The Atmospheric Data Assimilation Component Contributions from Lidia CucurullJim Purser John DerberMiodrag Rancic Yong HanXiujuan Su Daryl KleistRuss Treadon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© The Aerospace Corporation 2014 Observation Impact on WRF Model Forecast Accuracy over Southwest Asia Michael D. McAtee Environmental Satellite Systems.
Advertisements

Data Assimilation Andrew Collard. Overview Introduction to Atmospheric Data Assimilation Control Variables Observations Background Error Covariance Summary.
2. Description of MIIDAPS 1. Introduction A Generalized Approach to Microwave Satellite Data Assimilation Quality Control and Preprocessing Here, we present.
Satellite Radiance Assimilation John C. Derber Environmental Modeling Center NCEP/NWS/NOAA With input from: Many others.
Maturation of Data Assimilation Over the Last Two Decades John C. Derber Environmental Modeling Center NCEP/NWS/NOAA.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 Radiance Assimilation Activities at SPoRT Will McCarty SPoRT SAC Wednesday June 13,
Improved Simulations of Clouds and Precipitation Using WRF-GSI Zhengqing Ye and Zhijin Li NASA-JPL/UCLA June, 2011.
Slide 1 IPWG, Beijing, October 2008 Slide 1 Assimilation of rain and cloud-affected microwave radiances at ECMWF Alan Geer, Peter Bauer, Philippe.
Satellite SST Radiance Assimilation and SST Data Impacts James Cummings Naval Research Laboratory Monterey, CA Sea Surface Temperature Science.
ECMWF CO 2 Data Assimilation at ECMWF Richard Engelen European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Reading, United Kingdom Many thanks to Phil Watts,
1 ATOVS and SSM/I assimilation at the Met Office Stephen English, Dave Jones, Andrew Smith, Fiona Hilton and Keith Whyte.
1 Impact study of AMSR-E radiances in NCEP Global Data Assimilation System Masahiro Kazumori (1) Q. Liu (2), R. Treadon (1), J. C. Derber (1), F. Weng.
Quality control John Derber NCEP/EMC Reference slide at end.
Recent Progress on High Impact Weather Forecast with GOES ‐ R and Advanced IR Soundings Jun Li 1, Jinlong Li 1, Jing Zheng 1, Tim Schmit 2, and Hui Liu.
Improved NCEP SST Analysis
Data assimilation of polar orbiting satellites at ECMWF
UKmet February Hybrid Ensemble-Variational Data Assimilation Development A partnership to develop and implement a hybrid 3D-VAR system –Joint venture.
Operational Global Model Plans John Derber. Timeline July 25, 2013: Completion of phase 1 WCOSS transition August 20, 2013: GDAS/GFS model/analysis upgrade.
1 Data Impact Experiments at the JCSDA and NCEP/EMC S. Lord (NCEP/EMC) L.P. Riishojgaard (JCSDA) Contributions by: L. Cucurull, J. Jung, L. Bi, D. Kleist,
Use of GPS RO in Operations at NCEP
Towards Utilizing All-Sky Microwave Radiance Data in GEOS-5 Atmospheric Data Assimilation System Development of Observing System Simulation Experiments.
Assimilation of GOES Hourly and Meteosat winds in the NCEP Global Forecast System (GFS) Assimilation of GOES Hourly and Meteosat winds in the NCEP Global.
Applications and Limitations of Satellite Data Professor Ming-Dah Chou January 3, 2005 Department of Atmospheric Sciences National Taiwan University.
MIIDAPS Status – 13 th JCSDA Technical Review and Science Workshop, College Park, MD Quality Control-Consistent algorithm for all sensors to determine.
Diagnosing Climate Change from Satellite Sounding Measurements – From Filter Radiometers to Spectrometers William L. Smith Sr 1,2., Elisabeth Weisz 1,
1 NCEP data assimilation systems status and plans John C. Derber Environmental Modeling Center NCEP/NWS/NOAA With input from: Many others.
Slide 1 EUMETSAT Fellow Day, 9 March 2015 Observation Errors for AMSU-A and a first look at the FY-3C MWHS-2 instrument Heather Lawrence, second-year EUMETSAT.
Progress in Community Radiative Transfer Model for Satellite Radiance Assimilation Quanhua (Mark) Liu 1,2, Paul van Delst 1,3, Ming Chen 1, David Groff.
Satellite Bias Correction for CFSRR Haixia Liu, Russ Treadon, Robert Kistler, John Derber, Suru Saha and Hua-lu Pan Nov. 7, 2007 with input from Jack Woollen,
A NON-RAINING 1DVAR RETRIEVAL FOR GMI DAVID DUNCAN JCSDA COLLOQUIUM 7/30/15.
11 th JCSDA Science Workshop on Satellite Data Assimilation Latest Developments on the Assimilation of Cloud-Affected Satellite Observations Tom Auligné.
P1.85 DEVELOPMENT OF SIMULATED GOES PRODUCTS FOR GFS AND NAM Hui-Ya Chuang and Brad Ferrier Environmental Modeling Center, NCEP, Washington DC Introduction.
11 Background Error Daryl T. Kleist* National Monsoon Mission Scoping Workshop IITM, Pune, India April 2011.
1 EMC’s Current and future GSI development John C. Derber Environmental Modeling Center NCEP/NWS/NOAA With input from: Many others.
Assimilation of Satellite Radiances into LM with 1D-Var and Nudging Reinhold, Christoph, Francesca, Blazej, Piotr, Iulia, Michael, Vadim DWD, ARPA-SIM,
1 Hyperspectral Infrared Water Vapor Radiance Assimilation James Jung Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies Lars Peter Riishojgaard.
USE OF AIRS/AMSU DATA FOR WEATHER AND CLIMATE RESEARCH Joel Susskind University of Maryland May 12, 2005.
AIRS Radiance and Geophysical Products: Methodology and Validation Mitch Goldberg, Larry McMillin NOAA/NESDIS Walter Wolf, Lihang Zhou, Yanni Qu and M.
A Generalized Approach to Microwave Satellite Data Assimilation Quality Control and Preprocessing Kevin Garrett 1 and Sid Boukabara 2 11 th JCSDA Science.
AIRS, HIRS and CSBT Experiments Plus Other FY05/06 Results by James A. Jung Tom H. Zapotocny and John Le Marshall Cooperative Institute for Meteorological.
JAG/ODAA Fall Meeting, October The Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation (JCSDA); Program Overview Presenter: S.-A. Boukabara Materials.
Evaluation of radiance data assimilation impact on Rapid Refresh forecast skill for retrospective and real-time experiments Haidao Lin Steve Weygandt Stan.
The Infrastructure, Design and Applications of Observing System Simulation Experiments at NASA's Global Modeling and Assimilation Office By Ronald M. Errico.
ECMWF reanalysis using GPS RO data Sean Healy Shinya Kobayashi, Saki Uppala, Mark Ringer and Mike Rennie.
The Hyperspectral Environmental Suite (HES) and Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) will be flown on the next generation of NOAA Geostationary Operational Environmental.
Slide 1 NWS Activities in Satellite Data Assimilation Andrew Collard, Daryl Kleist, John Derber, Li Bi, Lidia Cucurull, David Groff, Xu Li, Emily Liu,
MIIDAPS Application to GSI for QC and Dynamic Emissivity in Passive Microwave Data Assimilation.
NCAR April 1 st 2003 Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Data Assimilation in AMPS Dale Barker S. Rizvi, and M. Duda MMM Division, NCAR
Satellites Storm “Since the early 1960s, virtually all areas of the atmospheric sciences have been revolutionized by the development and application of.
A step toward operational use of AMSR-E horizontal polarized radiance in JMA global data assimilation system Masahiro Kazumori Numerical Prediction Division.
Cloudy Radiance Assimilation in the NCEP Global Forecast System NOAA/NCEP/EMC 4 ESSIC, University of Maryland,
UCLA Vector Radiative Transfer Models for Application to Satellite Data Assimilation K. N. Liou, S. C. Ou, Y. Takano and Q. Yue Department of Atmospheric.
Scattering and Polarimatric Components in Community Radiative Transfer Model Quanhua (Mark) Liu The 4 rd JCSDA Science Workshop, May 31- June 1, 2006,
The Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation: Science Workshop 2006 John Le Marshall Director, JCSDA.
Towards Assimilation of GOES Hourly winds in the NCEP Global Forecast System (GFS) Xiujuan Su, Jaime Daniels, John Derber, Yangrong Lin, Andy Bailey, Wayne.
Infrared Sounding Data in the GMAO Data Assimilation System JCSDA Infrared Sounding Working Group (ISWG) 30 January 2009.
Global vs mesoscale ATOVS assimilation at the Met Office Global Large obs error (4 K) NESDIS 1B radiances NOAA-15 & 16 HIRS and AMSU thinned to 154 km.
Status on Cloudy Radiance Data Assimilation in NCEP GSI 1 Min-Jeong Kim JCSDA 9th Workshop on Satellite Data Assimilation, May 24-25, 2011, M-J. Kim 2.
1 Moisture Profile Retrievals from Satellite Microwave Sounders for Weather Analysis Over Land and Ocean John M. Forsythe, Stanley Q. Kidder*, Andrew S.
Radiance Simulation System for OSSE  Objectives  To evaluate the impact of observing system data under the context of numerical weather analysis and.
© Crown copyright Met Office Assimilating infra-red sounder data over land John Eyre for Ed Pavelin Met Office, UK Acknowledgements: Brett Candy DAOS-WG,
Assimilation of GPM satellite radiance in improving hurricane forecasting Zhaoxia Pu and ChauLam (Chris) Yu Department of Atmospheric Sciences University.
June 20, 2005Workshop on Chemical data assimilation and data needs Data Assimilation Methods Experience from operational meteorological assimilation John.
The GSI Capability to Assimilate TRMM and GPM Hydrometeor Retrievals in HWRF Ting-Chi Wu a, Milija Zupanski a, Louie Grasso a, Paula Brown b, Chris Kummerow.
ECMWF/EUMETSAT NWP-SAF Satellite data assimilation Training Course
ECMWF/EUMETSAT NWP-SAF Satellite data assimilation Training Course
Assimilation of Cloudy AMSU-A Microwave Radiances in 4D-Var
Use of ATOVS at DAO Joanna Joiner, Donald Frank, Arlindo da Silva,
Initialization of Numerical Forecast Models with Satellite data
Infrared Satellite Data Assimilation at NCAR
Presentation transcript:

The Atmospheric Data Assimilation Component Contributions from Lidia CucurullJim Purser John DerberMiodrag Rancic Yong HanXiujuan Su Daryl KleistRuss Treadon Mark LiuPaul van Delst Haixia LiuWan-Shu Wu Dave ParrishShuntai Zhou NCEP CFSRR 1 st Science Advisory Board Meeting 7-8 Nov 2007

GSI History The GSI system was initially developed as the next generation global analysis system –Wan-Shu Wu, R. James Purser, David Parrish Three-Dimensional Variational Analysis with spatially Inhomogeneous Covariances. (MWR, 2002) Originated from SSI analysis system –Replace spectral definition of background errors with grid point representation Allows for anisotropic, non-homogenous structures Allows for situation dependent variation in errors

Operational GSI applications SystemImplementation date Mode Physical SST retrieval 9/27/2005CRTM + analytical solution NAM (regional)6/20/20063D-VAR RTMA8/22/20062D-VAR Global5/1/20073D-VAR HWRF6/19/20073D-VAR

Global GSI upgrades 5/1/ initial implementation 5/29/2007 –data upgrade Replace GOES 5x5 with 1x1 sensor based radiances Assimilate METOP-A HIRS, AMSU-A, MHS radiances 11/27/2007 –Data upgrade Replace Version 6 SBUV/2 ozone data with Version 8 data –Reduce high ozone bias in SH polar regions Assimilate high resolution JMA atmospheric motion winds –Slight reduction in 200 hPa vector wind rms forecast error –Code upgrade Addition of many new options to be turned on Spring 2008

Globally assimilated data types “Conventional” data –Sondes, ship reports, surface stations, aircraft data, profilers, etc Satellite data –Winds SSM/I and QuikSCAT near surface winds Atmospheric wind vectors –Geostationary and POES (MODIS), IR and water vapor –Brightness temperatures (T b ) Operational: ATOVS, AQUA, GOES sounder, … Experimental: AMSRE, SSM/IS, IASI, … New for CFSRR  SSU

Globally assimilated data types Satellite data (continued) –Ozone Operational: SBUV/2 profile and total ozone Experimental: OMI and MLS capabilities –COSMIC GPS radio occulation Refractivity (operational) or bending angle –Precipitation rates SSM/I and TMI products

Radiance (T b ) Assimilation GSI uses Community Radiative Transfer Model (CRTM) as its fast radiative transfer model –CRTM developed/maintained by JCSDA –Features: Reflected and emitted radiation from surface (emissivity, temperature, polarization, etc.) Atmospheric transmittances dependent on moisture, temperature, ozone, clouds, aerosols, CO2, methane,... Cosmic background radiation (important for microwave) View geometry (local zenith angle, view angle (polarization)) Instrument characteristics (spectral response functions, etc.) Scattering from clouds, precipitation and aerosols

T b Quality Control Issues Instrument problems –Example: Increasing noise in AQUA ASMU-A channel 4 Inability to properly simulate observations –Example: GSI/CRTM set up to simulate clear sky T b IR and Microwave radiances –IR radiances cannot see through clouds – cloud heights difficult to determine –Microwave impacted by thicker clouds and precipitation Less impacted by thin clouds (bias corrected) –Surface emissivity and temperature not well known for land/snow/ice Complicates cloud and precipitation detection

Bias Correction Currently bias correct –Radiosonde data (radiation correction) –Brightness temperatures Biases can be much larger than signal  crucial to bias correct the data NCEP uses a 2 step process for T b –Scan angle correction – based on position –Air Mass correction – based on predictors

New GSI options (tested/ready) CFSRR will exercise several new GSI options pertaining to –Time component FOTO (First-Order Time-extrapolation to Observations) –QC Variational QC and tighter gross checks Tighter QC for COSMIC GPSRO data –Background error Flow dependent variation in background error variances Change land and snow/ice skin temperature background error variances

FOTO F irst -O rder T ime-extrapolation to O bservations Many observation types are available throughout 6 hour assimilation window –3D-VAR does not account for time aspect –FOTO is a step in this direction Generalize operators in minimization to use time tendencies of state variables –Improves fit to observations –Some slowing of convergence compensated by adding additional iterations Miodrag Rancic, John Derber, Dave Parrish, Daryl Kleist

Obs - Background Analysis 3D-VAR Difference from Background Forecast Updated Forecast T = 0T + 3T - 3 Time

Obs - Background Analysis FOTO Difference from Background Forecast Updated Forecast T = 0T + 3T - 3 Time

Variational QC Most conventional data quality control is currently performed outside GSI –Optimal interpolation quality control (OIQC) Based on OI analysis along with very complicated decision making structure Variational QC (VarQC) pulls decision making process into GSI –NCEP development based on Andersson and Järvinen (QJRMS,1999) –Iteratively adjust influence of observations on analysis as part of the variational solution  consistency Xiujuan Su

Variational QC implementation Only applied to conventional data Slowly turned on in first outer loop to prevent shocks to the system Some slowing of convergence –compensated by adding additional iterations In principle, VarQC allows removal of OIQC step This, however, has not been done (yet). When VarQC on, GSI ignores OIQC flags

Situation dependent B -1 One motivation for GSI was to permit flow dependent variability in background error Background error variances modified based on 9-3 hr forecast differences in T v, and P s –Variance increased in regions of rapid change –Variance decreased in “calm” regions –Global mean variance ~ preserved Daryl Kleist, John Derber

New flow-dependent adjusted background error standard deviation “As is” 500 hPa streamfunction (1e6) background error standard deviation Valid:

Land & Snow/Ice variance change Operational global GSI has a uniform standard deviation of 1K for the skin temperature Modify GSI code to allow different values over ocean, land, and snow/ice –Increase from 1 to 3K over land and snow/ice Results in –More satellite data being assimilated –More realistic skin temperature analysis (not used) –Slight improvement in forecast skill Daryl Kleist

CFSRR GSI Based on 11/27/2007 GSI with addition of –SSU processing (requires updated CRTM) –Possible adjustment to T b QC for early satellites –… Includes GSI options targeted for Spring 2008 global implementation –FOTO –VarQC –Situation dependent rescaling of background error –T skin variance tweaks

Thanks! Questions?

Extra slides Bias, FOTO, flow dependent B -1, etc …

Bias Correction (general) Simulated - observed differences can show significant biases Bias can come from –Biased observations –Deficiencies in the forward models –Biases in the background Would like to remove bias except when it is due to the background

Guess fields 500 hPa VT:

3D-VAR without FOTO Latitude-height cross section along 180E – Shaded: U-wind increment (m/s) – Thick contour: Temperature increment (K)

3D-VAR with FOTO Latitude-height cross section along 180E – Shaded: U-wind increment (m/s) – Thick contour: Temperature increment (K) Note asymmetry and smaller magnitude increments at off times

Surface pressure background error standard deviation fields a)with flow dependent re-scaling b)without re-scaling Valid: HPC Surface Analysis b)b) a)a) rescaled “as is” L