Using and Understanding Post School Outcome Data Collection Presented by Kentucky Post School Outcome Center (KyPSO) Beth Miller Harrison, Ph.D. Tony LoBianco,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collecting and Using Post-School Outcome Data New Mexico Cadre Summer Camp June 11-12, 2007.
Advertisements

State Performance Plan (SPP) Indicator #14 Post School Outcomes Study Cohort III: Exiters Technical Assistance Session #2 Presented by The New.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
This document was developed by the National Post-School Outcomes Center, Eugene, Oregon, (funded by Cooperative Agreement Number H326U090001) with the.
Each Year, nationwide, 1.2 million students fail to graduate from high school!
Teaching and Learning Special Education Secondary Programs Transition Services.
Pre-test Please come in and complete your pre-test.
Special Education Director’s Conference Sept. 29, 2006 Prepared by Sharon Schumacher.
Charlotte Y. Alverson, Ed. S. Secondary Transition State Planning Institute Charlotte, NC May 8, 2008 Blueprint for Success: Helpful Hints for Writing.
Examining Local Post-School Outcomes A guided dialog for using post- school outcomes for youth with disabilities to improve transition services and outcomes.
Part B Indicator 13 FFY 09 SPP/APR Writing Suggestions Western Regional Resource Center APR Clinic 2010 November 1-3 San Francisco, California.
OAVSNP 2014 Charlotte Alverson, NPSO Pattie Johnson, TRI Sally Simich, ODE 1.
Tony LoBianco, PhD & Beth Harrison, PhD Kentucky Post School Outcomes Center Human Development Institute / University of Kentucky.
Your Students, Your Outcomes: Using Your PSO Reports Sally Simich, ODE Pattie Johnson, TRI Charlotte Alverson, NPSO 1.
1 Oregon Post School Data Collection Jackie Burr, Oregon Department of Education (ODE) Pattie Johnson, Teaching Research Institute (TRI)
April 2010 Copyright © 2010 Mississippi Department of Education Quarterly Special Education Meeting SPP/APR Update April 2010.
THE OHIO LONGITUDINAL TRANSITION STUDY (OLTS) Lawrence Dennis, Office for Exceptional Children, Ohio Department of Education & Dr. Robert Baer, Center.
Examining Local Post-School Outcomes A guided dialog for using post- school outcomes for youth with disabilities to improve transition services and outcomes.
Indicator 14 and Kentucky’s Continuous Monitoring Process (KCMP) Prepared by Kentucky Post School Outcome Center (KyPSO) Human Development Institute University.
Kentucky Post School Outcome Study Human Development Institute University of Kentucky
Working with Your RRC to Improve Secondary Transition Education Presented by: Lucy Ely Pagán, NERRC and Jeanna Mullins, MSRRC.
CCTS 1.Type your name and address (along with all team members participating with you) in the ‘Chat Box’ on the left. 2.CCTS will conduct a sound.
Connecting the Dots: Using the CCTS Transition Systemic Framework Wizard for Secondary Transition Program Improvement May 16, 2012 Webinar CCTS Special.
1.Type your name and address (along with all team members participating with you) in the ‘Chat Box’ on the left. 2.CCTS will conduct a sound check.
Do We Have all the Workers? Strategies for Gaining Representativeness Loujeania W. Bost, Ph.D. NDPC-SD & Deanne Unruh, Ph.D. NPSO State Planning Institute.
Everyone Counts, Everyone In: Essentials for Participation in the 2015 Post School Outcomes (PSO) Survey Requirements, Data Collection, and Results Spring.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
Transition Systemic Framework Pilot Project: Indicator 14 / Post-school Data Webinar #1 October 28, 2009 Presented by: Center for Change in Transition.
Collecting Post-school Data Webinar #2 November 18, 2009 Presented by: Center for Change in Transition Services Cinda Johnson, Wendy Iwaszuk, Denny Hasko,
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
2010 B13 Data Collection March 24, 2010 Craig Wiles Public Sector Consultants Chuck Saur MI-TOP.
National High School Center Summer Institute What’s the Post-School Outcomes Buzz? Jane Falls Coordinator, National Post-School Outcomes Center Washington,
1 Post-Secondary Outcomes Data Collection 2008 Jackie Burr, Oregon Department of Education Pattie Johnson, Teaching Research Institute.
Indicator 14 Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions Revised May 2010 (Revisions indicated in red font)
Policy and Practice Implications for Secondary and Postsecondary Education and Employment for Youth With Disabilities September 18 and 19, 2003 Washington,
New Indicator 14 Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions 3 rd Annual Secondary Transition State Planning Institute Charlotte, NC May12-14,
KCMP SELF-ASSESSMENT PROCESS Winter Reporting Period.
Kentucky Continuous Monitoring Process Spring 2012.
Using Post-school Data for Program Improvement Cinda Johnson, Ed.D. Center for Change in Transition Services Seattle University Seattle, Washington.
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network Pennsylvania Post School Outcome Survey (PaPOS) Utilizing the Data Results for Longitudinal Planning.
1 State Performance Plan (SPP) Indicator # Measurement 1Graduation 2Dropout 3Statewide Assessments 4Suspension and Expulsion 5Least Restrictive Environment.
2009 Post-school Survey Webinar #7 June 2, 2010 Presented by: Center for Change in Transition Services Cinda Johnson, Wendy Iwaszuk, Denny Hasko
1)Type your name, address, and zip code (along with all team members participating with you) in the ‘Chat Box’ on the left. 2)CCTS will conduct a.
Center for Change In Transition Services improving post-school outcomes for students with disabilities in Washington state Seattle University OSPI State.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education California Department of.
National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center Connecting TA for Part B Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14: Working Together to Support States OSEP Project.
ESC Region XI Texas Effectiveness Study PROGRAM UPDATE 2005 Deborah Norris, Project Coordinator Education Service Center Region XI Fort Worth, Texas.
North Carolina Post-School Outcomes (Indicator 14) January 14, 2016 David W. Test, UNC Charlotte.
Post-Secondary Transition. Kentucky Transition Indicator 13 “Sub-Indicators” 49a Postsecondary Goals 49b Transition Services 49c Agency Involvement 49d.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Improving Special Education Services November 2010 Sacramento, CA SPP/APR Update.
Transition Improvement Plan (TIP) Introduction to the Indicator 14 Post School Outcomes (PSO) Report
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
Cumberland County Schools Transition. Indicator 1 Graduation Percent of youth with IEPs graduating from high school with a regular diploma is.
Texas Effectiveness Study Mini-Grant Program for LEA Follow-up.
Transforming the Future with PSO Data.  Understand why collecting PSO data is so important for district decisions on how to best serve students  Learn.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
The Career and Technical Education (CTE) Completer Follow-up 2016 Follow-Up of the 2015 CTE Graduates March 3, 2016.
Post-Secondary Transition
YOYO Training for New Interviewers
Post Secondary Outcomes Sally Simich, Oregon Department of Education
Trend Data Guest Speakers: Pattie Johnson, TRI Sally Simich, ODE
Post-Secondary Outcomes Data Collection 2008
Wisconsin Transition Improvement Grant (TIG) Transition Improvement Plan (TIP) Tools to Improve the Postsecondary education and employment outcomes.
Ohio Longitudinal Transition Study (OLTS)
Post-Secondary Transition
Utilizing Indicator 14 data and Evidence Based Resources 2017
Ohio Longitudinal Transition Study (OLTS)
State performance plan indicator 14
The Career and Technical Education (CTE) Completer Follow-up
Presentation transcript:

Using and Understanding Post School Outcome Data Collection Presented by Kentucky Post School Outcome Center (KyPSO) Beth Miller Harrison, Ph.D. Tony LoBianco, Ph.D. Judy Johns Winter/Spring 2011

Expected Webinar Outcomes Directors of Special Education and other school administrators will: 1.Understand reasons for collecting post-school outcome data 2.Understand data collection process 3.Understand how to interpret Indicator 14 (post-school outcome data) Kentucky Continuous Improvement Monitoring (KCMP) Report 4.Understand how to use Indicator 14 data for school improvement

What is Indicator 14? Indicator 14: Percent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school, and were: A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school. B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school. C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.

Collecting this data will help us answer questions like: For students who are successful, did school help and how? For students who aren’t successful, what could the school have done differently/better? What kinds of supports do young adults need most after high school? What changes are needed to better support students, families, schools, agencies?

What Data are Collected? 1.Data about student transition planning experience and post school plans during the final year of high school. 2.Data about the post-school outcomes of Former Students (FS) one year after secondary school exit. When are Data Collected? From April 1 st to June 30 th of each year.

How are data collected? Data about the transition planning process and post-school plans are collected using the Kentucky In School Transition Survey (KISTS) which consists of 1). Student contact information after high school, 2). A review of the student record (Record Review), and 3). A survey completed by the exiting student (Student Survey). Data about post-school outcomes of former students (FS) are collected using the Youth One Year Out (YOYO) former student interview. The YOYO is a computer assisted, telephone interview. 6

How are Data Collected? Both the KISTS and the YOYO are web- based instruments

Roles in Data Collection State Education Agency (SEA) ~ responsible for assuring data collection; developing and submitting State Performance Plan (SPP) and Annual Performance Report (APR) to Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP). This contains state targets and improvement activities for all Indicators, including Indicator 14.

Roles in Data Collection Local Education Agencies (LEA) ~ responsible for collecting the data including identifying who, at the local level, will collect the data; review of Indicator 14 data via the KCMP; development of district improvement planned based upon data review.

Roles in Data Collection Special Education Cooperatives ~ assist/participate with districts in data review and in development of improvement activities and root cause analysis.

Roles in Data Collection Kentucky Post School Outcome Center ~ responsible for secondary data analysis; development of LEA, Cooperative, and State level reports regarding the data; provision of technical assistance and/or training of LEA, SEA, and Cooperative level staff in regard to data collection, data interpretation, and data use.

Old Indicator #14 (2005 – 2008) Percent of youth, who had IEPs, are no longer in secondary school and were: New Indicator #14 (as of Feb 2009) Percent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school, and were: Another Way of Thinking About New Indicator #14 · Enrolled in some type of postsecondary school, within one year of leaving high school, but not employed. · Competitively employed, within one year of leaving high school, but not enrolled in post- secondary education. · Both employed and enrolled in postsecondary school within one year of leaving high school. A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school. A. The percentage of former students with IEPs that exited the previous year and are enrolled in two or four year college/university. B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school. B. Part A plus the percentage of former students with IEPs that exited the previous year and are, or have been, competitively employed since exit. C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school. C. Part B plus the percentage of former students with IEPs that exited the previous year and are, or have been, enrolled in another post-secondary training program and/or employed non- competitively.

Indicator 14 is Considered a “New” Indicator Because Indicator 14 was redefined, it is considered a new indicator. Therefore, no state targets were set for Indicator 14 for the reporting year. This years’ ( ) YOYO data, both at the state and local levels, are considered baseline data. The Kentucky Department of Education/Division of Learning Services (KDE/DLS) is currently setting state targets for all indicators through the Annual Performance Report (APR).