Geant4 Low Energy Polarized Compton Processes Gerardo Depaola * Francesco Longo + Francesco Longo + * National University of Córdoba (Argentina) + University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NDVCS measurement with BoNuS RTPC M. Osipenko December 2, 2009, CLAS12 Central Detector Collaboration meeting.
Advertisements

Advanced GAmma Tracking Array
Gamma-Ray Spectra _ + The photomultiplier records the (UV) light emitted during electronic recombination in the scintillator. Therefore, the spectrum collected.
Tony Hyun Kim (Partner: Connor McEntee) 12/1/ MW2-5 Prof. Roland.
Chapter2: Compton Effect Professor Mohammad Sajjad Alam University at Albany September 28, 2010 Adapted from Web Adapted from the Web.
Polarization of Light Waves
Now that we have determined the solutions to the differential equation describing the oscillations of the electric and magnetic fields with respect to.
Thurs. Nov. 12, 2009Physics 208, Lecture 211 From last time… EM waves Inductors in circuits I? + -
Evan Walsh Mentors: Ivan Bazarov and David Sagan August 13, 2010.
Degree of polarization of  produced in quasielastic charge current neutrino-nucleus scattering Krzysztof M. Graczyk Jaroslaw Nowak Institute of Theoretical.
ARPES (Angle Resolved PhotoEmission Spectroscopy) Michael Browne 11/19/2007.
20 February 2002Geant4 Users' Workhsop, SLAC1 Low-Energy Electromagnetic Processes in P. Nieminen (ESA-ESTEC)
Light and Matter Tim Freegarde School of Physics & Astronomy University of Southampton Controlling light with matter.
Particle Interactions
Compton Scattering Experiment John Klumpp And Ainsley Niemkiewicz.
LESSON 4 METO 621. The extinction law Consider a small element of an absorbing medium, ds, within the total medium s.
Compton Scattering Reporter: Hui He. Outline Theory Experimental setup Experimental results (1) Calibration (2) Angular Distribution of the 137 Cs Source.
March 2, 2011 Fill in derivation from last lecture Polarization of Thomson Scattering No class Friday, March 11.
The Secondary Electron Yield Model in ECLOUD and Comparison to CLOUDLAND Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
The linear algebra of Canadarm
RF background, analysis of MTA data & implications for MICE Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Collaboration Meeting – Analysis session, October.
Chapter 5 Jones Calculus and Its Application to Birefringent Optical Systems Lecture 1 Wave plates Wave plates (retardation plates) are optical elements.
1 ECE 480 Wireless Systems Lecture 3 Propagation and Modulation of RF Waves.
St. Petersburg State University. Department of Physics. Division of Computational Physics. COMPUTER SIMULATION OF CURRENT PRODUCED BY PULSE OF HARD RADIATION.
Summary of Work Zhang Qiwei INFN - CIAE. Validation of Geant4 EM physics for gamma rays against the SANDIA, EPDL97 and NIST databases.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم ” وقل رب زدنى علماً “ صدق الله العظيم.
Geant4 Low Energy Polarized Processes Gerardo Depaola * Francesco Longo + Francesco Longo + * National University of Córdoba (Argentina) + University of.
Incoherent pair background processes with full polarizations at the ILC Anthony Hartin JAI, Oxford University Physics, Denys Wilkinson Building, Keble.
Diffraction Basics Coherent scattering around atomic scattering centers occurs when x-rays interact with material In materials with a crystalline structure,
EXPERIMENTS WITH LARGE GAMMA DETECTOR ARRAYS Lecture IV Ranjan Bhowmik Inter University Accelerator Centre New Delhi
Inelastic scattering When the scattering is not elastic (new particles are produced) the energy and direction of the scattered electron are independent.
Simulation of the energy response of  rays in CsI crystal arrays Thomas ZERGUERRAS EXL-R3B Collaboration Meeting, Orsay (France), 02/02/ /03/2006.
M. Dugger, February Triplet polarimeter study Michael Dugger* Arizona State University *Work at ASU is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation.
Doc.: IEEE /0431r0 Submission April 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Polarization Model for 60 GHz Date: Authors:
Polarimetry in Astronomy Or Do you know where your photons are coming from? Elizabeth Corbett AAO.
Nonlinear Optics Lab. Hanyang Univ. Chapter 9. Wave-Particle Duality of Light 9.1 What is a Photon ? Whether light consists of particles or waves ? - ~1700,
Gamma ray interaction with matter A) Primary interactions 1) Coherent scattering (Rayleigh scattering) 2) Incoherent scattering (Compton scattering) 3)
Interactions of EM Radiation with Matter
Lecture 38 Radiation Energy Density EM Wave: Equal partitions: Intensity:
Initial (FLUKA) calculations for synchrotron radiation at TLep April 4 th, 2013 F. Cerutti, A. Ferrari, L. Lari* *BE Dept.
Accelerator Physics, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 In the figure: Photoelectric suppressed. Single Compton (effect of crystal dimensions).
Study of the Parity Violation Based on the SLEGS ( ) 范功涛 徐望 Ⅰ Background & Motivation Ⅱ Simulation Ⅲ Summary.
Gamma and X ray interactions
Low Angle X-ray Scattering (LAXS) for Tissue Characterization Dr M A Oghabian.
Goddard February 2003 R.Bellazzini - INFN Pisa A new X-Ray Polarimeter based on the photoelectric effect for Black Holes and Neutron Stars Astrophysics.
Electromagnetism Around 1800 classical physics knew: - 1/r 2 Force law of attraction between positive & negative charges. - v ×B Force law for a moving.
1 EFFECT OF EXITING PHOTON INELASTIC SCATTERING IN PHOTOIONIZATION OF ATOMS V.A. Kilin, R.Yu. Kilin Tomsk Polytechnic University.
Validation of the bremssrahlung process IV Workshop on Geant4 physics validation Susanna Guatelli, Luciano Pandola, Maria Grazia Pia, Valentina Zampichelli.
On the possibility of stop mass determination in photon-photon and e + e - collisions at ILC A.Bartl (Univ. of Vienna) W.Majerotto HEPHY (Vienna) K.Moenig.
Dipole radiation during collisions LL2 Section 68.
Radiation from electrons passing through helical undulator or colliding with circularly polarized laser wave V.Strakhovenko Budker Institute of Nuclear.
Hale COLLAGE (CU ASTR-7500) “Topics in Solar Observation Techniques” Lecture 3: Basic concepts in radiative transfer & polarization Spring 2016, Part 1.
A RUNAVA B HADRA AND B HAKTA K UNWAR High Energy & Cosmic Ray Research Centre, University of North Bengal, Siliguri, WB, India Scattered radiation from.
Interactions of Ionizing Radiation
Compton Scattering When light encounters charged particles, the particles will interact with the light and cause some of the light to be scattered. incident.
Dollan, Laihem, Lohse, Schälicke, Stahl 1 Monte Carlo based studies of polarized positrons source for the International Linear Collider (ILC)
Compton Effect X-Ray Scattering Classical Theory (cont’d): c) The scattered radiation should have the same frequency as the incident radiation d) Because.
Sect. 4.5: Cayley-Klein Parameters 3 independent quantities are needed to specify a rigid body orientation. Most often, we choose them to be the Euler.
Chapter 2 Radiation Interactions with Matter East China Institute of Technology School of Nuclear Engineering and Technology LIU Yi-Bao Wang Ling.
Measuring polarization at gamma-rays with Fermi
Electron Polarization effects in Compton X/γ-ray Sources
A.P. Potylitsyn, I.S. Tropin Tomsk Polytechnic University,
Interaction of gamma rays with matter
Progress with Spin Tracking in GEANT4
Elastic Scattering in Electromagnetism
Interaction of gamma rays with matter
Status of Compton Analysis
Scattering by free charges
Hour 38 Scattering Cross Sections
Geant4 Low Energy Compton Profile
Presentation transcript:

Geant4 Low Energy Polarized Compton Processes Gerardo Depaola * Francesco Longo + Francesco Longo + * National University of Córdoba (Argentina) + University of Trieste and INFN (Italia)

COMPTON SCATTERING The Klein Nishina cross section: Where, h 0 : energy of incident photon. h : energy of the scattered photon.  : angle between the two polarization vectors

Angles in the Compton Effect ä  Polar angle ä  Azimuthal angle ä  Polarization vector  O x  A Cy y O z x     h h   A C

Angular distribution Scattered Radiation composed of two components :  ’  and  ’   with respect of the AOC plane  ’   ’  CO  A h  ’   x

Summing over the two directions the cross section can be written as: Sample Methods implemented in G4LowEnergyPolarizedCompton class : Integrate over  Sample  Theta - Energy Relation Energy Sample of  from P(  ) = a (b – c cos 2  ) distribution

Results  distribution obtained with the class

Scattered Photon Polarization  is obtained from cos  = cos  N and  is sampled from Klein Nishina cross section

The Stokes Parameters Introduced by G. G. Stokes in 1852 to characterise a beam of light. They are represented by a 4-vector: where: I is the intensity; P 1 is the degree of plane polarization with respect to arbitrary orthogonal axes; P 2 is the degree of plane polarization with respect to a set of axes oriented at  /4 to right of the previous one and P 3 is the degree of circular polarization.

Examples of characterization of a beam by the Stokes parameters:

Interactions with the Stokes Parameters: When photons undergo an interaction, in general the Stokes parameters of the initial beam are transformed into a new set of parameters. The relation between these two Stokes vectors is given by a transformation matrix T characteristic of the interaction. That is: In this way, the fractional intensity detected with an analyzer characterized by the parameters (1,D) of a beam characterized by (I, P) that it transformed by an interaction represented by matrix T is :

Matrix transformation for the Compton scattering

Use of the Stokes Parameters. Example 1: Compton Scattering of Unpolarized Gamma rays. The Stoke parameters of an unpolarized bean undergo after Compton Scattering into: From the definition of the degree of polarization: One can see the scattered radiation of an unpolarized gamma ray will have some degree of polarization:

Sometimes is more easy, due the experimental setup, to measure the ratio of intensities with opposite polarization in the scattered beam, this ratio is defined by: where: yielding the result: For  = 0 and  we have p = 1, that is, an unpolarized beam. where the || and  refer to plane polarization parallel to and perpendicular to the plane of scattering, respectively.

Comparison between the theoretical rates of intensities with that obtained from GEANT4, for 3 energies: 100 keV, 1 MeV and 10 MeV.

Example 2: Compton Scattering of Polarized Gamma rays. Degree of polarization for scattered radiation by incident linearly polarized gamma ray of 100 keV (top left), 1 MeV (top right) and 10 MeV (left) as function of  and .

Comparison between the theoretical rates of intensities with that obtained from GEANT4 for 1 MeV Gamma rays. Simulate Theoretical:

Binding effects The above relations are valid for scattering by free electrons at rest. For unpolarized photon, the atomic binding effects are usually taken into account by introducing the incoherent scattering function S, with depends on the momentum transfer x = (k 0 /hc) sin(  /2) and the atomic number Z. As a theory describing the polarization- dependent binding effects is lacking at present, we assume, as it is usually done, that S(x,Z) is polarization–independent, an therefore: (here d  KN /d  is the Klein-Nishina cross section) In practice, this means that the scattering angle  must be determinated according to the form factor; , instead, is assumed to be unaffected by the binding effects, and can be calculated in the same way as for free electrons.

Conclusion The class reproduce very well the theoretical expectation. Unpolarized beam after Compton scattering, produced polarized radiation, so the polarization is always important to take into account. The Stokes parameters provide a suitable method to calculate the polarization of the scattered radiation.