126th Annual Meeting and Conference December 9, 2011 Discussion of Significant Findings and Aggregate Data Based on the Results of the Endicott College.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
TASK FORCE CALL TO ARMS Henninger High School 2012.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Best Practices. Overview of Best Practices Literacy Best Practice Documents: Were developed by curriculum staff and area specialists, with coaches’ and.
Presented by Margaret Shandorf
Roles and Responsibilities of School Principals
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Annual Title I Information Meeting September 9, :30 PM Presenter: Liss A. Maynard, Principal Clarkdale Elementary School.
WASC Report to Scotts Valley High School Home of the Falcons.
Curriculum & Alignment Institute Susan McCauley, Ph.D.
So What Can I Expect When I Serve on an NEASC/CPSS Visiting Team? A Primer for New Team Members.
Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.
GIFTED PROGRAM EVALUATION LONG BEACH SCHOOL DISTRICT DEBORAH HOLT LBSD GIFTED COORDINATOR JUNE 25, 2013.
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
Provided by Education Service Center Region XI 1 Title I, Part A Overview Provided by Education Service Center Region XI
Centennial Elementary School Parent Opinion Inventory 1 Ocean City Public Schools Parent Opinion Inventory Summary Analysis November 2007 Prepared by the.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
WASC Visiting Committee Final Presentation for Overseas Schools International School Myanmar October 3, 2013.
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.
Title I Orientation Title I Programs Support the Katy ISD Mission Katy Independent School District, the leader in educational excellence, together.
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
Integrated Media and Technology Program with an Emphasis on Student Achievement.
Site Leadership and Counselor Cohort: “Quality Pathway Design” Rob Atterbury, Connect Ed Daphannie Stevens, Center for Urban School Leadership (CUSL),
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Wells Branch Leadership Academy Annual Title 1 Meeting September 23, 2015.
J.S.Abrams Elementary School Guidance Counseling Program
The School Counseling Program
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
USING DATA TO IMPROVE LEARNING FOR ALL STUDENTS Advancing Improvement in Education (AIE) Annual Conference October 18, 2012 Victoria L. Bernhardt Education.
Columbus State University C ollege of Education and Health Professions PSC Program Review February 14-17, 2010.
NEASC SITE VISIT SEPTEMBER 30-OCTOBER 3, Standards of Accreditation 4 standards of Teaching and Learning 1- Mission and Expectations for Student.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Welcome to Central Middle School
Administrator-Association Collaboration-from MOUs to Problem-solving SIOUX CITY COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Connecting K-12 Schools Nationwide to Support Sustainable School Improvement October 2008 “We” Survey Suite with Linda Lucey
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
MAPLE VALLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT PD January 18, 2016.
All Surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart above (and on subsequent pages)
October Katy Independent School District, the leader in educational excellence, together with family and community, provides unparalleled learning.
Graduate Program Completer Evaluation Feedback 2008.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
 Plan for K-12 Program Assessment Elizabeth Duncan EDUC 665 Week 5 Assignment March 9, 2015.
ADVANCED (SACS) SYSTEM SUMMARY FY15. STANDARD ONE INDICATORS 1.1-The system engages in a systematic, inclusive and comprehensive process to review, revise.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Early Childhood Education
Missouri Comprehensive Guidance Program
Overview of the Title I Program at [school name]
Accreditation External Review
So what can I expect when I serve on a NEASC/CPSS Visiting Team?
Lake Sybelia Elementary
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
The School Counseling Program
WELCOME.
Missouri Comprehensive Guidance Program
Parent & Staff Survey Results
Survey Results Overview
Parent Satisfaction/Engagement Survey
TKES and SLO assessments
State of the School Title I Meeting Folwell School, Performing Arts Magnet October 9, /8/2019.
Title I Annual Meeting Sol C. Johnson High School September 6, 2018
Woodland Public Schools Parent Survey Results
2019 School Climate Survey Results and Analysis Nampa School District
August 25, 2016 Dr. ScharbreniaLockhart Principal
Insert your school’s logo and school name Sample
Presentation transcript:

126th Annual Meeting and Conference December 9, 2011 Discussion of Significant Findings and Aggregate Data Based on the Results of the Endicott College Surveys for CPS High Schools 10:30 a.m. Venetian Room 1

Peter Hart, Executive Director Endicott College Research Center 2

Endicott Research Center CPSS – Commission on Public Secondary Schools CAISA / CIS – Commission on American International Schools Abroad / Council of International Schools (Madrid) Web page: – FAQ’s, Sample Reports, Aggregate data available, this presentation Other ERC work: School Performance Survey, Institutional Research, Custom Surveys, Economic Impact Statement 3

Over an eight-year period (2003/04 – 2010/11), we have surveyed: 517 CPSS schools 334,338Students 35,070 Teachers and professional staff 81,327 Parents 4

In This Session Brief overview of the CPSS Surveys Demographic data Highs (responses over 85% in agreement) Lows (responses under 50% in agreement) Trends (results moving in the same direction for eight years where applicable) Questions / Remarks / Recommendations – Slide numbers included so we can go back 5

Brief Overview - CPSS Surveys ~60 Public Secondary Schools per year Survey questions developed from the CPSS Standards and reviewed each year Administered Online or Paper or Both Dedicated Database Server for data collection Students, Professional Staff and Parents Data analysis, Final Report, Aggregate Report Cost 6

CPSS Surveys – 2011 Standards Student Survey – 67 questions Parent Survey – 58 questions Professional Staff – 78 questions – (Teachers, Administration, Non-teaching Professionals) Questions on Paper and Online are identical Some questions worded so that gaps may be revealed Now in the third year 7

8

9

10

In This Session Brief overview of the CPSS Surveys Demographic data Highs (responses over 85% in agreement) Lows (responses under 50% in agreement) Trends (results moving in the same direction for eight years where applicable) Questions / Remarks / Recommendations – Slide numbers included so we can go back 11

Student Demographic Data Grade Level 2007/082009/102010/11 Grade %25.5%26.2% Grade %24.7%25.7% Grade %25.3%23.1% Grade %22.8%21.4% 12

Student Demographic Data Gender 2007/ /102010/11 Male49.3%49.8%48.8% Female50.7%50.2%51.2% 13

Professional Staff Demographic Data Years Teaching # of Years 2003/042004/052005/062006/072007/08 < %24.7%25.9%24.9%25.5% %29.5%32.7%34.9%38.7% %45.8%41.4%40.2%35.8% 14 # of Years 2008/ /102010/11 < %37.0%20.2% %31.9%43.3% %31.1%36.5%

Professional Staff Demographic Data Highest Degree Highest Degree 2003/042009/102010/11 Bachelor30.4%29.3%24.4% Master25.5%24.8%28.1% Master+41.5%43.4%45.3% Doctorate2.6%2.4%2.2% 15

Professional Staff Demographic Data Gender 2003/042009/102010/11 Male41.1%38.8%36.4% Female58.9%61.2%63.6% 16

Parents Demographic Data Number of Children in School # of children2003/042009/102010/ %51.7%52.0% %33.4%32.6% %10.4%11.4% 4 3.4%3.0% >4 1.2%1.5%1.0% 17

Parents Demographic Data Highest Level of Education Highest Degree 2003/042009/102010/11 High School35.8%32.5%24.5% Associate14.9%12.5%11.1% Bachelor27.8%30.5%29.7% Master17.3%19.2%22.1% Doctorate4.2%5.3%7.3% 18

In This Session Brief overview of the CPSS Surveys Demographic data Highs (responses over 85% in agreement) Lows (responses under 50% in agreement) Trends (results moving in the same direction for eight years where applicable) Questions / Remarks / Recommendations – Slide numbers included so we can go back 19

“Teachers examine student work to improve their instructional practices.” Standard 3: Instruction 2009/102010/11 Staff85.4%61.3% 20 “Teachers have formal opportunities to examine student work to improve their instructional practices.” Changed in 2010

“Teachers maintain expertise in their content area and in content-specific instructional practices.” Standard 3: Instruction 2009/102010/11 Staff 89.2%91.1% 21 “My son’s/daughter’s teachers maintain expertise in their subject areas. 2009/102010/11 Parents 69.8%73.0%

“Teachers support students in assuming responsibility for their learning.” Standard 5: School Culture and Leadership 2009/102010/11 Staff 89.3%90.7% 22 “The school encourages students to take responsibility for their learning.” 2009/102010/11 Parents 84.5%89.9%

Highs - Recap Staff: 3 Parents: 0 Students: 0 23

In This Session Brief overview of the CPSS Surveys Demographic data Highs (responses over 85% in agreement) Lows (responses under 50% in agreement) Trends (results moving in the same direction for eight years where applicable) Questions / Remarks / Recommendations – Slide numbers included so we can go back 24

“My teachers include topics from other subject areas in my courses.” Standard 2: Curriculum 2009/102010/2011 Students 49.9%51.0% 25

“My school provides opportunities for learning off-campus (e.g. field trips, internships, job shadowing, college courses, etc.)” Standard 2: Curriculum 2009/102010/2011 Students 46.2%45.0% 26

“The curriculum emphasizes cross- disciplinary learning.” Standard 2: Curriculum 2009/102010/2011 Staff 46.5%44.2% 27

“Co-curricular programs are adequately funded.” Standard 2: Curriculum 2009/102010/2011 Staff 34.0%33.1% /102010/2011 Parents 40.1%38.4%

“Teachers have sufficient time to be engaged in formal curriculum evaluation, review and revision work.” Standard 2: Curriculum 2009/102010/2011 Staff 33.3%38.8% 29

“My teachers personalize my instruction.” Standard 3: Instruction 2009/102010/2011 Students 37.7%39.2% /102010/2011 Staff 79.4%81.6% “Teachers personalize instruction to support the achievement of the school’s learning expectations.”

“My teachers spend one-on-one time with me.” Standard 3: Instruction 2009/102010/2011 Students 41.8%44.4% 31

“My teachers ask for my ideas/opinions to improve how they teach.” Standard 3: Instruction 2009/102010/2011 Students 38.5%39.7% /102010/2011 Parents 19.1%21.8% “My son’s/daughter’s teachers have asked me for feedback about their instructional practices.

“I use the school-wide analytic rubrics when assessing student work.” Standard 4: Assessment Of and For Student Learning 2009/102010/2011 Staff 38.2%35.0% 33

“Students respect teachers.” Standard 5: School Culture and Leadership 2009/102010/2011 Students 45.1%49.0% 34

“Students respect one another.” Standard 5: School Culture and Leadership 2009/102010/2011 Students 37.0%40.3% 35

“My school has a program which provides me with an adult in school, in addition to my guidance counselor, with whom I meet regularly and who knows me well.” Standard 5: School Culture and Leadership 2009/102010/2011 Students 36.3%45.5% 36

“Students have input in important decisions made at my school.” Standard 5: School Culture and Leadership 2009/102010/2011 Students 42.2%42.0% 37

“The school has timely and coordinated intervention strategies for all students, including at-risk students.” Standard 6: School Resources for Learning 2009/102010/2011 Parents 48.9%53.5% 38

“I meet with my school counselor regularly.” Standard 6: School Resources for Learning 2009/102010/2011 Students 25.6%26.1% /102010/2011 Parents 43.1%45.6% “The school counseling personnel meet regularly with my son/daughter to discuss personal, academic, career and college topics/planning.”

“We use the library often during classes.” Standard 6: School Resources for Learning 2009/102010/2011 Students 28.7%31.6% 40

“The library/information services program has an adequate number of certified/licensed personnel and support staff.” Standard 6: School Resources for Learning 2009/102010/2011 Parents 48.2%52.3% 41

“My son/daughter uses the library/media center’s resources on a regular basis.” Standard 6: School Resources for Learning 2009/102010/2011 Parents 46.1%50.4% 42

“The support services program has an adequate number of certified/licensed personnel and support staff for identified students, including special education, 504 and English language learners.” Standard 6: School Resources for Learning 2009/102010/2011 Parents 45.8%47.9% 43

“The community and the district’s governing body provide dependable funding for a wide range of programs and services.” Standard 7: Community Resources for Learning 2009/102010/2011 Staff 41.5%39.6% /102010/2011 Parents 48.4%45.5% “My community provides dependable funding for programs and services.”

“The community and the district’s governing body provide dependable funding for professional and support staff.” Standard 7: Community Resources for Learning 2009/102010/2011 Staff 41.4%39.2% /102010/2011 Parents 51.1%48.6% “My community provides dependable funding for staffing (building administrators, teachers and support staff).

“The community and the district’s governing body provide dependable funding for instructional materials and supplies.” Standard 7: Community Resources for Learning 2009/102010/2011 Staff 43.2%42.4% 46

“I have input into the development of the school budget.” Standard 7: Community Resources for Learning 2009/102010/2011 Staff 27.0%26.2% 47

“The school has a long-range plan to address facilities, future programs, services, staffing levels, and capital improvements.” Standard 7: Community Resources for Learning 2009/102010/2011 Staff 43.6%42.2% 48

Low’s Recap Staff: 10 Parents: 9 Students: 11 49

In This Session Brief overview of the CPSS Surveys Demographic data Highs (responses over 85% in agreement) Lows (responses under 50% in agreement) Trends (results moving in the same direction for eight years where applicable) Questions / Remarks / Recommendations – Slide numbers included so we can go back 50

“The school’s Mission Statement embodies what the community values and believes about student learning.” Old Standard 1: Mission 51 “The school’s core values and beliefs represent what the community values about student learning.” 2009/10: 68.1%, 2010/11: 72.7%

“I know the civic expectations that the school has for my child.” Standard 1: Mission 52 “The school’s learning expectations (academic, social and civic) are challenging.” : 71.1%, 2010/11: 75.3%

“I use school-wide rubrics in assessing student work.” Standard 1: Mission 53 I use the school-wide analytic rubrics when assessing student work.” : 38.2%, 2010/11: 35.0%

“My teachers spend one on one time with me if I need it.” Standard 5: Leadership & Organization 54 “My teachers spend one on one time with me.” 2009/10: 42%, 2010/11: 44.4%

“I feel safe at school.” 55

“Teachers respect students.” 56

“Students respect teachers.” 57

“Students respect one another.” 58

“I think bullying is a problem at school.” 59

“I am proud of my school.” 60

“At school, I know who to ask for help if I have a personal problem.” 61

“We use the library often during classes.” 62

“The library has the materials I need.” 63

“My parents participate in school programs.” 64

“Furniture and equipment in my classrooms are in good condition.” 65

“The school building is clean and well maintained.” 66

“My teachers use a variety of methods to assess my learning.” “Teachers use a variety of methods to assess my child’s learning.” 67

68

69

Thank you 70