Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PRESENTATION OUTLINE Introduction Climate change initiatives Capacity Challenges.
Advertisements

Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop March 22 – 24, 2011 Kyiv, Ukraine.
Next USAID Indonesia Forestry Program July 7, 2014.
Programming directions for GEF-6 Climate Change Mitigation
Prabianto Mukti Wibowo Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs
Forests, Agriculture and Climate Change: What happened in Copenhagen? Presentation to The Food & Drink Innovation Network GMP 27 January 2010 Andréanne.
Sustainable Peatlands for People and Climate SPPCwww.wetlands.org A project implemented by Wetlands International, Deltares, University Gadja Mada, WI-Indonesia,
Basic Considerations  outlines the process by which the Government of Kenya will develop its national strategy for participating in an evolving international.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Is the.
Derek Eaton Division of Technology, Industry & Economics Economics & Trade Branch Geneva, Switzerland “Designing the Green Economy” Centre for International.
UNEP’s flagship publication, Towards A Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Alleviation, is the result of two year’s work, involving.
Katoomba Group Training Initiative Climate Change, Markets and Services Welcome and Introduction Course Introduction and Guidelines Participant Introduction:
Stakeholder consultation on discussion document on GHG mitigation potential within the agriculture and forest sector Portlaoise 15 May 2015 Eugene Hendrick.
Vulnerability Assessments and Adaptation to Climate Change Consultations on the Relationship between Climate and human rightsGeneva 22 October 2008 Festus.
Module developers: Erika Romijn, Wageningen University
Green Economy Initiative Derek Eaton UNEP UNCEEA, June 2010.
Wetlands International, Susanna Tol,
A. N. Gichu Kenya Forest Service REDD+ and REDD Readiness.
Berau Forest Carbon Project / BFCP
Center for International Climate and Environmental Research-Oslo: Research Priorities and Interest in China Lin Gan SINCIERE Member Workshop October 19,
Challenges and options John Couwenberg Hans Joosten Greifswald University Are emission reductions from peatlands MRV-able.
REDD Preparation in Indonesia Wahjudi Wardojo Forestry Research and Development Agency (FORDA) Ministry of Forestry, INDONESIA.
Green development and oil palm in Indonesia: Observations from East Kalimantan Krystof Obidzinski and Pablo Pacheco.
Biodiversity and Ecosystem Accounting Initiatives in Uganda Ronald Kaggwa (NEMA) Bright Kimuli (UBOS)
Peatland Forest Degradation and Emissions in South East Asia Faizal Parish Global Environment Centre Marcel Silvius, Wetlands International Forest Day.
World Bank Energy Sector Lending: Encouraging the World’s Addiction to Fossil Fuels Heike Mainhardt-Gibbs Bank Information Center – March 2009.
Investment in Sustainable Natural Resource Management (focus: Agriculture) increases in agricultural productivity have come in part at the expense of deterioration.
Actions needed to halt deforestation and promote climate-smart agriculture.
Critical issues facing REDD+ CPA Conference. Global Mechanisms: Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+), July 2010.
INDONESIAN FOREST FIRES AND CHALLENGING TO REDUCE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION AS ONE OF THE MAIN FACTOR TO MINIMIZE NEGATIVE IMPACT OF GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE.
Philippines Country Report On Sustainable Forest Management
PRIVATE SECTOR ENGAGEMENT ON REDD+ IN VIETNAM, CURRENT AND POTENTIAL FUTURE Prepared by Vu Thanh Nam Vietnam administration of Forestry (VNFOREST)
United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen - COP 15 Restoring degraded peatlands to achieve GHG emission reductions Viktar Fenchuk Irina Voitekhovich.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants the.
U.S. Office: 1877 Garden Avenue Eugene, Oregon USA.
1. Sustainable Development. International commitment. COORDINATION. A LONG-TERM VISSION. Policies Enhance the economic growth. Certainty and Economic.
Mohamed Bakarr Senior Environmental Specialist GEF Familiarization Seminar Washington, DC January 17 – 19, 2012 GEF Strategies, Activities and Accomplishment:
Banda Aceh, 18 May 2010 From REDD Plus to Low Carbon Growth Strategy: An opportunity for Provincial Actions Doddy S. Sukadri Indonesia National Council.
Development of GHG Inventories in Indonesia: National System Indonesia Rizaldi Boer Bogor Agricultural University
1 Protection of soil carbon content as a climate change mitigation tool Peter Wehrheim Head of Unit, DG CLIMA Unit A2: Climate finance and deforestation.
Tatsushi HEMMI Institute for Global Environmental Strategies COP 9 Decisions related to CDM in forestry sector – An update on implications for Asia IGES-URC.
Peatland Stocks and emissions Faizal Parish Global Environment Centre Andrey Sirin, Russian Academy Of Science Hans Joosten, International Mire Conservation.
REDD+ Guiana Plateau project First Steering Committee Meeting Paramaribo, 6 August 2013 Rene Somopawiro SBB, Suriname.
SUSTAINABLE LANDSCAPES IN BRAZIL AND INDONESIA Herlina Hartanto Indonesia Terrestrial Program.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop April 5 – 7, 2011 Da Lat, Vietnam.
R-PLAN and REDD activities Review Lao PDR Flag of your country.
USDA’s Inventory & Improvements Marci Baranski, PhD USDA Office of the Chief Economist Climate Change Program Office.
REDD and Governance Challenges in Indonesia Iman Santoso Center for Socio-economic and Policy Forest Research and Development.
Forests & The Resource Curse The Anatomy of A Forest Destruction 1.
Piloting a System of Positive Incentives for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) The Proposed Forest Carbon Partnership Facility.
Network for Certification and Conservation of Forests.
Natural Capital: concepts & trends Jonathan Hughes CEO, Scottish Wildlife Trust Founder, World Forum on Natural Capital.
Introduction to REDD+, status in Asia-Pacific, and the UN-REDD Programme Tim Boyle UN-REDD Regional Coordinator UNDP Regional Centre, Bangkok.
Duncan Marsh The Nature Conservancy Inter-American Development Bank June 7, 2007 Reducing Deforestation in Developing Countries: Critical Issues and Directions.
Bosque Patagónico Bosque Chaqueño YungasYungas REDD+ REDD+ ARGENTINA ARGENTINA REDD+ REDD+ ARGENTINA ARGENTINA Selva Misionera Bosque Patagónico.
Poverty - Environment Linkages Uganda’s Case By D.N Byarugaba Commissioner for Forestry.
1  Energy efficiency has led to a decoupling of economic and energy growth.  In 2013, OECD energy consumption = 2000 levels, while GDP expanded by 26%.
PPPs for Value Chain Development
Robin Matthews Climate Change Theme Leader Macaulay Institute
Forest Landscape Restoration: key strategy to enhance carbon stocks
Peatlands and the Pulp and Paper Industry in Indonesia
FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
Indonesia’s Readiness-Plan Technical Advisory Panel Review
Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050
The Ecology of Responsibility:
SEEA as a framework for assessing policy responses to climate change
Results of Workshop Organized by
A quick word on water and rural development policy after 2013
GEF-5 Focal Area Strategies
Green fiscal policy: Reducing GHG emissions and mobilizing revenue
Presentation transcript:

Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands Interim Report of a Multi-Disciplinary Study Presented at Wetlands International Side Event 11 December 2009 COP 15, Copenhagen, Denmark Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands Interim Report of a Multi-Disciplinary Study Presented at Wetlands International Side Event 11 December 2009 COP 15, Copenhagen, Denmark BAPPENAS REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA

Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 The objective of this analysis is to assess the potential for reducing emissions from the country’s peat lands. The analysis assesses – the present extent, land use and land cover of Indonesia’s peat lands, – the magnitude of current peat land emissions, – the possible carbon abatement potentials under the three different policy scenarios, – the economic costs and benefits of specific policy options and actions to reduce emissions, and – the potential application of national and international policy instruments to achieve GHG emission reductions in Indonesia’s peat land. THE STUDY THE STUDY

Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 INDONESIA’S PEAT LANDS INDONESIA’S PEAT LANDS Indonesia has around 21 million hectares of peat. Peat more than 3m thick (around 8million hectares) is protected by law. In 2006, more than 55% of peat land was forested. Other peat land covers include cropland (14%) and shrub/grassland (20%) Almost ¼ of Indonesia’s peatland is protected/conserved. About 3.3 million of this is still forested. As of 2006, forestry & plantation licences on peat = 5.6 million hectares. Agriculture, plantation timber & plantation crops cover more than 3 million hectares of land for development. Although protected by law, more than 2.5million hectares of peat land over 3m deep is allocated for development.

Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 THE EMISSIONS OF PEAT LANDS THE EMISSIONS OF PEAT LANDS Indonesia has an average annual net emission of 903 Mt CO2 yr-1 between 2000 and 2006 This estimate is based on: Estimates of emissions from oxidation of 220 Mt CO2/yr using land use and land cover data from and previously published emissions factors. Loss of Above-Ground Biomass of 210 Mt CO2/yr based on past rates of deforestation and carbon stock in peat swamp forests. Fire emissions estimate of 470 Mt CO2/y, based on published data and the Second National Communication. The majority of the peat emissions result from uncontrolled burning (contributing 46% of total emissions), peat oxidation (25%) and biomass removal (24%) with the main source regions being Sumatra (44%) and Kalimantan (40%).

Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 Peat land areas contribute to the national economy principally through the forestry, plantations and agriculture sectors: Plantations & forestry sectors contributed 3% (USD12.6 billion) [2007] Oil palm plantation sector contributed 0.85% of GDP & 3 million jobs. But highly carbon intensive: Peat land contributes approx USD1.06billion (or 0.26%) of Indonesia’s total GDP yet accounts for almost 50% of emissions. Carbon intensity of the 7 “peat provinces” (90% of Indonesia’s peat) is 22.1 kg of CO2 / US dollar of GRDP. THE ECONOMICS of PEAT LAND THE ECONOMICS of PEAT LAND

Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 MITIGATION POTENTIAL MITIGATION POTENTIAL The BAU scenario assumes all peat areas currently allocated to companies are developed with fire emissions continuing based on historical emissions, which provides an estimated increase in emissions to 1,387 Mt CO 2 yr -1 by The potential emissions under each of three main policy measures are estimated and compared to the BAU scenario Up to 92 % reduction on BAU is possible by 2025 through: 1. Legal compliance and best management practices in existing land under production Mt CO 2 or 24 % reduction 2. Peat land rehabilitation and prevention of uncontrolled fires Mt CO 2 or 31 % reduction 3. Revision of land allocation, forest conservation and land swaps that direct future development away from peat land Mt CO 2 or 37 % reduction

Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 MITIGATION POTENTIAL MITIGATION POTENTIAL

Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 Preliminary analysis of the opportunity costs of protecting unlicensed peat, and shifting future development onto mineral soil: There is a net positive benefit on GDP, and to a lesser extent on tax revenues and local revenues In terms of macro impact, unlikely to involve opportunity cost due to availability of land at national level. But an opportunity cost still exists at the local level, especially in districts with little alternative land available. Here, the cost will need to be borne by carbon revenue THE ECONOMIC OUTLOOK THE ECONOMIC OUTLOOK

Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 NET POSITIVE BENEFIT OF REVISING LAND ALLOCATION, PERMITS NET POSITIVE BENEFIT OF REVISING LAND ALLOCATION, PERMITS

Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 THE BUSINESS OUTLOOK THE BUSINESS OUTLOOK (1)Implementing Best Practices in Oil Palm on Peat Comparison of a standard ‘business as usual’ model with a ‘best practice’ model: Improving yields and financial performance reduces pressure to open up new peat land. The average regional GDP (GRDP) produced by a best practice plantation is more than double that produced on a BAU plantation. If 500,000 hectares of peat land plantations are upgraded to best practice management, a further 500,000 hectares would not need to be converted. The costs of “best practice” are $1,405 per hectare (discounted at 15%). But the benefit is worth $4,626 – a return on investment of over 22%.

Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 THE BUSINESS OUTLOOK THE BUSINESS OUTLOOK (2)Land Swaps from Peat Land to Mineral Soils Assessment of the economic viability of shifting planned plantations to degraded mineral soils: Net land available for oil palm expansion on degraded mineral soils is 8 million ha. Sufficient to cover planned increase in palm oil production up to Assuming a best practice management, degraded land offers superior rates of return (18.6%) than either unforested (11.3%) or forested peat land (12.9%). A strong case to review and consider revised business models such as enhanced community-business partnership models or innovative community-based plantation models. A key success factor for working on degraded mineral land will be Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) for the participation of local communities and farmers as business partners.

Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 ENABLING LAWS AND INSITUTIONS ENABLING LAWS AND INSITUTIONS The current policy, institutional and legal environment regarding peat land management in Indonesia is currently under review Policies are already in place to regulate peat-land management including limits on developing peat > 3 metres deep, zero burning, and water management But to reduce emissions at scale, there is still a need for: A more effective institutional framework for peat and lowland, e.g. to address overlapping mandates A performance-based framework to promote best practice A national strategy, plan and finance for peat land rehabilitation and fire prevention in degraded peat lands A comprehensive review of spatial planning e.g. to assess scope for shifting future development onto mineral soil A review of experience on land swaps and the potential to scale up experience from pilots to a national scale policy and program The development of peat land carbon policies and their articulation at the international level

Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: This study is commissioned and led by the Indonesian National Development Planning Agency (BAPPENAS), with the support of experts from the Ministry of Forestry, the Ministry of Agriculture, the Bogor Agricultural Institute (IPB), and the Indonesian Centre for Environmental Law (ICEL). The UK Department for International Development and the Netherlands Ministry for Development Cooperation have provided co-funding.

Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 Thank you Directorate of Forestry and Water Resources Conservation