ENVIRONMENTAL LAYERS MEETING IPLANT TUCSON 2012-04-03 Roundup Benoit Parmentier.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Has EO found its customers? Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit GLC2000 GLOBAL LEGEND GLC 2000 – “FIRST RESULTS” WORKSHOP JRC – Ispra, March 2002.
Advertisements

A Land Cover Map of Eurasia’s Boreal Ecosystems S. BARTALEV, A. S. BELWARD Institute for Environment and Sustainability, EC Joint Research Centre, Italy.
GLC 2000 ‘Final Results’ Workshop (JRC-Ispra, 24 ~ 26 March, 2003) GLC 2000 ‘Final Results’ Workshop (JRC-Ispra, 24 ~ 26 March, 2003) LAND COVER MAP OF.
LAND COVER MAPPING OVER France USING S1-S10 VEGETATION DATASET J-L CHAMPEAUX, S. GARRIGUES METEO-FRANCE GLC 2000 – “FIRST RESULTS” WORKSHOP JRC – Ispra,
Scaling Biomass Measurements for Examining MODIS Derived Vegetation Products Matthew C. Reeves and Maosheng Zhao Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group.
Production of land cover map of Asia, Central Asia, and Middle East with emphasis of the development of ground truth database Ryutaro Tateishi, Hiroshi.
Literature Review Kathryn Westerman Oliver Smith Enrique Hernandez Megan Fowler.
VEGETATION MAPPING FOR LANDFIRE National Implementation.
Has EO found its customers? Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit GLC2000 Land Cover Classification.
GIS and Spatial Statistics: Methods and Applications in Public Health
Princeton University Global Evaluation of a MODIS based Evapotranspiration Product Eric Wood Hongbo Su Matthew McCabe.
Geographic data: sources and considerations. Geographical Concepts: Geographic coordinate system: defines locations on the earth using an angular unit.
Hydrological Modeling FISH 513 April 10, Overview: What is wrong with simple statistical regressions of hydrologic response on impervious area?
Time series – spatial information ESPON workshop, 6 th May 2010 Oscar Gomez, EEA.
Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit 1 Towards a global Land Cover 2000 product: the preliminary version of the global product and how it can be improved.
Validation of the GLC2000 products Philippe Mayaux.
Overview Minimum required classifiers for mapping vegetation cover at global scale using the FAO-LCCS tool GLC LEGEND hjs/30-Apr-01.
Integrating Global Species Distributions, Remote Sensing and Climate Station Data to Assess Biodiversity Response to Climate Change Adam Wilson & Walter.
Integrating global species distributions, remote sensing and climate data to model change in species distributions.
Satellite Data Access – Giovanni, LAADS, and NEO Training Workshop in Partnership with BAAQMD Santa Clara, CA September 10 – 12, 2013 Applied Remote SEnsing.
Climate Grid Analysis Toolset (CGAT) Kirk Sherrill - GIS Specialist Brent Frakes – Geographer NRPC – I&M Division – GIS Program George Wright Society Conference.
International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) ISL 2004 RiskCity Exercise 5: Generating an elements at risk database Cees.
Esri International User Conference | San Diego, CA Technical Workshops | Spatial Statistics: Best Practices Lauren Rosenshein, MS Lauren M. Scott, PhD.
Spatial Interpolation of monthly precipitation by Kriging method
Land_Cover_CCI – CMUG Co-location Meeting, Reading, March 2011 Land Cover_CCI Pierre Defourny et al. Univ.cath. de Louvain.
Senegal Change Assessment Ugo Leonardi GLCN Land Cover/Remote Rensing Expert
Lu Liang, Peng Gong Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley And Center for Earth System Science,
Has EO found its customers? Results of GLC2000 Legend Workshop November 2000 JRC / Ispra.
Development and evaluation of Passive Microwave SWE retrieval equations for mountainous area Naoki Mizukami.
ENVIRONMENTAL LAYERS IPLANT MEETING WEBEX Roundup 3 Benoit Parmentier.
ENVIRONMENTAL LAYERS MEETING IPLANT TUCSON Roundup Benoit Parmentier.
North American Croplands Teki Sankey and Richard Massey Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, AZ.
Quality control of daily data on example of Central European series of air temperature, relative humidity and precipitation P. Štěpánek (1), P. Zahradníček.
MODIS OCEAN QA Browse Imagery (MQABI Browse Tool) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Sept 4, 2003
An Adaptive Management Model for the Red River Basin of the North.
Spatially Assessing Model Error Using Geographically Weighted Regression Shawn Laffan Geography Dept ANU.
1 Directional Difference of Satellite Land Surface Temperature Yunyue Yu NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
Spatial Interpolation Chapter 13. Introduction Land surface in Chapter 13 Land surface in Chapter 13 Also a non-existing surface, but visualized as a.
1 Upscaling of Site-Specific Nitrate-Nitrogen Measurements to the Watershed Scale in the Santa Fe River Watershed S. Lamsal, S. Grunwald, C. M. Bliss,
EEA 2006 Accounts Update Tables. PART 1 Table 1.1: Classifying land cover and land cover change for land accounting.
WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management Akm Saiful Islam Lecture-7:Extereme Climate Indicators.
Remote Sensing Classification Accuracy
Land cover mapping of Asia , Central Asia, and Middle East for GLC2000 project Ryutaro Tateishi, Hiroshi Sato, and Zhu Lin Center for Environmental Remote.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Bee Lake Water Quality Monitor Data Summary Period of record: to 2/19/07.
LDOPE QA Tools Sadashiva Devadiga (SSAI) MODIS LDOPE January 18, 2007.
ENVIRONMENTAL LAYERS MEETING IPLANT TUCSON Roundup Benoit Parmentier.
An Improved Global Snow Classification Dataset for Hydrologic Applications (Photo by Kenneth G. Libbrecht and Patricia Rasmussen) Glen E. Liston, CSU Matthew.
Assessment of CCI Glacier and CCI Land cover data for hydrological modeling of the Arctic ocean drainage basin David Gustafsson, Kristina Isberg, Jörgen.
1. The Study of Excess Nitrogen in the Neuse River Basin “A Landscape Level Analysis of Potential Excess Nitrogen in East-Central North Carolina, USA”
DEMs Download from Seamless Server Project Mosaic Calculate Slope Create a DEM (ArcGIS)
A Project Linking In-situ and Satellite Measurements to Validate MODIS Terrestrial Ecology Products Warren B. Cohen, US Forest Service; Stith T. Gower,
ENVIRONMENTAL LAYERS MEETING IPLANT TUCSON Roundup Benoit Parmentier.
Debra Harrington and Haizhi Chen FDEP Groundwater Protection June, 2005 HYDROPORT RETRIEVAL APPLICATION FOR ASSESSMENTS.
Mapping Spatial Distribution of Land Cover Classification Errors Maria João Pereira, Amílcar Soares CERENA – Centre for Natural Resources and Environment.
GLC 2000 Workshop March 2003 Land cover map of southern hemisphere Africa using SPOT-4 VEGETATION data Ana Cabral 1, Maria J.P. de Vasconcelos 1,2,
INTEGRATING SATELLITE AND MONITORING DATA TO RETROSPECTIVELY ESTIMATE MONTHLY PM 2.5 CONCENTRATIONS IN THE EASTERN U.S. Christopher J. Paciorek 1 and Yang.
UNCEEA NYC June 2009 Land Cover and Land Use Classifications in the SEEA Revision Xiaoning Gong (FAO) & Jean-Louis Weber (EEA) Fourth Meeting of.
Biostatistics Regression and Correlation Methods Class #10 April 4, 2000.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Chandra Giri Ying Zhong 7/15/2015 Cropland Extent Mapping in South America.
Mapping the Thermal Climate of the HJ Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon Jonathan Smith Spatial Climate Analysis Service Oregon State University Corvallis,
Science Review Panel Meeting Biosphere 2, Tucson, AZ - January 4-5, 2011 Vegetation Phenology and Vegetation Index Products from Multiple Long Term Satellite.
Detect geographic and temporal patterns of land use and land cover change in China from 1982 to 2012 Yaqian He, Eungul Lee, and Timothy A. Warner May 5.
Modified Rational Method for Texas Watersheds
Paraguay Landscape Analysis
Evaluating Land-Use Classification Methodology Using Landsat Imagery
1. The Study of Excess Nitrogen in the Neuse River Basin
Jan Horálek (CHMI) Peter de Smet, Frank de Leeuw (RIVM),
Validation for TPW (PGE06)
Paraguay Landscape Analysis
ENM 310 Design of Experiments and Regression Analysis Chapter 3
Presentation transcript:

ENVIRONMENTAL LAYERS MEETING IPLANT TUCSON Roundup Benoit Parmentier

What I have been doing working on: 1)Visualization of RMSE fit for Geographically Weighted Regression Writing a code in R to visualize the RMSE using -Stations location -Kriged error surface from stations 2)Producing LST daily mean Python script (with IDRISI API but with GDAL in mind) to calculate: -Daily mean -Number of valid observation per day. 3) GAM prediction Some GAM predictions with interaction terms Including daily mean LST and LC in the GAM regression

1)Visualization of RMSE fit for Geographically Weighted Regression Writing a code in R to visualize the RMSE using -Stations location -Kriged error surface from stations 1)VISUALIZATION OF RMSE  Moving beyond aggregate statistic…

RMSE FIT USING GWR WITH 30% RETAINED FOR VALIDATION

Run 10-Fit residuals from gwr using

Run 9-Fit residuals from gwr using

Run 8-Fit residuals from gwr using

Run 7-Fit residuals from gwr using

Fit residuals from gwr using Run 6-Fit residuals from gwr using Potentially useful to have the 2 sd thresholds…

Run 5-Fit residuals from gwr using

Run 4-Fit residuals from gwr using

Run 3-Fit residuals from gwr using NO KRIGED FIT

Run 8-Fit residuals from gwr using Run 2-Fit residuals from gwr using

Run 8-Fit residuals from gwr using Run 9-Fit residuals from gwr using Run 1-Fit residuals from gwr using

Python script (with IDRISI API but with GDAL in mind) to calculate: -Daily mean -Number of valid observation per day. LST DAILY MEAM PRODUCTION

MOD11A1 hdf OR83M.rst Mosaic Reprojection QC flags Level 1 and 2 Masking Low quality Daily MeanDaily Valid Obs. WORKFLOW DAILY MEAN CALCULATION Part of the process is automated in python with IDRISI API. Downloading Missing Data Assessment

OREGON- DAILY MEAN FOR DOY 001 mean_day001_rescaled.rst

OREGON-NUMBER OF VALID OBSERVATION FOR DOY 001 mean_day_valid_obs_001_Sum.rst

OREGON- DAILY MEAN FOR DOY 182 mean_day182_rescaled.rst

OREGON-NUMBER OF VALID OBSERVATION FOR DOY 182 mean_day_valid_obs_182_Sum.rst

SUMMARY INFORMATION OF THE DAILY MEAN CALCULATION  A full assessment of the temporal and spatial distribution of mean would be necessary: -Most dates have 10 images (on average 9.88 images). -The number of valid values seems to be lower in Winter (more check needed). -Average per month may be quite helpful. Missing data: The average was done over the time period and there were 45 missing images (out of a total of 3652). Missing DOY 78 to 88: to Missing DOY 166 to 181: to (with July 01 missing 2) Missing DOY 301 to 305 Missing DOY 351 to 357: to (355 to 357 missing 2)

3)GAM MODELING USING LST AND LC  GAM regressions: Some GAM predictions with interaction terms Including daily mean LST and LC in the GAM regression

Aggregated Classification class Class No. GLC UMDMODISGlobCover 2 Forest1 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, 8 1,2,3,4,5, 6 1,2,3,4,5, 8 40,50,60,70,90,100,160,17 0 Shrub29,10,11,12,147,8,96,7,9110,120,130,150 Grass Crop ,14 Mosaic 3 517, ,30 Urban Barren Snow Wetland Water body Table 5. Legend for the 10 aggregated land cover classes and the corresponding classes from the six individual global land cover legends. Modified from (Nakaegawa 2011). 1 I added class 3 to ‘forest’ since it was missing in original table. The class 2 entry under ‘shrub’ is probably an error and so is removed. 2 GlobCover class assignment needs to be finalized. 3 Mosaic is composed of cropland and natural vegetation. LAND COVER CONSENSUS CATEGORIES

GAM MODELS USED FOR THIS ANALYSIS mod1<- tmax~ s(lat) + s (lon) + s (ELEV_SRTM) mod2<- tmax~ s(lat,lon,ELEV_SRTM) mod3<- tmax~ s(lat) + s (lon) + s (ELEV_SRTM) + s (Northness)+ s (Eastness) + s(DISTOC) mod4<- tmax~ s(lat) + s (lon) + s(ELEV_SRTM) + s(Northness) + s (Eastness) + s(DISTOC) + s(LST) mod5<- tmax~ s(lat,lon) +s(ELEV_SRTM) + s(Northness,Eastness) + s(DISTOC) + s(LST) mod6<- tmax~ s(lat,lon) +s(ELEV_SRTM) + s(Northness,Eastness) + s(DISTOC) + s(LST,LC1) mod7<- tmax~ s(lat,lon) +s(ELEV_SRTM) + s(Northness,Eastness) + s(DISTOC) + s(LST,LC3)

RMSE FOR DIFFERENT DATES AND MODELS

RMSE FOR ALL DATES AND MODELS

PROBLEM WITH MISSING DATA If screening is used such as LST> 258 & LST<313) … the number of observations can drop to 48 and 20 for training and testing compared to 120 and 50 stations.

What's next..? 1)Continue the Visualization of RMSE for GAM and GWR 2) Influence of sampling on results GWR Prediction 3)Producing LST monthly 4) GAM using LST and Land Cover 5) Use Kriging and co-kriging to predict tmax 6) Documentation of the analysis