Spatial analysis tools for biodiversity indicators on habitats and ecosystems Expert meeting on multi-scales mapping and integrated analysis of landscape.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Landscape Ecological Potential Author: JL Weber et al., EEA Discussant: Lars Hein, Wageningen University.

Advertisements

Applications jlw, 17 February INDEXES OF TEMPERATURE IN NATURA 2000 SITES.

Ecological soil map of the Alps A cross-border pilot area between Italy and Slovenia Sara Zanolla Stefano Barbieri Giuseppe Michelutti Borut Vrščaj.

Has EO found its customers? Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit GLC2000 GLOBAL LEGEND GLC 2000 – “FIRST RESULTS” WORKSHOP JRC – Ispra, March 2002.

GLC 2000 ‘Final Results’ Workshop (JRC-Ispra, 24 ~ 26 March, 2003) GLC 2000 ‘Final Results’ Workshop (JRC-Ispra, 24 ~ 26 March, 2003) LAND COVER MAP OF.

Building of Research Team in the Field of Environmental Modeling and the Use of Geoinformation Systems with the Consequence in Participation in International.

Remote Sensing II autumn spring 2008 "The practice of computer-aided interpretation of satellite images.“ Markus Törmä

George Büttner et al.: Institute of Geodesy, Cartography and Remote Sensing (FÖMI) Remote Sensing Centre Budapest, Hungary Construction.

Has EO found its customers? Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit GLC2000 Land Cover Classification.

„One Year of EU 25 – Conservation Policy Experience Regarding the 2nd Pillar of the CAP and Reform Prospects" 3-7 September 2005, Bonn, Germany presented.

Time series – spatial information ESPON workshop, 6 th May 2010 Oscar Gomez, EEA.

NORTHERN IRELAND COUNTRYSIDE SURVEY AND HNV FARMLAND Richard Weyl and Mark Wright Biodiversity Unit Northern Ireland Environment Agency.

Overview Minimum required classifiers for mapping vegetation cover at global scale using the FAO-LCCS tool GLC LEGEND hjs/30-Apr-01.

Land Cover Classification, Deforestation Patterns Analysis and Field Survey - Deforestation Patterns Analysis of the Baekdudaegan Mountain Range.

Parameterisation of Urban Sprawl Amon Boontore. S p r a w l P l a n i m e t e r Slpanimeter + Optional Title.

Lu Liang, Peng Gong Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley And Center for Earth System Science,

Proposed EEA approach to establish an environmental- compatible wind energy potential in Europe Hans Eerens MNP Netherlands Copenhagen 9 November 2006.

Remote Sensing Classification Systems

Marta Pérez-Soba Janneke Roos Sander Mücher Han Naeff Alterra, The Netherlands Brussels, 14th June 2001 Localisation of livestock systems.

Corine land cover, Land accounts and scenario development An introduction Jean-Louis Weber & Ferràn Paramo 26 February 2003.

Spatial sampling strategy MODIRISK. MODIRISK Kick-off-meeting Basis for sampling strategy Grid of 10X10 km = 326 cells Three samples per grid cell = 978.

Biomes. What is a biome? Definition: A group of ecosystems that have the same climate and similar dominant communities –Climate = temperature and precipitation.

Analysis and flood models for Ljubljana Urban Region Elco Koks & Hans de Moel.

Presentation of Land Accounts JLW. LEAC Home Introduction to land accounts Nomenclatures and definitions Spatial Assessments Builder Methodology, bibliography.

EEA 2006 Accounts Update Tables. PART 1 Table 1.1: Classifying land cover and land cover change for land accounting.

1 OPTIMA PROJECT Third Management Board Meeting, Gumpoldskirchen, Austria, May 18/20, 2006 Tunisia case study By Ahmed EZZINE.

Habitat suitability based landscape optimization vs. expert rules in agricultural landscapes Lutz Tischendorf Elutis Modelling & Consulting Inc. January.

JRC-AL – Bonn on Disaggregation of CAPRI results Renate Köble Adrian Leip.

Test of forest classification over Bavaria (Germany) using a SPOT-VGT pixel mosaic Erwann FILLOL, Pamela KENNEDY, Sten FOLVING.

European Environment Agency Land and Ecosystem Accounting 2008 Demonstration of Agro-Fuel and Urban Intensification Modelling Scenarios using Existing.

Roger Sayre, PhD Senior Scientist for Ecosystems Land Change Science Program U.S. Geological Survey and GEO Task Lead GI-14 Commonalities in Global Land.

CORINE land cover 1990 European Topic Centre on Terrestrial Environment (ETC-TE) Backdating CORINE land cover 1990 to 1950’ies 30x30km windows centred.

Defining the HNV farming concept at EU and local levels Guy Beaufoy & Gwyn Jones EFNCP.

UNCEEA NYC June 2009 Land Cover and Land Use Classifications in the SEEA Revision Xiaoning Gong (FAO) & Jean-Louis Weber (EEA) Fourth Meeting of.

NERI Roskilde Tuesday, May 18 th 2004 EEA activities and projects on spatial analysis and land accounting Jean-Louis Weber, EEA LANDSCAPE EUROPE Seminar.

Accounting for ecosystems & biodiversity at the EEA Jean-Louis Weber Environmental accounting / Spatial analysis.

Land accounts at the EEA Jean-Louis Weber & Ferràn Paramo 3 February 2004.

What if? prospects based on Corilis Alex Oulton, Manuel Winograd Ronan Uhel & Jean-Louis Weber LAND QUICK SCAN INTERFACE: Challenges and needs Internal.

PRELUDE PRospective Environmental analysis of Land Use Development in Europe European Environment Agency PRELUDE European Environment Agency.

27-28 April 2005Geoland workshop GEOLAND workshop Medium resolution change detection April 2005, JRC, Ispra EEA’s requirements for European assessments.

Modelling with CORILIS Change in land cover patterns, landscape ecological potential & “temperatures” on N2000, river basins and UMZ Wire frame and examples.

‘Beyond GDP’ accounting and climate change Professor Jacqueline McGlade Executive Director, European Environment Agency Copenhagen side event Climate change,

Urban Climate Analysis Assignment CLIM-CAP Training Pilot Module 2: Analysis techniques for urban climate - Assignment - "With the support of the Lifelong.

Habitat Quality: Model Overview Biodiversity is not treated as an ecosystem service Instead, it’s used to assess overlaps and tradeoffs InVEST models habitat.

Markus Erhard European Environment Agency (EEA) 1. Introduction:

Felix Müller, Ingo Zasada, Regine Berges (ZALF) Klaus Müller, Armin Werner, Verena Toussaint, Annette Piorr Linking European Land Use Change and Landscape.

CLC land cover, land use accounts and agri-environment (policy) analysis Jan-Erik Petersen.

Ivan Novković, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Geography

Land accounts at the EEA

Jean-Louis Weber & Emil Ivanov

Markus Erhard European Environment Agency (EEA) 1. Introduction:

Paraguay Landscape Analysis

ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT AND FUTURE DRINKING WATER QUALITY VULNERABILITY UNDER ANTICIPATED CLIMATE CHANGES ON A WATERSHED LEVEL Emiliya Velizarova1, Snezana.

Urban Audit Think Tank 06 March 2007

Pilot studies on the provision of harmonized land use/land cover statistics: Synergies between LUCAS and the national systems Norway Erik Engelien Division.

Pan-European Assessment of Riparian Zones

LUCAS Advisory Group Meeting LU/LC Classification & INSPIRE compliance

Paraguay Landscape Analysis

EUNIS habitat classification

Land Cover and Land Use Statistics

Finnish experiences in deriving CORINE land cover information

WP05: Turkey Land Use Change Model

Land Use Modelling Group, Sustainability Assessment Unit (DG JRC)

What if? prospects based on Corilis

A New Large-Scale Sentinel-2 Benchmark Archive to Drive Deep Learning Studies in Remote Sensing Gencer Sumbul1, Marcela Charfuelan3, Begüm Demir1, Volker.

Corine Land Cover and Land & Ecosystem Accounting tools

LUCAS long term perspective

Presentation of Jordan Case Study First Management Board Meeting

MAES EU Wide Ecosystem Assessment

Presentation transcript:

Spatial analysis tools for biodiversity indicators on habitats and ecosystems Expert meeting on multi-scales mapping and integrated analysis of landscape & green corridors Ferran Páramo European Topic Centre on Terrestrial Environment May 2005

Structure of the presentation Data sources Corilis Methodology GPB: Green Potential Background DLT: Dominant Landscape Types

DATA SOURCES

CORINE Land Cover

European Reference Grid 1x1 Km

K1000 E3666 N2073 Total surface: 100 Ha

CORILIS METHODOLOGY

Thresholds

CLC CORILIS EBGDLT CRITERIA DEPENDENT LAYERS Aggregation and/or Dominance STANDARD LAYERS

Green potential background map

Continuous urban fabric Discontinuous urban fabric Industrial or commercial units Road and rail networks and associated land Sport & leisure areas Airports Mineral extraction sites Dump sites Construction sites Green urban areas Port and leisure facilities Non-irrigated arable land Permanently irrigated land Rice fields Vineyards Fruit trees and berry plantations Olive groves Pastures Annual crops associated with permanent crops Complex cultivation patterns Land principally occupied by agriculture, with significant areas of natural vegetation Agro-forestry areas Broad-leaved forest Coniferous forest Mixed forest Natural grasslands Moors and heathland Sclerophyllous vegetation Transitional woodland-shrub Beaches, dunes, sands Bare rocks Sparsely vegetated areas Burnt areas Glaciers and perpetual snow Inland marshes Peat bogs Salt marshes Salines Intertidal flats Water courses Water bodies Coastal lagoons Estuaries Sea and Ocean No data 1. Artificial surfaces 2a. Arable land & permanent crops 2b. Pastures & mixed farmland 3a. Forests and transitional woodland shrub 4. Wetlands CLC Level 3 Aggregated Nomenclature 3b. Natural grassland, moors, heathland and sclerophylous vegetation 3c. Open spaces with little or no vegetation 5. Water bodies

Ecological Background Smoothing radius: 5 km Grouping of 2B, 3A, 3B, 3C, 4 and 5 classes

Ecological Background Smoothing radius: 10 km Grouping of 2B, 3A, 3B, 3C, 4 and 5 classes

Ecological Background Smoothing radius: 20 km Grouping of 2B, 3A, 3B, 3C, 4 and 5 classes

Legend % % Ecological Background Smoothing radius: 5 km Grouping of 2B, 3A, 3B, 3C, 4 and 5 classes

Legend % % Ecological Background Smoothing radius: 10 km Grouping of 2B, 3A, 3B, 3C, 4 and 5 classes

Legend % % Ecological Background Smoothing radius: 20 km Grouping of 2B, 3A, 3B, 3C, 4 and 5 classes

Dominant Landscape Types map

Continuous urban fabric Discontinuous urban fabric Industrial or commercial units Road and rail networks and associated land Sport & leisure areas Airports Mineral extraction sites Dump sites Construction sites Green urban areas Port and leisure facilities Non-irrigated arable land Permanently irrigated land Rice fields Vineyards Fruit trees and berry plantations Olive groves Pastures Annual crops associated with permanent crops Complex cultivation patterns Land principally occupied by agriculture, with significant areas of natural vegetation Agro-forestry areas Broad-leaved forest Coniferous forest Mixed forest Natural grasslands Moors and heathland Sclerophyllous vegetation Transitional woodland-shrub Beaches, dunes, sands Bare rocks Sparsely vegetated areas Burnt areas Glaciers and perpetual snow Inland marshes Peat bogs Salt marshes Salines Intertidal flats Water courses Water bodies Coastal lagoons Estuaries Sea and Ocean No data 1. Artificial surfaces 2. Arable land & permanent crops 3. Pastures & mixed farmland 4. Forests and transitional woodland shrub CLC Level 3 Aggregated Nomenclature 5. Shrubs & other semi-natural land

a) Threshold value = mean + sdev b) Codominance criteria

A1 - ARTIFICIAL DOMINANCE A2 - DISPERSED URBAN AREAS B1 - BROAD PATTERN INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE B2 - RURAL MOSAIC AND PASTURE LANDSCAPE C1 - FORESTED LANDSCAPE C2 - OPEN SEMI-NATURAL OR NATURAL LANDSCAPE D1 - COMPOSITE LANDSCAPE Dominant Land Cover Types Smoothing radius: 5 km

A1 - ARTIFICIAL DOMINANCE A2 - DISPERSED URBAN AREAS B1 - BROAD PATTERN INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE B2 - RURAL MOSAIC AND PASTURE LANDSCAPE C1 - FORESTED LANDSCAPE C2 - OPEN SEMI-NATURAL OR NATURAL LANDSCAPE D1 - COMPOSITE LANDSCAPE Dominant Land Cover Types Smoothing radius: 10 km

A1 - ARTIFICIAL DOMINANCE A2 - DISPERSED URBAN AREAS B1 - BROAD PATTERN INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE B2 - RURAL MOSAIC AND PASTURE LANDSCAPE C1 - FORESTED LANDSCAPE C2 - OPEN SEMI-NATURAL OR NATURAL LANDSCAPE D1 - COMPOSITE LANDSCAPE Dominant Land Cover Types Smoothing radius: 20 km

Legend A1 - ARTIFICIAL DOMINANCE A2 - DISPERSED URBAN AREAS B1 - BROAD PATTERN INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE B2 - RURAL MOSAIC AND PASTURE LANDSCAPE C1 - FORESTED LANDSCAPE C2 - OPEN SEMI-NATURAL OR NATURAL LANDSCAPE D1 - COMPOSITE LANDSCAPE Dominant Land Cover Types Smoothing radius: 5 km

Legend A1 - ARTIFICIAL DOMINANCE A2 - DISPERSED URBAN AREAS B1 - BROAD PATTERN INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE B2 - RURAL MOSAIC AND PASTURE LANDSCAPE C1 - FORESTED LANDSCAPE C2 - OPEN SEMI-NATURAL OR NATURAL LANDSCAPE D1 - COMPOSITE LANDSCAPE Dominant Land Cover Types Smoothing radius: 10 km

Legend A1 - ARTIFICIAL DOMINANCE A2 - DISPERSED URBAN AREAS B1 - BROAD PATTERN INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE B2 - RURAL MOSAIC AND PASTURE LANDSCAPE C1 - FORESTED LANDSCAPE C2 - OPEN SEMI-NATURAL OR NATURAL LANDSCAPE D1 - COMPOSITE LANDSCAPE Dominant Land Cover Types Smoothing radius: 20 km

Dominant Land Cover Types European Thresholds

Dominant Land Cover Types Sea Catchment thresholds

Sea Catchments Elevation Breakdown Analytical units

Adding the elevation breakdown

CLC CORILIS EBGDLT CRITERIA DEPENDENT LAYERS Aggregation and/or Dominance STANDARD LAYERS

Thanks for your attention