Grants 101c: Evaluation and Sustainability Provided to constituents as part of a webinar series, developed by the College Board’s Strategy, Outreach and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

RIDE – Office of Special Populations
A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
Support Services Review Support Services Review (SSR) is a representative, responsive form of assessment and self-evaluation to ensure continuous quality.
Purpose of Instruction
THIS WORKSHOP WILL ADDRESS WHY THE FOLLOWING ARE IMPORTANT: 1. A comprehensive rationale for funding; 2. Measurable objectives and performance indicators/performance.
Criteria for High Quality Career and Technical Education Programs National Career Pathways Network Orlando, FL November 14, 2014.
Thank you for joining us for Monitoring Progress Toward IEP Goals The presentation will begin momentarily. RIGHT REASON TECHNOLOGIES YOUR SOLUTION FOR.
Grantee Program Plan. Components of the Program Plan Goals  Objectives  Activities  Techniques & Tools  Outcomes/Change.
FY 2012 SIG 1003G LEAD PARTNER REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL (RFSP) BIDDERS’ CONFERENCE February 7, 2011.
School College Work Initiative: Phase May 11, 2006.
Enhancing Education Through Technology Round 9 Competitive.
COLLEGE SPARK WASHINGTON 2012 Community Grants Program LOI Webinar 9/27/2011 9:30 AM 9/28/2011 2:00 PM.
An Overview of the Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) January 25, 2014 FREMONT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Educate Challenge Inspire.
How to Write Goals and Objectives
Proposal Training.  What is Budgeting by Priorities?  How do I participate?  How do I write my proposals? ◦ Narrative Requirements ◦ Mechanics.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Trini Torres-Carrion. AGENDA Overview of ED 524B Resources Q&A.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
The Importance of Stakeholders American Association of Community Colleges Funded with a grant from The Atlantic Philanthropies 1.
How to Develop a Project Evaluation Plan Pat Gonzalez Office of Special Education Programs
A Conversation with Funders Work Plan & Budget Workshop Toronto Newcomer Office (TNO) & Toronto North LIP (TNLIP) Community Meeting, April 30, 2015.
Developing a District Guidance Plan NAPSA Conference 2007 Dr. Ann F. Cole.
Developing Quality Grant Proposals U.S. Department of Education Center for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
ZHRC/HTI Financial Management Training
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
TITLEIIA(3) IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY COMPETITIVE GRANTS PROGRAM 1.
Overview of the SPDG Competition Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. 1.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Outcome Based Evaluation for Digital Library Projects and Services
CHOLLA HIGH MAGNET SCHOOL Plc Workshop
Performance-based Contracting and Maine’s State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) Dawn Kliphan March 28, 2010.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
American Community Survey (ACS) Program Review Webinar March 6, 2012.
Predominantly Black Institutions Program CFDA: A FY 2015 PREAPPLICATION WEBINAR Washington, DC July 14, :00 AM. – 12:00 PM, EDT July 14, 2015.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S.
Guidance for Completing Interim Report I Evaluation Webinar Series 3 Dec 2013.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
Illinois Community College BoardIllinois State Board of Education Programs of Study Self-Assessment: Starting the Journey on the Right Foot February 4,
West Central Community School District Performance Document: Formative Evaluation Tool By John Johnson ortheast Iowa Charter School Northeast Charter School.
Professional Development Opportunities for the New Math Standards.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 25, 2015.
Peer Reviewer - Basic Workshop 2 Prof Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP Prof Hussein El-Maghraby Member, NQAAP.
Enhancing Education Through Technology Round 8 Competitive.
AB 86: Adult Education Webinar Series
Performance Monitoring COURTNEY MILLS SCPCSD DIRECTOR OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMS.
Adapted from guidance presented on August 2013 by Alexandra Pressley, Associate in Education Improvement Services NYSED Local Assistance Plan Schools:
OFFICE OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE ACQUISITION NATIONAL PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (NPD) NPD Grant Competition Webinar 2: GPRA & Selection Criteria January.
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
CSBG ROMA NEXT GENERATION
1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.
2015/16 Staff Performance Appraisals Webinar for ANR Supervisors Spring 2016.
Welcome IPFS Additional Strategic Plan Guidance March 3, 2016 The webinar will begin shortly.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
Briefing: Interdisciplinary Preparation for Personnel Serving Children with Disabilities Who Have High-Intensity Needs CFDA K Office of.
Courtney Mills Principal, Midlands Middle College
Assessment planning: It’s the parts that make up the whole!
Monitoring and Evaluation using the
Organizational Consulting
Tom Bean High School Targeted Improvement Plan Summary
Facilitators: Jennifer Coffey, OSEP Project Officer
APR Informational Webinar
Presentation transcript:

Grants 101c: Evaluation and Sustainability Provided to constituents as part of a webinar series, developed by the College Board’s Strategy, Outreach and Response Unit 6 March 2012

Overview Today, you will learn the components of a quality grant evaluation and how to plan for project sustainability after funding ends. Recording of this webinar and the power point presentation will be available within 48hrs at

Today’s Presenters Theodore Dwyer: Manager of Evaluation, Assessment & Accountability, Hillsborough County Public Schools, Tampa, FL Lynn Fell: Senior Grant/Response Writer, The College Board, Duluth, GA

First Steps – before developing your proposal Get support and approval from your leadership Identify your team (this includes your Evaluator) Read RFP thoroughly Takes notes, highlight Review and print all required forms Get the team together for review Ask questions!

Quality of the Evaluation

Project Evaluation Defines your ability to participate in required national evaluation activities Describes continuous feedback loop used to ensure project success Should be both formative and summative IMPORTANT: Contract with an experienced outside evaluator early in the application process so that they can assist you in developing the evaluation plan Local university American Evaluation Association American Educational Research Association

The Role of the External Evaluator Work with team as external consultant Provide balance between being part of the team and being external Collect information for formative and summative parts of the program Provide periodic feedback to program personnel (at all levels)

Common Criteria for Evaluation 1) The extent to which the methods of evaluation are thorough, feasible, and appropriate to the goals, objectives, and outcomes of the proposed project 2) The extent to which the methods of evaluation will provide performance feedback and permit periodic assessment of progress toward achieving intended outcomes

What does this mean? Extent to which the methods of evaluation are thorough, feasible, and appropriate to the goals, objectives, and outcomes of the proposed project The best evaluations are mixed method Qualitative – soft data (how participants feel about the project, such as surveys, focus groups, etc.) Quantitative – hard data (numbers; test performance; PD completers, etc.)

What does this mean? Extent to which the methods of evaluation will provide performance feedback and permit periodic assessment of progress toward achieving intended outcomes Informs progress, allows for course corrections Provides platform for regular sustainability planning

A good evaluation ensures that: Goals, objectives, and outcomes are clearly specified and measurable Goal – broad, generalized statement Objective – SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, and Time-Bound) GPRA, Program, Project At least one goal restates the program purpose GPRAs* (federally required outcomes) are evident in objectives *Government Performance and Results Act

Sample Project Model NeedGoal (should link to need) Objective (SMART) ActivityPartner/ Person Responsible OutcomesMeasure 50% of students currently enrolled in AP courses are white; 75% of students passing AP exams are white Increase opportunities for all students to earn postsecondary credit through enrollment in AP courses Increase the percentage of underrepres ented students in AP courses by ____% each year of the project Provide training for guidance counselors and administrator s to appropriately schedule students into AP courses Project Director, Supervisor of Staff Development, College Board Increase AP enrollment by ___% over baseline for each AYP subgroup annually AP enrollmen t data NeedGoal (Should link to NEED) Objective (SMART) ActivityPartner/ Person Responsible OutcomesMeasure 50% of students currently enrolled in AP courses are white; 75% of students passing AP exams are white Increase opportunities for all students to earn postsecondary credit through enrollment in AP courses Increase the percentage of underreprese nted students in AP courses by ____% each year of the project Provide training for guidance counselors and administrators to appropriately schedule students into AP courses Project Director, Supervisor of Staff Development, College Board Increase AP enrollment by ___% over baseline for each AYP subgroup annually AP enrollmen t data Increase the percentage of underreprese nted students Passing AP tests by ____% each year of the project Provide waiver for AP tests for low income students Increase AP level 3 and above by ___% over baseline for each AYP subgroup annually AP Testing data Program Purpose: Increase opportunities for students to earn postsecondary credit through AP, IB, or dual credit. GPRA: Percentage of students enrolled in AP courses by ethnicity and socio-economic status

Sustainability

Importance of Sustainability Planning Often a required criteria Necessary to actually sustain the project after funding ends

Common Supports for Sustainability Items created with project funding Curriculum Assessments Professional Development Methodologies

Common Supports for Sustainability Personnel in the project are needed to get the project up and running – those personnel who are vital to sustainability will be funded by the applicant after federal funding ends Training begun under project will continue; “train the trainer” model Advisory boards/stakeholder groups will continue to provide guidance

Common Supports for Sustainability Budget shows decreasing dependence on grant funds to implement project Expand grant writing resources to secure additional grant funding (public and private sources) Creation of foundation or other “giving group” that is charged with raising private funds

Formalize Sustainability Planning Build sustainability planning into your evaluation plan Sustainability plan should be finalized prior to the last year of the project

Sustainability Planning as Milestone MilestoneResponsible PartyYear 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5 Sustainability Planning Project Director, Advisory Board, Operating Team Qs 1-4, 2013 Qs 1-4, 2014 Qs 1-4, 2015 Q1, 2016 Make Sustainability Planning part of your Milestones Timeline (usually a required element) Make Sustainability Planning a regular agenda item in leadership meetings As the project nears its end, sustainability planning should be solidly in place

Remaining Webinars in the series Wed, Mar 14, 1pm EST -Grants 101d: Finalization and Submission: Tips and Strategies. to register

Whom to call 21

Please take a moment to complete the survey! Thank you!