADO COMMUNITY COLLEGE SUMMIT PATHWAYS TO COLLEGE AND BEYOND COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION BETH BEAN New Colorado Data Systems.
Jonathan H. Stroble, Senior Manager K-12 Student & School Services.
Examining pathways to the degree: what leads to student success? Kathi A. Ketcheson Ph.D. Portland State University EAIR Conference August 2008.
Success is what counts. A Better Way to Measure Community College Performance: An Achieving the Dream Cross-State Data Initiative 2009 SHEEO/NCES Network.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
The Creation of Two Comparison Groups to Facilitate Evidence-Based Decision Making Prepared and Presented by Keith Wurtz Dean, Institutional Effectiveness,
Some Statistics Related to Placement Test Results and First Semester Math Grades at George Brown College.
1 Predicting Success and Risk: Multi-spell Analyses of Student Graduation, Departure and Return Roy Mathew Director Center for Institutional Evaluation.
CSULB Student Profiles Characteristics & Aspirations.
URSULA MCCLOY, PHD STUDENT PATHWAYS IN HIGHER EDUCATION CONFERENCE JANUARY 26-27, 2012 MOBILITY IN ONTARIO’S PSE: CURRENT TRENDS Informing the Future.
Achieving the Dream: Developmental Courses and Student Retention Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment January 2008 Research Report.
AGC Update November Wyoming Public Schools’ Middle College is a collaboration between Wyoming Public Schools and Grand Rapids Community College.
PLACING IOWA WITHIN THE SUCCESS PARADIGM LINDA SERRA HAGEDORN, PH.D. ASSOCIATE DEAN – COLLEGE OF HUMAN SCIENCES; UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMS, TRANSFER, STUDENT.
Academic Advising Presented by: 9th Grade Counselor Teresa Noble and 8 th Grade Counselor Laura Mundy North Junior High Court Hanson Boise High School,
1 Predicting Success in Math: The relationship between high school courses and remedial math in college Brandon Lagerquist Northshore School District Paul.
Overview of the Early College High School Initiative Evaluation Susan Cole Mengli Song Andrea Berger American Institutes for Research Presentation at the.
Academic Attainment in California Community Colleges: Racial And Ethnic Disparities in the ARCC 2.0/Scorecard Metrics Tom Leigh Alice van Ommeren.
ARCC /08 Reporting Period Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research & Planning February 2010.
Equity Scorecard Update A presentation to the Madison College Board of Trustees February 09, 2011.
Comparing the bachelor’s completion rates of native and transfer students using multiple informational sources Eric Lichtenberger National Institute for.
Achieving the Dream Dr. Jan Lyddon October What is Achieving the Dream?
Marshall W. Garland Deborah L. Jonas. Ph.D. Chrys Dougherty, Ph.D. Anne Ware, Ph.D. Presentation at the 24th Annual Management Information Systems (MIS)
Fall/Spring Enrollment GROSSMONT COLLEGE Number of Students* (Based on End-of-Term Data) Fall and Spring Semesters: * Excludes students taking.
Regular Versus Shorter University Orientations: A Comparison of Attendee Make-up Carla Abreu-Ellis & Jason Brent Ellis.
Fall/Spring Enrollment CUYAMACA COLLEGE Number of Students* (Based on End-of-Term Data) Fall and Spring Semesters: * Excludes students taking.
Region VII College and Career Readiness Data AVATAR Initiatives.
DATA COLLECTION, STORAGE AND REPORTING FOR COLLEGE ACCESS PROGRAMS The University of North Carolina General Administration February 22, 2012.
Graduate Student Survey Fall Respondent characteristics  423 responses – 15% of graduate population  Distribution by gender, ethnicity and age.
DEVELOPING & USING INTERMEDIATE MEASURES: ASKING NEW & DIFFERENT QUESTIONS TO SUPPORT STUDENT SUCCESS James Sass, Rio Hondo College Agi Horspool, Fullerton.
The Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment Northern Virginia Community College (NOVA) AUGUST 2005.
Dr. Joni L. Swanson Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction Geneseo CUSD #228 Geneseo, IL
1. ACCJC INSTITUTION-SET STANDARDS DISCUSSION 2 A “standard” is the level of performance set by the institution to meet educational quality and institutional.
Fact Book Fall 2010 Outcomes *Unless otherwise specified, charts exclude students taking only non-credit courses.
1 Strategic Master Plan 2015 Annebelle Nery, PhD Executive Dean of Institutional Effectiveness, Educational Services & Planning Daniel Martinez, PhD Director,
24/36 Hour Rule L E G I S L A T I V E S E R V I C E S R U L E S E D U C A T I O N.
The University of Hawai ʻ i at Mānoa ACCESS TO SUCCESS: LEADING INDICATORS WORKGROUP.
Turning the Revolving Door into the Staircase of Academic Success for Basic Skills Students NACADA October 5, 2011 Presented by:  Marti Demarest Assistant.
Fall 2011NEnd of Fall 2011 GRCC GPA FTIACs with HS GPA 3.00 or higher 2, FTIACs with HS GPA below ,
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
Graduation, Completion, and Transfer ATD Data Team Subcommittee report January 2011.
One System…One Mission Florida’s Student Success Dashboard 2011 American Association of Community Colleges John Hughes, Ph. D.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
Multiple Measures Project  California Community Colleges are required to use multiple measures Title 5 § 55502(i) clearly mandates that California community.
Multiple Measures Assessment Project (MMAP) Cañada Pilot Study December /09/2015CAÑADA COLLEGE 1.
Examining the Enrollment and Persistence of Students with Discrepant High School Grades and Standardized Test Scores Anne Edmunds, Ed.D. Higher Education.
 California community colleges serve over 2.9 million students each year  70 to 80% of students enrolled in California community colleges need developmental.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
General Demographics. P-12 Public School Students in Colorado Fall 2009 Grades# of Students P-5411, , ,770 Detention Centers247 Total.
Estimating Effects and Inferring Implications 2016 Academic Academy Sacramento, CA Terrence Willett Senior Consulting Researcher RP Group.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Major Policy Discussion Achieving the Goals of 60x30TX: College Readiness and Dual Credit April 28, 2016 College.
Robert Franco, Ph.D. Director, Office for Institutional Effectiveness Professor of Anthropology
Multiple Measures Spring Follow-up Math Department.
Template provided by: “posters4research.com” Academic Performance and Persistence of Undergraduate Students at a Land-Grant Institution: A Statistical.
SUPPORTING DATA 1 Pipeline Subcommittee Draft - 5/12/2010.
Exploring enrolment, achievement and progression of IB graduates in Australian universities Dr. Daniel Edwards AARE-APERA Conference Sydney, December,
SUPPORTING DATA 1 Pipeline Subcommittee June 29, 2010 DRAFT.
Destination: Graduation Class of  Walk-in Appointments (Students) ◦ Students can see their counselor without an appointment before school, during.
A Statistical Analysis Utilizing Detailed Institutional Data
Data Mining in Higher Education
ENROLLMENT AND RETENTION
Student Success “By the Numbers”. Student Success “By the Numbers”
Defining and Measuring Student Success Dr
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
Presentation transcript:

INVESTIGATING MILESTONES AND COMPLETIONS AT A LOCAL INSTITUTION BASED ON ADELMAN’S STUDY, “THE TOOLBOX REVISITED.” What’s in YOUR toolbox? DANIEL MARTINEZ, PHD ASSOCIATE DEAN, INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

Inspiration What this is not  Critique  Replication What it is  What if?  Verification of milestones  Exploration

Difference From Toolbox Datasets  Adelman  NCES transcript-based grade cohort study  Cooperative Institutional Research Project (CIRP)  NCES Beginning Postsecondary Students (BPS) Survey  Martinez  State MIS data  Local administrative system  Local assessment database  National Student Clearinghouse Decision rules Type of regression

Analytic Steps: Adelman 1. Demographic background & high school history 2. Postsecondary entrance 3. 1 st postsecondary year history 4. Factors of financing postsecondary education 5. Postsecondary attendance patterns 6. Extended postsecondary performance 7. Final model with complete academic history

Analytic Steps: Martinez 1. Demographics 2. High school history 3. 1 st semester performance 4. 1 st year performance 5. Completion of transfer level English or math within 1 st 2 years of enrollment 6. Extended postsecondary performance 7. Continuous enrollment

Population First time students (self-reported) in Fall 2002 Prior enrollments used to verify Age?

Age Distribution

Population First time students (self-reported) in Fall 2002 Prior enrollments used to verify Age < 20 High school graduates

Demographics Gender Ethnicity  White/Asian  Black/Latino 1 st generation  FG4  FG2

High School History Placement test scores  English  Math/Math test  Reading Self-reported high school information  English grade  Highest level of math  Grade in highest level of math  Time since last math class  Geometry  HS GPA

1 st Semester Performance Units attempted Units earned GPA Delay Time of day

1 st Year Performance Units attempted Units earned GPA

Transfer Level English/Math in 1 st 2 Years Units earned in transfer level math in the 1 st 2 years of postsecondary enrollment Units earned in transfer level English in the 1 st 2 years of postsecondary enrollment

Extended Postsecondary Performance Overall GPA Transfer units Developmental education units Summer enrollment Winter enrollment Part-time Financial aid Withdrawals Repeats

Final Step Continuous enrollment

Completer Tracked for 6 years 2 year degree or certificate 4 year degree Transfer to a 4 year school

The Analyses

Step 1: Demographics What was entered: Gender Ethnicity 1 st generation

Step 1: Demographics What survived: Gender Ethnicity 1 st generation (modified)

Step 1: Demographics What survived: Gender Ethnicity 1 st generation (modified) R=.181 R 2 =.033

Step 2: High School History What was entered: Gender Ethnicity 1 st generation Followed by: Placement test scores  English/Math/Math test/Reading Self-reported high school information  English grade  Highest level of math  Grade in highest level of math  Time since last math class  Geometry  HS GPA

Step 2: High School History What survived: Gender 1 st generation Placement Test: Reading HS: Grade in English HS: Highest level of math HS: Grade in highest level of math HS: Geometry

Step 2: High School History What survived: Gender 1 st generation Placement Test: Reading HS: Grade in English HS: Highest level of math HS: Grade in highest level of math HS: Geometry R=.328 R 2 =.108

Step 3: 1 st Semester Performance What was entered: Gender 1 st generation Placement Test: Reading HS: Grade in English HS: Highest level of math HS: Grade in highest level of math HS: Geometry Followed by: Units Attempted 1st Units Earned 1st GPA 1st Delay Time of day

Step 3: 1 st Semester Performance What survived: Gender 1 st generation HS: Highest level of math HS: Grade in highest level of math HS: Geometry Units earned 1st GPA 1st

Step 3: 1 st Semester Performance What survived: Gender 1 st generation HS: Highest level of math HS: Grade in highest level of math HS: Geometry Units earned 1st GPA 1st R=.429 R 2 =.184

Step 4: 1 st Year Performance What was entered: Gender 1 st generation HS: Highest level of math HS: Grade in highest level of math HS: Geometry Units earned 1 st GPA 1st Followed by: Units attempted year Units earned year GPA year

Step 4: 1 st Year Performance What survived: Gender 1 st generation HS: Highest level of math HS: Grade in highest level of math HS: Geometry Units earned 1 st GPA 1 st

Step 4: 1 st Year Performance What survived: Gender 1 st generation HS: Highest level of math HS: Grade in highest level of math HS: Geometry Units earned 1 st GPA 1 st R=.427 R 2 =.182

Step 5: Transfer English/Math in 1 st 2 Years What was entered: Gender 1 st generation HS: Highest level of math HS: Grade in highest level of math HS: Geometry Units earned 1 st GPA 1st Followed by: Units earned in transfer level English in 1 st 2 years Units earned in transfer level math in 1 st 2 years

Step 5: Transfer English/Math 1 st 2 Years What survived: Gender 1 st generation HS: Highest level of math HS: Geometry Units earned 1 st GPA 1 st Transfer level math in 1st 2 years

Step 5: Transfer English/Math 1 st 2 Years What survived: Gender 1 st generation HS: Highest level of math HS: Geometry Units earned 1 st GPA 1 st Transfer level math in 1st 2 years R=.478 R 2 =.228

Step 6: Extended Postsecondary Performance What was entered: Gender 1 st generation HS: Highest level of math HS: Geometry Units earned 1 st GPA 1 st Transfer level math in 1st 2 years Followed by: Overall GPA Transfer units Developmental education units Summer enrollment Winter enrollment Part-time Financial aid Withdrawals Repeats

Step 6: Extended Postsecondary Performance What survived: Gender 1 st generation HS: Geometry Units earned 1 st Transfer level math in 1 st 2 years Summer enrollment Developmental education units

Step 6: Extended Postsecondary Performance What survived: Gender 1 st generation HS: Geometry Units earned 1 st Transfer level math in 1 st 2 years Summer enrollment Developmental education units R=.520 R 2 =.270

Step 7: Continuous Enrollment What was entered: Gender 1 st generation HS: Geometry Units earned 1 st Transfer level math in 1 st 2 years Summer enrollment Developmental education units

Step 7: Continuous Enrollment What was entered: Gender 1 st generation HS: Geometry Units earned 1 st Transfer level math in 1 st 2 years Summer enrollment Developmental education units Followed by: Continuous enrollment

Step 7: Continuous Enrollment What survived: Gender 1 st generation HS: Geometry Units earned 1 st Transfer level math in 1 st 2 years Summer enrollment Developmental education units Continuous enrollment

Step 7: Continuous Enrollment What survived: Gender 1 st generation HS: Geometry Units earned 1 st Transfer level math in 1 st 2 years Summer enrollment Developmental education units Continuous enrollment R=.526 R 2 =.276

What’s NOT Here Ethnicity Placement test scores Part-time enrollment Financial aid Withdrawals Repeats 20 unit milestone

Implications Milestone research may not be applicable to local institutions Effectiveness of placement tests needs to be examined 1 st generation data needs to be utilized The outcomes used in research need to be critically examined

Limitations/Future Research Not disaggregated by student characteristics Measures could be strengthened Identify gateway courses and investigate their impact on student achievement

THANK YOU