Utility of National Spatial Data for Conservation Design Projects Steve Williams Biodiversity and Spatial Information Center North Carolina State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Spatial Resolution in Digital Images Digital Images –“Size” can change easily (zoom, subset, mosaic) –Pixel size is assumed not to change within an image.
Advertisements

VEGETATION MAPPING FOR LANDFIRE National Implementation.
NLCD and MODIS Landuse Processing Tools and Projection Issues in Modeling Limei Ran and Alison Eyth Center for Environmental Modeling for Policy Development.
Tom Craven Matt Simon Anne Trainor.  Construct a RHESSys ecohydrologic model for Sandhills Region.
Snapshot of Northeast Ohio Environment. Overview Topography Watersheds Parks and Conservation Areas Land Cover (developed areas, forests, wetlands, agriculture)
Characteristics, uses, and sources Introduction to DEMs.
DETERMINING LAND DEVELOPMENT EFFECT ON SURFACE RUNOFF USING GIS.
C-CAP The Coastal Change Analysis Program Overview of C-CAP Products, Vision, Status, and Related Tools from the Coastal Services Center.
Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics (MRLC) Consortium Great Lakes Regional Data Exchange Land Cover / Land Use Chicago, IL April 27, 2005 Steve Raber.
APPLYING FOREST SIMULATION MODELING TO TEST THE IMPACT OF CLIMATIC CHANGE ON SELECTED ECOSYSTEMS AT TWO MOUNTAIN TRANSECTS IN NEVADA Mike Hay, Franco Biondi,
Multispectral Remote Sensing Systems
Green Vegetation Fraction (GVF) derived from the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) sensor onboard the SNPP satellite Zhangyan Jiang 1,2,
Some Significant Current Projects. Landsat Multispectral Scanner (MSS) and Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) Sensor System Characteristics.
Data Merging and GIS Integration
The Coeur d'Alene Tribe is learning the remote sensing methodology developed by LANDFIRE, and will be attempting to apply the methods to higher resolution.
Digital Elevation Models And Relief Models 1DEM. Part 1: The Underlying Elevation Data 2DEM.
Utilization of the SWAT Model and Remote Sensing to Demonstrate the Effects of Shrub Encroachment on a Small Watershed Jason Afinowicz Department of Biological.
PREFER 1 st Annual Review Meeting, 5-6 Dec 2013, Milano-Italy PREFER WP3.1 - Information Support to Preparedness/Prevention Phase Product: “Daily Fire.
Published in Remote Sensing of the Environment in May 2008.
CEOS - NSLRSDA Footprint Server John Faundeen U.S. Geological Survey October Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Finding An Ideal Ski Resort Location GIS Group Project: Meredith Faust Dana French Kalyna Malm.
An Object-oriented Classification Approach for Analyzing and Characterizing Urban Landscape at the Parcel Level Weiqi Zhou, Austin Troy& Morgan Grove University.
Vegetation Continuous Fields and the new Land Water Mask Mark Carroll John Townshend Rob Sohlberg Charlene DiMiceli Department of Geography University.
Geographic Information Systems Other Digital Data.
Utility of National Spatial Data for Conservation Design Projects Steve Williams Biodiversity and Spatial Information Center North Carolina State University.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Assessment of Conifer Health in Grand County, Colorado using Remotely Sensed Imagery Chris Cole.
NATHAN FOSTER WARM SEASON WORKSHOP 5/2/12 The Flash Flood Potential Index (FFPI) Project at BTV.
Saving the Chesapeake’s Great Rivers and Special Places High Resolution Land Cover Data in the Chesapeake Bay Chesapeake Conservancy.
Using spectral data to discriminate land cover types.
GTOPO30 Global 30-arc-second (1-km) elevation model - “Best available” global DEM - Initial release: March Widely used for climate modeling, land.
Descriptive Analysis Database Archive monitoring network locations, climate, emissions, wildfires, census, political, physical, and image databases Databases.
Remotely Sensed Data EMP 580 Fall 2015 Dr. Jim Graham Materials from Sara Hanna.
ORNL DAAC Spatial Data Access Tool (SDAT): Internet tools to access and visualize land-based data National Aeronautics and Space Administration
How do we represent the world in a GIS database?
Thematic Workshop on Standardization and Exchange of Land Use and Cover Information Wednesday, April 27, 2005 Chicago, Illinois.
Slide #1 Emerging Remote Sensing Data, Systems, and Tools to Support PEM Applications for Resource Management Olaf Niemann Department of Geography University.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey LANDFIRE Paul Bourget SGT, Inc., contractor to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Earth Resources.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Mid Decadal Global Land Survey Project briefing to the ScanEx RDC 3 rd International Conference,
Remote Sensing Classification Systems
Global map layers Additional global data sets such as Hydrology data (Hydrosheds), new and updated Landcover data (Globcover), demographic data and others.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Topographic Data Update IGOL: Rome September 13-15, 2004 Doug Muchoney USGS.
Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service.
Project Status  Project schedule and re-baselining. Operations and Maintenance Plan  Purpose, Functions, Organization/Governance  Implementation and.
North American Carbon Program Sub-pixel Analysis of a 1-km Resolution Land-Water Mask Source of Data: The North American sub-pixel water mask product is.
ORNL DAAC MODIS Subsetting and Visualization tools Tools and services to access subsets of MODIS data Suresh K. Santhana Vannan National Aeronautics and.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Entering A New Landsat Era – The Future is Now Tom Loveland U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources.
Land Cover Characterization Program National Mapping Division EROS Data CenterU. S. Geological Survey The National Land Cover Dataset of the Multi- Resolution.
GIS Data Structures How do we represent the world in a GIS database?
Quadrilateral Data Structure Geodetic latitude and longitude on GRS80/WGS 84 ellipsoid(NAD 83) Grid cell resolution constant N-S but progressively finer.
Rasters Steve Signell, Instructor Robert Poirier, TA School of Science Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Monday, February.
Fundamentals of GIS Lecture 16: Data Input I: Selected Public Data Lecture notes by Austin Troy, University of Vermont © Using GIS--
Terrain Susceptibility Kyle Renner GIS in Water Resources 2015
REMOTE SENSING DATA Markus Törmä Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Helsinki University of Technology
Tom Kutcher Natural Resources Specialist Narragansett Bay NERR Selection of an Effective Classification Scheme.
Mapping the Thermal Climate of the HJ Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon Jonathan Smith Spatial Climate Analysis Service Oregon State University Corvallis,
High Spatial Resolution Land Cover Development for the Coastal United States Eric Morris (Presenter) Chris Robinson The Baldwin Group at NOAA Office for.
The Vegetation Drought Response Index (VegDRI) An Update on Progress and Future Activities Brian Wardlow 1, Jesslyn Brown 2, Tsegaye Tadesse 1, and Yingxin.
Surface Analysis Tools. Lesson 7 overview  Topographic data  Sources  Uses  Topographic analysis  Hillshade  Visibility  Contours  Slope, aspect,
Rasters Peter Fox – based on materials from Steve Signell
VegDRI History, Current Status, and Related Activities
Terrain modelling: the basics
CyberGIS: Reston, VA, September 22, 2018
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Understanding and Assembling Model Input
An Enhanced Canopy Cover Layer for Hydrologic Modeling
Limei Ran and Alison Eyth
NASA alert as Russian and US satellites crash in space
EMP 580 Fall 2015 Dr. Jim Graham Materials from Sara Hanna
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources
Presentation transcript:

Utility of National Spatial Data for Conservation Design Projects Steve Williams Biodiversity and Spatial Information Center North Carolina State University PIF CDW St. Louis, MO April 11, 2006

Types of Data  Biological Land cover, species occurrence (surveys)… Land cover, species occurrence (surveys)…  Physical Terrain, soils… Terrain, soils…  Climatic Precipitation, temperature… Precipitation, temperature…  Biological Land cover, species occurrence (surveys)… Land cover, species occurrence (surveys)…  Physical Terrain, soils… Terrain, soils…  Climatic Precipitation, temperature… Precipitation, temperature…

EROS Data Center

EDC Land Cover Products  National Land Cover Dataset 1992 (NLCD 92) A U.S. land cover classification product based primarily on 1992 Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) data. A U.S. land cover classification product based primarily on 1992 Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) data. 30m 2 cell resolution 30m 2 cell resolution 21 classes 21 classes  Land Use and Land cover Data (LULC) A global land cover database primarily derived from 1992 to km AVHRR data. A global land cover database primarily derived from 1992 to km AVHRR data.  AVHRR NDVI Composites Weekly and biweekly NDVI composites based on 1-km AVHRR data (1980 to present). Weekly and biweekly NDVI composites based on 1-km AVHRR data (1980 to present).  National Land Cover Dataset 1992 (NLCD 92) A U.S. land cover classification product based primarily on 1992 Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) data. A U.S. land cover classification product based primarily on 1992 Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) data. 30m 2 cell resolution 30m 2 cell resolution 21 classes 21 classes  Land Use and Land cover Data (LULC) A global land cover database primarily derived from 1992 to km AVHRR data. A global land cover database primarily derived from 1992 to km AVHRR data.  AVHRR NDVI Composites Weekly and biweekly NDVI composites based on 1-km AVHRR data (1980 to present). Weekly and biweekly NDVI composites based on 1-km AVHRR data (1980 to present).

EDC Elevation Products  National Elevation Dataset (NED) Seamless 10- and 30-meter digital raster elevation data covers the conterminous U.S., Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands. Features periodic updates to incorporate the best available source data (primarily USGS 10 and 30-meter DEMs). Seamless 10- and 30-meter digital raster elevation data covers the conterminous U.S., Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands. Features periodic updates to incorporate the best available source data (primarily USGS 10 and 30-meter DEMs).  Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) Seamless SRTM "Finished" 1 arc second (30 meter posting) digital raster elevation covers the United States and its territories and possesions. Seamless SRTM "Finished" 3 arc second (90 meter posting) digital raster elevation covers the globe between 60 degrees N and 56 degrees S latitude. SRTM "Finished" was supplied by NGA. Seamless SRTM "Finished" 1 arc second (30 meter posting) digital raster elevation covers the United States and its territories and possesions. Seamless SRTM "Finished" 3 arc second (90 meter posting) digital raster elevation covers the globe between 60 degrees N and 56 degrees S latitude. SRTM "Finished" was supplied by NGA.  National Elevation Dataset (NED) Seamless 10- and 30-meter digital raster elevation data covers the conterminous U.S., Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands. Features periodic updates to incorporate the best available source data (primarily USGS 10 and 30-meter DEMs). Seamless 10- and 30-meter digital raster elevation data covers the conterminous U.S., Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands. Features periodic updates to incorporate the best available source data (primarily USGS 10 and 30-meter DEMs).  Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) Seamless SRTM "Finished" 1 arc second (30 meter posting) digital raster elevation covers the United States and its territories and possesions. Seamless SRTM "Finished" 3 arc second (90 meter posting) digital raster elevation covers the globe between 60 degrees N and 56 degrees S latitude. SRTM "Finished" was supplied by NGA. Seamless SRTM "Finished" 1 arc second (30 meter posting) digital raster elevation covers the United States and its territories and possesions. Seamless SRTM "Finished" 3 arc second (90 meter posting) digital raster elevation covers the globe between 60 degrees N and 56 degrees S latitude. SRTM "Finished" was supplied by NGA.

EDC Sensor Arrays  ASTER High-resolution (15- to 90-meter) multispectral data from the Terra satellite (2000 to present). High-resolution (15- to 90-meter) multispectral data from the Terra satellite (2000 to present).  MODIS Moderate-resolution (250- to 1000-meter) multispectral data from the Terra Satellite (2000 to present) and Aqua Satellite (2002 to present). Moderate-resolution (250- to 1000-meter) multispectral data from the Terra Satellite (2000 to present) and Aqua Satellite (2002 to present).  Hyperion and Advanced Land Imager (ALI) 10- to 30-meter multispectral and hyperspectral data from the Earth Observing-1 (EO-1) Extended Mission (2000 to present). 10- to 30-meter multispectral and hyperspectral data from the Earth Observing-1 (EO-1) Extended Mission (2000 to present).  ETM+ (Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus) High-resolution (15- to 60-meter) multispectral data from Landsat 7 (1999 to present). High-resolution (15- to 60-meter) multispectral data from Landsat 7 (1999 to present).  TM (Thematic Mapper) 30- to 120-meter multispectral data from Landsat 4 and 5 (1982 to present). 30- to 120-meter multispectral data from Landsat 4 and 5 (1982 to present).  MSS (Multispectral Scanner) 80-meter multispectral data from Landsats 1 to 5 (1972 to 1992). 80-meter multispectral data from Landsats 1 to 5 (1972 to 1992).  ASTER High-resolution (15- to 90-meter) multispectral data from the Terra satellite (2000 to present). High-resolution (15- to 90-meter) multispectral data from the Terra satellite (2000 to present).  MODIS Moderate-resolution (250- to 1000-meter) multispectral data from the Terra Satellite (2000 to present) and Aqua Satellite (2002 to present). Moderate-resolution (250- to 1000-meter) multispectral data from the Terra Satellite (2000 to present) and Aqua Satellite (2002 to present).  Hyperion and Advanced Land Imager (ALI) 10- to 30-meter multispectral and hyperspectral data from the Earth Observing-1 (EO-1) Extended Mission (2000 to present). 10- to 30-meter multispectral and hyperspectral data from the Earth Observing-1 (EO-1) Extended Mission (2000 to present).  ETM+ (Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus) High-resolution (15- to 60-meter) multispectral data from Landsat 7 (1999 to present). High-resolution (15- to 60-meter) multispectral data from Landsat 7 (1999 to present).  TM (Thematic Mapper) 30- to 120-meter multispectral data from Landsat 4 and 5 (1982 to present). 30- to 120-meter multispectral data from Landsat 4 and 5 (1982 to present).  MSS (Multispectral Scanner) 80-meter multispectral data from Landsats 1 to 5 (1972 to 1992). 80-meter multispectral data from Landsats 1 to 5 (1972 to 1992).

 11. Open Water  12. Perennial Ice/Snow  21. Developed, Open Space  22. Developed, Low Intensity  23. Developed, Medium Intensity  24. Developed, High Intensity  31. Barren Land (Rock/Sand/Clay)  32. Unconsolidated Shore*  41. Deciduous Forest  42. Evergreen Forest  43. Mixed Forest  51. Dwarf Scrub  52. Shrub/Scrub NLCD 2001 Land Cover Class Definitions (27 classes)  71. Grassland/Herbaceous  72. Sedge/Herbaceous  73. Lichens  74. Moss  81. Pasture/Hay  82. Cultivated Crops  90. Woody Wetlands 91. Palustrine Forested Wetland* 91. Palustrine Forested Wetland* 92. Palustrine Scrub/Shrub Wetland* 92. Palustrine Scrub/Shrub Wetland* 93. Estuarine Forested Wetland* 93. Estuarine Forested Wetland* 94. Estuarine Scrub/Shrub Wetland* 94. Estuarine Scrub/Shrub Wetland*  95. Emergent Herbaceous Wetlands 96. Palustrine Emergent Wetland (Persistent)* 96. Palustrine Emergent Wetland (Persistent)* 97. Estuarine Emergent Wetland* 97. Estuarine Emergent Wetland* 98. Palustrine Aquatic Bed* 98. Palustrine Aquatic Bed* 99. Estuarine Aquatic Bed* 99. Estuarine Aquatic Bed*  71. Grassland/Herbaceous  72. Sedge/Herbaceous  73. Lichens  74. Moss  81. Pasture/Hay  82. Cultivated Crops  90. Woody Wetlands 91. Palustrine Forested Wetland* 91. Palustrine Forested Wetland* 92. Palustrine Scrub/Shrub Wetland* 92. Palustrine Scrub/Shrub Wetland* 93. Estuarine Forested Wetland* 93. Estuarine Forested Wetland* 94. Estuarine Scrub/Shrub Wetland* 94. Estuarine Scrub/Shrub Wetland*  95. Emergent Herbaceous Wetlands 96. Palustrine Emergent Wetland (Persistent)* 96. Palustrine Emergent Wetland (Persistent)* 97. Estuarine Emergent Wetland* 97. Estuarine Emergent Wetland* 98. Palustrine Aquatic Bed* 98. Palustrine Aquatic Bed* 99. Estuarine Aquatic Bed* 99. Estuarine Aquatic Bed*

NLCD 2001 Currently Available

Gap Analysis Land Cover for the Eastern US  Based on NatureServe Ecological Systems  135 classes expected in Southeast  Basis for habitat modeling for vertebrate species  Based on NatureServe Ecological Systems  135 classes expected in Southeast  Basis for habitat modeling for vertebrate species

Ancillary Data to Support to Ecological System Mapping  Fine to Mid-scale  (1:24-1:100 k) Landform Model Landform Model Riparian Model Riparian Model Aerial Photo Reference Data Aerial Photo Reference Data National Wetland Inventory National Wetland Inventory NLCD 2001 Land cover NLCD 2001 Land cover  Coarse scale (1:250000) Ecological System Ranges Ecological System Ranges STATSGO Soils STATSGO Soils Omernick’s Ecoregions Omernick’s Ecoregions  Fine to Mid-scale  (1:24-1:100 k) Landform Model Landform Model Riparian Model Riparian Model Aerial Photo Reference Data Aerial Photo Reference Data National Wetland Inventory National Wetland Inventory NLCD 2001 Land cover NLCD 2001 Land cover  Coarse scale (1:250000) Ecological System Ranges Ecological System Ranges STATSGO Soils STATSGO Soils Omernick’s Ecoregions Omernick’s Ecoregions

LANDFIRE Data Products FARSITE Fuel layers:  13 Anderson (1982) Fire Behavior Fuel Models  40 Scott and Burgan (2005) Fire Behavior Fuel Models  Forest Canopy Bulk Density  Forest Canopy Base Height  Forest Canopy Height  Forest Canopy Cover  Elevation  Aspect  Slope Fire Regime layers:  FRCC  FRCC Departure Index Fire Regime Groups  Mean Fire Return Interval  Percent Low-severity Fire  Percent Mixed-severity Fire  Percent Replacement-severity Fire  Succession Classes FARSITE Fuel layers:  13 Anderson (1982) Fire Behavior Fuel Models  40 Scott and Burgan (2005) Fire Behavior Fuel Models  Forest Canopy Bulk Density  Forest Canopy Base Height  Forest Canopy Height  Forest Canopy Cover  Elevation  Aspect  Slope Fire Regime layers:  FRCC  FRCC Departure Index Fire Regime Groups  Mean Fire Return Interval  Percent Low-severity Fire  Percent Mixed-severity Fire  Percent Replacement-severity Fire  Succession Classes Vegetation layers:  Environmental Site Potential  Biophysical Settings  Existing Vegetation  Existing Vegetation Height  Existing Vegetation Cover  Vegetation Dynamics Models Fire Effects layers:  Fuel Loading Models

PhysicalPhysical

Based on Digital Line Graph (DLG) data and and EPA Reach File (RF3) data (RF3) data Initially 1:100k, but 1:24k updates are almost complete for US

Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Data “Soil Data Viewer provides users access to soil interpretations and soil properties while shielding them from the complexity of the soil database”

NRCS – STATSGO Database  The STATSGO database is being updated and renamed to the Digital General Soil Map of the United States. The update is scheduled for completion April 30,  Scale 1:250,000  The STATSGO database is being updated and renamed to the Digital General Soil Map of the United States. The update is scheduled for completion April 30,  Scale 1:250,000

NRCS – SSURGO Database  Soil Survey Geographic Database  Detailed county based soil surveys  Completion of the SSURGO data digitizing is scheduled for 2008  Soil Survey Geographic Database  Detailed county based soil surveys  Completion of the SSURGO data digitizing is scheduled for

NRCS – SSURGO Database

EPA Ecoregion Products

Omernik Ecoregions Level 4

Avian Data

Birds of NA

Stewardship Data

Protected Areas Database Conservation Biology Institute 260 SW Madison Avenue, Suite 106 Corvallis, OR USA Phone: (541) , Fax: (541) Version 4 (Jan. 2006) CD-ROM$35

Protected Areas Database

Climatic Data

SpatialClimateAnalysisServiceSpatialClimateAnalysisService

Spatial Climate Analysis Service (SCAS)  PRISM modeling Parameter-elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model Parameter-elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model  MapServer Explorer  ASCII grid format  4km resolution  2km data (high resolution) available through Climate Source at  PRISM modeling Parameter-elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model Parameter-elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model  MapServer Explorer  ASCII grid format  4km resolution  2km data (high resolution) available through Climate Source at

DAYMET Daily Surface and Weather Climatalogical Summaries  Utilizes a digital elevation model and daily observations of minimum and maximum temperatures and precipitation to create data sets  Temperature  Precipitation  Humidity  Radiation  1 km resolution  18 year daily data set  Utilizes a digital elevation model and daily observations of minimum and maximum temperatures and precipitation to create data sets  Temperature  Precipitation  Humidity  Radiation  1 km resolution  18 year daily data set

SummarySummary  Lots of data out there  Access is getting easier  Get to know the data sets you’re working with. Most have flaws – some that may be critical to your output.  Lots of data out there  Access is getting easier  Get to know the data sets you’re working with. Most have flaws – some that may be critical to your output. “Although conceptually simple….applying the methodology can be onerous” Shifley and Thompson “Although conceptually simple….applying the methodology can be onerous” Shifley and Thompson