Finding the green in Cities The Botanical Biodiversity of Urban Greenspaces Latisha T. Williams Abstract: Cities represent the most extreme form of human.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An introduction to climate change vulnerability assessments Stuart Butchart, BirdLife International
Advertisements

Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
Gateway National Recreation Area Jamaica Bay Transportation Studies at Floyd Bennett Field, Jacob Riis Park, Riis Landing, and the Former Pennsylvania.
Investigating the relationship between species richness and wilderness in the coastal temperate rainforest of Southeast Alaska. This poster represents.
Community and landscape ecology of forest interiors at Merry Lea Aradhana J. Roberts and Jonathon Schramm Goshen College Abstract Introduction Materials.
UNEP Coral Reef Unit Division of Environmental Conventions c/o UNEP-World Conservation Monitoring Centre Monitoring of coral reefs.
Principles of Landscape Ecology ENVS*3320 Instructors: Dr. Shelley Hunt (Module 1) Rm. 2226, Bovey Building x53065 Dr. Rob Corry (Module.
Tucson’s Birds: Why Scale Matters Rachel McCaffrey.
Konza Prairie Long-Term Ecological Research Station Tall Grass Prairie Ecosystem.
Low Impact Development Best Management Practices
Spatial Statistics in Ecology: Case Studies Lecture Five.
Food Accessibility in Wisconsin: Comparison of Self-Report, Direct Observation, and Mapping Data ResultsKey Findings Results Conclusions Background Results.
Community consultation 3 September – 10 December 2012 Draft ACT Nature Conservation Strategy.
Course Title: Ecotourism Course Code: (TM371) Lecture:3.
458 Estimating Extinction Risk (the IUCN criteria) Fish 458; Lecture 24.
Introduction to Vegetation Classification and the Biogeoclimatic Ecosystem Classification System FRST 211: Forest Classification and Silvics.
Presented By: By: By: Web Address: Topic Number: Topic Number: Date: Date:
Were you intrigued by the design ideas for your neighborhood? 1.Strongly Agree 2.Agree 3.Neutral 4.Disagree 5.Strongly Disagree.
Purposes of protected areas protect focal sp. / spp. –umbrella species protect biodiversity (spp. richness, endemism) protect large, functioning ecosystems.
Clermont College Ecology Michelle Beebe Ashley Callahan Kati O'Rourke Professor Janet Stein-Carter.
Module 2 - Plant Diversity, Sampling Area, and Island Biogeography SEE-U Brazil 2001.
Ecosystem processes and heterogeneity Landscape Ecology.
Urban Forest Inventory: A Primer Bill Hubbard Southern Regional Extension Forester.
Natural Heritage & Urban Forest Strategy (NH&UFS) DRAFT STRATEGY Open House Presentation June 20 th, 2013.
Weeds The Cancer of Our Land. Why Care? “The spread of noxious weeds may signal the decline of entire ecological watersheds. They severely impact the.
IUCN projects to support biodiversity in forests of Central Europe Piotr Tyszko, Ph.D. Project Officer IUCN Office for Central Europe.
Construction Management City Ordinance Landscaping & Tree Preservation Chad Herwald City Arborist Columbia, MO
Landscaping and Irrigation Standards. Purpose The landscaping of all areas of the community is intended to: provide visual relief and delight complement.
Urban Design Goals: Produce a high quality living environment for all residents. Clarify and enhance the relationship between new housing development and.
City of Brisbane Open Space & Ecology Committee April 27, 2006 Baylands EIR Scoping.
Species Abundance and Diversity
Land Chapter 14.
Landscape Ecology Questions Current regulations in Massachusetts and other states tend to leave landscapes rich in wetlands but lacking diverse and extensive.
Introduction Oithona similis is the most abundant copepod in the Gulf of Alaska, and is a dominant in many ecosystems from the poles to the sub-tropics.
Prepared by: ROBA KANDEEl بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
Conservation in Human Modified Landscapes- CH and ●Ecological changes are negative, anthropogenic, large, and accelerating (feedback.
Option G: Ecology and Conservation Chpt. 18: pages
INTRODUCTION Changes in land use in basin areas, including conversion of previously forested areas into agricultural pastureland, can often have negative.
What Is Ecology? What is Landscape? What is Landscape Ecology? A road to Landscape Ecological Planning.
February 22, Tree Data Arbor Day 2011 Colonial Oaks Park Peach Tree Planting Red Bug Slough Live Oak planting w/ educational signage Slash pine.
Methods 1. Dune area delineated with GIS before and after storms 2. Calculate total loss and mean loss in dune area for foredunes (N = 26) and secondary.
4. Aesthetic Evaluation of Urban Watercourses URBAN STREAM REHABILITATION.
Landscape Ecology: Conclusions and Future Directions.
Plant Ecology An introduction. Ecology as a Science  Study of the relationships between living organisms and their environment  Of the interactions.
Introduction. Spatial sampling. Spatial interpolation. Spatial autocorrelation Measure.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Planning and Sustainability Paul Farmer American Planning Association M6: Protecting the Urban Environment and Historical and Cultural Heritage.

Results I) Regional Survey Rarefaction curves leveled off across sites, suggesting that the sample effort was sufficient to capture differences between.
Conservation Strategy Revisions: 1. Grassland Conservation Strategy Natural Temperate Grassland Button Wrinklewort Ginninderra Peppercress Baeuerlan’s.
Wouldn’t we be wise to bring nature and wildlife into the city where the pleasures they bring can be enjoyed on a daily basis? Man has an inherent metaphysical.
The Effect of Fuel Treatments on the Invasion of Nonnative Plants Kyle E. Merriam 1, Jon E. Keeley 1, and Jan L. Beyers 2. [1] USGS Western Ecological.
 1 Species Richness 5.19 UF Community-level Studies Many community-level studies collect occupancy-type data (species lists). Imperfect detection.
Identify techniques for estimating various populations (quadrats, transects, mark- recapture) Understand the carrying capacity of ecosystems; factors.
University of Washington Institute for Hazards Mitigation Planning and Research Visions for Kimball Creek.
Ecological Succession Changing Ecosystems. Biodiversity  Biodiversity is the variety of organisms in a given area.  Physical factors (abiotic) have.
Cuevas, Ma. Fernanda (1,2) ; Ricardo Ojeda (1) and Fabián M. Jaksic (2) (1) Grupo de Investigaciones de la Biodiversidad (GIB), IADIZA, CCT-Mendoza CONICET,
Relationship of vegetation to socioeconomic status in Austin, Texas Kimberly Nichter, Department of Geography and the Environment This study observes the.
Single Season Study Design. 2 Points for consideration Don’t forget; why, what and how. A well designed study will:  highlight gaps in current knowledge.
Bill Hubbard Southern Regional Extension Forester taking the urban forest to the next level.
City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results  Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for second time  Survey conducted by mail  1200 randomly.
Estimating Local Values of Vegetable Non-Timber Forest Products to Pendjari Biosphere Reserve Dwellers in Benin VODOUHE G. Fifanou, PhD Candidate Accra,
C.4 Conservation of biodiversity Understanding: -An indicator species is an organism used to assess a specific environmental condition -Relative numbers.
Urban Biotopes Typification Based on Moscow Ant Community Sample
Quantifying Scale and Pattern Lecture 7 February 15, 2005
Exposing the Luxury Effect
Applying GIS to Santa Cruz Island:
Internal Assessment IB Geography
Biodiversity: Diversity among and within plant and animal species in an environment. Note: The preservation of biodiversity is considered by environmentalists.
Route 7 Setbacks and Buffer Standards
Presentation transcript:

Finding the green in Cities The Botanical Biodiversity of Urban Greenspaces Latisha T. Williams Abstract: Cities represent the most extreme form of human influence on an ecosystem and hold within them the faith of nature, the ability to conserve or destroy it. The wide spread belief (myth) that urban environments are disconnected from the natural world and lacking in biodiversity has been widely explored and it has been determined by some that biodiversity is indeed preserved in cities. Where this diversity is actually located is a matter of less clarity because much of the study on the urban biodiversity has historically focused on the wilderness surrounding the city, not within a city, creating a gap in information about city-biodiversity interactions (Oliveira et al. 2011). It has been extensively acknowledged and well documented that species diversity, or biodiversity, in urban areas is an important ecological factor. Yet there is little clarity about where this diversity can be found, partly because there is no unified understanding of what is urban nature. A space classified as an urban green space includes man-made plant communities throughout the landscape as well as natural areas, that when combined create the green urban infrastructure of the urban fabric. Identifying urban green space and the biodiversity within these spaces is important to preserve biodiversity of nature within urban environments. This study represents a pioneering effort to classify the types of urban greenspaces and works to identify the spatial distribution and species abundance of plant diversity throughout urban green spaces, allowing patterns of diversity to be recognized that could later be built upon in conservation and preservation efforts by addressing the following: 1.What are the different types of urban greenspaces located with the built environment of a city? 2. Of the greenspaces present, which has the highest level of diversity (what is the abundance and distribution of the botanical species present)? 3.How does the level of diversity for various urban greenspaces, compare across botanical categories (herbs, shrubs and trees)? What effect does human impact, through the frequency and level of maintenance, have on the diversity of urban greenspaces? It is expected that, diversity will be higher at locations that are more managed and easily accessed by the public and that exotic species will not inhibit the diversity of an area. At the same time the presence of native species is not expected to guarantee greater diversity. For the purpose of mapping, an urban green space was defined as any public area containing vegetation and accessible to the pubic for physical or aesthetic purposes. This vegetation did not need to be landscaped or maintained. Once the areas were mapped they were then divided into nine categories: parks, sports fields, playgrounds, grassy lots, over grown lots, green streets, traffic circles, cemeteries and natural areas. Of the nine categories the five chosen as study sites were parks, cemeteries, green streets, traffic circles, and natural/undeveloped areas. These categories were chosen because they represented green spaces that people could come in contact with on a daily basis, either by actually using them or through observation. Two sites for each of the selected categories were used for species survey/diversity analysis, because that was the maximum available for the area, and then sampled during the Spring-Fall growing season over the course of two years. Linear transects and circular quadrate were used to collect species information. Stratified linear transects measured 12.5meters long and at the end of this distance the type and number of trees, shrubs, and herbs in circular transects of 10meters, 5meters and 2.5meters respectively were determined. The size for circular transects was determined by the maximum width of the smallest green-space included in the study, green streets. Table 1: The organizations of urban green spaces in the City of Binghamton according to management level (1= least managed, 9=most managed) and frequency of maintenance (1=no maintenance, 9= frequent maintenance). Maintenance is different from management in that management is the act of establishing the green space and the measure of how much effort goes into the up keep, while the frequency of maintenance is how often this effort has to be exerted. Vegetation observations are made according to the general observations of most of the green spaces in that particular category (T=trees, G=grass, F=flowering plants, S=shrubs) Preliminary Conclusions: The results are still being analyzed, however it appears that managed areas may be slightly more diverse than the natural greenspaces, in Binghamton, but it is those greespaces with both a natural component as well as human influence that maintain the highest botanical diversity. Nonetheless, there may be some native species that refer � managed greenspaces. Thus, it may be optimum to have both natural and managed greenspaces within an urban environment. Also, it appears possible that particular types of management, especially close mowing of lawns, is inimical to biodiversity, while allowing some messy � spaces within managed greenspaces might increase diversity. Another aspect of this research, not reported here, was a survey of Binghamton residents to determine preferences and attitudes towards greenspace and the environmental attributes in these spaces, which may help to determine to what extent the public would support changes in management intended to increase biodiversity and conservation. Future Research This initial study concentrated on formatted � greenspaces that are incorporated into the social sphere as space that is physically used or visually enjoyed, and now is being extended by other students to unformatted � less accessible greenspaces such as overgrown lots, railroad rights of way, and islands and other streamside vegetation, that were identified through the greenspace mapping. There is also a need to study private yards. Once the data are analyzed, policy prescriptions will be developed that hopefully maximize conservation of biodiversity in Binghamton, as well as other urban environments.